Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Feb;50(451):100–104.

Do GPs working in practice with high or low prescribing costs have different views on prescribing cost issues?

A J Avery 1, R V Wetzels 1, S Rodgers 1, C O'Neill 1
PMCID: PMC1313625  PMID: 10750205

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous study we found that a minority of general practitioners (GPs) had different views to health authority advisers on a number of prescribing cost issues. However, there were few differences between subgroups of GPs. We hypothesised that subgroups that might show differences were GPs from practices with either high or low prescribing costs. AIM: To assess differences in views on prescribing cost issues between GPs working in practices with either high or low prescribing costs. METHOD: Using PACTLINE data, prescribing costs were obtained for general practices within the Trent Region for the financial year 1996 to 1997. A questionnaire was sent anonymously to 340 GPs working in those practices with high prescribing costs, and to 322 GPs working in practices with the lowest prescribing costs. RESULTS: A total of 216 (63.5%) GPs from high-cost practices and 194 (60.2%) from low-cost practices responded. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups on seven out of 22 statements. However, when the confounding effect of fundholding was taken into account, significant differences were found for just three statements and each of these related to substitution with comparable but cheaper drugs. CONCLUSIONS: GPs working in practices with either high or low prescribing costs had different views on a number of statements concerning substitution with comparable but cheaper drugs. When encouraging GPs to control their prescribing costs, a different approach may be required for doctors in some high-cost practices.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (50.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avery A. J., Heron T. Poles apart? The views of general practitioners and family health services authority advisers on prescribing cost issues. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jun;47(419):347–351. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bateman D. N., Campbell M., Donaldson L. J., Roberts S. J., Smith J. M. A prescribing incentive scheme for non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):535–538. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley C. P. Decision making and prescribing patterns--a literature review. Fam Pract. 1991 Sep;8(3):276–287. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.3.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradley C. P. Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Nov;42(364):454–458. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cartwright A. Professionals as responders: variations in and effects of response rates to questionnaires, 1961-77. Br Med J. 1978 Nov 18;2(6149):1419–1421. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Denig P., Haaijer-Ruskamp F. M., Zijsling D. H. How physicians choose drugs. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(12):1381–1386. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90203-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris C. M., Scrivener G. Fundholders' prescribing costs: the first five years. BMJ. 1996 Dec 14;313(7071):1531–1534. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill-Smith I. Sharing resources to create a district drug formulary: a countywide controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 May;46(406):271–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCarthy M., Wilson-Davis K., McGavock H. Relationship between the number of partners in a general practice and the number of different drugs prescribed by that practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jan;42(354):10–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morton-Jones T. J., Pringle M. A. Prescribing costs in dispensing practices. BMJ. 1993 May 8;306(6887):1244–1246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6887.1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morton-Jones T., Pringle M. Explaining variations in prescribing costs across England. BMJ. 1993 Jun 26;306(6894):1731–1734. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6894.1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts S. J., Harris C. M. Age, sex, and temporary resident originated prescribing units (ASTRO-PUs): new weightings for analysing prescribing of general practices in England. BMJ. 1993 Aug 21;307(6902):485–488. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6902.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Terry D. J., O'Leary J. E. The theory of planned behaviour: the effects of perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy. Br J Soc Psychol. 1995 Jun;34(Pt 2):199–220. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Whynes D. K., Baines D. L., Tolley K. H. Explaining variations in general practice prescribing costs per ASTRO-PU (age, sex, and temporary resident originated prescribing unit). BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):488–489. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7029.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whynes D. K., Heron T., Avery A. J. Prescribing cost savings by GP fundholders: long-term or short-term? Health Econ. 1997 Mar-Apr;6(2):209–211. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199703)6:2<209::aid-hec263>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson R. P., Hatcher J., Barton S., Walley T. Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):595–599. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES