Skip to main content
. 2026 May 1;16(25):22841–22860. doi: 10.1039/d6ra01064d

Table 1. Minimum experimental evidence for distinguishing fluorescence-response mechanisms in MQD-based sensing systems.

Mechanism Primary origin Lifetime behavior Spectral overlap requirement Surface/electronic evidence Reversibility behavior Typical diagnostic experiments
Inner filter effect (IFE) Optical absorption of excitation/emission light No change Strong overlap with MQD excitation or emission None Usually reversible UV-vis absorption analysis; dilution correction
Dynamic quenching Collisional interaction in excited state Lifetime decreases Not required None Reversible Time-resolved fluorescence; Stern–Volmer analysis
Static quenching Ground-state complex formation Lifetime unchanged Often weak Evidence of complex formation Often reversible UV-vis spectral shift; binding constant analysis
Electron transfer (ET) Charge transfer between MQD and analyte Lifetime decreases Not essential Redox compatibility; XPS or electrochemistry Often reversible Cyclic voltammetry; transient spectroscopy
Redox-triggered recovery Chemical reduction/oxidation restoring emission Signal restored after redox step System-dependent Oxidation-state change (XPS/EPR) Reversible after reduction/oxidation Chemical reduction tests; electrochemical cycling