Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 13;26:339. doi: 10.1186/s12883-026-04839-z

Table 1.

Population characteristics

Journal Data Population Characteristics Intervention Detail
Study Location Sample size Age (mean ± SD) Gender
Male, n (%)
Type of Stroke (%) Staging of Stroke Severity Type of Fine Motor Dysfunction NIBS Parameters Outcome
Ischaemic Hemorrhagic
Ibrahim et al. [4] Egypt 40 59.45 ± 5.46 24 (60) 100 0 Subacute and chronic severe left upper extremity paresis (1) rTMS M1, (2) s-rTMS M1, 10 consecutive sessions × 5 Hz x 87 dB × 80% MSO FMA-UE
Boasquevisque et al. [3] Brazil 30 61.85 ± 16.45 12 (40) 100 0 subacute moderate upper limb paresis (1) IL c-tDCS M1, (2) s-tDCS. 6 sessions x 1 mA × 20 min × 35 cm2 sponge NIHSS, FMA, mRS, BI, MAS
Bolognini et al. [5] Italy 32 68.5 ± 10.75 21 (65.63) 78.13 21.87 NA severe motor impairment

(1) IL a-tDCS M1, (2) CL c-tDCS M1. 10

session × 2 mA × 15 min × 35 cm2

sponge

MI-UL, NIHSS, BI
Bornheim et al. (2019) Belgium 50 62.98 ± 12.4 33 (66) 100 0 Acute, subacute, and chronic mild to moderate hand paresis (1) CL a-tDCS, (2) s-tDCS. 20 sessions x 2 mA × 20 min × 25 cm2 surface electrodes WMFT, BI, SIS
Chen et al. [7] Taiwan 22 52.75 ± 9.7 14 (63.64) 22.73 77.27 chronic moderate hemiplegia and hemiparesis (1) iTBS M1, (2) sham. 5 consecutive sessions × 50 Hz × 600 p/s × 80% AMT ARAT, MAS, FMA-UE, MAL, BBT
Edwards et al. [12] USA 82 67.8 ± NA 50 (60.98) NA NA chronic mild to severe arm hemiparetic

(1) IL a-tDCS M1, (2) s-tDCS. 36

session × 2 mA × 20 min × 35 cm2

sponge

FMA-UE
Garrido et al. (2022) Chile 70 65 ± 13 37 (52.86) 97.14 2.86 acute moderate upper limb paralysis (1) BL-tDCS (IL anode and CL cathode M1) + CIMT, (2) sham. 14 session × 2 mA × 20 min × 25 cm2 sponge FMA-UE
Kang et al. [13] South Korea 20 64.94 ± 9.38 10 (58.82) 88.24 11.76 subacute mild upper extremity paresis (1) rTMS + MI + ES, (2) s-rTMS + MI. 10 sessions × 1 Hz × 1200 p/s × 90% of RMT MMSE, FMA, MBI, Purdue Pegboard
Ke et al. [21] China 48 56.5 ± 8.6 20 (41.67) 100 0 acute moderate upper limb paralysis (1) HF a-rTMS M1, (2) s-rTMS M1, 10 consecutive sessions × 20 Hz × 1200 p/s × 110% of RMT FMA-UE
Kim et al. [19] South Korea 73 62.06 ± 12.16 45 (61.64) 100 0 NA mild upper limb dysfunction (1) rTMS M1, (2) s-rTMS M1, 10 consecutive sessions × 1 Hz × 100% of RMT (pulse not clearly described) FMA-UE
Kuo et al. [26] Taiwan 18 61 ± 12.14 9 (50) 100 0 subacute mild to moderate hand paresis (1) BL-tDCS (IL anode and CL cathode M1) + TMS, (2) BL-tDCS (IL anode and CL cathode M1) + MEG, (3) s-tDCS + TMS, (4) s-tDCS + MEG. 2 sessions × 2 mA × 20 min × 35 cm2 sponge FMA-UE, NIHSS, mRS, MRC, ARAT
Liu et al. [23] China 58 58.12 ± 6.75 26 (44.83) 60.34 39.66 chronic mild to severe motor impairment (1) 10 Hz rTMS × 700 pulses × 90% of RMT × 10 sessions (2) s-rTMS FIM
Luk et al. [18] China 24 66.2 ± 4.45 14 (58.33) 95.83 1.47 chronic mild to moderate Paretic hand and limb (1) rTMS M1, (2) s-rTMS M1, 10 consecutive sessions × 1 Hz × 1200 p/s × 90% of rMT NHPT, ARAT, FMA-UE, BBT
Meng et al. [25] China 28 53.84 ± 10.56 18 (64.28) 57.14 42.86 Subacute and chronic moderate hand paretic (1) CL rTMS M1 + IL iTBS M1, (2) Cl rTMS M1 + IL s-iTBS, (3) CL s-rTMS + IL s-iTBS. 1 Hz rTMS × 1200 p/s × 100% of RMT. 10 sessions × 50 Hz iTBS × 1200 p/s × 80% of RMT FMA-UE
Pinto et al. [20] USA 27 54.78 ± 12.25 16 (59.26) 100 0 Chronic moderate hemiplegia/hemiparesis (1) Fluoxetine + rTMS, (2) Fluoxetine, (3) s-rTMS. 10 sessions × 1 Hz × 1200 p/s × 100% of RMT NIHSS, JTHFT, FMA-UE, MMSE, HDRS
Qin et al. [9] China 49 58.59 ± 9.89 31 (63.27) 100 0 Chronic moderate upper limb dysfunction (1) LF-rTMS M1 + rPMS, (2) LF-rTMS (3) CG. 3 sessions x 1 Hz × 90% RMT × 1,200 p/s FMA-UE, MAS, MBI (other outcome)
Rosso et al. [16] France 27 61.56 ± 12.56 21 (77.78) 100 0 Chronic mild to moderate upper limb dysfunction (1) rTMS M1, (2) s-rTMS. 5 consecutive sessions × 0.2 Hz × 90% of RMT (conditioning stimulus) and 140% of RMT (test stimulus) FMA-UE
Vink et al. [17] Netherland 59 60.2 ± 12 40 (68) 85 15 Subacute moderate arm paretic (1) cTBS M1, (2) s-cTBS. 10 consecutive sessions × 50 Hz × 70% of RMT (pulse not clearly described) JTHFT, NHPT, ARAT, FMA-UE, SIS
Wang et al. [14] China 45 59.87 ± 12.26 30 (66.67) 66.67 33.33 Subacute severe motor impairment (1) HF rTMS M1, (2) LF rTMS, (3) s-rTMS M1, 14 consecutive sessions × 10 Hz × 1000 p/s × 100% of RMT FMA-UE
Wang et al. [24] China 29 55.41 ± 7.48 18 (62.07) 65.5 34.5 Subacute mild to moderate upper limb dysfunction (1)LF rTMS M1, (2) s-rTMS M1. 10 sessions × 1 Hz × 90% of RMT (pulse not clearly described) FMA-UE, WMFT, MBI (other outcome)
Wu et al. [8] China 60 55.45 ± 10.96 48 (80) 45 55 Subacute and chronic moderate upper limb dysfunction (1) rTMS M1 + CNRMS (2) rTMS (3) CNRMS (4) s-rTMS M1. 10 consecutive sessions × 10 Hz × 1.000 p/s × 80% of RMT FMA-UE
Yang et al. [10] China 39 62.92 ± 8.72 28 (71.79) 79.49 20.51 Subacute and chronic moderate upper limb and hand dysfunction (1) HF rTMS + hand grip training M1, (2) HF rTMS (3) hand grip training.10 consecutive sessions × 5 Hz × 750 p/s × 100% of RMT FMA-UE

a-tDCS anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, BL-tDCS bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation, CIMT constraint induced movement therapy, CL contralesional, c-tDCS cathodal transcranial direct current stimulatio, IL ipsilesional, M1 primary motor cortex, N.A not available, NIBS non-invasive brain stimulation, p/s pulses/session, RMT resting motor threshold, AMT active motor threshold, rPNS repeated peripheral nerve stimulation, rTMS repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation, s-rTMS sham repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation, HF high frecuency, LF low frequency, s-tDCS sham transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS transcranial direct current stimulation, FMA-UE fugl-meyer assessment for upper extremity, JTHFT jjebsen-taylor hand function test, ARAT action research arm test, NHPT nine hole peg test, NIHSS national institutes of health stroke scale, BBT box block test, MAS modified ashworth Scale, BI barthel index, MBI modified barthel index, WMFT wolf motor function test, mRS modified rankin scale, MRC medical research council scale, SIS Stroke Impact Scale, MMSE mini-mental state examination, HDRS hamilton depression rating scale, CNRMS cervical nerve root magnetic stimulation, CG control group, MSO maximal stimulator output, Data are given as n and mean ± SD