Table 7.

Results of different evaluation methods.

Static selection methods	Method (1): Scoring function		Method (2): TOPSIS		Method (3): Orthogonal projection
	Result	Rank	Result	Rank	Result	Rank
	– 0.6541	3(N)	0.404	3(N)	0.0763	3(N)
	– 0.6722	4(N)	0.298	5(N)	0.0694	5(N)
	– 0.6745	5(N)	0.378	4(N)	0.0768	4(N)
	– 0.6068	2(Y)	0.569	1(Y)	0.0811	1(Y)
	– 0.5536	1(Y)	0.534	2(Y)	0.0796	2(Y)

Dynamic selection method	Method (4): Scoring function and field theory		Method (5): TOPSIS and field theory		Method (6): The proposed method
	Result	Rank	Result	Rank	Result	Rank
	0.0188	4(Y)	0.2355	4(Y)	0.1258	4(Y)
	0.0224	2(Y)	0.2892	2(Y)	0.1423	2(Y)
	0.0205	3(Y)	0.2409	3(Y)	0.1309	3(Y)
	0.0111	10(N)	0.1121	10(N)	0.0800	10(N)
	0.0136	6(Y)	0.1453	8(Y)	0.0987	6(Y)
	0.0176	5(Y)	0.1912	5(Y)	0.1109	5(Y)
	0.0243	1(Y)	0.3104	1(Y)	0.1524	1(Y)
	0.0132	8(Y)	0.1440	9(N)	0.0822	9(N)
	0.0136	7(Y)	0.1497	7(Y)	0.0846	7(Y)
	0.0129	9(N)	0.1555	6(Y)	0.0832	8(Y)
	– 0.0094	4(N)	0.1182	3(N)	0.0559	3(N)
	– 0.0096	5(N)	0.0869	5(N)	0.0507	4(N)
	– 0.0088	3(N)	0.0934	4(N)	0.0468	5(N)
	– 0.0068	2(Y)	0.1678	1(Y)	0.0569	2(Y)
	– 0.0038	1(Y)	0.1632	2(Y)	0.0593	1(Y)