Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Jan;50(450):7–12.

Validity of symptom and clinical measures of asthma severity for primary outpatient assessment of adult asthma.

T P Ng 1
PMCID: PMC1313602  PMID: 10695059

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptom and pulmonary function measures of asthma severity are used for severity classification in practice guidelines. However, there is limited methodological evidence in support of their validity and utility. AIM: To validate initial symptom and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) measures of asthma severity with the subsequent risks of exacerbations resulting in emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalisation, and sickness absence from work. In addition, symptom-based measures of change in asthma severity were also evaluated against the concurrent risks of asthma exacerbations. METHOD: A cohort of 361 adult asthmatic patients in general outpatient clinics was studied. At initial interview, frequencies of asthmatic symptoms and nocturnal exacerbations, FEV1, and a severity score combining these measures, were recorded. At re-interview in the third year, the frequencies of asthma exacerbations resulting in ER visits, hospitalisation, and sickness absence, and a self-assessed global measure of change in severity and serially-assessed change in symptom frequencies, were measured. RESULTS: All individual symptom and FEV1 measures were strongly related to the subsequent risks of ER visits, hospitalisation, and sick absence. A severity score of more than 3 (moderate to severe asthma) and self-assessed change in asthma severity were most strongly and significantly associated with greatly increased risks of all outcomes. Individual symptoms and FEV1 measures alone did not show high sensitivities, but the severity score combining these measures gave much more satisfactory validity. Perhaps not surprisingly, self-assessed change in asthma appeared to give the most satisfactory validity. CONCLUSION: These results support the validity and clinical utility of a simple clinical score based on symptom and FEV1 measures, and self-assessed measure of change in severity, for risk classification in contemporary clinical practice guidelines.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (52.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abramson M. J., Hensley M. J., Saunders N. A., Wlodarczyk J. H. Evaluation of a new asthma questionnaire. J Asthma. 1991;28(2):129–139. doi: 10.3109/02770909109082737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck J. R., Shultz E. K. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Jan;110(1):13–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Better S. R., Fine P. R., Celes G. W., Owen E. N. Complications among spinal cord injury patients following discharge. ARN J. 1979 Mar-Apr;4(2):8–10. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1979.tb00899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks C. M., Richards J. M., Jr, Bailey W. C., Martin B., Windsor R. A., Soong S. J. Subjective symptomatology of asthma in an outpatient population. Psychosom Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;51(1):102–108. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlton I., Charlton G., Broomfield J., Mullee M. A. Evaluation of peak flow and symptoms only self management plans for control of asthma in general practice. BMJ. 1990 Dec 15;301(6765):1355–1359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6765.1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enright P. L., Lebowitz M. D., Cockroft D. W. Physiologic measures: pulmonary function tests. Asthma outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Feb;149(2 Pt 2):S9–S20. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/149.2_Pt_2.S9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garrett J., Fenwick J. M., Taylor G., Mitchell E., Rea H. Peak expiratory flow meters (PEFMs)--who uses them and how and does education affect the pattern of utilisation? Aust N Z J Med. 1994 Oct;24(5):521–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1994.tb01752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hong C. Y., Ng T. P., Wong M. L., Koh K. T., Goh L. G., Ling S. L. Lifestyle and behavioural risk factors associated with asthma morbidity in adults. QJM. 1994 Oct;87(10):639–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones P. W., Quirk F. H., Baveystock C. M., Littlejohns P. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Jun;145(6):1321–1327. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knottnerus J. A. Interpretation of diagnostic data: an unexplored field in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Jun;35(275):270–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McNeil B. J., Keller E., Adelstein S. J. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):211–215. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197507312930501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ng T. P., Tan W. C., Hui K. P. Ventilatory function measured with the Micro Spirometer: performance evaluation and reference values. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995 May;24(3):403–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. O'Connor G. T., Weiss S. T. Clinical and symptom measures. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Feb;149(2 Pt 2):S21–S30. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/149.2_Pt_2.S21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richards J. M., Jr, Bailey W. C., Windsor R. A., Martin B., Soong S. J. Some simple scales for use in asthma research. J Asthma. 1988;25(6):363–371. doi: 10.3109/02770908809071376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner-Warwick M. Nocturnal asthma: a study in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jun;39(323):239–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES