Skip to main content
Biomaterials Translational logoLink to Biomaterials Translational
. 2025 Aug 14;7(1):55–78. doi: 10.12336/bmt.25.00043

Building the next frontier: Artificial intelligence in 3D-printed medicines

Rittin Abraham Kurien 1,2,3,4, Gokul Kannan 2,5,6, Kasitpong Thanawut 7, Supakij Suttiruengwong 2, Pornsak Sriamornsak 1,8,*
PMCID: PMC13190116  PMID: 42179771

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing are transforming pharmaceutical manufacturing by enabling the production of personalized medications. AI supports real-time decision-making in diagnostics and robotics, although its application in pharmaceutical research remains at an early stage. 3D printing, particularly additive manufacturing, provides precise control over drug formulation, allowing the design of patient-specific dosage forms with tailored release profiles. Machine learning and deep neural networks are used to predict formulation parameters, optimize processing conditions, and support the design of innovative drug delivery geometries. Technological platforms such as cloud computing and blockchain enhance data security, transparency, and scalability. Printable materials—including thermoplastic polymers, hydrogels, and bioinks—demonstrate utility in AI-assisted manufacturing systems. The integration of AI, smart materials, and 3D printing advances intelligent drug production technologies aligned with Industry 4.0 principles. Key considerations include regulatory compliance, data reliability, ethical implications, and pathways for clinical translation. Clinical medicine is rapidly advancing through the adoption of 3D printing and AI, enabling personalized prosthetics, accurate surgical planning, and bioprinted tissues. AI-driven segmentation and optimization enhance the accuracy and efficiency of 3D-printed anatomical models for pre-operative preparations and medical training. Cardiology, oncology, and orthopedics are increasingly adopting these technologies to improve patient outcomes and clinical workflows. Future directions include broader adoption across specialties, bioprinting for regenerative health care, and AI-optimized systems for targeted drug delivery. This review addresses the current challenges and limitations of AI and 3D-printed medicines, pharmaceutical manufacturing, case studies, ethical considerations, and future perspectives.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, 3D printing, Machine learning, Neural networks, Bioprinting, Industry 4.0

1. Introduction

Recent advancements in 3D printing technologies have generated unparalleled prospects for applications in health care, ranging from personalized medicine to tissue engineering. Innovations in materials such as smart polymers, bioinks, and printable drug matrices are revolutionizing how we approach complex medical challenges.1 3D printing is an additive manufacturing (AM) method that builds a 3D shape by depositing and solidifying based on a digital model.2 Personalized and on-demand medicine production is entering the pharmaceutical industry through the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing. Traditionally, drug production has relied on “one-size-fits-all” formulations designed for broad patient populations. However, this approach generally fails to address interindividual variability in drug response, highlighting the need for more customized therapeutic options.3 Due to its remarkable versatility, 3D printing can produce drugs with accurate concentrations, controlled release profiles, and customized shapes, facilitating personalized therapy. This is especially beneficial for pediatric, geriatric, rare disease, and complex combination therapy patients. Developing pharmaceutical formulation is inherently complicated, involving numerous material composition choices, design parameters, and printing conditions.4 This process is both time-consuming and requires significant expertise. Using machine learning (ML) and advanced data analytics, AI can rapidly predict optimal formulations, compositions, and printing parameters, thereby accelerating the design and production of 3D-printed pharmaceuticals. The integration of AI with 3D printing extends beyond formulation optimization. It encompasses real-time quality assurance, automated process monitoring, and predictive maintenance of printing equipment to ensure consistent output.5 AI-powered vision systems can detect printing defects such as incomplete layers and material inconsistencies and make real-time adjustments. This leads to improved product quality, reduced material waste, and lower production costs. Furthermore, AI-driven systems support the development of intelligent, decentralized manufacturing networks. By incorporating the Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain technology, electronic prescriptions can be transmitted to local 3D printers for quick, personalized drug dispensing. This digital pharmacy model improves patient access to tailored treatments and accelerates the clinical adoption of 3D-printed pharmaceuticals. In inkjet printing, a liquid containing the medication and additives is jetted onto a designated surface to form a layer. Subsequent layers are created by repeating this process,6 ultimately forming a 3D object. Inkjet printing comprises two main types: Continuous inkjet (CIJ) printing, which emits droplets continuously, and drop-on-demand (DOD) printing, which emits droplets only when triggered. The resulting layers have very fine thickness, offering high resolution but requiring longer print times.7 Nozzle-based technologies rely on the extrusion of medicinal substances through a narrow nozzle. This can be accomplished either by applying pressure, which is referred to as a pressure-assisted microsyringe, or by melting the material filaments, a process referred to as fused deposition modeling (FDM).8 Pharmacies, hospitals, and rural clinics can become part of a decentralized manufacturing network, reducing reliance on centralized production and shortening supply chains.

Future AI–3D printing convergence could overcome pharmaceutical development constraints, eliminate the need for expert intervention, and produce safer, more effective treatments tailored to patient needs. AI can estimate drug release kinetics, forecast patient adherence, and uncover drug interactions, thereby personalizing treatment regimens. Patient feedback loops, which monitor therapy outcomes and feed back into AI models, can also enhance formulations and dosing regimens.9 This technological convergence should spur innovation in regulatory science beyond manufacturing. Regulatory bodies are exploring ways to certify AI-driven, 3D-printed pharmaceuticals, balancing both safety and effectiveness with rapid customization and innovation. Industry, academics, and regulators must collaborate to ensure data integrity, procedure validation, and post-market surveillance requirements. This transformation has far-reaching effects. By enabling on-demand, patient-specific drug production, AI combined with 3D printing can address global health issues such as medicine shortages, antibiotic resistance, and rapid response to infectious diseases.10 Portable 3D printers using AI-driven composition tools could generate life-saving pharmaceuticals during disasters or humanitarian situations. The collective impact of these technologies will make the pharmaceutical sector more sustainable. By producing medicines only when needed and minimizing recyclables, 3D printing and AI could reduce the environmental impact of drug manufacturing. Digital inventory systems and just-in-time production also reduce the occurrence of expired and unused drugs. Creating the next frontiers in medicine requires the integration of these technologies to establish a smart, autonomous, and patient-focused drug production ecosystem.11 Although technical, regulatory, and ethical challenges exist, the potential to improve health care is vast. With ongoing research and collaboration, AI and 3D printing are set to transform pharmaceutical science, providing more secure, more effective, and fully personalized treatments to patients worldwide.

Figure 1 shows the conceptual process of making personalized medicines using AM-assisted design and fabrication of a drug delivery system (DDS). As research continues to evolve, the potential applications of AI in 3D-printed medicines are likely to expand further, contributing to a new era of health-care innovation.12 The intersection of AI and 3D printing in pharmaceuticals presents a promising frontier, yet significant research gaps remain. These gaps primarily concern the integration of AI technologies into the 3D printing processes for drug development and manufacturing.13 This review addresses AI research gaps in drug discovery and AI–3D printing integration in medicine. Table 1 shows the materials used with different AM techniques in biomedical fields.

Figure 1. Conceptual process for creating personalized medicines using additive manufacturing (AM)-assisted design and fabrication. This complete workflow outlines the creation of customizable and personalized drug delivery systems using 3D printing and AM. Drug delivery solutions such as hydrogels and controlled-release tablets are initially created. These innovative compositions are thoroughly evaluated before being customized into implants and scaffolds. The resulting drug doses and matrices are then converted into a precise recipe, which guides 3D printing filament extrusion. To produce an accurate 3D model, 3D printing uses filament alongside design and optimization techniques, including medication carrier optimization and 3D scanning. A personalized drug delivery device created by 3D printing completes a cycle of patient-specific medical innovation and improvement. The figure was created by the authors using Canva.

Figure 1

Table 1. Materials used with different AM techniques in biomedical fields.

AM technique Materials used Application References
Material extrusion (FDM) PLA Prosthetics 14

ABS Surgical models

Nylon Custom implants

PBF Titanium alloys Orthopedic implants 14

Cobalt-chromium alloys Dental implants

Magnesium alloys Bone scaffolds

Directed energy deposition Titanium Implants 15

Cobalt-chromium Repairing structures

Material jetting (PolyJet) Photopolymers Dental applications 15

Surgical guides

Binder jetting Stainless steel Bone implants 16

Ceramics Dental applications

Vat photopolymerization Photopolymer resins Custom dental appliances 16

Surgical models

Abbreviations: ABS: Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; AM: Additive manufacturing; FDM: Fused deposition modeling; PBF: Powder bed fusion; PLA: Polylactic acid.

In medical imaging, AI and 3D printing have promoted innovation. Combining these two technologies has the potential to increase diagnostic precision, streamline clinical workflows, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. AI has made significant strides in medical imaging by aiding the automation of processes that were previously manual and time-consuming. By utilizing AI-based algorithms, medical professionals can analyze and interpret images more quickly and accurately, leading to earlier detection of diseases and improved patient care.17 Recently, three-dimensional printing, often known as 3D printing or 3DP, has paved the way for the manufacturing of entirely individualized medications on demand. When it comes to formulation creation, pharmaceutical 3DP provides infinite alternatives because of its versatility. However, successful navigation of these options typically requires experienced oversight. Utilizing AI within pharmaceutical 3D printing eliminates the need for human expertise, as ML can reliably predict optimal process parameters.18 This frees up human resources for other tasks. AI may also be integrated into a pharmaceutical 3DP IoT, transforming the personalized creation of pharmaceuticals into an intelligent, efficient, and autonomous production pipeline. The cloud and distributed ledger technology (blockchain) are examples of supporting infrastructure that will play an important role.19 Importantly, the use of pharmaceutical 3D printing in clinical settings will be accelerated by these technologies, which will also drive the global shift toward personalized medicine and Industry 4.0.20 A multi-stage approach uses AI algorithms and 3D printing technology to improve design, optimization, and manufacturing. In AI, implementation begins with problem definition and algorithm selection, including supervised learning for regression and classification tasks or reinforcement learning for adaptive control systems. For robust model performance, data are gathered, cleaned, and labeled before being partitioned into sets for training, validation, and testing. Model development may use pre-trained models for rapid implementation or bespoke models for domain-dependent requirements, with precision, accuracy, and recall evaluated.21 After training, AI models can automate or optimize 3D printing workflow tasks such as defect identification, material selection, and parameter optimization.

Parallel to 3D printing, Computer-Aided Design software creates a comprehensive 3D model for AM to ensure watertightness. A slicing program transforms stereolithography apparatus (SLA) files into layers and generates printer G-code from the exported model. Fused filament fabrication/FDM, SLA/digital light processing (DLP) methods, and selective laser sintering printers are set up with the appropriate material and build plate for optimal adhesion.22 The object is printed layer by layer, with AI algorithms checking for anomalies, adjusting conditions in real time, or identifying and fixing faults.

AI improves 3D printing’s productivity, reliability, and adaptability, while 3D printing delivers a clear, standardized outcome based on AI-driven design and manufacturing processes.

2. Advances in 3D printing for pharmaceuticals

The pharmaceutical industry stands to gain significant advantages from the utilization of 3D printing technology, particularly in the early phase of drug development. The process from the discovery of a medicine to its availability on the market typically takes between 10 and 15 years, with costs reaching £1.3 billion.23 The recent COVID-19 pandemic, which required rapid medication development and repurposing studies, highlighted the critical need to shorten both the time and cost to market to accelerate drug development timelines. This need became particularly evident during the pandemic.24 Various 3D printing processes are employed in the pharmaceutical sector, depending on the application and product type. Table 2 compares different 3D printing techniques in the pharmaceutical sector, and Figure 2 shows a schematic representation of the pharmaceutical 3D printing process.

Table 2. Comparison of different 3D printing techniques in the pharmaceutical sector.

Technique Process description Pharmaceutical application Key advantages References
Powder-based Layer-by-layer powder binding/sintering Sustained/immediate release tablets Customizable release; multidrug 25
Extrusion-based Paste/filament extrusion Personalized, complex dosage forms Versatile; rapid prototyping 26
Inkjet-based Droplet deposition on powder bed Fast-dissolving, precise dosage forms High precision; gentle process 27
Laser-based (selective laser sintering) Laser sintering/curing of powder/resin Complex, porous structures (selective laser sintering) Complex geometries; material versatility 28

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the pharmaceutical 3D printing process. (A) Powder-based: A rolling device spreads a thin coating of powder, which is then fused or bound precisely by a laser or binder inkjet tip to form the printed product. (B) Extrusion-based: A filament is inserted into a preheated nozzle that melts and deposits it to form the product. (C) Inkjet-based: A heating element or piezoelectric nozzle ejects microscopic droplets of ink to layer the product. (D) Laser-based: A laser precisely freezes liquid photopolymer as the surface moves to expose and cure additional layers. Reprinted from Huanbutta et al.29 Copyright © 2023, Authors.

Figure 2

2.1. 3D printing process for medicines

Three-dimensional printing can be employed as a rapid prototyping tool for the development of pre-clinical and clinical formulations of medicinal products. This approach allows for the evaluation of one-off or small-batch variations across a range of drug product iterations. The assessment of how various compositions influence key quality attributes, such as drug efficacy in in vitro and in vivo models, can be accelerated using rapid prototyping.30 To date, 3D-printed formulations have been evaluated in a wide variety of pre-clinical animal models. As a result, compared to labor-intensive traditional manufacturing methods, 3D printing may facilitate earlier understanding of process and design variables.31 This, in turn, may enable a quicker entry into first-in-human clinical trials, thereby reducing both development time and cost. In addition, 3D printing could be employed throughout pre-clinical and early-stage clinical studies to generate small batches of dosage-flexible therapeutic products on demand for evaluating safety and effectiveness. In medicine, AM technologies are widely used, particularly in the production of medical devices and drug formulations.32 The growing availability of printing technologies and products has made the broad application of 3D printing in the pharmaceutical and medical fields more accessible. Compared to conventional production methods, AM represents an innovative and novel approach to manufacturing medical tools and equipment.33 Utilizing clinical images of patients, individualized medical devices, and highly customized surgical guides can be fabricated efficiently and precisely. This enables a better anatomical fit for patients and allows surgeons to perform procedures more safely.34

2.2. Advantages and potential applications of 3D-printed medicines

One of the most significant advantages of 3D printing in pharmaceuticals is the ability to tailor a patient’s therapy precisely to their specific medical or lifestyle needs. In the near future, it is possible that patients may be able to choose a formulation type from a catalog.35 The ability to fabricate medications with precise doses, or even incorporate variable amounts of multiple drugs into a single 3D-printed polyprintlet, can improve treatment efficacy while minimizing the risk of side effects from improper dosing. Table 3 compares AI-enhanced 3D printing and traditional manufacturing.

Table 3. Comparison of AI-enhanced 3D printing and traditional manufacturing.

Feature AI+3D printing Traditional methods References
Production scale On-demand, small-batch production Large-scale batch processing 16

Customization Patient-specific dosages, release profiles, and multidrug combinations Fixed-dose, one-size-fits-all formulations 36

Efficiency Rapid prototyping (<24 h for new formulations); reduced material waste Lengthy processes with downtime between steps; higher material waste 37

Drug development AI-accelerated drug design (<50% time reduction); real-time quality control Trial-and-error formulation; post-production quality checks 38

Supply chain Distributed manufacturing (e.g., hospitals/pharmacies) Centralized manufacturing plants are vulnerable to disruptions 39

Clinical impact Personalized release kinetics (e.g., dissolution rate) Standardized release profiles are often associated with higher adverse events 40

Abbreviation: AI: Artificial intelligence.

2.2.1. Enhanced surgical planning and training with 3D printing

The use of 3D printing is becoming increasingly prevalent in medical education and the performance of surgical procedures. Although useful, 2D images offer limited visualization and do not accurately depict the structure of the human body.41 On the other hand, 3D printing can create models with lifelike appearance and accurate representation. As a result, surgical procedures can become more precise and efficient.42

2.2.2. Innovative technological development

In the future, physicians may be able to train using 3D-printed organs. For example, training on animal organs is not as precise as training with human-like models. The quality of skills acquired by medical students during training, and the overall quality of patient care, can be significantly improved when those skills are practiced on realistic 3D-printed components.43

2.2.3. Attention to minute detail

Three-dimensional printers can produce low-cost prostheses in areas where they are most needed, such as nations experiencing conflict. For individuals who cannot afford traditional prosthetics, 3D printing provides an economical alternative.44 Access to affordable medical equipment is crucial in economically disadvantaged countries and geographically isolated places. In some areas, poor road infrastructure prevents the timely delivery of medical supplies. The use of 3D printing facilitates the local production of vital equipment, reducing the need for frequent transport.45 Table 4 compares CIJ and DOD in 3D-printed medicines.

Table 4. Comparison of CIJ and DOD in 3D-printed medicines.
Feature CIJ DOD References
Mechanism High-pressure pump forms a continuous ink stream; droplets are selectively charged and deflected to print areas Droplets are generated only when needed, using thermal or piezoelectric actuators in the print head 46

Droplet formation Continuous stream breaks into droplets; unused droplets are recycled or discarded Droplets are formed only on demand, reducing waste and improving efficiency 47

Speed Generally faster for high-throughput applications Slower than CIJ for large-scale, but more precise and efficient for small, customized batches 48

Precision Good for marking and coding; less precise for complex pharmaceutical dosing Very high precision, suitable for exact drug deposition and personalized dosing 49

Material compatibility Limited by ink properties and recycling requirements Greater compatibility with a wide range of solvents and APIs, especially in piezoelectric DOD 49

Waste Higher, due to a continuous stream and the need to recycle or discard unused ink Minimal, as only required droplets are generated 50

Pharmaceutical applications Suitable for marking and coding tablets; less common for drug loading or 3D structuring Widely used for drug loading, personalized tablets, films, and complex 3D structures 51

Automation and flexibility Good for large-scale, repetitive tasks Excellent for automation and flexible, patient-specific production 52

Cost Lower per unit for high volume, but with higher material waste Higher initial cost, but lower material waste and better suited for small, customized batches 53

Examples in medicine Tablet marking, packaging Personalized tablets, orodispersible films, microneedles, capsules, and combination therapies 54

Abbreviations: APIs: Active pharmaceutical ingredients; CIJ: Continuous inkjet; DOD: Drop-on-demand.

2.2.4. Cost reduction and faster access to medical equipment

Medical and laboratory equipment can be produced using a 3D printer. For example, plastic components of various apparatuses can be fabricated with a 3D printer. This results in a significant reduction in both expenditures and the time spent waiting for innovative medical equipment from external vendors.55 In addition, the production process and subsequent applications are simplified. This increases the availability of equipment and enables low-income or remote areas to more easily obtain 3D-printed medical devices.56

2.2.5. Individualization

The conventional method of fabricating prostheses is extremely costly due to the customization required for each individual patient. With 3D printing, users can choose prosthetic size, form, color, and design,57 making each 3D-printed component unique. 3D printing has also improved the affordability and accessibility of prostheses. AM is currently being reexplored across health care, aerospace, automotive, maritime, and machinery industries. In pharmaceuticals, personalized medications produced using AM are revolutionizing drug development. The integration of automation and AI improves formulation design, parameter selection, real-time quality control, and defect detection.58 Together, AM and AI in 3D-printed medicines are accelerating the transition from mass-produced to personalized health care, streamlining production, and enhancing drug quality and availability.

3. Smart materials and printable formulations

Printable drug matrices represent a transformative advancement in pharmaceutical manufacturing, enabling precise control over drug delivery and personalized treatment regimens. These innovations address critical limitations in conventional drug production while introducing new capabilities in medication design and administration.

3.1. Smart polymers

Smart polymers are a promising technology in medicinal 3D printing. Scientists in Heidelberg have developed polymers with shape memory that can be 3D-printed with excellent precision at both macroscopic and microscopic scales. These novel materials possess lifelike features that advance biological engineering and micro-robotics technologies.59 Intelligent or stimulus-responsive polymers can change their chemical or physical features in response to external stimuli such as variations in pH, temperature, or electromagnetic fields. These dynamic changes enable smart polymers to perform specialized functions, making them valuable in pharmaceutical and health-care applications.60 The integration of smart polymers with nanotechnology, bioinformatics, and advanced manufacturing is expected to drive innovative personalized medicine, real-time health monitoring, and less invasive treatments. Smart polymers are revolutionizing health-care diagnostics and therapies by making them more intelligent, safer, and more effective.61

3.2. AI-assisted 3D-printed medicine materials

AI-assisted 3D printing is revolutionizing pharmaceutical production by enabling the creation of personalized drugs with precise dosage, release patterns, and medicinal combinations. Pharmaceutical-grade polymers play a crucial role in these applications. Among the most commonly used materials are cellulose derivatives such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, and ethyl cellulose.62 These polymers serve as binding agents, film-forming precursors, and drug release modulators. These biodegradable materials are ideal for extrusion-based and inkjet 3D printing. In pharmaceutical FDM 3D printing, sustainable polylactic acid is widely employed63 due to its reliability, printability, and tablet-forming properties. SLA and DLP 3D printing use the photopolymerizable material polyethylene glycol diacrylate, which is employed in the production of hydrogels and pliable dosage forms for controlled or prolonged drug release. Polyvinyl alcohol, a water-soluble and biocompatible polymer, is commonly used for immediate-release formulations and as a support material in multimaterial printing.64 Gelatin and alginate are natural polymers valued for their biocompatibility and ability to form hydrogels, especially in printing chewable or fast-dissolving dosage forms. Methacrylate copolymers are used for enteric coatings or to achieve targeted drug release in the gastrointestinal tract.65 Table 5 lists the materials used in AI-assisted 3D-printed medicines.

Table 5. Materials for artificial intelligence-assisted 3D-printed medicines.

Material type Examples Printing method Key role in 3D-printed medicines References
Cellulose derivatives HPMC, HPC Extrusion, inkjet Binder, film former, controlled release 66
PLA Polylactic acid FDM Solid dosage forms, biodegradable 66
PEGDA PEG diacrylate SLA, DLP Hydrogels, flexible forms, sustained release 67
PVA Polyvinyl alcohol FDM, inkjet Immediate release, support material 67
Gelatin, alginate - Extrusion, inkjet Hydrogels, chewable/dissolvable forms 68
Eudragit Methacrylate copolymers Extrusion, inkjet Enteric coating, targeted drug release 68

Abbreviations: DLP: Digital light processing; FDM: Fused deposition modeling; HPC: Hydroxypropyl cellulose; HPMC: Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; PEG: Polyethylene glycol; PEGDA: Polyethylene glycol diacrylate; PLA: Polylactic acid; PVA: Polyvinyl alcohol; SLA: Stereolithography apparatus.

3.2.1. Material selection and AI integration

AI algorithms play a crucial role in predicting the printability and stability of different material-drug combinations, optimizing formulation parameters such as viscosity, melting point, and drug release profiles, and accelerating the design and quality control of personalized medicines by simulating how materials will behave during and after printing.69 AI analyzes huge databases of pharmaceutical products to identify ideal formulations for 3D-printed drugs. Advanced AI models, such as conditional generative adversarial networks, can learn from datasets of successful and failed formulations to rapidly explore new material combinations and mass fractions.70 This method accelerates the development of biocompatible and regulatory-compliant materials and optimizes processing settings for printability and drug release characteristics. AI-driven optimization methods, including artificial neural networks (ANNs) and genetic algorithms, can predict the material properties and processing conditions that will work best for a given treatment, thereby eliminating trial-and-error experimentation. This makes pharmaceutical production more effective, safer, and more personalized, enabling patient-specific dosages and improved treatment outcomes.71

3.2.2 Bioinks for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Bioinks are essential for 3D bioprinting of intricate biological components to regenerate malfunctioning organs or tissues. These biomimetic, cell-compatible, and mechanically stable materials assist tissue regeneration.72 They enable precise, layer-by-layer fabrication of complex structures that mimic natural tissues, addressing critical challenges in organ repair and replacement. Bioinks are composed of natural or synthetic biomaterials and living cells, often supplemented with growth regulators such as the growth hormone, transforming growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, or exosomes to promote tissue regeneration.73 They must maintain appropriate viscosity for printability, form stable gels to preserve structure, and exhibit biocompatibility to ensure cell viability. For instance, collagen-based bioinks are widely used due to their resemblance to the extracellular matrix, while exosome-laden bioinks improve cell interactions and extracellular matrix remodeling.74 Innovations include multi-material bioinks for heterogeneous tissue engineering and physiologically responsive bioinks. Integration with organ-on-a-chip systems and bioreactors is bridging the gap between laboratory-scale prototyping and clinical-scale production. Bioinks enable on-demand tissue transplantation, disease modelling, and drug testing by merging the science of materials, cell biology, and sophisticated manufacturing.75

3.2.3. Requirements for effective bioinks

Successful bioinks must meet several critical requirements spanning both material and biological properties. From a material standpoint, ideal bioinks should exhibit excellent printability, appropriate mechanical integrity, controlled biodegradation rates, and modifiable surface functional groups.76 Biologically, they must be biocompatible to maintain cell viability, cytocompatibility to support cellular functions, and capable of preserving the bioactivity of encapsulated cells during and after the printing process. The printability of a bioink depends on factors such as viscosity, surface tension, self-crosslinking ability, and interaction with the printer nozzle. Hydrophilic properties and viscosity of the bioink influence both printing effectiveness and cell encapsulation efficiency. More concentrated bioinks can produce longer-lasting 3D structures but require higher extrusion pressures, which may impact flow during direct ink writing through narrow nozzle orifices.77

3.2.4. Bioink manufacturing methods

There are two main bioink approaches to bioink formulation for 3D bioprinting: (i) Cell-scaffold based approach, which involves printing 3D tissue constructs using bioink composed of biological materials and living cells.78 The scaffold material eventually degrades, allowing the embedded cells to proliferate and form functional tissue structures. (ii) Scaffold-free, cell-based approach, which involves printing with living cells to replicate natural embryonic tissue development. Neo-tissues fuse to create larger, functional tissue structures from selected cell populations.79 Recently developed supramolecular biomaterials, composed of polymers, have been used as bioinks for 3D printing. These advanced materials offer enhanced printing speeds, configurable surface properties for improved cell–material interactions, and precisely programmable mechanical properties through biomaterial gradients.80

3.2.5. Limitations and future prospects

Bioink technology continues to advance but faces several challenges. Bioinks must exhibit high resolution, in situ gelation, appropriate viscoelasticity, mechanical stability, and compatibility with various cell types. Sufficient permeability for nutrients, oxygen, and metabolic waste removal is necessary for cell survival within printed structures.81 Another important factor is that each 3D bioprinting method direct ink writing, inkjet bioprinting, SLA, and laser-induced forward transfer—requires distinct bioink characteristics. To address these challenges, researchers are developing functional polymeric biomaterials, modifying materials, and introducing novel cell–hydrogel blends to create programmable bioinks. These next-generation bioinks are more environmentally friendly, maintain cell viability, offer high-resolution printability, and retain mechanical integrity after printing.82 Figure 3 shows the advantages and limitations of AI-based 3D-printed medicines.

Figure 3. Advantages and limitations of artificial intelligence-based 3D-printed medicines. The figure compares the pros and cons of pharmaceutical 3D printing. On the left, blue circles emphasize advantages such as personalization, complex dosage design, rapid prototyping, on-demand production, cost effectiveness, and improved patient compliance. On the right, orange circles denote limitations including regulatory concerns, high initial costs, scalability issues, limited material availability, quality control, and technical challenges. The central image of a 3D printer symbolizes the pivotal role of the technology and visually separates the advantages and disadvantages. Reprinted from Bernatoniene et al.83 Copyright 2025, Authors.

Figure 3

4. AI-driven design and optimization in 3D printing

AI-driven design and optimization are revolutionizing 3D printing by enhancing efficiency, enabling the fabrication of complex geometries, and reducing production costs. These advancements include generative design, real-time process adjustments, and enhanced quality control, with applications across aerospace, health care, automotive, and defense industries.84 ML techniques can predict optimal compositions and process conditions by analyzing large databases of medication formulations, excipient characteristics, and printing parameters, thereby accelerating design and testing processes. Generative models such as conditional generative adversarial networks can rapidly generate unique, printable pharmaceutical formulations that are both innovative and feasible, often surpassing traditional human-driven approaches in diversity and speed.85 Figure 4 shows the ML method for pharmaceutical 3D printability prediction.

Figure 4. Machine learning method for pharmaceutical 3D printability prediction. This graphic illustrates the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing in pharmaceutical production. In this method, medications and excipients are processed via 3D printing. The printed results are either accepted or rejected based on quality assessments. The AI system continuously learns from both successful and failed outcomes to refine 3D printing predictions. By connecting to databases and computational resources, incorporating both data and user input via digital devices, the AI system improves the efficiency and accuracy of pharmaceutical manufacturing. Reprinted from Elbadawi et al.85 Copyright © 2020, Elsevier B.V.

Figure 4

4.1. AI and its applications in the health-care industry

The remarkable developments in AI technology and ML provide transformative potential for the pharmaceutical industry in areas such as dosage form testing, drug discovery, and formulation. AI systems that analyze genomes and proteomics data help researchers identify disease-related targets and predict how these may interact with potential drug candidates.86 AI can also reduce development expenses by enhancing both academic and industrial efficiency. ML techniques help design experiments and estimate the pharmacokinetics and toxicology of prospective pharmaceutical compounds. By prioritizing and optimizing lead compounds, extensive animal testing can be reduced, saving both time and resources.87 AI algorithms that analyze real-world data can facilitate the implementation of personalized medicine, leading to more effective treatment outcomes and improved patient adherence. This in-depth analysis explores the various ways AI can be utilized in the pharmaceutical industry, including dosage form design, drug discovery, drug administration, process optimization, and testing.88

4.2. AI-driven innovations in drug discovery, diagnosis, and personalized medicine

AI shortens drug development timelines and reduces costs while increasing success rates. Innovations such as generative molecular design, lab-in-the-loop validation, and precision targeting are reshaping how diseases are diagnosed and treated. As AI becomes more deeply integrated into health care, it holds the promise of more effective, patient-specific therapies.

4.2.1. AI uses in surgical equipment

AI has been incorporated into surgical equipment to assist surgeons during procedures. Robotic surgical devices utilise AI algorithms to support physicians in performing precise and minimally invasive operations. In addition, AI can analyze data from pre-operative and intraoperative procedures to provide real-time guidance and improve surgical outcomes.89,90

4.2.2. Toxic effect prediction

AI algorithms can predict the toxic effects of drugs by analyzing molecular structure and attributes. ML models trained on toxicological datasets can anticipate harmful properties and identify potentially dangerous structural features. This capability enables researchers to select safer chemicals and reduce the risk of adverse reactions during clinical trials.91

4.2.3. AI in nanomedicine

AI has the potential to revolutionize nanomedicine by enabling nanoscale therapeutic applications. Nanoparticles are used in imaging, diagnostics, and targeted medical treatments. AI algorithms can predict the physical and chemical properties, stability, and efficacy of nanoparticles, thereby aiding in their synthesis and optimization.92

4.2.4. Rehabilitation–prosthetics integration

Advanced prosthetic devices now incorporate AI to improve movement and functionality. ML algorithms can analyze user behavior to adapt the prosthesis to better meet individual needs. AI also monitors motion patterns and provides feedback to patients to improve gaits and measure track progress.93

4.2.5. Medication administration

AI-powered devices help patients manage their medications more effectively. Smart pill dispensers can remind users to take their medication at the correct times and dispense the appropriate dosage. AI algorithms can also analyze patient data, such as medical history and medication usage, to provide personalized treatment recommendations.94

4.3. AI’s pharmaceutical manufacturing potential

AI could accelerate drug development, improve decision-making processes, and reduce costs in the pharmaceutical sector. There are currently numerous applications of AI being utilized within the industry.95 One company is using AI to develop brand-new pharmaceuticals, while another is employing it to analyze existing marketed medications in search of unanticipated applications.96 Organizations in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors are increasingly turning to AI for support as they compete to bring novel medications to market. AI can speed up the drug development process by automating tasks such as identifying potential therapeutic targets and designing new compounds to act on those targets.97 It can also analyze large datasets to uncover patterns that may reveal new insights into disease mechanisms. AI is being used to create “virtual patients” capable of testing new treatments and predicting their effectiveness in real patients. Recent advancements highlight AI’s widespread influence across the pharmaceutical industry.98 Drug research, supply chain management, precision medicine, clinical trials, and safety assessment are all being transformed. AI can also support patient engagement by providing information on health and treatment options, potentially improving both compliance and outcomes. The acceleration of target identification, clinical trial planning, and study data analysis can be achieved through AI, helping pharmaceutical companies develop new drugs more efficiently and effectively.99 In the near future, AI could revolutionize the pharmaceutical sector by expediting drug discovery and development.100 Using techniques such as virtual screening, vast chemical libraries can be rapidly analyzed, making it easier to identify therapeutic candidates with the desired properties and accelerating lead compound selection. By analyzing genomes, proteomes, and clinical data, AI-enabled precision medicine can classify patients into distinct groups, predict therapeutic responses, and personalize treatment.101

4.4. Improved drug formulation and dosage customization

AI algorithms can optimize 3D-printed dose forms based on patient-specific data such as weight, gender, age, and medical history, enabling customized pharmaceutical therapies.102 AI can simulate 3D-printed dosing strategies using ML and mathematical modeling on large datasets. Parameters such as geometry, drug diffusion patterns, and dosage strengths can be rapidly prototyped and optimized. Technologies such as binder jetting, fused filament fabrication, and pressure-assisted microsyringe printing are employed to produce 3D-printed pills.103 Nozzle and platform temperatures, as well as printing speed, significantly affect the quality of 3D-printed tablets. A study using an ANN model demonstrated how processing parameters influenced the performance and drug release profile of 3D-printed diazepam tablets.104 Conducted post-manufacture, the study evaluated infill pattern, density, and other input parameters to optimize drug-dispersing 3D-printed tablets. For subsequent modeling, infill density, volume ratio, and contact area were identified as the most critical factors. After rigorous testing, ANN modeling, and evaluation, the dissolution performance of the tablets improved.

4.5. Effective medication delivery

AI, in combination with big data, has led to the development of computational pharmaceutics, a field that improves drug delivery using multiscale models. Computational pharmaceutics uses AI and ML to predict drug activity from huge datasets. Simulations of drug formulations and delivery mechanisms allow researchers to evaluate scenarios and optimize drug delivery methods without relying solely on trial-and-error.105 By saving time in drug development, this approach improves both efficiency and efficacy. Computational pharmaceutics models drug delivery at multiple scales, encompassing chemical interactions and biological behavior.106 AI-powered systems can predict drug behavior across scales by analyzing complex interactions among pharmacological properties, formulation components, and physiological data. This enhances the design of effective DDSs and deepens understanding of drug dispersion mechanisms. It is particularly useful for estimating physicochemical characteristics of drugs, as well as drug stability and in vitro release profiles.107 In addition, the same expertise can be applied to improve the predictions of in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior, drug distribution, and in conducting in vivo–in vitro correlation research. By employing appropriate AI technologies, researchers can identify potential risks and challenges associated with DDSs earlier in the development process.108 This enables proactive adjustments to reduce risks and enhance drug performance. AI and computational modeling reduce the need for time-consuming and costly trial-and-error experiments, lowering the likelihood of unexpected findings.109 AI has also improved 3D-printed medicines by enabling the development of patient-specific oral dosage forms, personalized drug delivery implants and instruments, biofabrication of complex tissue structures, scaffold-based tissue regeneration methods, and 3D-printed prosthetics, orthotics, surgical implants, and tools.110 Furthermore, 3D-printed medical equipment and implants offer improved functionality, better patient fit, and enhanced surgical outcomes.

4.6. Accelerated drug development and optimization

Due to the failure rate of drugs during the initial stages of research, the pharmaceutical industry bears a significant financial burden. In 2013, the estimated cost of bringing a new chemical entity to market was around $5 billion, and this figure is expected to continue rising in the coming decade.111 As a result, there is growing demand for novel technologies to support drug development, particularly those that can rapidly identify potential drug candidates at minimal cost. Using regression models generated by the random forest method, it is now possible to predict the time-dependent release of medications.112 Tablets are among the most common solid dosage forms in the pharmaceutical industry, available in a wide variety of shapes and sizes, each requiring specific preparation techniques. AI can assist in identifying optimal tablet designs and investigating the desired formulation properties.113 In addition, it is anticipated that AI will be able to manage tasks with the aid of various automated technologies and algorithms. The integration of AI presents a challenge to regulatory authorities, requiring them to reinterpret regulations related to current good manufacturing practices.114 To develop solid dosage forms and better understand the relationships between operations and process inputs and outputs, several AI techniques, including fuzzy logic, neural networks, ANNs, and genetic algorithms, are utilized. Genetic algorithms are employed to predict outcomes based on input parameters, while ANNs improve prediction accuracy for solid dosage forms.115

4.7. Increased accessibility to personalized medicines

Producing personalized pharmaceuticals via 3D printing is a promising technological approach. It offers the necessary adaptability to customize both the dosage and the physical characteristics (such as size, shape, and color) of DDSs according to individual patient needs.116 In recent years, several studies have demonstrated the viability of 3D printing in health care as a substitute for traditional compounding, offering advantages in terms of cost, safety, and patient outcomes. These studies have shown that 3D printing could be effectively used in clinical settings to produce medications. In medical environments, 3D-printed chewable drugs appear to be more precise and easily adaptable in terms of size (to achieve various dosages) and organoleptic properties (such as color and taste).117 3D printing may also be used to construct so-called “polypills,” which contain multiple active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with distinct release kinetics and physical separation of each API within a single dosage unit. This opens up the possibility of producing tablets with different flavors, further improving patient adherence.118 Researchers are currently working to advance the technology, including hardware (printers), software, and suitable excipients, to achieve ideal dosage accuracy, API release, stability, and safety. While these technological advancements are necessary for practical application, it is also vital to take into account the societal factors to gain a comprehensive understanding of the overall success and acceptance of the technology.119

5. Synergistic platforms in personalized medicines

The integration of the IoT, AI, ML, and cloud computing is revolutionizing personalized medicine by enhancing data security, enabling real-time health monitoring, and facilitating tailored treatments. These technologies work synergistically to address longstanding challenges in health care, such as interoperability, scalability, and patient-centric care.120 AI analyzes genetic, lifestyle, and IoT-generated data to identify optimal therapies, predict disease risks, and recommend preventive measures.121 For example, ML models can personalise chemotherapy regimens based on tumor genomics. Blockchain technology secures access to sensitive data, ensuring that only authorized providers contribute to treatment plans. Cloud computing provides the computational power needed for AI-driven drug discovery and large-scale genomic analysis.122

5.1. AI techniques to enhance 3D printing for drug development

AI helps ensure the printability, quality, and safety of 3D-printed medicines. This interface enables decentralized, on-demand production of complex and customized dosage forms, including multi-drug combinations and tailored release profiles, either at the point of care or in pharmacies, supporting the development of digital and personalized medicine.123 AI-enhanced 3D printing is making drug development more efficient, cost-effective, and patient-specific while maintaining strict safety and quality standards. IoT, AI, ML, and cloud computing continue to drive advances in pharmaceutical 3D printing.124 By analyzing real-time processing data and automatically modifying parameters to minimize errors and ensure regulatory compliance, these technologies are transforming how personalized medicines are developed and delivered.

5.1.1. IoTs

The IoT refers to technology that connects devices and equipment during manufacturing. IoT devices can monitor environmental parameters such as temperature and humidity in pharmaceutical manufacturing, thereby ensuring product safety and quality.125 In addition, these devices can track items across the supply chain in real time, allowing for prompt quality interventions. IoT is a leading innovation in information technology. The Internet is a global network of computer systems that links millions of users through the Internet Protocol and Transmission Control Protocol standard suite. Various wireless, online, and optical networking technologies interconnect millions of public, private, educational, commercial, and governmental networks worldwide.126 Due to a unique addressing scheme, Radio Frequency Identification and other IoT technologies can communicate and adapt to their surroundings to achieve shared objectives. The term IoT was first introduced by computer expert Kevin Ashton. It is best defined as “an openly wide and informational network of electronic devices that can offer data, information, and resources; self-organise; and act and react in response to environmental changes.”127 As the pharmaceutical sector is pragmatic about adopting technological advancements, IoT offers significant potential. It can help pharmaceutical companies increase production efficiency, reduce costs, and improve the distribution of medicines to patients. IoT bridges the gap between physicians, manufacturers, distributors, and consumers by monitoring patient compliance with prescriptions via cloud-based platforms.128 Sensors and smart devices are poised to help the pharmaceutical industry save lives and develop more effective treatments. While IoT increases productivity, resilience, and efficiency, it also presents significant opportunities to transform the pharmaceutical industry.

5.1.2. AI

In the context of Pharma 4.0, AI has the potential to revolutionize drug discovery, development, and production. AI-powered drug discovery tools can identify and validate drug targets more quickly and accurately than traditional approaches, assisting researchers in discovering new medicines.129 AI can also predict the safety and efficacy of new drug candidates, thereby reducing the need for time-consuming and expensive clinical trials. In manufacturing, AI can forecast and prevent equipment failures, minimize downtime, and reduce waste. AI-driven automation improves industrial efficiency and quality.130 In personalized medicine, AI helps optimize therapeutic outcomes by tailoring treatment regimens based on patient-specific data. Overall, AI in the pharmaceutical sector drives innovation and productivity while increasing the potential for safer, more effective therapies.

5.1.3. ML

ML is another key technology in Pharma 4.0. It uses algorithms to process data and make predictions or judgments without explicit programming. By analyzing large datasets, ML can uncover patterns that lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets in drug discovery.131 ML also enhances manufacturing by predicting equipment failures and enabling dynamic adjustment of production schedules. As a subfield of AI, ML develops statistical models and algorithmic techniques that allow computers to perform tasks autonomously. Its transformative potential in drug discovery, development, and production has made ML highly relevant to the pharmaceutical industry.132 ML algorithms can identify trends, predict potential drug candidates, and optimize drug formulations by processing extensive biological and chemical datasets. This accelerates drug discovery by helping researchers filter through massive data to identify promising compounds. In personalized medicine, ML analyzes patient data to predict therapeutic responses, enhancing treatment outcomes.133 ML boosts productivity in the health-care sector and may help solve complex medical challenges while facilitating the development of targeted therapies.

5.1.4. Cloud computing

Cloud computing can help the pharmaceutical industry by enabling more efficient data sharing and collaboration. Cloud-based solutions enable organizations to exchange data and insights, thereby improving drug discovery and development. These tools enhance supply chain transparency and collaboration, accelerating responsiveness to quality issues.134 Cloud computing has revolutionized data management, collaboration, and research in the pharmaceutical sector. Cloud services help pharmaceutical companies streamline operations, secure sensitive data, and accelerate the drug development process. The cloud supports advanced data analysis and ML algorithms for predictive modeling and personalized medicine, along with efficient storage and processing of large datasets and real-time collaboration across geographically dispersed teams.135 Cloud-based solutions improve scalability, enabling organizations to respond to fluctuating workloads and demands. This flexible and cost-effective strategy optimizes research and development efforts while ensuring regulatory compliance, as cloud providers often offer strong security measures. Overall, cloud computing has driven pharmaceutical innovation, agility, collaboration, and progress in health care.136

5.2. Intersection of AI and 3D printing in medicine

Thanks to the advancement of 3D printing technology, it is now feasible to manufacture complex items without human assistance. AI has the potential to further enhance the manufacturing process, despite its complexity. The integration of AI with 3D printers will result in the production of new applications.137 Several applications will benefit from this technological combination. As adoption becomes more widespread, this integration is expected to revolutionize the manufacturing industry.138 For example, new prosthetic limbs suitable for surgical applications can be developed using these technologies. Although AI and 3D printing are frequently discussed together, AI can also be utilized independently to improve the quality and performance of manufactured goods. By automating processes, AI can enhance 3D printing performance and minimize human error.139 This integration may benefit both manufacturing and quality control. In addition, it supports the growth of Industry 4.0 and the IoT in the industrial sector. ML, a subset of AI, can analyze data streams and detect hidden patterns.140 For example, during the 3D printing of complex materials like titanium, carbon, and other metal alloys, AI is useful for maintaining consistent material properties. Predictive maintenance can also be enabled using trained models. Even in the development of spare parts, ML can assist manufacturers.141

5.3. AI–ML–3D printing process for medicines

Three-dimensional printing is a powerful technology capable of creating complex and customized medical devices such as implants, surgical tools, and prosthetics. However, to ensure the safety, performance, and quality of these devices, the printing process must be optimized and comply with specific standards and regulations.142 AI and ML, when combined with 3D printing, are transforming the pharmaceutical industry, especially in the realm of personalized drugs. This innovative approach improves drug formulation, production processes, and patient treatment outcomes.143

5.3.1. Pharmaceutical 3D printing

AM, or 3D printing, produces patient-specific pharmaceutical products layer by layer. This method enables the creation of variable formulations with different dosages, shapes, sizes, and release profiles, shifting from mass production to truly personalized medication. Producing customized drugs on demand offers many advantages, including tailoring medications to individual therapeutic needs and patient preferences, and reducing production expenses and time compared to traditional approaches.144

5.3.2. AI/ML integration in 3D printing

The combination of AI/ML and 3D printing is key to solving pharmaceutical manufacturing problems. One significant application is quality monitoring, where AI algorithms can detect defects in printed dosage forms in real time, ensuring product consistency and safety throughout the production process.145 In addition, ML can be used to optimize critical printing parameters such as temperature and speed, leading to improved precision and reproducibility. Beyond production, AI also contributes to design innovation by enabling the development of complex dosage forms and multi-drug combinations tailored to individual patient needs.146 This convergence of AI, ML, and 3D printing facilitates the advancement of personalized medicine, enhancing drug production efficiency, patient engagement, and treatment adherence. As these technologies continue to mature, their integration into clinical practice is expected to grow, ushering in a new era of data-driven and patient-centric pharmaceutical care.147

5.4. Successful integration of AI and 3D printing in pharmaceutical manufacturing

Over the past 10 years, AI and 3D printing have driven advancements in the health care industry. New medical equipment, orthopedic implants, and prostheses are being developed by medical specialists using 3D printing technology.148 In addition, customized models of tissues, bones, and organs are being created with this technology. According to international market research, the medical 3D printing market was valued at more than 1.7 billion US dollars in 2020.149 It is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of over 22.3% from 2021 to 2027.150 Compared to conventional manufacturing approach, AI and AM enables the creation and printing of more intricate designs and a wider range of material.151 This is facilitated by recent advancements in both technology and materials. Today, medical experts can easily produce customized medical instruments and implants tailored precisely to a patient’s anatomy or specific surgical procedure. A more accurate fit of prostheses and implants can significantly reduce the risk of infection, enable pain-free functionality, and accelerate recovery.152 The integration of AI and 3D printing, also known as AM, is catalyzing a transformative shift across various industries. This synergy enhances efficiency, optimizes design processes, and fosters innovation in manufacturing. The synergistic integration of AI and 3D printing represents a significant leap forward in AM capabilities.153 By optimizing processes, enhancing design flexibility, and enabling mass customization, this collaboration is set to redefine industry standards and unlock new opportunities for innovation across multiple sectors. As technology evolves, the potential for further advancements remains vast, promising a future where creativity and efficiency are seamlessly intertwined in manufacturing practices.154 Table 6 presents the AI algorithms for formulation optimization.

Table 6. Artificial intelligence algorithms for formulation optimization.

Feature/criterion ANN GAN RF References
Core idea Mimics biological neurons to model complex relationships Two networks (generator and discriminator) compete to generate realistic data Ensemble of decision trees for prediction and classification 155

Use in optimization Predicts formulation outcomes; used in inverse modeling Generates novel, optimized formulations by learning data distribution Selects important variables; predicts outcomes and ranks factors 155

Data requirement Requires large, labeled datasets Requires substantial data; can work with unlabeled data for generation Handles smaller datasets well; less prone to overfitting 156

Strengths Captures non-linear relationships; flexible model Can propose entirely new formulation candidates Robust to noise; interpretable feature importance 156

Weaknesses Prone to overfitting; requires tuning Training instability; harder to interpret May struggle with highly non-linear problems 157

Output type Predictive model (e.g., concentration vs. response) New data generation (e.g., novel formulation recipes) Predictive model with variable importance 157

Optimization role Response prediction and optimization via simulation Direct generation of optimized formulations Response prediction and feature selection 158

Interpretability Low (black-box model) Very low (black-box and generative) High (feature importance is accessible) 158

Computation demand Moderate to high High Low to moderate 159

Common use cases Pharmaceutical QbD, mixture optimization New material formulation, drug-like compound generation Ingredient screening, quality prediction 159

Abbreviations: ANN: Artificial neural network; GAN: Generative adversarial network; QbD: Quality by design; RF: Random forest.

6. Clinical translation and case studies

Clinical translation involves translating fundamental biomedical research into health-improving applications, from laboratory innovations to patient care. This translational process encompasses preclinical studies, clinical trials, health-care implementation, and public health outcomes. The goal is to bridge the gap between scientific breakthroughs and widespread clinical application, delivering diagnostics, therapies, and preventive strategies to patients.

6.1. Case 1: Advanced AI for diabetics

For instance, Medtronic, a global medical technology company, has developed AI-based tools for diabetes management. The Medtronic Guardian Connected System uses AI and continuous glucose monitoring to provide real-time diabetes support. In 2016, IBM Watson and Medtronic created the Sugar IQ app, offering mobile-based personal support for diabetes patients. This diabetes management application uses AI to provide several valuable features, with one of its most important being “Insights.” The software performs an in-depth analysis of a user’s glucose patterns over time, discovers trends, and delivers personalized alerts to the patient. These insights help individuals understand how certain behaviors, habits, and environmental factors influence their glucose levels. As a result, users can make more informed decisions and take proactive steps toward more effectively managing their diabetes.160-168

6.2. Case 2: Large-scale emergency medical supply production

Ian McHale, a student at Steinert High School in New Jersey, developed a design for a finger splint that can be produced on a 3D printer for less than two cents. Aware of the challenges faced by underdeveloped countries in sourcing medical supplies—especially custom-made items—McHale aimed to create an accessible and low-cost solution. His design enables the production of finger splints using recycled plastic on affordable 3D printers, with each splint taking approximately 10 min to print. Depending on the size of the build platform, a single print run can yield 30–40 splints. The splint is particularly valuable in rural clinics, emergency stations, and field hospitals where medical equipment is limited or unavailable. McHale’s innovation won first place in his division at the Mercer Science and Engineering Fair, with the award presented by the US Army and Air Force. He believes this approach allows splints to be fabricated on demand and tailored to individual finger sizes, making them ideal for rapid response and resource-limited settings.169

6.3. Case 3: Bone implants

In 2018, medical professionals at Kunming Medical University (KMU) Hospital in China, in collaboration with the 3D printer company IEMAI 3D, successfully implanted the world’s first 3D-printed polyether ether ketone (PEEK) collarbone. This accomplishment was made possible through international collaboration. The procedure was carried out on a 57-year-old patient with advanced cancer to remove cancerous cells from damaged organs and tissues. As part of the operation, the patient’s collarbone had to be removed. To reconstruct the collarbone following resection, the medical team at KMU hospital chose to use a PEEK prosthesis rather than the conventional titanium mesh. This decision was made because the PEEK prosthesis would not interfere with the patient’s subsequent chemotherapy treatment. In addition, PEEK promotes faster recovery and has shown no adverse effects in patients. The introduction of thermoplastics such as PEEK, polymethyl methacrylate, and others into the medical field has enabled more patients to undergo implant surgeries, as these materials do not compromise potential future treatments.170

6.4. Case 4: Human corneas

In 2018, researchers at Newcastle University in the United Kingdom successfully 3D-printed the first human cornea. They developed a printable solution known as “bio-ink” by combining healthy corneal stem cells with alginate and collagen, allowing for a transparent and printable material. In under 10 min, the bio-ink was effectively extruded using a straightforward 3D bioprinting technique to construct the shape of a human cornea. With 3D printing technology, corneas were customized to the exact specifications of each patient. By using data obtained from scanning a patient’s eye, researchers were able to print a cornea that precisely matched the size and shape of the original. The Newcastle researchers anticipated that 3D-printed corneas could help address the global shortage of donor corneas in the near future. However, further testing is still required before these bioprinted corneas can be approved for transplantation.171

6.5. Case 5: Heart valves

The 3D tissue printing method was pioneered by Cheung et al. at Cornell University, who succeeded in generating living heart valves with anatomy similar to that of natural valves. Butcher’s team developed algorithms that process 3D image datasets of native valves to automatically construct full 3D models of heart valves with high precision. Bioprinting is then performed using a dual syringe system containing a mixture of alginate/gelatin hydrogel, smooth muscle cells, and valve interstitial cells. The goal is to accurately replicate the composition of the valve root and leaflets. Butcher believed that the fields of tissue engineering and biomedicine would increasingly adopt bioprinting in the future. Patient-specific tissue models would be especially valuable to medical professionals for studying disease pathophysiology, evaluating therapeutic efficacy, and manufacturing living tissue substitutes tailored precisely to individual patient geometry.172

7. Challenges and regulatory perspectives

Advanced health-care materials encompass biomaterials, nanotechnology, biofabrication, and biomedical devices aimed at improving diagnostics, therapeutics, and regenerative medicine. These innovations face multifaceted challenges and evolving regulatory landscapes as they transition from research to clinical application. Collaborative efforts between researchers, industry, and regulators are critical to addressing gaps in material characterization, accelerating translational pathways, and ensuring patient safety without stifling innovation.

7.1. Challenges of 3D-printed drugs in regulatory approval and standardization

Due to the innovative nature of the technology and the lack of established regulatory frameworks for 3D-printed pharmaceuticals, regulatory approval and standardization remain difficult. While 3D printing offers the potential to develop patient-specific doses and multi-drug formulations for personalized medicine, it also complicates regulatory pathways.

7.1.1. Regulatory approval issues

Although some regulatory authorities have addressed 3D-printed medical devices, there are no specific regulations for 3D-printed drugs. Even though the Food and Drug Administration approved the first 3D-printed tablets in 2015 and has published guidelines for 3D-printed medical devices, it has not done so for pharmaceuticals.173 Manufacturers must therefore adapt chemical processes, manufacturing methods, and control procedures to 3D printing in the absence of clear regulatory guidelines. Existing pharmaceutical regulations do not sufficiently cover 3D printing-specific variables such as digital layout files, printing parameters, and material properties, making compliance challenging.174 Each batch of 3D-printed medication must be tested for safety, efficacy, and quality, further complicating the approval process. In addition, variations in printer models, software, and raw materials make it difficult to ensure consistent product quality across manufacturing sites or even within the same site.175 This variability raises concerns about the reproducibility and reliability of drug products, which are key requirements for regulatory approval.

7.1.2. Standardization challenges

Standardization is another major obstacle. The lack of standardized 3D printing operations, materials, and quality control procedures makes it difficult to ensure that all 3D-printed pharmaceuticals are safe and effective.176 For instance, the absence of current good manufacturing practices specific to 3D printers and the significant variability among devices complicate the achievement of consistent production outcomes. Materials used in 3D printing must be carefully chosen and evaluated for printability, strength, and biocompatibility, but available options remain limited. Traditional pharmaceutical manufacturing relies on validated, controllable methods; however, 3D printing introduces novel factors such as layer thickness, printing speed, and temperature, all of which can influence product quality.177 Each printed dose must meet stringent criteria, yet real-time, non-destructive quality control procedures are still under development.

7.1.3. Ethical and regulatory issues

Beyond technology aspects, regulatory and ethical considerations must also be considered. The possibility of drugs being printed in pharmacies, hospitals, or even at home raises significant concerns regarding regulation and oversight.178 As the technology evolves, issues such as hacking of printing software, unauthorized replication of medication designs, and intellectual property protection become increasingly relevant. Ethical concerns include equitable access to 3D-printed pharmaceuticals and the prevention of misuse or unsupervised self-treatment.179 Overall, while 3D printing holds great promise for personalized medicine, the lack of comprehensive regulatory guidelines, standardization issues, and the need for reliable quality control systems continue to hinder its widespread adoption and regulatory approval. Manufacturers and researchers must collaborate to develop new standards and protocols that ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of these transformative products.180

7.2. Challenges and limitations of implementing AI in 3D-printed medicines

The integration of ML and 3D printing is not without its challenges. To ensure a smooth transition into clinical practice, software developers working on ML-guided 3D printing should proactively investigate and address these potential obstacles. While some of these challenges are specific to the pharmaceutical 3D printing sector, most are common to the broader field of ML.181 The lack of readily available large datasets for ML training is perhaps the most significant problem faced across industries. In general, ML predictions are more reliable when large amounts of training data are available, although ML algorithms capable of working with small datasets are beginning to emerge. Ideally, unified and easily accessible databases containing relevant 3D printing data would be available for ML analysis.182 Despite their numerous advantages, AI-based models suffer from several drawbacks, most notably their lack of interpretability and their requirement for extremely large datasets. As a result, AI models should be employed in conjunction with more conventional experimental methods to ensure both the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals. The following sections are examples of some of these limitations.183

7.2.1. Limited available data

For AI algorithms to make accurate predictions, a substantial amount of data is required. However, there may be insufficient data available for certain demographics or medicines, which could result in less accurate or biased outcomes.184 For instance, limited data may be available for rare diseases, presenting a substantial challenge when developing AI models. In addition, the data utilized to train AI models may not be representative of the target population, leading to biased findings.185 In addition, certain types of data, such as longitudinal data or real-world evidence, may not be readily accessible, which can further limit the utility of AI models. Due to these constraints, it is essential to carefully consider both the accuracy and representativeness of the data used to construct AI models.186

7.2.2. Analysis and discussion of the results

The outputs produced by AI models are not always easy to interpret, even for subject matter experts. Because these models may not provide a transparent explanation of how their predictions were generated, it can be difficult for physicians and researchers to fully understand and trust the results.187 In some cases, translating AI-generated findings into actionable insights for clinical practice or drug development may be challenging. Moreover, the use of AI models may require a level of technical expertise that is not readily available to all health-care professionals and researchers, further limiting their practical utility.188 Consequently, there is a growing need for improved interpretability and explainability of AI models to ensure that their predictions can be clearly understood and effectively applied.189

7.2.3. Considerations of an ethical nature

As with any application of AI, several considerations must be taken into account in drug development using such technologies. One major concern is patient privacy, especially given the frequent use of sensitive health data in training AI models.190 Data protection and security are critical issues that require significant attention and cannot be overlooked. It is essential to ensure that patient information is gathered and utilized in ways that safeguard privacy and comply with legal rights. Another ethical issue involves data ownership.191 In some cases, patient data may be collected without their informed consent, and it may be unclear who owns the data or holds the right to its use. This ambiguity has the potential to cause disputes among patients, researchers, and pharmaceutical companies.192

7.2.4. Inadequate clinical knowledge and experience

Although AI is capable of detecting correlations, it is vital to recognize that individual patient treatments may differ despite these associations. AI algorithms often operate within a statistical framework, which may limit their ability to understand the numerous complex factors and far-reaching consequences that various parameters may have.193 The intricate nature of treatment decisions, shaped by a wide range of individualized characteristics, presents a challenge for AI models that are primarily focused on statistical relationships. As a result, the capacity of AI to fully capture the essential aspects and implications of certain parameters may be limited.194

7.2.5. Systematically complicated biological entities

AI has several limitations in its ability to accurately emulate the complexity of biological systems as a whole. Biological systems are complex and dynamic, consisting of numerous interconnected pathways, feedback loops, and intricate chemical interactions.195 Because of this complexity, AI models, which frequently oversimplify and generalize biological processes, face significant challenges. These models heavily rely on training data to detect patterns and make predictions; however, the currently available data may not adequately reflect all the intricacies and nuances of biological systems.196 Real-world complexity and diversity, including genetic variations, environmental influences, and inter-individual variability, may not be well captured by existing AI models.197

7.2.6. Ethical considerations and regulatory implications

It is essential to recognize and develop specific elements of quality assurance, production challenges, excipient specifications, manufacturing procedures, and related regulatory and technical issues before 3D printing can become a widely adopted therapeutic tool.198 The creation of personalized pharmaceuticals, with tailored dosing, dosage forms, and drug release kinetics, can be effectively achieved through 3D printing. However, the use of 3D-printed medical devices in home settings presents a significant challenge; to minimize the risk of adverse reactions, such practices must be supervised and managed by qualified professionals.199 New procedures to govern intellectual property rights related to 3D printing designs are becoming increasingly important. These would provide the flexibility necessary for supporting digital technologies more rapidly and efficiently, especially in the event of a global health emergency.200 As engineers and health-care professionals gain experience, the time required to design, manufacture, and implement a 3D-printed personalized medical device (including implants) continues to decrease. Consequently, it is essential for multidisciplinary teams to engage in effective collaboration and foster mutual trust.201

7.2.7. Material limits and compatibility

Only a limited selection of pharmaceutical-grade components and excipients is currently available for use in 3D printing, which significantly restricts the range of medications and dosage forms that can be produced.202 Many of these approved materials are mechanically weak or lack the necessary stability, resulting in printed dosage forms that are friable, fragile, and prone to physical degradation. This not only complicates the manufacturing process but also poses challenges for packaging, storage, and transportation, as the risk of breakage or contamination increases.203 In addition, the limited availability of suitable materials restricts the development of complex DDSs, such as those with controlled release profiles or multi-drug combinations, further narrowing the potential applications of 3D printing in personalized medicine. Compatibility concerns also arise when considering the chemical and physical interactions between available excipients and APIs, which can impact drug stability and bioavailability.204 As a result, ongoing research is focused on developing new, robust materials that meet stringent regulatory standards while also supporting innovative dosage form designs.

7.2.8. Printer resolution, degradation, and thermal stability

Achieving high-dimensional precision and resolution is difficult for complex or small medicinal items. Nozzle shape, layer thickness, and printer calibration significantly affect product quality. Low-dimensional precision can lead to irregular drug release patterns and dosage inconsistencies, which are critical concerns in pharmaceutical manufacturing.205 3D printing currently lacks adequate in-process control, making batch-to-batch uniformity and quality assurance challenging. Variations in printing parameters, environmental conditions, and material properties can affect reproducibility. In addition, techniques such as selective laser sintering may damage thermolabile drugs and excipients due to high temperatures or localized heating. Therefore, thermal stability must be carefully assessed to avoid degradation and to ensure the efficacy and safety of printed medicines.206

7.2.9. Powder agglomeration and reuse of unused material

Powder agglomeration can lead to irregular microstructures, poor densification, and product defects, which affect the mechanical properties of the printed dosage form and its drug release profile. These issues can result in inconsistencies in tablet strength, dissolution rate, and therapeutic performance.207 Recyclability and safety are becoming increasingly important in pharmaceutical 3D printing, especially in binder jetting and powder bed processes. Modifications in the particle size distribution, moisture content, or flowability in recycled powders can reduce print quality and compromise product integrity.208 Continuous reuse of recycled material may introduce impurities or change its physicochemical properties, making it unsuitable for high-quality dosage forms. To reduce these risks and maintain product quality, temperature and humidity must be carefully monitored and controlled during the printing process. Recycled materials must also undergo rigorous quality assurance and in-process monitoring to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance.9

7.3. Implications of industry 4.0 on pharmaceutical manufacturing

Industry 4.0, with its integration of automated processes, real-time data sharing, and smart production systems, is transforming pharmaceutical manufacturing. One of the key implications is improved operational efficiency, as AI and data analytics enable real-time monitoring, optimization, and control of production processes. This leads to reduced waste and enhanced product quality.209 Predictive quality control is another critical benefit; generative AI can anticipate potential quality issues during manufacturing, allowing for proactive interventions to ensure compliance with safety standards. In addition, dynamic production scheduling becomes more feasible, as AI systems can adjust schedules in response to real-time demand and changes in supply chain conditions, ensuring timely delivery while minimizing operational costs.210 Finally, Industry 4.0 supports enhanced regulatory compliance. As regulations continue to evolve, these technologies assist manufacturers in maintaining compliance through advanced tracking, reporting, and documentation systems.211

In the not-too-distant future, AI may revolutionize the pharmaceutical sector by accelerating drug discovery and development processes. Using techniques such as virtual screening, vast chemical libraries can be rapidly analyzed, making it easier to identify therapeutic candidates with the desired characteristics. This will expedite the identification of lead compounds. By analyzing genomes, proteomes, and clinical data, AI-enabled precision medicine will be able to classify patients into distinct groups, predict therapeutic responses, and personalize treatment regimens.212 Deep learning and generative models provide researchers the ability to design novel molecules with target-binding properties, thereby improving the therapeutic efficacy of existing medications while simultaneously reducing adverse effects. In addition, AI will enable the formulation of patient-specific dosages by accounting for individualized drug administration needs.213 By accurately predicting adverse effects and the toxicity of potential drug candidates, AI algorithms are expected to usher in a new era of innovation in safety assessment.

8. Limitations of the study

The dynamic and multidisciplinary nature of this research area makes it challenging to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date summary. As AI and 3D printing technologies advance rapidly, many current advancements, algorithms, and applications may be omitted or only briefly addressed due to publication delays or limited availability of peer-reviewed literature. The quality and scope of the available research may also constrain the review, as many studies are preliminary or exploratory and lack large-scale clinical validation. This hinders the ability to draw firm conclusions and develop standardized methodologies. Furthermore, due to the scarcity of literature, regulatory, legal, and data privacy concerns related to AI in pharmaceutical 3D printing may not be fully addressed. The evaluation may also exhibit a technological bias, emphasizing AI’s potential and applications rather than examining the feasibility, risks, and constraints of clinical and manufacturing implementation.

9. Conclusion and future perspectives

Future research in AI-driven pharmaceutical manufacturing should focus on integrating AI into all stages of drug development and production to improve both efficiency and personalization. Three key sub-points are outlined in the following subsections.

9.1. AI in advanced manufacturing technologies

AI should be studied in conjunction with 3D printing and continuous manufacturing. It can optimize printing parameters, predict material behavior, and ensure regulatory compliance in real time, enabling rapid prototyping and scalable production of complex drug formulations tailored to individual patients. By employing AI-driven analytics to dynamically monitor and adjust operations, this integration can address material and regulatory challenges, reduce errors, and ensure product consistency.

9.2. AI growth in personalized medicine with on-demand production

By analyzing extensive biological, clinical, and lifestyle data, AI should support the development of customized medications in future research. AI-driven platforms could accelerate the transformation from mass production to on-demand, patient-specific pharmaceuticals by automating drug discovery and fabrication for rare medical conditions or unique patient profiles. This would require advancements in modular production systems and AI-powered real-time quality control mechanisms to enable rapid adaptation.

9.3. AI-driven predictive maintenance along with supply chain optimization

Research should focus on AI solutions for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment and smart supply chain management. AI can forecast equipment failures, minimize downtime, and optimize inventory and logistics using IoT devices and real-time data analytics to ensure timely drug delivery. These innovations will strengthen supply chains, reduce waste, and enable more flexible responses to market demands and regulatory changes.

The pharmaceutical industry stands to gain significant advantages from the use of 3D printing technology, particularly in the early phases of drug discovery. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, which required rapid drug development and repurposing efforts, highlighted the urgent need to reduce time and cost to market by shortening drug development timelines. 3D printing can be employed as a rapid prototyping tool during the development of pre-clinical and clinical formulations. This would allow for the evaluation of one-off or small-batch variations of different drug product iterations. Rapid prototyping can accelerate the assessment of how various formulation compositions impact critical quality attributes, such as drug efficacy, in both in vitro and in vivo models. To date, 3D-printed medicines have been evaluated in a range of pre-clinical animal models to determine their efficacy. Compared to labor-intensive traditional manufacturing methods, 3D printing may facilitate earlier understanding of process and formulation parameters, potentially enabling quicker entry into first-in-human clinical trials, thereby reducing both the time and cost of product development. In addition, 3D printing can be used during pre-clinical and early-phase clinical testing to produce small batches of dose-flexible therapeutic products on demand, allowing for real-time evaluation of their efficacy and safety. Medications could be formulated on demand in decentralized locations such as clinics, pharmacies, or even the patient’s home using 3D printing technology. This could help pharmaceutical companies reduce transportation and overall logistics expenditures, thereby lowering the carbon footprint associated with distribution and eliminating the need for energy-intensive storage conditions, such as cold-chain systems required for temperature-sensitive medications. However, for 3D printing to be widely adopted in the pharmaceutical sector, a significant transformation in both business models and strategic approaches will be necessary. Despite the fact that many of the opportunities presented by 3D printing remain unexplored, recent developments demonstrate the far-reaching impact AI is already having on the pharmaceutical industry. These impacts extend to precision medicine, drug discovery, clinical studies, formulation optimization, safety evaluation, and supply chain management. AI can enhance the efficiency of drug formulation and delivery. Models powered by AI can predict drug release and absorption, optimizing formulations for efficacy and targeted distribution. Pharmaceutical delivery devices and systems are increasingly leveraging AI to improve patient adherence and convenience. Clinical trials are also being improved through AI, which enhances productivity and reduces costs. AI algorithms support patient recruitment, trial population selection, and trial protocol optimization. In addition, AI can track and evaluate sample data in real time, enabling more flexible trial designs and faster decision-making. Pharmaceutical supply chains are being optimized through AI to improve manufacturing, inventory control, and delivery, forming an integral part of comprehensive supply chain management. AI and ML hold the potential to revolutionize drug administration, especially in the treatment of infectious diseases. This prospective outlook presents exciting opportunities. Nevertheless, it is vital to address challenges related to data quality, legal frameworks, and ethical standards to fully realize AI’s potential in pharmaceutical development. AI-driven innovations, on the other hand, have the capacity to transform the pharmaceutical industry and significantly improve patient health outcomes in the coming decades, provided that progress continues through active collaboration among industry stakeholders, academic institutions, and regulatory authorities.

Acknowledgement

The authors extend their appreciation to the Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Thailand, for its generous support in guidance, supervision, and implementation (R.A.K. and P.S.), which significantly contributed to the completion of this work.

Footnotes

Financial support: This work was financially supported by Thailand Science Research and Innovation under the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund, Fiscal Year 2568, and by the postdoctoral fellowship program at Silpakorn University (R.A.K.).

Conflicts of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: RAK, PS, and SS; Supervision: PS and SS; Writing–original draft: RAK, GK; Writing–review & editing: All authors. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Availability of data: Not applicable.

Further disclosure: The authors employed ChatGPT to improve the language and readability of the manuscript and have reviewed and edited the paper, as needed, following usage of the AI tool. The authors will take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Open-access statement: This is an open-access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially if appropriate credit is given. The new creations are licensed under identical terms.

References

  • 1.Wang X., Huang Z., Xing L., et al. STING agonist-based ER-targeting molecules boost antigen cross-presentation. Nature. 2025;641:202–210. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08758-w. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08758-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arrick G., Sticker D., Ghazal A., et al. Cephalopod-inspired jetting devices for gastrointestinal drug delivery. Nature. 2024;636:481–487. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08202-5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08202-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krueger L., Awad A., Basit AW., Goyanes A., Miles JA., Popat A. Clinical translation of 3D printed pharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2024;2(10):801–803. doi: 10.1038/s44222-024-00217-x. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Han GR., Goncharov A., Eryilmaz M., et al. Machine learning in point-of-care testing:Innovations, challenges, and opportunities. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):3165. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58527-6. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58527–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarkar N., Bhumiratana S., Geris L., Papantoniou I., Grayson WL. Bioreactors for engineering patient-specific tissue grafts. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023;1(5):361–377. doi: 10.1038/s44222-023-00035-5. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chua CYX., Jimenez M., Mozneb M., et al. Advanced material technologies for space and terrestrial medicine. Nat Rev Mater. 2024;9(11):808–821. doi: 10.1038/s41578-024-00456-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yi HG., Kim H., Kwon J., et al. Application of 3D bioprinting in the prevention and the therapy for human diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):177. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00566-8. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00658-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen K., Yu W., Zheng G., et al. Biomaterial-based regenerative therapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury. Asia Mater. 2024;16(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41427-023-00560-4. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Buch VH., Ahmed I., Maruthappu M. Artificial intelligence in medicine:Current trends and future possibilities. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;68(668):143–144. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695213. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Orr A., Kalantarnia F., Nazir S., et al. Recent advances in 3D bioprinted neural models:A systematic review on the applications to drug discovery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2025;218:115524. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2025.115524. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2025.115524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saadi MA., Maguire A., Pottackal NT., et al. Direct ink writing:A 3D printing technology for diverse materials. Adv Mater. 2022;34(28):e2108855. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108855. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Elbadawi M., Gaisford S., Basit AW. Advanced machine-learning techniques in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(3):769–777. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.12.003. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buj-Corral I., Domínguez-Fernández A., Gómez-Gejo A. Effect of printing parameters on dimensional error and surface roughness obtained in direct ink writing (DIW) processes. Materials (Basel) 2020;13(9):2157. doi: 10.3390/ma13092157. doi: 10.3390/ma13092157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun S., Alkahtani ME., Gaisford S., Basit AW., Elbadawi M., Orlu M. Virtually possible:Enhancing quality control of 3D printed medicines with machine vision trained on photorealistic images. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2630. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15112630. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15102630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elbadawi M., Li H., Sun S., Alkahtani ME., Basit AW., Gaisford Sl. Artificial intelligence generates novel 3D printing formulations. Appl Mater Today. 2024;36:102061. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2024.102061. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kassa FM., Youssef SH., Song Y., Garg S. Use of computational intelligence in customizing drug release from 3D-printed products:A comprehensive review. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(5):551. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17050551. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17050551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Croom BP., Abbott A., Kemp JW., et al. Mechanics of nozzle clogging during direct ink writing of fiber-reinforced composites. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101701. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu W., Jambhulkar S., Ravichandran D., et al. 3D Printing-enabled nanoparticle alignment:A review of mechanisms and applications. Small. 2021;17(1):e2100817. doi: 10.1002/smll.202100817. doi: 10.1002/smll.202100000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marin E., Boschetto F., Pezzotti G., et al. Biomaterials and biocompatibility:An historical overview. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(8):1617–1633. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36930. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xu H., Zhang S., Song K., Yang H., Yin J., Huang Y. Droplet-based 3D bioprinting for drug delivery and screening. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2024;217:115486. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115486. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Seoane-Viaño I., Trenfield SJ., Basit AW., Goyanes A. Translating 3D Printed pharmaceuticals:From hype to real-world clinical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;174:553–575. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.003. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu T., Rao J., Mo Y., et al. 3D printing in musculoskeletal interface engineering:Current progress and future directions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2025;219:115552. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2025.115552. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2025.115552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Binson VA., Thomas S., Subramoniam M., Arun J., Naveen S., Madhu S. A review of machine learning algorithms for biomedical applications. Ann Biomed Eng. 2024;52(5):1159–1183. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03459-3. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03105-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Roy A., Kizhakkethottam JJ. Research on intelligent river water quality management system using blockchain-internet of things. TELKOMNIKA Comput Electron Control. 2024;22(6):1478–1490. doi: 10.12928/telkomnika.v22i6.33434. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ong JJ., Muñiz Castro B., Gaisford S., et al. Accelerating 3D printing of pharmaceutical products using machine learning. Int J Pharm X. 2022;4:100120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2022.100120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2022.100120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goyanes A., Elbadawi M., McCoubrey LE., et al. Harnessing artificial intelligence for the next generation of 3D printed medicines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175:113805. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.015. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grof Z., Štěpánek F. Artificial intelligence based design of 3D-printed tablets for personalised medicine. Comput Chem Eng. 2021;154:107492. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107492. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Serrano DR., Luciano FC., Anaya BJ., et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in drug discovery and drug delivery:Revolutionizing personalized medicine. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(7):1328. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16101328. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16071328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huanbutta K., Burapapadh K., Sriamornsak P., Sangnim T. Practical application of 3D printing for pharmaceuticals in hospitals and pharmacies. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7):1877. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071877. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aggarwal A., Tam CC., Wu D., Li X., Qiao S. Artificial intelligence-based chatbots for promoting health behavioral changes:Systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e40789. doi: 10.2196/40789. doi: 10.2196/40789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu C., Alameri A., Leong W., et al. Multiscale engineering of brain organoids for disease modeling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2024;210:115344. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115344. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huang H., Dong C., Feng W., Wang Y., Huang B., Chen Y. Biomedical engineering of two-dimensional MXenes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;184:114178. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114178. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhu Y., Guo S., Ravichandran D., et al. 3D-printed polymeric biomaterials for health applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14:2402571. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202402571. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202402571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dai Y., Wang P., Mishra A., et al. 3D Bioprinting and AI-assisted biofabrication of personalized oral soft tissue constructs. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14:2402727. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202402727. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202402727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee RY., Wu Y., Goh D., et al. Application of artificial intelligence to in vitro tumor modeling and characterization of the tumor microenvironment. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12:e2202457. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202457. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Khullar D., Casalino LP., Qian Y., Lu Y., Krumholz HM., Aneja S. Perspectives of patients about artificial intelligence in health care. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(5):e2210309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10309. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ma L., Yu S., Xu X., Amadi SM., Zhang J., Wang Z. Application of artificial intelligence in 3D printing physical organ models. Mater Today Bio. 2023;23:100792. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100792. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meshram S., Hatwar P., Bakal, Raut P. Artificial intelligence-assisted fabrication of 3D printed technology in pharmaceutical development and its application. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2024;14:214–222. doi: 10.22270/jddt.v14i1.6725. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Singh S., Kumar M., Kumar D., Chopra hopra S. Kuma Therapeutic precision:Unveiling the potential of 3D printing in drug delivery, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2024;11(2):236–255. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2023.0364. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2023.0364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Z., Han X., Chen R., et al. Innovative color jet 3D printing of levetiracetam personalized paediatric preparations. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2021;16:374–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2021.02.003. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2021.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gerardo-Nava JL., Jansen J., Günther D., et al. Transformative materials to create 3D functional human tissue models in vitro in a reproducible manner. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12:2301030. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202301030. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202301030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Taylor S., Mueller E., Jones LR., Makela AV., Ashammakhi N. Translational aspects of 3D and 4D printing and bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13:2400463. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400463. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chang TJ., Kjeldsen RB., Christfort JF., et al. 3D-printed radiopaque microdevices with enhanced mucoadhesive geometry for oral drug delivery. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12:2201897. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201897. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202201897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abolhassani S., Fattahi R., Safshekan F., Saremi J., Hasanzadeh E. Advances in 4D bioprinting:The next frontier in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14:2403065. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202403065. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202403065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee D., Yoon SN. Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry:Opportunities and challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lupton M. Some ethical and legal consequences of the application of artificial intelligence in the field of medicine. Trends Med. 2018;18(4):1000147. doi: 10.15761/tim.1000147. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dedeloudi A., Weaver E., Lamprou DA. Machine learning in additive manufacturing and microfluidics for smarter and safer drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 2023;636:122818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang J., Zhang Y., Aghda NH., et al. Emerging 3D printing technologies for drug delivery devices:Current status and future perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;174:294–316. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.019. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Phung TH., Kwon KS. Improved continuous inkjet for selective area coating using high-viscosity insulating inks. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;24(8):2101527. doi: 10.1002/adem.202100527. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim S., Cho M., Jung S. The design of an inkjet drive waveform using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4841. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08784-y. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08784-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shin J., Kang M., Hyun K., et al. Machine Learning Driven Optimization for High Precision Cellular Droplet Bioprinting. [bioRxiv Preprint] 2024 doi: 10.1002/advs.202412831. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.04.611131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Muñiz Castro B., Elbadawi M., Ong JJ., et al. Machine learning predicts 3D printing performance of over 900 drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2021;337:530–545. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.046. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Elsen R., Nayak S., Logeshwaran A. Artificial intelligence-based 3D printing strategies for bone scaffold fabrication and its application in preclinical and clinical investigations. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2024;10(2):677–696. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01368. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kumar R., Singh V., Gupta P. Revolutionizing Pharmaceutical Manufacturing:Advances and Challenges of 3D Printing System and Control. [arXiv Preprint] 2024 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.11712. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rezvani Ghomi E., Nourbakhsh N., Akbari Kenari M., Zare M., Ramakrishna S. Collagen-based biomaterials for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021;109(12):1986–1999. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34881. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jandyal A., Chaturvedi I., Wazir I., Raina A., Ul Haq MI. 3D printing - a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustain Oper Comput. 2022;3:33–42. doi: 10.34162/soc.v3i0.245. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sing SL., Tey CF., Tan JHK., Huang S., Yeong WY. Additive manufacturing in biomaterials. In: Narayan R., editor. Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd; 2020. Ch. 2. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817244-4.00002-0. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nouri A., Shirvan AR., Li Y., et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic and polymeric load-bearing biomaterials using laser powder bed fusion:A review. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;94:196–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.021. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Borges J., Zeng J., Liu XQ., et al. Recent developments in layer-by-layer assembly for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13:e2302713. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202302713. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202302713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shuai Y., Zheng M., Kundu SC., Mao C., Yang M. Bioengineered silk protein-based 3D in vitro models for tissue engineering and drug development:From silk matrix properties to biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13:e2401458. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401458. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhu T., Hu Y., Cui H., Cui H. 3D multispheroid assembly strategies towards tissue engineering and disease modeling. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13:e2400957. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400957. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202400957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ravichandran D., Kakarla M., Xu W., et al. 3D-printed in-line and out-of-plane layers with stimuli-responsive intelligence. Compos Part B Eng. 2022;247:110352. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110352. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ertugrul I., Ulkir O., Ersoy S., Ragulskis M. Additive manufactured strain sensor using stereolithography method with photopolymer material. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15(4):991. doi: 10.3390/polym15040991. doi: 10.3390/polym15040991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li J., Wu S., Li Y., Chen X., Yan S., Zhang XY. SLA printed dual-band conical-beam filtering antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2023;22(10):2462–2466. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2023.3299553. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kelava L., Ivić I., Pakai E., et al. Stereolithography 3D printing of a heat exchanger for advanced temperature control in wire myography. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14(3):471. doi: 10.3390/polym14030471. doi: 10.3390/polym14030471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ullah M., Wahab A., Khan SU., et al. 3D printing technology:A new approach for the fabrication of personalized and customized pharmaceuticals. Eur Polym J. 2023;195:112240. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112240. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wang S., Chen X., Han X., et al. A review of 3D printing technology in pharmaceutics:Technology and applications, now and future. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):416. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020416. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nizam M., Purohit R., Taufik M. Materials for 3D printing in healthcare sector:A review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2024;238(5):1–18. doi: 10.1177/09544119241289731. doi: 10.1177/09544119241289731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gao H., An J., Chua CK., Bourell D., Kuo CN., Tan DT. 3D printed optics and photonics:Processes, materials and applications. Mater Today. 2023;69:107–132. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2023.04.010. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kirihara S. Stereolithographic additive manufacturing of acoustic devices with spatially modulated cavities. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2022;19(2):949–956. doi: 10.1111/ijac.13820. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhao Z., Tian X., Song X. Engineering materials with light:Recent progress in digital light processing based 3D printing. J Mater Chem C. 2020;8(40):13896–13917. doi: 10.1039/D0TC03198G. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hornbeck LJ. In:Projection Displays V. Vol. 3634. Bellingham: SPIE; 1999. Digital light processing update:Status and future applications; pp. 158–170. doi: 10.1117/12.338535. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Maurel A., Martinez AC., Grugeon S., et al. Toward high resolution 3D printing of shape-conformable batteries via vat photopolymerization:Review and perspective. IEEE Access. 2021;9:140654–40666. doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3118829. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Park D., Lee S., Kim J. Thermoelectric and mechanical properties of PEDOT:PSS-coated Ag2Se nanowire composite fabricated via digital light processing based 3D printing. Compos Commun. 2022;30:101084. doi: 10.1016/j.coco.2022.101084. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang M., Lin R., Wang X., et al. 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration. Sci Adv. 2020;6(12):eaaz6725. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang Y., Alizadeh N., Barde M., et al. Poly(acrylic acid)-based hydrogel actuators fabricated via digital light projection additive manufacturing. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2022;4(2):971–979. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.1c01607. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kim MH., Lin CC. Poly(ethylene glycol)-norbornene as a photoclick bioink for digital light processing 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(2):2737–2746. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c20098. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c18157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Shi H., Li Y., Xu K., Yin J. Advantages of photo-curable collagen-based cell-laden bioinks compared to methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) in digital light processing (DLP) and extrusion bioprinting. Mater Today Bio. 2023;23:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100799. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hong H., Seo YB., Lee JS., et al. Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;232:119679. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sherman SL., Kadioglu O., Currier GF., Kierl JP., Li J. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(3):422–428. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.012. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Carluccio D., Demir AG., Bermingham MJ., et al. Challenges and opportunities in the selective laser melting of biodegradable metals for load-bearing bone scaffold applications. Metall Mater Trans A. 2020;51:3311–3334. doi: 10.1007/s11661-020-05672-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Song S., Li Y., Wang Q., et al. Boosting piezoelectric performance with a new selective laser sintering 3D printable PVDF/graphene nanocomposite. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2021;147:106452. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106452. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bernatoniene J., Stabrauskiene J., Kazlauskaite JA., Bernatonyte U., Kopustinskiene DM. The future of medicine:How 3D printing is transforming pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(3):390. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17030390. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17030390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wu Y., Sun K., Yu S., Zuo L. Modeling the selective laser melting-based additive manufacturing of thermoelectric powders. Addit Manuf. 2021;37:101666. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101666. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Elbadawi M., Castro BM., Gavins FK., et al. M3DISEEN:A novel machine learning approach for predicting the 3D printability of medicines. Int J Pharm. 2020;590:119837. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119837. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dermeik B., Travitzky N. Laminated object manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater. 2020;22(9):2000256. doi: 10.1002/adem.202000256. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Manmadhachary A., Reddy HM. Manufacturing of customized implants for orbital fractures using 3D printing. Bioprinting. 2021;21:e00118. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00118. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhu Y., Kwok T., Haug JC., et al. 3D printable hydrogel with tunable degradability and mechanical properties as a tissue scaffold for pelvic organ prolapse treatment. Adv Mater Technol. 2023;8(10):2201421. doi: 10.1002/admt.202201421. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ansari V., Calore A., Zonderland J., et al. Additive manufacturing of a-amino acid based poly(ester amide)s for biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules. 2022;23(3):1083–100. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01417. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kamble GN., Joshi DC., Asha SK., et al. Design and synthesis of photocrosslinker and light blocker based on l-amino acid polyester and their application in solvent-free resin formulation for DLP/SLA 3D printing. Polymer. 2023;270:125781. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.125781. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Taleb K., Saidi-Besbes S., Pillin I., Grohens Y. Biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) nanocomposites based on dimeric surfactant organomodified clays with enhanced water vapor barrier and mechanical properties. ACS Omega. 2022;7(47):43254–43264. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05964. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Righetti MC., Di Lorenzo ML., Cinelli P., Gazzano M. Temperature dependence of the rigid amorphous fraction of poly(butylene succinate) RSC Adv. 2021;11(41):25731–25737. doi: 10.1039/d1ra03775g. doi: 10.1039/D1RA04117K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Arif ZU., Khalid MY., Noroozi R., Sadeghianmaryan A., Jalalvand M., Hossain M. Recent advances in 3D-printed polylactide and polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;218:930–968. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Yang X., Wang Y., Zhou Y., Chen J., Wan Q. The application of polycaprolactone in three-dimensional printing scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13(16):2754. doi: 10.3390/polym13162754. doi: 10.3390/polym13162754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Fleck E., Sunshine A., DeNatale E., Keck C., McCann A., Potkay J. Advancing 3D-printed microfluidics:Characterization of a gas-permeable, high-resolution PDMS resin for stereolithography. Micromachines (Basel) 2021;12(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/mi12101266. doi: 10.3390/mi12101266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wang J., Sun S., Li X., Fei G., Wang Z., Xia H. Selective laser sintering of polydimethylsiloxane composites. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023;10(4):684–696. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2021.0105. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ariati R., Sales F., Souza A., Lima RA., Ribeiro J. Polydimethylsiloxane composites characterization and its applications:A review. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13(23):4258. doi: 10.3390/polym13234258. doi: 10.3390/polym13234258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Paberit R., Rilby E., Gohl J., et al. Cycling stability of poly(ethylene glycol) of six molecular weights:Influence of thermal conditions for energy applications. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2020;3(11):10578–10589. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01534. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bistac S., Brogly M., Bindel D., et al. Crystallinity of amphiphilic PE-b-PEG copolymers. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14(17):3639. doi: 10.3390/polym14173639. doi: 10.3390/polym14173639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Altay E., Jang YJ., Kua XQ., et al. Synthesis, microstructure, and properties of high-molar-mass polyglycolide copolymers with isolated methyl defects. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22(6):2532–2543. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00269. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Chumachenko D., Yakovlev S., et al. Artificial intelligence algorithms for healthcare. Algorithms. 2024;17(3):105. doi: 10.3390/a17030105. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mohammed SH., Ahamad S., Hameed MA., et al. Enhancements in Random Forest Algorithms for Improving Healthcare Applications. 2024 [Preprint] doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2411.00000. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Little C., Elliot M., Allmendinger R., et al. Generative Adversarial Networks for Synthetic Data Generation:A Comparative Study. [arXiv Preprint] 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Deeba K., Vathana D., Vanusha D., Ramaprabha J. In:Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Cancer Care. United States: CRC Press; 2025. Applications of generative adversarial networks (GANs) in healthcare; pp. 177–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Takayama K., Fujikawa M., Obata Y., Morishita M. Neural network based optimization of drug formulations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(9):1217–1231. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(03)00120-0. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(03)00117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Mondal S., Maity R., Nag A. An efficient artificial neural network-based optimization techniques for the early prediction of coronary heart disease:Comprehensive analysis. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):4827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85765-x. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09032-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Serrano DR., Terres MC., Lalatsa A., et al. Applications of 3D printing in cancer. J 3D Print Med. 2018;2(3):115–127. doi: 10.2217/3dp-2018-0008. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Xu J., Zheng S., Hu X., et al. Advances in the research of bioinks based on natural collagen, polysaccharide and their derivatives for skin 3D bioprinting. Polymers (Basel) 2020;12(6):1237. doi: 10.3390/polym12061237. doi: 10.3390/polym12061237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Fang W., Ping H., Li X., et al. Oriented strontium carbonate nanocrystals within collagen films for flexible piezoelectric sensors. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(45):2105806. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202105806. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wang X., Yue O., Liu X., et al. Anovel bio-inspired multi-functional collagen aggregate based flexible sensor with multi-layer and internal 3D network structure. Chem Eng J. 2020;392:123672. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.123672. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Bellis SL. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2011;32(18):4205–4210. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ghorani B., Emadzadeh B., Rezaeinia H., Russell SJ. Improvements in gelatin cold water solubility after electrospinning and associated physicochemical, functional and rheological properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2020;104:105740. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105740. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Chen RJ., Wang JJ., Williamson DF., et al. Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;7(6):719–742. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01031-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mullowney MW., Duncan KR., Elsayed SS., et al. Artificial intelligence for natural product drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22(11):895–916. doi: 10.1038/s41573-023-00774-7. doi: 10.1038/s41573-023-00774-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Greenberg ZF., Graim KS., He M. Towards artificial intelligence-enabled extracellular vesicle precision drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;199:114974. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114974. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Abdalla Y., Elbadawi M., Ji M., et al. Machine learning using multi-modal data predicts the production of selective laser sintered 3D printed drug products. Int J Pharm. 2023;633:122628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Che L., Li J., Song D. Advances in bone defect repair using bio-3D printing technology:Innovations and challenges in mechanically assisted post-bioprinting strategies. BMT. :00012. doi: 10.12336/bmt.25.00012. doi: 10.12336/bmt.25.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang C., Cheng Y., Ma Y., Ji Y., Huang D., Qian H. Prediction of enhanced drug solubility related to clathrate compositions and operating conditions:Machine learning study. Int J Pharm. 2023;646:123458. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123458. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wang F., Sangfuang N., McCoubrey LE., et al. Advancing oral delivery of biologics:Machine learning predicts peptide stability in the gastrointestinal tract. Int J Pharm. 2023;634:122643. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122643. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zeng X., Wang F., Luo Y., et al. Deep generative molecular design reshapes drug discovery. Cell Rep Med. 2022;3(12):100794. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100794. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ragoza M., Masuda T., Koes DR. Generating 3D molecules conditional on receptor binding sites with deep generative models. Chem Sci. 2022;13(9):2701–2713. doi: 10.1039/d1sc05976a. doi: 10.1039/D1SC06722B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ayyoubi S., Van Kampen EE., Kocabas LI. 3D printed, personalized sustained release cortisol for patients with adrenal insufficiency. Int J Pharm. 2023;630:122466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.DeCamp M., Lindvall C. Mitigating bias in AI at the point of care. Science. 2023;381(6654):150–152. doi: 10.1126/science.adh2713. doi: 10.1126/science.adg1802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wang F., Elbadawi M., Tsilova SL., Gaisford S., Basit AW., Parhizkar M. Machine learning predicts electrospray particle size. Mater Des. 2022;219:110735. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110735. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Mohammadnabi S., Moslemy N., Taghvaei H., Zia AW., Askarinejad S., Shalchy F. Role of artificial intelligence in data-centric additive manufacturing processes for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2025;166:106949. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106949. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Liang Z., Liao X., Zong H., et al. Pioneering the future of dentistry:AI-Driven 3D bioprinting for next-generation clinical applications. Transl Dent Res. 2024;1:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.tdsc.2024.100005. [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Aghajanpour S., Amiriara H., Esfandyari-Manesh M., et al. Utilizing machine learning for predicting drug release from polymeric drug delivery systems. Comput Biol Med. 2025;188:109756. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109756. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bennett-Lenane H., Griffin BT., O'Shea JP., et al. Machine learning methods for prediction of food effects on bioavailability:A comparison of support vector machines and artificial neural networks. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2022;168:106018. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106018. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Jang HY., Song J., Kim JH., et al. Machine learning-based quantitative prediction of drug exposure in drug-drug interactions using drug label information. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00639-0. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00636-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Myszczynska MA., Ojamies PN., Lacoste AM., et al. Applications of machine learning to diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(8):440–456. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0377-8. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Ahsan MM., Luna SA., Siddique Z. Machine-learning-based disease diagnosis:A comprehensive review. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10(3):541. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030541. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.McKinney SM., Sieniek M., Godbole V., et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020;577(7788):89–94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Kim HE., Kim HH., Han BK., et al. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using Artificial Intelligence:A retrospective, multireader study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(3):e138–e148. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30003-0. doi: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Han SS., Park I., Eun Chang S., et al. Augmented intelligence dermatology:Deep neural networks empower medical professionals in diagnosing skin cancer and predicting treatment options for 134 skin disorders. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(9):1753–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.01.019. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Haenssle HA., Fink C., Schneiderbauer R., et al. Man against machine:Diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(8):1836–1842. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy166. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Li S., Zhao R., Zou H., et al. Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021;135(3):253–260. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001816. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Alfaras M., Soriano MC., Ortín S. A fast machine learning model for ECG-based heartbeat classification and arrhythmia detection. Front Phys. 2019;7:103. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00103. [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Raghunath S., Pfeifer JM., Ulloa-Cerna AE., et al. Deep neural networks can predict new-onset atrial fibrillation from the 12-lead ECG and help identify those at risk of atrial fibrillation-related stroke. Circulation. 2021;143(13):1287–1298. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047829. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.047829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Becker J., Decker JA., Römmele C., et al. Artificial intelligence-based detection of pneumonia in chest radiographs. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12(6):1465. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061465. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Mijwil MM., Aggarwal K. Diagnostic testing for people with appendicitis using machine learning techniques. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022;81(5):7011–7023. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-11939-8. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-11939-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Undru TR., Uday U., Lakshmi JT., et al. Integrating artificial intelligence for clinical and laboratory diagnosis - a review. Maedica (Bucur) 2022;17(2):420–426. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.420. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Peiffer-Smadja N., Dellière S., Rodriguez C., et al. Machine learning in the clinical microbiology laboratory:Has the time come for routine practice? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(10):1300–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.006. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Smith KP., Kang AD., Kirby JE. Automated interpretation of blood culture Gram stains by use of a deep convolutional neural network. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(3):e01521–e01517. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01521-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01521-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Weis CV., Jutzeler CR., Borgwardt K. Machine learning for microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing on MALDI-TOF mass spectra:A systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(10):1310–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.014. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Go T., Kim JH., Byeon H., Lee SJ. Machine learning-based in-line holographic sensing of unstained malaria-infected red blood cells. J Biophotonics. 2018;11(9):e201800101. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201800101. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201800101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Smith KP., Kirby JE. Image analysis and artificial intelligence in infectious disease diagnostics. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(10):1318–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.012. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Vandenberg O., Durand G., Hallin M., et al. Consolidation of clinical microbiology laboratories and introduction of transformative technologies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33(2) doi: 10.1128/CMR.00057-19. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00057-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Panch T., Szolovits P., Atun R. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health systems. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2):020303. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020303. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Berlyand Y., Raja AS., Dorner SC., et al. How artificial intelligence could transform emergency department operations. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(8):1515–1517. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.017. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Matheny ME., Whicher D., Thadaney Israni S. Artificial intelligence in health care:A report from the National academy of medicine. JAMA. 2020;323(6):509–510. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21579. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Jiang F., Jiang Y., Zhi H., et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare:Past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230–243. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hautz WE., Kämmer JE., Hautz SC., et al. Diagnostic error increases mortality and length of hospital stay in patients presenting through the emergency room. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0629-z. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0629-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Haug CJ., Drazen JM. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical medicine, 2023. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1201–1208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2302038. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2302038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Abubaker Bagabir S., Ibrahim NK., Abubaker Bagabir H., et al. Covid-19 and artificial intelligence:Genome sequencing, drug development and vaccine discovery. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(2):289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.011. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Censi R., Di Martino P., Pellitteri S., Anselmi C. Artificial intelligence algorithms for pharmaceutical formulation design:Predictive modelling of drug solubility and dissolution using random forests and neural networks. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(5):987. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14050987. [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Gupta S., Sharma R., Jain A. Generative adversarial networks and ensemble learning for drug formulation process optimization:A case study on hot-melt extrusion. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023;82:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104430. [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Sundarkumar V., Nagy ZK., Reklaitis GV. Developing a machine learning enabled integrated formulation and process design framework for a pharmaceutical dropwise additive manufacturing printer. AIChE J. 2022;69(4):e17990. doi: 10.1002/aic.17990. doi: 10.1002/aic.17990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Obeid M., Almetwally EA., Khalil I., Shi W., Qian H. AI-driven design of customized 3D-printed multi-layer capsules with controlled drug release profiles for personalized medicine. Int J Pharm. 2024;620:123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Aghbashlo M., Mobli H., Rafiee S., Madadlou A. Use of artificial neural network to predict exergetic performance of spray drying process:Preliminary study. Comput Electron Agric. 2021;88:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106123. [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Jang TS., Jung HD., Pan HM., et al. 3D printing of hydrogel composite systems:Recent advances in technology for tissue engineering. Int J Bioprint. 2018;4(1):126. doi: 10.18063/IJB.v4i1.126. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v4i1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Du Y., Liu H., Yang Q., et al. Selective laser sintering scaffold with hierarchical architecture and gradient composition for osteochondral repair in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2017;137:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.021. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Bogue R. 3D printing:The dawn of a new era in manufacturing? Assembly Autom. 2013;33(4):307–311. doi: 10.1108/AA-09-2013-086. [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ma Y., Xie L., Yang B., et al. Three-dimensional printing biotechnology for the regeneration of the tooth and tooth-supporting tissues. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116(2):452–468. doi: 10.1002/bit.26882. doi: 10.1002/bit.26837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Sigaux N., Pourchet L., Breton P., et al. 3D bioprinting:Principles, fantasies and prospects. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;120(2):128–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.12.014. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Malyala SK., Ravi Kumar Y., Rao CSP. Organ printing with life cells:A review. Mater Today Proc. 2017;4(2):1074–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.042. [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Macko M., Szczepanski Z., Mikołajewski D., et al. Design and manufacture of artificial organs made of polymers. MATEC Web Conf. 2019;254:06006. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201925406006. [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Sharma S., Goel SA. 3D printing and its future in medical world. J Med Res Innov. 2019;3(1):e000141. doi: 10.15419/jmri.141. [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Kalyan BG., Mehrotra S., Marques SM., Kumar L., Verma R. 3D printing in personalized medicines:A focus on applications of the technology. Mater Today Commun. 2023;35:105875. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105875. [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Economidou SN., Douroumis D. 3D printing as a transformative tool for microneedle systems:Recent advances, manufacturing considerations and market potential. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;173:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.03.007. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Prendergast ME., Burdick JA. Recent advances in enabling technologies in 3D printing for precision medicine. Adv Mater. 2020;32(13):1902516. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902516. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yu Q., Wang Q., Zhang L., et al. The applications of 3D printing in wound healing:The external delivery of stem cells and antibiosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;197:114823. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114823. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Cheung DY., Duan B., Butcher JT. Current progress in tissue engineering of heart valves:multiscale problems, multiscale solutions. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15(8):1155–1172. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1051527. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1051527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Pudjihartono N., Fadason T., Kempa-Liehr AW., O'Sullivan JM. A review of feature selection methods for machine learning-based disease risk prediction. Front Bioinform. 2022;2:927312. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.927312. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.927312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Widen E., Raben TG., Lello L., Hsu SD. Machine learning prediction of biomarkers from SNPs and of disease risk from biomarkers in the UK Biobank. Genes (Basel) 2021;12(7):991. doi: 10.3390/genes12070991. doi: 10.3390/genes12070991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Wang H., Avillach P. Diagnostic classification and prognostic prediction using common genetic variants in autism spectrum disorder:Genotype-based deep learning. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9(4):e24754. doi: 10.2196/24754. doi: 10.2196/24754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 176.Sorlie T., Perou CM., Tibshirani R., et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–10874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Yersal O., Barutca S. Biological subtypes of breast cancer:Prognostic and therapeutic implications. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(3):412–424. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Leek JT., Scharpf RB., Bravo HC., et al. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:733–739. doi: 10.1038/nrg2825. doi: 10.1038/nrg2825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Blanco-González A., Cabezón A., Seco-González A., Conde-Torres D., Antelo-Riveiro P., Pineiro A. The role of AI in drug discovery:Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(6):891. doi: 10.3390/ph16060891. doi: 10.3390/ph16060891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Tran TTV., Surya Wibowo A., Tayara H., Chong KT. Artificial intelligence in drug toxicity prediction:Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives. J Chem Inf Model. 2023;63(9):2628–2643. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00200. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Tran TTV., Tayara H., Chong KT., et al. Artificial intelligence in drug metabolism and excretion prediction:Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(4):1260. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041260. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Guedj M., Swindle J., Hamon A., et al. Industrializing AI-powered drug discovery:Lessons learned from the patrimony computing platform. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2022;17(8):815–824. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2022.2095368. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2022.2095368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Ahmed F., Kang IS., Kim KH., et al. Drug repurposing for viral cancers:A paradigm of machine learning, deep learning, and virtual screening-based approaches. J Med Virol. 2023;95(4):e28693. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28693. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Singh DP., Kaushik B. A systematic literature review for the prediction of anticancer drug response using various machine-learning and deep learning techniques. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2023;101(1):175–194. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.14164. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.14164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Quazi S. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine. Med Oncol. 2022;39(2):120. doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01711-1. doi: 10.1007/s12032-022-01711-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 186.Subramanian M., Wojtusciszyn A., Favre L., et al. Precision medicine in the era of artificial intelligence:Implications in chronic disease management. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02658-5. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02658-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Johnson KB., Wei WQ., Weeraratne D., et al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(1):86–93. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Pulley JM., Denny JC., Peterson JF., et al. Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine:The design of the vanderbilt PREDICT project. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92(1):87–95. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.371. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Huang C., Clayton EA., Matyunina LV., et al. Machine learning predicts individual cancer patient responses to therapeutic drugs with high accuracy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34753-5. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34753-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Sheu YH., Magdamo C., Miller M., Das S., Blacker D., Smoller JW. AI-assisted prediction of differential response to antidepressant classes using electronic health records. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6:73. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00817-8. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00817-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Martin GL., Jouganous J., Savidan R., et al. Validation of artificial intelligence to support the automatic coding of patient adverse drug reaction reports, using nationwide pharmacovigilance data. Drug Saf. 2022;45(5):535–548. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01153-8. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01153-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Lee H., Kim HJ., Chang HW., Kim DJ., Mo J., Kim JE. Development of a system to support warfarin dose decisions using deep neural networks. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94305-2. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94305-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Blasiak A., Truong A., Jeit W., et al. PRECISE CURATE. AI:A prospective feasibility trial to dynamically modulate personalized chemotherapy dose with artificial intelligence. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16 Suppl):1574–1574. doi: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.1574. [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Sjövall F., Lanckohr C., Bracht H. What's new in therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials? Intensive Care Med. 2023;49:587–589. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07060-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07060-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Partin A., Brettin TS., Zhu Y., et al. Deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer:Predominant and emerging trends. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1086097. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1086097. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1086097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Zhang H., Chen Y., Li F., et al. Predicting anticancer drug response with deep learning constrained by signaling pathways. Front Bioinform. 2021;1:639349. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2021.639349. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2021.639349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Han K., Cao P., Wang Y., et al. A review of approaches for predicting drug-drug interactions based on machine learning. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:814858. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.814858. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.814858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Liu JYH., Rudd JA. Predicting drug adverse effects using a new gastro-intestinal pacemaker activity drug database (GIPADD) Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33655-5. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33655-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Nelson KM., Chang ET., Zulman DM., Rubenstein LV., Kirkland FD., Fihn SD. Using predictive analytics to guide patient care and research in a national health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(8):1379–1380. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04961-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04961-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Amarasingham R., Patzer RE., Huesch M., Nguyen NQ., Xie B. Implementing electronic health care predictive analytics:Considerations and challenges. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(7):1148–1154. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0352. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Alotaibi S., Mehmood R., Katib I., Rana O., Albeshri A. A big data analytics tool for healthcare symptoms and diseases detection using Twitter, Apache Spark, and machine learning. Appl Sci. 2020;10:1398. doi: 10.3390/app10041398. [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Crossnohere NL., Elsaid M., Paskett J., Bose-Brill S., Bridges JFP. Guidelines for artificial intelligence in medicine:Literature review and content analysis of frameworks. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(8):e36823. doi: 10.2196/36823. doi: 10.2196/36823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Rivera SC., Liu X., Chan A., Denniston AK., Calvert MJ., SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence:The SPIRIT-AI extension. BMJ. 2020;370:m3210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Vollmer S., Mateen BA., Bohner G., et al. Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for patient benefit:20 critical questions on transparency, replicability, ethics, and effectiveness. BMJ. 2020;368:l6927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Collins GS., Dhiman P., Andaur Navarro CL., et al. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Radanliev P., De Roure D. Disease X vaccine production and supply chains:Risk assessing healthcare systems operating with artificial intelligence and industry 4.0. Health Technol (Berl) 2023;13(1):11–15. doi: 10.1007/s12553-022-00722-2. doi: 10.1007/s12553-022-00722-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Li LR., Du B., Liu HQ., Chen C. Artificial intelligence for personalized medicine in thyroid cancer:Current status and future perspectives. Front Oncol. 2021;10:604051. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604051. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Davoudi A., Malhotra KR., Shickel B., et al. The Intelligent ICU Pilot Study:Using Artificial Intelligence Technology for Autonomous Patient Monitoring. New York: Cornell University; 2018. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1804.10201. [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Curtis RG., Bartel B., Ferguson T., et al. Improving user experience of virtual health assistants:Scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e31737. doi: 10.2196/31737. doi: 10.2196/31737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Kim JW., Jones KL., D'Angelo E. How to prepare prospective psychiatrists in the era of artificial intelligence. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(3):337–339. doi: 10.1007/s40596-019-01025-x. doi: 10.1007/s40596-019-01025-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Graham S., Depp C., Lee EE., et al. Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses:An overview. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(11):116. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1094-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Luxton DD. Artificial intelligence in psychological practice:Current and future applications and implications. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2014;45(5):332–339. doi: 10.1037/a0034559. [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Lee EE., Torous J., De Choudhury M., et al. Artificial intelligence for mental health care:Clinical applications, barriers, facilitators, and artificial wisdom. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021;6(9):856–864. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.001. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biomaterials Translational are provided here courtesy of Chinese Medical Multimedia Press

RESOURCES