TABLE 2.
Comparison of antimicrobial resistance between VREF and VSEF isolates
| Antimicrobial agentc | No. of resistant isolates (%)
|
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VREF (n = 63) | VSEF (n = 186) | ||
| Teicoplanin | 53 (84.1) | 0 | <0.01a |
| Ampicillin | 63 (100) | 170 (91.4) | 0.01a |
| Tetracycline | 10 (15.9) | 11 (5.9) | 0.01a |
| Erythromycin | 60 (95.2) | 167 (89.8) | 0.19a |
| Ciprofloxacin | 63 (100) | 172 (92.5) | 0.02b |
| Chloramphenicol | 5 (7.9) | 3 (1.6) | 0.03b |
| Rifampin | 62 (98.4) | 178 (95.7) | 0.45b |
| Quinupristin-dalfopristin | 2 (3.2) | 23 (12.4) | 0.01a |
| Streptomycin-HLR | 45 (71.4) | 117 (62.9) | 0.22a |
| Gentamicin-HLR | 60 (95.2) | 168 (90.3) | 0.22a |
a
Chi-square test.
b
Fisher's exact test.
c
HLR, high-level resistance.