Table 2.
Results of the linear regression between the urban cluster and physical activity measures.
| Outcome (log-transformed) | Characteristics | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (95 % CI) | R2 | Beta (95 % CI) | R2 | Beta (95 % CI) | R2 | ||
| Total LTPA | Urban cluster | ||||||
| 1 (original city center) | Ref. | 0.08 | Ref. | 0.08 | Ref. | 0.09 | |
| 2 (new city center) | −0.06 (−0.13, 0.01) | −0.06 (−0.13, 0.01) | −0.05 (−0.13, 0.02) | ||||
| 3 (suburban) | −0.13 (−0.21, −0.06)* | −0.13 (−0.21, −0.05)* | −0.12 (−0.22, −0.03)* | ||||
| LTPA | Urban cluster | ||||||
| 1 (original city center) | Ref. | 0.08 | Ref. | 0.08 | Ref. | 0.08 | |
| 2 (new city center) | −0.07 (−0.15, 0.01) | −0.06 (−0.15, 0.02) | −0.07 (−0.16, 0.03) | ||||
| 3 (suburban) | −0.16 (−0.25, −0.07)* | −0.16 (−0.25, −0.06)* | −0.16 (−0.28, −0.05)* | ||||
| Commuting activity | Urban cluster | ||||||
| 1 (original city center) | Ref. | 0.03 | Ref. | 0.06 | Ref. | 0.06 | |
| 2 (new city center) | −0.01 (−0.06, 0.03) | −0.01 (−0.05, 0.04) | 0.00 (−0.04, 0.05) | ||||
| 3 (suburban) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) | −0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) | −0.01 (−0.07, 0.05) | ||||
*
P < 0.05.
a
Adjusted for age, sex, education, work, and living status.
b
Based on model 1, additionally adjusted for smoking, alcohol drinking, and illicit substance use.
c
Based on model 2, additionally adjusted for neighborhood deprivation level and the proportion of single households in the neighborhood.