Abstract
The introduction of oral GnRH antagonists has created the possibility to replace progestins in combined oral contraceptives as the suppressor of ovarian function. A concept for this new approach to oral hormonal contraception is the combination of 40 mg relugolix, known to inhibit ovulation, and a low dose of the fetal estrogen estetrol. Major noncontraceptive benefits of this regimen will be the establishment of continuous amenorrhea and a smooth and symptomless perimenopausal transition to the postmenopausal status, creating a life cycle endocrine management approach for women (the RE4Women concept). An additional long‐term effect of RE4W is the expected strong reduction of the incidence of breast cancer due to the absence of luteal progesterone and progestins. The dose of estetrol maintaining estrogen function, preventing perimenopausal symptoms, and not causing unacceptable endometrial growth and/or breakthrough bleeding will be assessed in two Phase 2 studies in women aged 18–35 and 36–51 years, respectively.
Keywords: amenorrhea, breast cancer, contraception, estetrol, perimenopausal transition, Relugolix
It is expected that the relugolix estetrol combination RE4W will enable women to control their fertility and prevent menstrual cycle related problems, while offering a smooth transition through perimenopause into the postmenopause and decrease the risk of breast cancer.

Abbreviations
- COC
combined oral contraceptives
- E/P
estrogen/progestin
- E2V
estradiol‐valerate
- EE
ethinylestradiol
- FSH
follicle‐stimulating hormone
- GnRH
gonadotrophin‐releasing hormone
- LH
luteinizing hormone
- RE4W
relugolix estetrol combined oral contraceptive
Key message.
It is expected that the relugolix estetrol combination RE4W will enable women to control their fertility and prevent menstrual cycle‐related problems, while offering a smooth transition through perimenopause into the postmenopause and decreasing the risk of breast cancer.
1. INTRODUCTION
It has been 65 years now since the first combined oral contraceptive pill, Enovid, was introduced for female contraception. This remarkable invention has changed the lives of women worldwide. It enabled women to take control over their own fertility independent of their heterosexual partners. This first “Pill,” as it became known and is today, was developed in the USA through a collaborative effort of the biologists Gregory Pincus and Min Chueh Chang focusing on the scientific aspects; the Catholic gynecologist John Rock conducting clinical trials; and Catherine Dexter McCormick providing financial support. Margaret Sanger, a birth control advocate, played a key role in bringing these individuals together and initiate the project. The chemist Carl Djerassi developed several synthetic progestins used in the Pill to inhibit ovarian function.
New developments in the composition of combined estrogen/progestin (E/P) oral contraceptives (COC) have focused on (i) reduction of the dose of ethinylestradiol (EE), the estrogen used in the pill since 1960, (ii) the introduction of the natural estrogens estradiol and estetrol as the estrogen component, and (iii) new progestins with potentially fewer side effects. The first pill, Enovid, contained 150 μg of the estrogen mestranol, and 9.85 mg of the progestin norethynodrel; dosages decreased soon after the introduction to 75 μg and 5 mg, respectively. Over the last 65 years, the daily dose of EE has been lowered to 10–30 μg to reduce estrogenic side effects. 1 Replacing EE by 1.5 mg Estradiol or 1–3 mg Estradiol‐valerate led to a reduction of cardiovascular and thromboembolic side effects. 2 However, due to liver metabolism, the oral bioavailability of Estradiol and Estradiol Valerate is only 5%, whereas the other 95% is metabolized into estrone and Estrone‐sulfate. 3 Since 2022, the fetal estrogen Estetrol has been available as the estrogen component in a COC. 4 , 5 , 6 Estetrol has an oral bioavailability of 70–80% and a half‐life of 20–28 h. Because progestins may have intrinsically different (anti‐)androgenic effects and cross‐reactivity with other hormone receptors, progestins often have side effects such as nausea, fatigue, headache, peripheral edema, body weight fluctuations, bloating and abdominal discomfort, breast tenderness, and acne. Therefore, after the first progestin, norethynodrel, many new progestins were developed to find a compound with fewer side effects (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Profile various progestins and degree of cross‐reactivity to other hormone receptors.
| Progestin | Receptor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Androgen | Estrogen | Mineralo‐corticoid | Glucocorticoid | |
| Strong androgenicity | ||||
| Levonorgestrel | Positive | Negative | No | No |
| Norgestrel | Positive | Negative | No | No |
| Medroxyprogesterone acetate | Weak | Negative | No | Positive |
| Moderate androgenicity | ||||
| Norethisterone (acetate) | Positive | Positive | No | No |
| Mild androgenicity | ||||
| Gestodene | Positive | Negative | Negative | Positive |
| Etonogestrel | Positive | Negative | No | Weak |
| Desogestrel | Positive | Negative | No | No |
| Neutral androgenicity | ||||
| Progesterone | Negative | Negative | Weak | Weak |
| Segesterone acetate | No | No | No | No |
| Moderate antiandrogenicity | ||||
| Norgestimate | Positive | Negative | No | No |
| Norelgestromin | Positive | Negative | No | No |
| Dienogest | Negative | Negative | No | No |
| Strong antiandrogenicity | ||||
| Drospirenone | Negative | Negative | Negative | No |
| Cyproterone acetate | Negative | Negative | No | Positive |
Note: The present table is an adaptation of a table published by Zaman et al. 40 Positive effect: agonist; Weak: weak effect; No: no effect; Negative effect: antagonist.
It has been shown that the natural hormone progesterone from the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle is an important cause of breast cancer. 7 When Progesterone is replaced by progestins as in COC's or in E/P postmenopausal treatment, the Breast cancer risk is the same or even somewhat higher. 8 , 9 , 10 The introduction of oral gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, such as relugolix, linzagolix, and enzagolix has created the possibility to replace the progestins in COC's as the suppressor of ovarian function and avoid the side effects of the progestins. 11 , 12
2. THE RELUGOLIX ESTETROL COMBINATION CONTRACONCEPTION APPROACH
GnRH antagonists inhibit GnRH dose‐dependently by competition with GnRH for the GnRH receptor, and can suppress follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), thereby ovarian function almost completely. As a result, estrogen levels (especially Estradiol) are decreased and a persistent amenorrhea occurs. The recent introduction of the safe and effective natural fetal estrogen, Estetrol, as the estrogenic component in a COC, 5 allows adding Estetrol to relugolix for estrogen substitution to create the new combination: RE4W. Estetrol differs from Estradiol and Ethinyl Estradiol by a high oral bioavailability, little effect on liver function and coagulation, and a favorable side‐effect profile. 4 , 5 , 6 , 13 , 14 Estetrol's potential ability to preserve cardiovascular health warrants further exploration of pathways such as annexin‐A1 induction. 15 Milestones in the history of Estetrol are its identification in 1965 by Egon Diczfalusy at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, its rediscovery and clinical development since 2001 by the first author of this article at Pantarhei Bioscience in the Netherlands, the market introduction of the first Estetrol‐containing COC in 2022, 13 and the approval of Estetrol for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in January 2026. 16
A major benefit of RE4W in addition to amenorrhea will be a smooth, unnoticed, and symptomless perimenopausal transition into the postmenopausal status, creating a life cycle endocrine management approach for women. Moreover, a reduced risk of Breast cancer is an expected important long‐term preventive effect of RE4W related to the absence of luteal progesterone and progestins.
3. FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE HORMONES
In women, the reproductive system functions from on average 11 years of age at menarche until on average 51 years of age at menopause. Thereafter, women become victims of the loss of their ovarian Estradiol.
On top of the essential hormones steering reproductive function is GnRH, secreted intermittently in a pulsatile manner by some 1000 neurons in the nucleus arcuatus of the hypothalamus, thereby stimulating the synthesis and secretion of FSH and LH by the anterior pituitary gland. 17 GnRH release itself is regulated by the kisspeptin–neurokinin–dynorphin system in the hypothalamus. This pulsatile GnRH secretion is one of many remarkable systems in the human body. 18 , 19 In women, the pulse‐interval is about 90 min. 20 Continuous GnRH as well as a too low or a too high GnRH pulse frequency does not work and the reproductive system is disrupted. 21 With appropriate GnRH pulsatility, FSH stimulates follicle growth in women, whereas LH stimulates testosterone synthesis by ovarian thecal cells. 22 Testosterone is metabolized by aromatization to Estradiol, but Testosterone levels during the menstrual cycle remain up to eight times higher than Estradiol levels, since women need Testosterone for optimal health and function. 23 , 24 In summary, the system depends upon pulsatile GnRH, FSH, and LH. The effects of Estradiol and Testosterone are seen in the typical body shapes, breast development in women, the hair growth patterns, gender‐related human behavior, reproduction, and sexual function.
4. PROGESTERONE
In addition to GnRH, FSH, LH, Estradiol, and Testosterone, there is progesterone, a sixth human hormone essential for reproduction and present only in women. Progesterone plays a vital role during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and throughout pregnancy and the only reason for the existence of Progesterone is to make pregnancy possible and maintain pregnancy until term. Counteracting the effect of Progesterone at any time during pregnancy results in termination of pregnancy. Progesterone is the major cause of the subjective side effects during the luteal and premenstrual phase of the menstrual cycle and during pregnancy. However, Progesterone is also the major cause of Breast cancer in women by inducing mutations in normal breast epithelium. 7 , 25 This is due to the stimulation by Progesterone of the paracrine factors WNT4 and RANKL and the upregulation of the expression of the DNA mutator enzyme APOBEC3B in normal breast epithelium during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. 26 These effects of P4 increase the accumulation of mutations in long‐lived mammary stem and progenitor cells. The human body has DNA repair genes such as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 to remove the mutations caused by Progesterone. These genes on chromosome 17 produce proteins that act as tumor suppressors, primarily by repairing damaged DNA and maintaining genomic stability through the homologous recombination repair pathway. Mutations in these BRCA genes compromise this repair mechanism, resulting in 55–72% Breast cancer with a BRCA1 mutation and 45–69% Breast cancer with a BRCA2 mutation by age 70 in women with mutated BRCA genes. 27 The mitotic effect of Progesterone is confirmed by breast mitotic activity determined by the Ki‐67 marker, which is highest during the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle corresponding with the highest Progesterone levels. 28 Estrogens have only mild proliferative effects on normal breast epithelium, and are therefore, unlikely to cause Breast cancer, but can stimulate already existing estrogen receptor positive (ER+) Breast cancer. Important for differentiating between causality and stimulation is the understanding that it takes at least about 10 years from a mutation in normal breast epithelium until the resulting breast tumor has reached a diameter of about 1 cm and can be diagnosed. Just like Progesterone, progestins can cause Breast cancer by the same mutagenic effects as those of Progesterone on normal breast epithelium, but also in this case it takes at least 10 years until the progestin‐induced Breast cancer is large enough to be diagnosed. 29 Apart from causing Breast cancer, progestins can also stimulate existing Progestrone‐receptor positive Breast cancer, and different progestins may have different stimulatory effects on Progesterone receptor‐positive Breast cancer. 30 Nationwide Danish and Swedish studies confirm the stimulatory role of progestins of existing Breast cancer and reveal that the Breast cancer risk in COC users is significantly increased compared with non‐users [RR 1.21 (95% CI: 1.11–1.33) and HR 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07–1.17), respectively], and strongly related to the duration of use. 8 , 9 Duration of COC use of at least more than 10 years may induce new Breast cancers caused by progestins. 10
5. MODE OF ACTION OF ESTROGEN/PROGESTIN COMBINED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES
The essential mode of action of all E/P COCs is the inhibition of hypothalamic GnRH pulsatility and release by the progestins, thereby suppressing the gonadotrophic hormones FSH and LH, resulting in ovulation inhibition and suppression of ovarian function. Progestins are also needed to transform the estrogen‐stimulated endometrium into a secretory state and enable endometrial shedding after progestin discontinuation. The estrogen in a COC primarily substitutes the loss of ovarian Estradiol, which is an essential hormone for women, but is also important for the regulation of endometrial growth and supports the progestin suppression by additional negative feedback on FSH and LH.
6. GnRH ANTAGONIST AND ESTROGEN COMBINATIONS
We searched the literature for relevant publications, using the combination of terms as GnRH, estrogen, women's health, and contraception. The GnRH antagonist/estrogen combinations found include a progestin for endometrial safety and are also indicated to relieve endometriosis‐associated pain or heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. 31 , 32 , 33 A once‐daily oral dose of relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, 1 mg Estradiol and 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate) inhibits ovulation in all women who completed the 84‐day treatment period. 34 The 1 mg Estradiol dose in relugolix Combination Therapy is considered sufficient to maintain bone health, but long‐term confirmation is required. 35
7. PLANNED RELUGOLIX ESTETROL COMBINATION STUDIES
The composition of RE4W is a tablet containing 40 mg relugolix, known to inhibit ovulation and ovarian function in all women exposed to this dose, 34 combined with a low dose of Estetrol for estrogen replacement. RE4W has to be taken daily without pauses and aims at amenorrhea without spontaneous or withdrawal bleedings. Two Phase 2 dose‐finding studies are planned in healthy cycling women aged 18–35 years (Group 1) and aged 36–51 years (Group 2). Participants will be treated for 84 consecutive days with 40 mg relugolix, and either 4, 8, or 12 mg Estetrol. Inhibition of ovulation by 40 mg relugolix will be confirmed, and the Estetrol dose that replaces estrogen function optimally and does not cause unacceptable endometrial growth and/or breakthrough bleeding will be selected for further clinical investigations. In the Phase 2 studies, bone biochemistry using markers for resorption and formation of bone will be tested. Later in Phase 3, bone mass will be investigated in a subgroup of study participants and fracture rates will follow in postmarketing follow‐up studies. Phase 3 development will also focus on the Pearl Index (No. of pregnancies per 100 women‐years of use), assessed in an adequate number of women using RE4W for 1 year.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most important risk factor of any estrogen containing oral contraceptive, especially in the older age group also targeted by RE4W. Increasing evidence suggests that the VTE risk with Estetrol is lower than with other estrogens in a COC, 14 while E4 has shown to have a limited impact on hemostasis in postmenopausal women. 36 In the RE4W studies hemostasis will be tested regularly and VTE will be registered carefully.
When used as a contraceptive and pregnancy is wanted, RE4W is discontinued. As shown in relugolix CT studies, the first ovulation occurs around 3 weeks after discontinuation, 34 and therefore forgetting pills occasionally will not result in unwanted pregnancies. Return of ovulation after discontinuation of RE4W will also be investigated in the planned Phase 2 study.
8. COMPARISON OF RELUGOLIX/ESTETROL AND THE ESTROGEN/PROGESTIN COMBINED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE
The expected benefits and concerns regarding RE4W are summarized in Box 1. Major advantages of RE4W are: (i) the expected lower incidences of breast cancer, by avoiding progesterone from the natural cycle and progestins from E/P or P‐only contraception, (ii) a lower risk of endometriosis by avoiding tubal retrograde endometrial shedding into the abdomen, and (iii) improved symptom control and cycle management for women with established polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), with potential additional benefit on androgen‐related symptoms and cardiometabolic risk factors. The induced amenorrhea prevents menstrual cycle‐related disorders such as menstrual bleeding disorders, dysmenorrhea, menstrual cycle‐related migraine, premenstrual syndrome (PMS), and premenstrual dysphoric disorders (PMDD). The amenorrhea and estrogen substitution of RE4W prevent perimenopausal problems. There will be no menopause and RE4W will enable a smooth and unnoticed shift from contraception to postmenopausal estrogen treatment. The perimenopausal transition is accompanied by many symptoms such as vasomotor hot flushes, urogenital symptoms, mood disorders, and irregular bleeding, 37 , 38 all expected to be relieved by RE4W. The additional advantages of RE4W are expected to be those of E/P contraceptives, 39 and include apart from the benefits already mentioned above, the following established advantages of E/P Pills: less ovarian cysts, a lower risk of ectopic pregnancy, less uterine fibroids, a lower incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), less benign breast disease, higher bone mass and less osteoporosis, a less serious course of disease in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and porphyria, and a lower risk of cancer of the ovary (up to 80%) and colon (up to 15–20%). Most of these additional E/P advantages are related to the substitution of the natural cycle by the E/P Pill cycle and no cycle at all, as is the case with RE4W, may further increase the magnitude of these beneficial effects. However, most of these effects are not subjective and contraceptives are often judged on subjective side effects such as mood and libido changes. These subjective problems may be related to the loss of testosterone, occurring with E/P COC's as well as with RE4W. This could potentially be solved by adding 50 mg dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to RE4W. This dose has shown to maintain physiological free and total testosterone levels and to improve sexual function in women using EE‐COCs, known to reduce androgen levels. 23 , 24
BOX 1. Advantages and disadvantages of the RE4W contraceptive.
Immediate additional benefits
|
(Peri)menopause‐related beneficial effects
|
Same advantages as combined estrogen/progestin oral contraception
|
Specific long‐term oncological effect
|
Possible concerns
|
A potential concern about RE4W without progestins is breakthrough bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial cancer, the latter being reduced by the E/P COC's by 25–30%. 39 This will be evaluated during the further development of RE4W and is an important reason to aim for the lowest effective dose of Estetrol. A strategy will be developed to address these issues depending on the results of clinical studies, and occasional 10–14 days progestin courses may be required to shed the endometrium once per 6–12 months.
9. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
After 65 years since the introduction of the first combined oral contraceptive pill, the progestins can be replaced by the oral GnRH antagonist relugolix, and the loss of estradiol can be compensated by the human fetal estrogen estetrol. The new RE4W combination has many potential advantages, especially the absence of menstrual cycle‐related problems and disorders, and the expected lower incidences of breast cancer, endometriosis, and adenomyosis and prevention/treatment of symptoms of polycystic ovary syndrome. Phase 2 dose‐finding studies will reveal the minimal effective and endometrial safe dose of estetrol to be combined with 40 mg relugolix, known to inhibit ovarian function completely in all women treated. Final confirmation of efficacy and safety requires further Phase 3 studies, although both relugolix and estetrol already have an established safety and efficacy record in several human applications.
In summary, RE4W will enable women to control their fertility, will provide continuous amenorrhea and may reduce the risk of breast cancer. It has comparable advantages to the present E/P COC's and offers a smooth transition through perimenopause into the postmenopause.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
HCB: conceptualization and supervision; HCB, CLW, KGD: writing – original draft and revisions, KA, LGB, AG, DB, TB, YO, and SP: writing – revisions. All authors commonly agreed on the final version to be submitted.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
HCB is affiliated with the Karolinska Institutet, has retired as President of Pantarhei Bioscience, and is currently President of Pandora Endocrine Innovation BV (PEI), a company involved in the development of new female and male hormonal contraceptives. LB has served on Medical Advisory Boards and gave ad hoc invited lectures for Organon and Bayer. AG has participated in speakers' bureaus for Bromatech and Novo Nordisk; participated in advisory boards for Astellas Pharma, Mylan and Uriach; and served as a consultant for Astellas Pharma, Fagron, Mylan and Uriach. DB has provided clinical education at events sponsored by Bayer Healthcare, Besins and Mayne Pharma and received support to attend an educational event from Organon Australia. TB is President of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health and Secretary of the Portuguese Society of Contraception, had received consulting fees and speaker's honoraria from Bayer HC, Exelgyn, Organon, and Gedeon Richter. SP has received consulting fees and speaker's honoraria from Shionogi and Bayer HC, Exeltis, Gedeon Richter, NovoNordisk, Procare H, Serelys, Lacer, Sandoz, Pfizer, and Theramex. KGD reports ad hoc presentations or participation on advisory boards for Bayer, Organon, Gedeon Richter, Natural Cycles, Exelgyn, Exeltis, Cirqle, RemovAid, and Obseva. CLW served as consultant to Merck, Bayer, AbbVie, Therapeutics MD, and HRAPharma; and received research support from Estetra SPRL, Sebela, Chemoresearch, Exeltis, and Medicines360, all managed through Columbia University. KGD is also director of the WHO collaborating center at Karolinska Institutet, and a member of the International Committee for contraceptive research (ICCR), Population Council, past president of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, and FIAPAC, and the FIGO council. KA and YO have nothing to declare.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Jan F.M. Egberts (at Appletree Medical Writing, Hilversum, the Netherlands) for his support. Also thanks to the worldwide RE4W Advisory Board (chaired by Professor Gemzell‐Danielsson) for their support of the Relugolix & Estetrol combination anticonception approach (RE4W).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Rosenberg MJ, Meyers A, Roy V. Efficacy, cycle control, and side effects of low‐ and lower‐dose oral contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35 micrograms estrogen preparations. Contraception. 1999;60(6):321‐329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Grandi G, Facchinetti F, Bitzer J. Estradiol in hormonal contraception: real evolution or just same old wine in a new bottle? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(4):245‐246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Stanczyk FZ, Winer SA, Foidart JM, Archer DF. Comparison of estrogenic components used for hormonal contraception. Contraception. 2024;130:110310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gerard C, Arnal JF, Jost M, et al. Profile of estetrol, a promising native estrogen for oral contraception and the relief of climacteric symptoms of menopause. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2022;15(2):121‐137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gemzell‐Danielsson K, Cagnacci A, Chabbert‐Buffet N, et al. A novel estetrol‐containing combined oral contraceptive: European expert panel review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;27(5):373‐383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chen MJ, Jensen JT, Kaunitz AM, et al. Tolerability and safety of the estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraceptive: pooled analysis of two multicenter, open‐label phase 3 trials. Contraception. 2022;116:44‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Coelingh Bennink HJT, Schultz IJ, Schmidt M, et al. Progesterone from ovulatory menstrual cycles is an important cause of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2023;25(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Morch LS, Skovlund CW, Hannaford PC, Iversen L, Fielding S, Lidegaard O. Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(23):2228‐2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hadizadeh F, Koteci A, Karlsson T, Ek WE, Johansson A. Hormonal contraceptive formulations and breast cancer risk in adolescents and premenopausal women. JAMA Oncol. 2025;11(12):1497‐1506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sayon‐Orea C, Romanos‐Nanclares A, Bullon‐Vela V, et al. Effect of duration of hormonal contraceptive use on breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Maturitas. 2025;202:108750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Barretta M, Vignali M, La Marca A, Grandi G. The oral GnRH antagonists, a new class of drugs in gynecology: from pharmacokinetics to possible clinical applications. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2025;21(3):265‐277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Paulson RJ. Orally active gonadotropin‐releasing hormone antagonists: are we witnessing a revolution in oral contraception? Fertil Steril. 2025;124(2):250‐251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Coelingh Bennink HJT, Gosden R, Stanczyk FZ, Adashi EY. The rediscovery of estetrol and its implications for estrogen treatment. Menopause. 2025;32:648‐651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Didembourg M, Locquet M, Raskin L, et al. Lower reporting of venous thromboembolisms events with natural estrogen‐based COCs compared to ethinylestradiol containing pills: a disproportionality analysis of the Eudravigilance database. Contraception. 2025;124:110727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Singh J, Jackson KL, Fang H, et al. Annexin‐A1 deficiency uncovers female‐specific pathways in blood pressure control and cardiovascular remodeling in mice. Commun Biol. 2025;8(1):955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. European Medicines Agency . Fylrevy (Estetrol). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/fylrevy. Accessed 12 February 2026
- 17. Schally AV, Arimura A, Baba Y, et al. Isolation and properties of the FSH and LH‐releasing hormone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;43(2):393‐399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yen SS, Tsai CC, Naftolin F, Vandenberg G, Ajabor L. Pulsatile patterns of gonadotropin release in subjects with and without ovarian function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1972;34(4):671‐675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Santen RJ, Bardin CW. Episodic luteinizing hormone secretion in man. Pulse analysis, clinical interpretation, physiologic mechanisms. J Clin Invest. 1973;52(10):2617‐2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Crowley WF, Filicori M, Spratt DI, Santoro NF. The physiology of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion in men and women. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1985;41:473‐531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Knobil E. The GnRH pulse generator. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(5 Pt 2):1721‐1727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tsutsumi R, Webster NJ. GnRH pulsatility, the pituitary response and reproductive dysfunction. Endocr J. 2009;56(6):729‐737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Coelingh Bennink HJT, Zimmerman Y, Laan E, et al. Maintaining physiological testosterone levels by adding dehydroepiandrosterone to combined oral contraceptives: I. Endocrine effects. Contraception. 2017;96(5):322‐329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. van Lunsen RHW, Zimmerman Y, Coelingh Bennink HJT, et al. Maintaining physiologic testosterone levels during combined oral contraceptives by adding dehydroepiandrosterone: II. Effects on sexual function. A phase II randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Contraception. 2018;98(1):56‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kim J, Munster PN. Estrogens and breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2025;36(2):134‐148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Brisken C, Scabia V. 90 YEARS OF PROGESTERONE: Progesterone receptor signaling in the normal breast and its implications for cancer. J Mol Endocrinol. 2020;65(1):T81‐T94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Petrucelli N, Pal T. BRCA1‐ and BRCA2‐Associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1247/. Accessed December 9, 2025 [PubMed]
- 28. Navarrete MA, Maier CM, Falzoni R, et al. Assessment of the proliferative, apoptotic and cellular renovation indices of the human mammary epithelium during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(3):R306‐R313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Santen RJ, Yue W, Heitjan DF. Modeling of the growth kinetics of occult breast tumors: role in interpretation of studies of prevention and menopausal hormone therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(7):1038‐1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Siitonen H, Joensuu J, Savolainen‐Peltonen H, Gissler M, Ylikorkala O, Mikkola TS. Update of the impact of menopausal hormone therapy on breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer. 2025;220:115340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Giudice LC, As‐Sanie S, Arjona Ferreira JC, et al. Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy versus placebo in patients with endometriosis‐associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double‐blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2). Lancet. 2022;399(10343):2267‐2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Al‐Hendy A, Venturella R, Arjona Ferreira JC, et al. LIBERTY randomized withdrawal study: relugolix combination therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229(6):662.e1‐e25‐e662.e1‐e25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Donnez J, Petraglia F, Taylor H, et al. Linzagolix with and without hormonal add‐back therapy for symptomatic uterine fibroids: PRIMROSE 1 & 2 long‐term extension and withdrawal study. Fertil Steril. 2025;124(4):737‐748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Duijkers IJM, Klipping C, Draeger C, et al. Inhibition of ovulation and pharmacologic mechanism of action of relugolix combination therapy. Fertil Steril. 2025;124(2):344‐354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Carballo Garcia A, Fernandez Risquez AC, Delgado Garcia S, Romero Duarte P, Presa Lorite JC. Relugolix in monotherapy and combined therapy for the treatment of uterine diseases and its effects on bones: a systematic review. Biomedicine. 2025;13(8):1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Douxfils J, Gaspard U, Taziaux M, et al. Impact of estetrol (E4) on hemostasis, metabolism and bone turnover in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2023;26(1):55‐63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cunningham AC, Hewings‐Martin Y, Wickham AP, Prentice C, Payne JP, Zhaunova L. Perimenopause symptoms, severity, and healthcare seeking in women in the US. NPJ Women's Health. 2025;3:12. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kaunitz AM. Perimenopause: addressing symptoms and contraceptive needs. Menopause. 2025;32(11):1057‐1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Coelingh Bennink HJT, van Gennip FAM, Gerrits MGF, Egberts JFM, Gemzell‐Danielsson K, Kopp‐Kallner H. Health benefits of combined oral contraceptives – a narrative review. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2024;29(2):40‐52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zaman A, Lazorwitz A, Wierman ME. Contraceptive selection for the endocrine patient: what an endocrinologist should know. Endocr Rev. 2025;46(5):736‐759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
