Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 14;24:495. doi: 10.1186/s12951-026-04274-9

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

M1-Migs exert injurious effects primarily through guanylate binding protein-5 (GBP5). (A) Flowchart of quantitative proteomic sequencing (Astral-DIA) for M0-Migs and M1-Migs (n = 3). (B) Quantitative volcano plot demonstrating differentially expressed proteins between M0-Migs and M1-Migs, with GBP5 ranked fifth among upregulated proteins in M1-Migs/M0-Migs. (C) Heat map of differentially expressed proteins between M0-Migs and M1-Migs, with GBP5 highlighted with red rectangles. (D) Western blot analysis comparing the protein profiles of M0-Migs and M1-Migs with the same amount of total protein (n = 4). (E) Western blot comparison of GBP5 and migrasome-related protein expression between normal controls (NC) and MI groups. The quantitative results are presented as bar graphs (n = 6). (F) Immunofluorescence localization of GBP5 in M1-Migs. Scale bars = 10 μm (low magnification) and 5 μm (high magnification). Data are representative of three biologically independent experiments. (G) Echocardiographic comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) between groups (n = 6). (H) Masson’s trichrome staining for infarct area comparison. Scale bars = 0.500 mm (n = 6). (I) Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining demonstrating a significantly larger infarct area in the M1-Migs group than in the M1-Migs guanylate binding protein 5 knockdown (GBP5-KD) group. Scale bars = 1 cm (n = 6). (J) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining to detect myocardial tissue injury in both groups. Scale bars = 50 μm (n = 6). K) Calcein/propidium iodide (PI) viability assay for HL-1 cell mortality under two treatments. Scale bars = 100 μm (n = 3). L) Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay to assess HL-1 cell viability under two treatments (n = 3). Results were shown as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. One-way or two-way ANOVA variance was applied for multivariate analysis. Unpaired t-tests were applied to compare two groups