TABLE 2.
Step | Issue(s) to consider and indicate | Pitfalls and comments |
---|---|---|
A | Method | State all modifications and the version of a kit protocol; most commercially available kits provide numerous diverging protocols |
B | Amt of specimen | Use concn and/or wt; unusual metrics do not allow for evaluating sensitivity and data comparison |
C | Elution vol | Missing information does not allow for back calculations and makes interstudy comparison impossible |
D | No. and quality of ENCsa | “Water only” ENCs without carrier DNA might miss low amplicon carryover; the same is true for too-small no. of ENCs |
E | No., quality, and concn of EPCsb | Too many and/or too highly concentrated EPCs can be a contamination source, as can certain formulations (e.g., amplicon, irrespective of whether cloned or not) |
F | Integrity and amt of DNA | DNA might get lost during repeated thawing-freezing cycles or extraction; amplification of genes other than the target does not prove integrity of an intact target region and rather provides an indication of specimen quality and quantity |
G | Quality and concn of ICOc if used | To check for a successful DNA extraction and/or inhibition, ICO might be included at the extraction level; primers and probes used to amplify ICO should have attributes similar to those of targets; if the ICO concn is too high, complete or partial inhibition is not ruled out; if the concn is too low, ICO might get lost during extraction and inhibition is falsely assumed |
H | Anticontamination strategy | Basic recommendations include separate rooms with laboratory coats, safety cabinet, pipettes plus aerosol-resistant pipette tips, gloves, and racks; wrong airway pressure conditions favor contamination; all reagents used should be subdivided into small aliquotsd |
ENC, extraction-negative control.
EPC, extraction-positive control.
ICO, internal control.
A good and still up-to-date review on NAAT laboratory design and workflow can be found in reference 24.