Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 29;27(3):731–755. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01855-7

Table 2.

Study characteristics: face-to-face counseling

Author, year, country Study design Type of analysis Perspective Study population, sample size, age, sampling method Intervention and control Follow-up duration
Face-to-face counseling

Bauld, 2011

UK

Observational study, simulation study (Markov) CEA, CUA Healthcare

Smokers, NHS SCS participants in Glasgow, having set a quit date

n = 1,785; follow-up: 22%

Markov: 3.000 (Cohort, 1,000 each)

I1: 7-weeks group therapy + pharmacotherapy

I2: 12-weeks individual counseling by pharmacist + pharmacotherapy vs. unaided smoking cessation

12 months (cycle)

Feldman, 2019

Sweden

RCT, simulation study (Markov) CEA, CUA Society

Smokers between 19–71 years, sufficient language skills

n = 300, follow-up 84% (1 year), 80% (5–8 years), average age: 49

Recruitment in dental clinic or general practice

High-intensive therapy (counseling in dental clinic) vs. low-intensive therapy (self-help materials) 12 months 5–8 years

Gòmez-Martinez, 2024

Spain

Non-randomized controlled study CEA, CUA Healthcare and society

Smokers 18 years or older, average age: 49

Pharmacists assigned to the intervention when having received CAESAR-Training, recruitment by pharmacists

n = 1078 (I: 278, K: 800)

Follow-up: I: 54,32%, K: 60,88%

Behavioral therapy + pharmacotherapy by pharmacists with CESAR training vs. usual care 12 months

Nohlert, 2013

Sweden

RCT, simulation study (Markov) CEA, CUA Healthcare and society

Adult smokers,

Average age: 49

n = 300, follow-up: 86%

High-intensive therapy (counseling in dental clinic) vs. low-intensive therapy (self-help materials)

No intervention

12 months (cycle)

Olsen, 2006

Netherlands

Simulation study (Markov) CEA Healthcare

Adult smokers,

average age: 48.6

n = 10,000 (cohort)

SCS offered by hospitals, pharmacies, and other organizations, incl. group- and individual counseling, NRT vs. no intervention 12 months (cycle)

Salize, 2009

Germany

Cluster RCT CEA Healthcare

General practice patients between 36–75 years, daily smokers + GP visit for health examination = 577

Recruitment through participating GPs

I1: GP training + GP remuneration for each abstinent patient

I2: GP Training + free NRT and/or Bupr

I3: Combination I1 + I2 vs. usual care

12 months

Virtanen, 2017

Sweden

Cluster RCT, simulation study (Microsimulation + Markov) CUA Healthcare and society

Smokers between 20–75 years

n = 205 (I: 99, C: 106)

Dental clinics assigned to intervention or control

Minimal counseling in dental clinic vs. usual care 6 months
Digital counseling

Feenstra, 2005

Netherlands

Simulation study (Microsimulation) CEA, CUA

Society

(only direct healthcare costs)

Smokers

n = 1,000 (cohort)

I1: Telephone counseling

I2: Minimal counseling

I3: Minimal counseling + NRT

I4: Intensive counseling + NRT

I5: Intensive counseling + Bupr vs. usual care

12 months (cycle)

Rasmussen, 2013

Denmark

Observational study, simulation study (Microsimulation) CEA Healthcare

Quitline callers, smokers

n = 386, follow-up: 76.9%

First 100 callers per quarter

Telephone counseling vs. other SCS 12 months (cycle)

Smit, 2013

Netherlands

RCT CEA, CUA Healthcare

Smokers, 18 years or older, motivated to quit, sufficient language skills, internet access,

average age: 48 years

n = 414 (I1: 163, I2: 132, K: 119),

follow-up: 55,8%

Recruitment by Practice Nurse

I1: Web-based and personalized program + one counseling session with Practice Nurse

I2: Web-based and personalized program vs. usual care

12 months

Stanczyk, 2014

Netherlands

RCT CEA, CUA Society

Daily smokers, 18 years or older, motivated to quit, sufficient language skills, internet access,

average age: 45.7 years

n = 2,099 (I1: 670, I2: 708, K: 721)

follow-up: (I1: 54%, I2: 60%,

C: 58.5%)

Enrollment via the study website

I1: Video-based and personalized program

I2: Text-based and personalized program vs. general advise

12 months

Tomson, 2004

Sweden

Observational study CEA Healthcare

Smokers, Quitline callers

n = 1.131

Telephone counseling via Quitline 12 months

Trapero-Bertran, 2018

Spain

Simulation study (Markov) CUA, CBA Society

Smokers, 16 years or older

n = 3.1 Mio (Cohort)

Total estimated adult smokers, motivated to quit within the next 12 months

I1: Usual care: minimal physician counseling + self-help materials

I2: Proactive telephone counseling

I3: NRT; I4: Var; I5: Bupr vs. unaided smoking cessation

12 months (cycle)

Wu, 2014

UK

RCT, Simulation study (Markov) CUA Healthcare

Smokers between 18–65 years

n = 6,911, follow-up: 77%

Invitation to a random sample of GP patients

Computer-based intervention (ESCAPE) vs. general information 6 months
Reimbursement

Cadier, 2016

France

Simulation study (Markov) CEA Healthcare

Smokers between 15–75 years

n = 1,000 (Cohort)

Reimbursement of medication vs. usual care (€50 reimbursement) 12 months (cycle)

Chevreul, 2014

France

Simulation study (Markov) CEA Healthcare Smokers between 15–75 years Reimbursement of medication and 6 individual counseling sessions vs. usual care (€50 reimbursement) 12 months (cycle)

Gebreslassie, 2023

Sweden

Simulation study (Markov) CUA Healthcare and society Smokers, 16 years or older Reimbursement of NRT for 3 months vs. usual care 5 years (cycle)

Kaper, 2006

Netherlands

RCT CEA, CUA Society

Smokers, 18 years or older, average age: 40

n = 1,266 (I: 634, C: 632),

follow-up: I: 81.5%, C: 73.1%

Random sample

Reimbursement (NRT, Burp, counseling) for 6 months vs. usual care: no reimbursement 12 months

Vemer, 2010

Netherlands

Simulation study (Microsimulation) CEA, CUA Healthcare

Smokers, 16 years or older

n = 3.8 Mio. (cohort)

Estimated smokers in the Netherlands

Reimbursement (NRT, Burp, counseling) for 6 months vs. usual care: no reimbursement 12 months (cycle)
Awareness building

Gilbert, 2017

Wu, 2018

UK

RCT, simulation study (Markov) CUA Healthcare

Smokers 16 years or older, willing to quit, have not attended NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSS) within the last 12 months,

average age: 49.3

n = 4,383 (I: 2,635, C: 1,748), follow-up: 76.9%

Invitations to participate sent to GP patients

NHS SSS Start to quit (personalized letter by GP + invitation to join a “come and try” meeting) ->proactive recruitment vs. standard letter by GP to inform about local SSS 6 months

Kotz, 2011

UK

Observational study, simulation study (Microsimulation) CEA Healthcare

Smoking Toolkit Study (STS) participants; daily or occasional smokers

n = 3,981 (I: 1,309, C: 2,672)

Cluster sampling

No Smoking Day: annual nationwide marketing campaign vs. usual care 12 months (cycle)

Nèmeth, 2018

Hungary

Simulation study (Markov) CEA, CUA, CBA Society Smokers, 18 years or older

I1: Nationwide marketing campaign

I2: Double group therapy and proactive telephone counseling

I3: Combination I1 + I2 vs. usual care

12 months (cycle)

C control group, CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis, CEA Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, CESAR Cost-effectiveness of a Tobacco Cessation Care Service in the Community Pharmacy, CUA Cost-Utility Analysis, GP General practitioner, I Intervention Group, SSS NHS Stop Smoking Services, SCS Smoking Cessation support, STS Smoking Toolkit Study, UK United Kingdom