TABLE 2.
UniFrac P valuesa
| Sample | Compared sample(s) (P value) |
|---|---|
| SRU1 | SNU3 (0.118), STU2 (0.111) |
| STU2 | SNU3 (0.201), SRU1 (0.111), SNU5 (0.066), SNU6 (0.107) |
| SNU3 | SNU6 (0.802), SNU7 (0.070), SRU1 (0.118), STU2 (0.201) |
| SNC4 | WTC11 (0.105), SNU5 (0.053) |
| SNU5 | SNC4 (0.053), STU2 (0.066) |
| SNU6 | SNU7 (0.394), SNU3 (0.802), STU2 (0.107) |
| SNU7 | SNU6 (0.394), SNU3 (0.070) |
| WRU8 | |
| WTC9 | WTC11 (0.639), INU20 (0.076), INC19 (0.155), INU18 (0.097) |
| WTU10 | |
| WTC11 | SNC4 (0.105), WTC9 (0.639), INC19 (0.055) |
| WTU12 | |
| WPU13 | WPU14 (0.238) |
| WPU14 | WPU13 (0.238) |
| INC15 | |
| IRU16 | INU18 (0.257) |
| IRC17 | |
| INU18 | WTC9 (0.097), INU20 (0.055), INC19 (0.233), IRC17 (0.257) |
| INC19 | WTC11 (0.055), WTC9 (0.155), INU18 (0.233) |
| INU20 | WTC9 (0.076), INU18 (0.055) |
a
UniFrac P values were based on comparisons to 1,000 randomized trees. Results are listed only if the P value (listed in parentheses) is ≥0.05. All other pairwise comparisons indicated that the communities were significantly different.