Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2002 Jan;52(474):14–17.

Variance in practice emergency medical admission rates: can it be explained?

Rebecca Duffy 1, Ron Neville 1, Harry Staines 1
PMCID: PMC1314195  PMID: 11791810

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency admission rates have been rising steadily in recent years, with the majority of the increase owing to emergency medical admissions. Possible causative factors include changing demography, incidence of disease, admission thresholds, multiple admissions, and appropriateness of admission. AIM: To investigate the impact of patient and practice factors on variance in general practices' emergency medical admissions rates. DESIGN OF STUDY: Multiple regression analysis relating emergency medical admission rates of general practices to patient and practice characteristics. SETTING: The study was conducted between 1996 and 1997 in the acute hospital trust serving the study area, Dundee, Scotland. METHOD: Scottish Morbidity Record 1 (SMR1) data, which contains details of all hospital consultant episodes, was used to calculate individual practices emergency medical admission rates. These rates were then standardised to an expected value of 100. Forward selection was used to find a suitable multiple regression model to predict each practice's emergency medical admission rate from practice and patient variables. RESULTS: Crude emergency medical admission rates for general practices showed a 1.8-fold variation between the top and bottom deciles. The deprivation status and age of patients explained 42% of the variance in admission rates (64% with the exclusion of one practice that had a poor fit to the model). After correcting for age and deprivation there was a 1.2-fold variation in general practices' emergency medical admission rates. CONCLUSION: The most important factors in explaining variance in general practices' emergency medical admission rates are socio-demographic, with age and deprivation explaining a large proportion of the variation. We found no evidence to support the contention that general practice factors were linked with admission rates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blatchford O., Capewell S., Murray S., Blatchford M. Emergency medical admissions in Glasgow: general practices vary despite adjustment for age, sex, and deprivation. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jul;49(444):551–554. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Capewell S. The continuing rise in emergency admissions. BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):991–992. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Durojaiye L. I., Hutchison T., Madeley R. J. Improved primary care does not prevent the admission of children to hospital. Public Health. 1989 May;103(3):181–188. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(89)80073-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farmer A., Coulter A. Organization of care for diabetic patients in general practice: influence on hospital admissions. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Feb;40(331):56–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Giuffrida A., Gravelle H., Roland M. Measuring quality of care with routine data: avoiding confusion between performance indicators and health outcomes. BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):94–98. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7202.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Griffiths C., Naish J., Sturdy P., Pereira F. Prescribing and hospital admissions for asthma in east London. BMJ. 1996 Feb 24;312(7029):481–482. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7029.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kendrick S. The pattern of increase in emergency hospital admissions in Scotland. Health Bull (Edinb) 1996 Mar;54(2):169–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morrison C., Woodward M., Leslie W., Tunstall-Pedoe H. Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register. BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):541–546. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reid F. D., Cook D. G., Majeed A. Explaining variation in hospital admission rates between general practices: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1999 Jul 10;319(7202):98–103. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7202.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roland M. O., Bartholomew J., Morrell D. C., McDermott A., Paul E. Understanding hospital referral rates: a user's guide. BMJ. 1990 Jul 14;301(6743):98–102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6743.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Roland M. O., Green C. A., Roberts S. O. Should general practitioners refer more patients to hospital? J R Soc Med. 1991 Jul;84(7):403–404. doi: 10.1177/014107689108400708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith T. Differences between general practices in hospital admission rates for self-inflicted injury and self-poisoning: influence of socioeconomic factors. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Sep;45(398):458–462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilkin D., Smith A. Explaining variation in general practitioner referrals to hospital. Fam Pract. 1987 Sep;4(3):160–169. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.3.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES