Table 5.
Comparison of human-machine collaborative decision performance.
| Solution | Patch Risk Level |
Decision accuracy (%) |
False positive rate (%) |
Average number of iterations (times) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method in this paper | High Risk | 94 | 3.5 | 9.5 |
| Medium Risk | 97 | 1.8 | 7.8 | |
| Low Risk | 98.5 | 0.7 | 7.3 | |
| Average | 96.5 | 2 | 8.2 | |
| ZT | High Risk | 75 | 18 | — |
| Medium Risk | 79 | 15.5 | — | |
| Low Risk | 81.5 | 14 | — | |
| Average | 78.5 | 15.8 | — | |
| Auto-Q-learning | High Risk | 79 | 14.5 | 17.2 |
| Medium Risk | 82.5 | 12 | 15.3 | |
| Low Risk | 84.5 | 11 | 14.3 | |
| Average | 82 | 12.5 | 15.6 | |
| SR | High Risk | 76.5 | 17.5 | — |
| Medium Risk | 80.5 | 15 | — | |
| Low Risk | 83 | 13.5 | — | |
| Average | 80 | 15.3 | — |