Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 10;15(3):1357–1374. doi: 10.1007/s40120-026-00936-w

Table 3.

Summary of input parameters for the base case model

Base case
PC CA
Transition probability (1 cycle = 4 weeks)
Assumption No → no insomnia 1.00 1.00
Treatment phase Severe → no insomnia (remissiona) 0.50 0.00
Severe → mild 0.30 0.67
Severe → moderate 0.20 0.33
Moderate → no insomnia (remissiona) 0.65 0.52
Moderate → mild 0.27 0.32
Moderate → moderate 0.08 0.16
Follow-up phase Moderate → mild 0.43 0.80
Moderate → moderate 0.57 0.20
Mild → no insomnia (remission) 0.30 0.15
Mild → mild 0.57 0.77
Mild → moderate 0.13 0.08
Medical costs for 4 weeks (KRW)
 Treatment phase (KM and WM) 481,000 403,000
 Follow-up phase (WM) 6100 6200
 Utility
 No insomnia 0.844 0.844
 Mild 0.791 0.791
 Moderate 0.784 0.784

PC, pharmacopuncture; CA, conventional acupuncture (traditional acupuncture and electroacupuncture); KM, Korean medicine; WM, Western medicine

aRemission defined as Insomnia Severity Index score < 8

bTransition probabilities were derived from observed transitions between insomnia severity states across consecutive time points in the clinical trial. No relapse was assumed in the base case analysis

cMedical costs were estimated using trial-based data (PC pricing, WM utilization) and national fee schedules (acupuncture, electroacupuncture, hypnotics, and WM visit costs)

dUtility values were derived from HINT-8 scores using ISI-based severity categories estimated from the clinical trial using a linear mixed-effects model