Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 28;15(4):246. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-aw-2385

Table 2. Comparative performance of optimal machine learning predictors and Cox benchmark for all-cause mortality.

Index C-index (95% CI) Optimal model Cox regression benchmark
P value HR 95% CI
TyG 0.771 (0.741–0.801) GBSA 0.234 0.926 0.816–1.051
TyG-BMI 0.753 (0.721–0.787) CoxPH 0.005 0.998 0.997–0.999
TyG-WHtR 0.739 (0.703–0.777) RSF 0.150 0.937 0.857–1.024
TyG-WC 0.725 (0.688–0.761) SurvivalSVM 0.082 1.000 0.999–1.000

CI, confidence interval; CoxPH, Cox proportional hazards; GBSA, gradient boosting survival analysis; HR, hazard ratio; RSF, random survival forest; survivalSVM, support vector machine for survival analysis; TyG, triglyceride-glucose; TyG-BMI, triglyceride-glucose-body mass index; TyG-WC, triglyceride-glucose-waist circumference; TyG-WHtR, triglyceride-glucose-waist-to-height ratio.