Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2001 Apr;51(465):280–285.

Managing patient demand: a qualitative study of appointment making in general practice.

M Gallagher 1, P Pearson 1, C Drinkwater 1, J Guy 1
PMCID: PMC1313977  PMID: 11458480

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Managing patients' requests for appointments is an important general practice activity. No previous research has systematically observed how patients and receptionists negotiate appointments. AIM: To observe appointment making and investigate patients' and professionals' experiences of appointment negotiations. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative study using participant observation. SETTING: Three general practices on Tyneside; a single-handed practice, a practice comprising three doctors, and a seven-doctor practice. METHOD: Participant observation sessions, consisting of 35 activity recordings and 34 periods of observation and 38 patient and 15 professional interviews, were set up. Seven groups of patients were selected for interview. These included patients attending an 'open access' surgery, patients who complained about making an appointment, and patients who complimented the receptionists. RESULTS: Appointment making is a complex social process. Outcomes are dependent on the process of negotiation and factors, such as patients' expectations and appointment availability. Receptionists felt that patients in employment, patients allocated to the practice by the Health Authority, and patients who did not comply with practice appointment rules were most demanding. Appointment requests are legitimised by receptionists enforcing practice rules and requesting clinical information. Patients volunteer information to provide evidence that their complaint is appropriate and employ strategies, such as persistence, assertiveness, and threats, to try and persuade receptionists to grant appointments. CONCLUSION: Appointment making is a complex social process where outcomes are negotiated. Receptionists have an important role in managing patient demand. Practices should be explicit about how appointments are allocated, including publishing practice criteria.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (76.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arber S., Sawyer L. The role of the receptionist in general practice: a 'dragon behind the desk'? Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(9):911–921. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90347-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker R. Characteristics of practices, general practitioners and patients related to levels of patients' satisfaction with consultations. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Oct;46(411):601–605. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown A., Armstrong D. Telephone consultations in general practice: an additional or alternative service? Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):673–675. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell J. L., Howie J. G. Changes resulting from increasing appointment length: practical and theoretical issues. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Jul;42(360):276–278. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):719–720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisner M., Britten N. What do general practice receptionists think and feel about their work? Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Feb;49(439):103–106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Freeman G. K. Receptionists, appointment systems and continuity of care. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Apr;39(321):145–147. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gallagher M., Huddart T., Henderson B. Telephone triage of acute illness by a practice nurse in general practice: outcomes of care. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Apr;48(429):1141–1145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kendrick T., Kerry S. How many surgery appointments should be offered to avoid undesirable numbers of 'extras'? Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Apr;49(441):273–276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mays N., Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50–52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Neal R. D., Heywood P. L., Morley S., Clayden A. D., Dowell A. C. Frequency of patients' consulting in general practice and workload generated by frequent attenders: comparisons between practices. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jan;48(426):895–898. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pencheon D. Matching demand and supply fairly and efficiently. BMJ. 1998 May 30;316(7145):1665–1667. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7145.1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rogers A., Entwistle V., Pencheon D. A patient led NHS: managing demand at the interface between lay and primary care. BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1816–1819. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES