Skip to main content
. 2026 May 7;11(5):aakag044. doi: 10.1093/esj/aakag044

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of the predictive performance of SAP risk scores in external validation.

Score Number of Study Arms ROC SE 95% CI Q I2 Egger’s Test
A2DS2 22 (35–56) 0.800 0.00978 0.780 to 0.819 331.6643 93.67% P = 0.5055
A2DS2 modified 8 (35, 42, 43, 45, 49, 53, 55, 56) 0.881 0.0159 0.850 to 0.912 61.2397 88.57% P = 0.8329
ISAN 13 (36, 39, 41, 44, 46, 47, 51, 52, 54, 57, 60–62) 0.779 0.00974 0.760 to 0.798 69.9041 82.83% P = 0.4408
AIS-APS 6 (37, 40, 41, 46, 47, 52) 0.783 0.00899 0.766 to 0.801 11.4343 56.27% P = 0.9491
PANTHERIS 4 (37, 39, 41, 52) 0.725 0.0278 0.671 to 0.780 29.3483 89.78% P = 0.2702
PASS 4 (52, 57–59) 0.745 0.0288 0.689 to 0.801 100.0979 97.00% P = 0.1903

Abbreviations: I2 = I-squared; Q = Cochran’s Q; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.