TABLE 2.
Moderated mediation analysis results with extraversion as moderator, including conditional and indirect effects at different levels of extraversion (Central China, 2024).
| Analysis | Variable | Model 1 (DV: residents’ somatic health) | Model 2 (DV: place satisfaction) | Model 3 (DV: residents’ somatic health) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β t | β t | β t | ||
| Regression Results | Intrinsic motivation | 0.664, 30.628*** | 0.163, 4.226*** | 0.669, 29.512*** |
| Place satisfaction | | | 0.106, 6.321*** | |
| Extraversion | | 0.143, 6.034*** | | |
| Intrinsic motivation × extraversion | | −0.187–6.044*** | | |
| R 2 | 0.441 | 0.089 | 0.459 | |
| F | 938.084*** | 38.851*** | 504.382*** |
| | Level of extraversion | Conditional effect (X→M) | Conditional indirect effect (X→M→Y) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | SE | 95% CI | Effect | BootSE | 95% CI | ||
| Conditional effects and indirect effects | M-SD | 0.372 | 0.045 | (0.283, 0.461) | 0.040 | 0.007 | (0.026, 0.054) |
| M | 0.163 | 0.039 | (0.087, 0.239) | 0.017 | 0.006 | (0.007, 0.023) | |
| M + SD | −0.047 | 0.058 | (-0.159, 0.066) | −0.005 | 0.009 | (-0.021, 0.016) | |
All regression coefficients (β) are standardized. Confidence intervals are 95% bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals based on 5,000 bootstrap samples. Dependent variable: Residents’ Somatic Health. Mediator: Place Satisfaction. Moderator: Extraversion. N = 1,191.