Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 30;34:e20250677. doi: 10.1590/1678-7765-2025-0677

Table 11. Prevalence of IMTM follicular spaces and its association with related influence factors.

Variables prevalence of IMTM follicular spaces Total χ2 p
  <2mm (N=974) 2mm–3mm (N=14) >3mm (N=19) (N=1007)    
Gender            
Male 450 7 9 466 0.089 0.956
(96.6%) (1.5%) (1.9%) (100.0%)
Female 524 7 10 541
(96.9%) (1.3%) (1.8%) (100.0%)
Age            
18–25 220 2 3 225 N/A† 0.626†
(97.8%) (0.9%) (1.3%) (100.0%)
26–35 287 6 9 302
(95.0%) (2.0%) (3.0%) (100.0%)
36–45 239 5 5 249
(96.0%) (2.0%) (2.0%) (100.0%)
46–55 117 0 1 118
(99.2%) (0.0%) (0.8%) (100.0%)
≥56 111 1 1 113
(98.2%) (0.9%) (0.9%) (100.0%)
Winter’s classification
Vertical impaction 362 6 8 376 N/A† 0.000***†
(96.3%) (1.6%) (2.1%) (100.0%)
Mesioangular impaction 289 3 1 293
(98.6%) (1.0%) (0.3%) (100.0%)
Horizontal impaction 237 1 3 241
(98.3%) (0.4%) (1.2%) (100.0%)
Distoangular impaction 56 3 6 65
(86.2%) (4.6%) (9.2%) (100.0%)
Other types of impaction 30 1 1 32
(93.8%) (3.1%) (3.1%) (100.0%)
Pell & Gregory’s classification (Ramus)
Class I 373 2 4 379 N/A† 0.130†
(98.4%) (0.5%) (1.1%) (100.0%)
Class II 429 10 11 450
(95.3%) (2.2%) (2.4%) (100.0%)
Class III 172 2 4 178
(96.6%) (1.1%) (2.2%) (100.0%)
Pell & Gregory’s classification (Occlusal)
Position A 506 9 14 529 N/A† 0.216†
(95.7%) (1.7%) (2.6%) (100.0%)
Position B 326 5 3 334
(97.6%) (1.5%) (0.9%) (100.0%)
Position C 142 0 2 144
(98.6%) (0.0%) (1.4%) (100.0%)
Contact status between IMTM and MSM
No contact 149 4 2 155 N/A† 0.524†
(96.1%) (2.6%) (1.3%) (100.0%)
Point contact 35 0 1 36
(97.2%) (0.0%) (2.8%) (100.0%)
Surface-to-surface contact 790 10 16 816
(96.8%) (1.2%) (2.0%) (100.0%)
MSM distal alveolar bone condition
Compressive resorption 890 14 18 922 N/A† 0.775†
(96.5%) (1.5%) (2.0%) (100.0%)
Inflammatory resorption 84 0 1 85
(98.8%) (0.0%) (1.2%) (100.0%)

***p<0.001, indicating a statistically significant difference.

†p-values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test with Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 replications), as the chi-squared test was not applicable due to violations of its assumptions (≥20% of cells had expected counts of 1 < T < 5).