Table 2.
Agreement analysis between LLMs and human performance.
| Kappa (95% CI) | |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT-4 vs. Human Examinees (Correctness) | 0.34 (0.26, 0.43) |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. Human Examinees (Correctness) | 0.39 (0.3, 0.48) |
| ChatGPT-4 First vs. Second Attempt | 0.66 (0.59, 0.73) |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet First vs. Second Attempt | 0.68 (0.61, 0.76) |
| ChatGPT-4vs Human Majority (Answer Choice) | 0.50 (0.45, 0.56) |
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. Human Majority (Answer Choice) | 0.63 (0.57, 0.68) |
Cohen’s kappa coefficients with 95% CI. Correctness agreement compares binary correct/incorrect classifications. Answer choice agreement compares selected options with the human majority response. Self-consistency measured agreement between LLM attempts.
CI confidence interval, LLM large language model.