Table 2.

Tailored personas decision-making cognition in CR among elderly post- CABG patients’ caregivers

Name	Proactive caregivers	Support-dependent caregivers	Resource-constrained caregivers	Decision-making difficult caregivers
Personas
Individuals	C2、C4、C5、C6、C12、C16、C18、C24	C8、C11、C13、C17、C19、C20、C21、C23	C3、C7、C15、C22	C1、C9、C10、C14
Gender and age	3 men and 5 women Aged 38ཞ61	2 men and 6 women Aged 40ཞ71	2 men and 2 women Aged 59ཞ68	2 men and 2 women Aged 57ཞ65
Residential address	City: 7 peoples Village: 1 people	City: 5 peoples Town: 2 peoples	Town: 2 peoples Village: 2 peoples	City: 3 peoples Village: 1 people
Employment status	Employed: 6 peoples Farmer: 1 people Retired: 1people	Employed: 5 peoples Self-employed: 1 people Retired: 2 peoples	Farmer: 2 peoples Retired: 2 peoples	Self-employed: 1 people Farmer: 1 people Retired: 2 peoples
Care duration	1ཞ10 months	4 daysཞ12 months	3 daysཞ3 months	4 daysཞ4 months
Decision-making cognition	Have a relatively in-depth understanding of cardiac rehabilitation; Actively participate in rehabilitation decision-making	Have a general understanding of cardiac rehabilitation; Rely highly on professionals to make decisions	Have a certain understanding of cardiac rehabilitation; Prioritize programme implementability in decision-making.	Vague understanding of cardiac rehabilitation; Contradictions are prone to arise in decision-making.
Psychological state	Strong psychological resilience, high self-efficacy, and a positive attitude towards various challenges.	Low self-efficacy, strong dependence on others, and often experience autonomy anxiety.	Self-efficacy is easily suppressed by reality, leading to anxiety and often leaving one in a state of fatigue and powerlessness.	Low self-efficacy, high psychological anxiety, and emotions swinging between excessive worry and avoidance.
Behavioral characteristics	Strong initiative; Strong compliance; Strong adjustment ability;	Low initiative; Strong dependence; Weak adjustment ability;	Low initiative; Good compliance; Decision-making constraints;	Low initiative; Poor judgment ability; Decisions are prone to change;
Social support	Families, medical staff and others can provide diversified and high-quality social support.	Rely on the support provided by professional medical staff and be skeptical of non-authoritative help.	Social support is limited, mainly coming from family and friends. Aid is usually unsustainable and there is less utilization of institutions.	It has a wide but inefficient support network and lacks substantive decision assistance.
Resource requirements	Individualized decision support system to optimize the quality of rehabilitation decisions.	Professional guidance is needed to fully understand cardiac rehabilitation and improve one’s own judgment ability.	Authoritative knowledge acquisition channels are needed, as well as sustainable rehabilitation guidance.	Decision support tools help make decisions while requiring comprehensive guidance from multiple disciplines.
Economic status	Better	Moderate	Pool	Moderate