Abstract
Background:
Hamstring tendon autograft remains a popular graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction because of its favorable biomechanical properties, lower donor-site morbidity, and comparable functional outcomes to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft1-5. However, variability in hamstring graft size and length remains a challenge, particularly in female or short-statured patients7. Smaller graft diameters are consistently associated with increased failure and revision rates, with grafts of <8 mm demonstrating inferior outcomes6,7,18,19. Magnussen et al.6 reported revision rates of 13.6% for grafts of <7 mm compared with 1.7% for grafts of ≥8 mm, and Park et al.18 and Mariscalco et al.19 reported no revisions in grafts of ≥8 mm. Although some studies have suggested slightly higher laxity or failure rates with hamstring grafts compared with BPTB in certain populations3,20-22, large systematic reviews have shown no significant differences in return to sport, rerupture rates, or patient-reported outcomes when grafts are appropriately sized23,24. The 5-strand hamstring autograft configuration has demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes to the traditional 4-strand construct while more reliably achieving large graft diameters9,10,12. The present video article outlines the key steps and technical pearls and pitfalls of performing a 5-strand hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction.
Description:
The semitendinosus and gracilis are harvested after reflecting the sartorial fascia and removing the attached adhesions and bands from each tendon. If a 4-strand configuration is <8 mm in diameter, a 5-strand technique is utilized, tripling the semitendinosus and doubling the gracilis. A diagnostic knee arthroscopy is performed. The tibial tunnel is drilled through an accessory anteromedial portal over the residual ACL tibial footprint. The femoral tunnel is drilled with use of an over-the-top guide and subsequently reamed to a depth of 25 mm via independent femoral drilling at the center of the femoral ACL footprint. Femoral stabilization is then achieved with interference screw fixation, the knee is cycled, and screw-and-sheath tibial fixation is performed.
Alternatives:
Nonoperative treatment includes formal physical therapy that emphasizes strengthening, stretching, and neuromuscular control11. Surgical alternatives include ACL reconstruction using BPTB or quadriceps tendon autograft or allograft tissue. In cases of insufficient hamstring graft length or diameter, hybrid graft constructs incorporating allograft tissue may be considered12.
Rationale:
Hamstring tendon autograft offers reliable long-term results for ACL reconstruction with a well-established biomechanical profile1,2, reduced anterior knee pain3, and clinical outcomes comparable to BPTB and quadriceps autograft4,5,14. Although biomechanical studies have demonstrated similar ultimate load to failure and cyclic elongation between 4- and 5-strand constructs9,16, the 5-strand technique significantly increased the likelihood of achieving a graft diameter of >8 mm, which has been associated with improved stiffness and lower revision rates6,17-19. Brzezinski et al. demonstrated larger mean graft diameters with 5-strand constructs (9.32 mm) compared with 4-strand constructs (7.96 mm), without biomechanical compromise16.
Expected Outcomes:
Hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstruction results in outcomes comparable to BPTB and quadriceps autografts, with similar graft failure rates, knee stability, and functional outcomes, and lower rates of anterior knee pain (11.5% versus 17.4%, respectively)4,5,14. However, increased failure rates have been reported in younger patients and those with generalized ligamentous laxity13,15. Krishna et al. reported significantly larger graft diameters with 5-strand constructs compared with 4-strand constructs (9.06 ± 0.60 versus 8.13 ± 0.32 mm, respectively; p < 0.05), with no difference in functional outcomes when grafts were adequately sized9.
Important Tips:
Avoid injury to the superficial medial collateral ligament during harvest.
Release all fascial bands prior to proximal tendon harvest to avoid premature amputation of the tendon.
Harvesting the periosteal footprint may increase graft length by 3 to 4 cm.
Remove graft creep with tensioning and knee cycling before fixation.
A femoral interference screw should be placed parallel to the tunnel.
Preserve 2 mm of posterior femoral wall to avoid posterior wall blowout.
Acronyms and Abbreviations:
ACL = anterior cruciate ligament
ACLR = anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
AM = anteromedial
BPTB = bone-patellar tendon-bone
HT = hamstring tendon
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging
QT = quadriceps tendon
ROM = range of motion
Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 19;6(3):2325967118760815, Am J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;50(13):3502-9, and Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jun 14;5(6):2325967117709735.
Investigation performed at Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A524).
Contributor Information
J. Christian Peterson, Email: James.Peterson@rothmanortho.com.
William L. Justice, Email: William.Justice@rothmanortho.com.
Nathaniel Tchangou, Email: nmt86@drexel.edu, nathaniel.tchangou@rothmanortho.com.
References
- 1.Wilson TW, Zafuta MP, Zobitz M. A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):202-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hart D, Gurney-Dunlop T, Leiter J, Longstaffe R, Eid AS, McRae S, MacDonald P. Biomechanics of hamstring tendon, quadriceps tendon, and bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1067-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR, Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):2-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Poehling-Monaghan KL, Salem H, Ross KE, Secrist E, Ciccotti MC, Tjoumakaris F, Ciccotti MG, Freedman KB. Long-Term Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Autografts. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jun 14;5(6):2325967117709735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chee MY, Chen Y, Pearce CJ, Murphy DP, Krishna L, Hui JH, Wang WE, Tai BC, Salunke AA, Chen X, Chua ZK, Satkunanantham K. Outcome of Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Trials. Arthroscopy. 2017 Feb;33(2):450-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):526-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ Jr, Dhawan A. Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jul;30(7):882-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wan KH, Lai CY, Tang SP, Ng EP, Moy RL, Chan WL, Lee RH, Wong KK. The Use of Five-Strand Hamstring Autograft to Increase the Graft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Prospective Cohort Study With Satisfactory Early Clinical Results. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep 30;4(6):e1923-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krishna L, Tan XY, Wong FKL, Toh SJA. A 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Achieves Outcomes Comparable to Those of a 4-Strand Hamstring Autograft With a Graft Diameter of 8 mm or More in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 19;6(3):2325967118760815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lodhia P, Nazari G, Bryant D, Getgood A, McCormack R, Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R, Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Firth AD, Wanlin S, Pinto R, Martindale A, O’Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, McCormack RG, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Moon R, Fan B, Mohan B, Payne K, Heard M, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, MacDonald PB, Stranges G, Mcrae S, Gullett L, Brown H, Legary A, Longo A, Christian M, Ferguson C, Rezansoff A, Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Campbell C, Garven A, Pulsifer K, Mayer M, Peterson D, Simunovic N, Duong A, Robinson D, Levy D, Skelly M, Shanmugaraj A, Bardana D, Howells F, Tough M, Spalding T, Thompson P, Metcalfe A, Asplin L, Dube A, Clarkson L, Brown J, Bolsover A, Bradshaw C, Belgrove L, Milan F, Turner S, Verdugo S, Lowe J, Dunne D, McGowan K, Suddens CM, Verdonk PCM, Declerq G, Vuylsteke K, Van Haver M; STABILITY Group. Performance of 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the STABILITY Study: A Subgroup Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Nov;50(13):3502-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thoma LM, Grindem H, Logerstedt D, Axe M, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Snyder-Mackler L. Coper Classification Early After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Changes With Progressive Neuromuscular and Strength Training and Is Associated With 2-Year Success: The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):807-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang HD, Gao SJ, Zhang YZ. Hamstring Autograft Versus Hybrid Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;48(4):1014-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Salem HS, Varzhapetyan V, Patel N, Dodson CC, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Female Athletes: Patellar Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2086-92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ebert JR, Calvert ND, Radic R. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(3):660-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krebs NM, Barber-Westin S, Noyes FR. Generalized Joint Laxity Is Associated With Increased Failure Rates of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2021 Jul;37(7):2337-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brzezinski A, Nasra M, Pfaff W, Imbergamo C, Simon M, Tarapore R, Xavier J, Ghodbane S, Gatt C. Five-Strand Hamstring Grafts are Biomechanically Comparable to Four-Strand Grafts and Offer Greater Diameter for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 13;4(5):e1731-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Figueroa F, Figueroa D, Espregueira-Mendes J. Hamstring autograft size importance in anterior cruciate ligament repair surgery. EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Mar 29;3(3):93-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park SY, Oh H, Park S, Lee JH, Lee SH, Yoon KH. Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 May;21(5):1111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, Pedroza AD, Jones MH, Andrish JT, Parker RD, Kaeding CC, Magnussen RA. The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):1948-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gifstad T, Sole A, Strand T, Uppheim G, Grøntvedt T, Drogset JO. Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Mar;21(3):576-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cristiani R, Sarakatsianos V, Engström B, Samuelsson K, Forssblad M, Stålman A. Increased knee laxity with hamstring tendon autograft compared to patellar tendon autograft: a cohort study of 5462 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Feb;27(2):381-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Taylor DC, DeBerardino TM, Nelson BJ, Duffey M, Tenuta J, Stoneman PD, Sturdivant RX, Mountcastle S. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):1946-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Connors JP, Cusano A, Saleet J, Hao KA, Efremov K, Parisien RL, Seil R, Li X. Return to Sport and Graft Failure Rates After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jul;53(8):1996-2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015 Mar;22(2):100-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee JH, Kim KJ, Jeong YG, Lee NS, Han SY, Lee CG, Kim KY, Han SH. Pes anserinus and anserine bursa: anatomical study. Anat Cell Biol. 2014 Jun;47(2):127-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reina N, Abbo O, Gomez-Brouchet A, Chiron P, Moscovici J, Laffosse JM. Anatomy of the bands of the hamstring tendon: how can we improve harvest quality? Knee. 2013 Mar;20(2):90-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
