Table 1. Comparison of the photocatalytic efficiency of various photocatalytic materials with the CaO@AC nanocomposite.
| Sr. No. | Photocatalytic material | Light source | Dosage | Degradation efficiency | Time | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TiO2/C | Visible light | 10 mg | 100% RhB | 60 min | 65 |
| 2 | Co–NiF/AC | 16 W low-pressure mercury lamps | 100 mg | 91% RhB | 60 min | 66 |
| 3 | WO3/AC | 400 W power metal halide lamp | 10 mg | 76% RhB | 180 min | 67 |
| 4 | AC/Ag | 80 W lamp | 60 mg | 96.09% MB | 100 min | 45 |
| 5 | AC/CaO | — | 500 | MB | 350 min | 68 |
| 6 | CaO/AC/ZnO | 100 W incandescent light bulb | 50 mg | 96.7% MB | 120 min | 69 |
| 7 | AC/CaO/Fe3O4 | — | 200 | Formaldehyde | 150 | 70 |
| 8 | CaO@AC | Sunlight | 0.05 grams | 95%, 74%, and 86% for RhB, MB, and RB | 40 min | This work |