Table 3.

Comparison of mechanical and thermal performance of cementitious composites

Study	Material/treatment	Natural fiber	MOR (MPa)	MOE (GPa)	Toughness (kJ m—2)	Thermal conductivity (W/m·K)
This work	STMC—carbonated and mineralized	Erythrina poeppigiana	8.26	3.0	5.6	0.16
This work	STM—mineralized	Erythrina poeppigiana	7.51	3.3	5.5	0.2
Borges et al. (2024)	PKP11%AS—mineralized	Pinus Kraft pulp	8.1	2.2	2.2	NR
Gbekou et al. (2023)	M5—natural fibers	Miscanthus fibers	2.31	NR	NR	0.6
Batista et al. (2024)	SM0—mineralized	Hevea brasiliensis	8.7	3.8	0.8	0.1
Arvizu-Montes et al. (2025)	AFM—alfa fibers	Natural fibers	5.5	NR	NR	NR
Shah et al. (2022)	SC3—fiber content of 1.5%	Sisal	3.0	NR	NR	NR
Castillo-Lara et al. (2020)	H1.5FC—fiber content of 1.5%	Henequen plant	0.4	0.02	NR	NR
Jamshaid et al. (2022)	22—fiber content of 3%	Jute Fiber	1.2	NR	0.002	NR

NR, not reported