Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 9;12:99. doi: 10.1186/s40795-026-01294-4

Table 2.

Correlations of UPF consumption and quality with body composition and physical activity

Age (years) Degree program (year) TEI (kJ/day) BMI (kg/m2) WC (cm) HC (cm) WHR FM (%) FFM (%) SB (times/day) ST (hours/day) MVPA (min)
UPF Variables
UPF (%) 0,007 -0,033 0,029* -0,046 -0,068 -0,045 -0,048 0,094 -0,054 0,001 0,069 -0,017
FSAm-NPS DI (NS) -0,038 -0,038 0,021 -0,015 -0,035 -0,021 0,013 0,131 -0,232** -0,030 0,238** -0,001
FSAm-NPS DI (TL) -0,090 -0,106 -0,021 -0,077 -0,046 -0,044 -0,002 0,113 -0,237** -0,020 0,245** -0,040

TEITotal Energy Intake (kJ/day), BMIBody mass index (kg/m2), WCWaist circumference (cm), HCHip circumference (cm), WHR Waist-to-hip ratio, FMFat mass (percentage from total body weight), FFMFat-free mass (percentage from total body weight), SBSedentary breaks (times per day), STSedentary time (hours per day), MVPAModerate-to-vigorous physical activity (minutes per week), UPFUltra-processed food (percentage from total energy intake), FSAm-NPS DI (NS)Nutrient Profiling System of the British Food Standards Agency for Dietary Index (linked to Nutri-Score), FSAm-NPS DI (TL)Nutrient Profiling System of the British Food Standards Agency for Dietary Index (linked to Traffic Light)

*p value < 0,05; **p value < 0,01; bold correlations are for significant Spearman’s correlation coefficients