Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1992 Jul;58(1):159–172. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-159

Sample-stimulus discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcement in delayed matching to sample

B Maxwell Jones, K Geoffrey White
PMCID: PMC1322120  PMID: 16812662

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained in a delayed matching-to-sample task with red and green stimuli. The retention interval between sample-stimulus presentation and the availability of the choice stimuli was varied between 0.01 s and 12 s within each session. The probability of food produced by correct-red and correct-green responses was varied across conditions. Sample-stimulus discriminability and response bias were measured at four different retention intervals. The results of these analyses showed an interaction between the discriminability of the sample stimuli and the control exerted by differential reinforcement. At longer retention intervals, sample discriminability decreased and sensitivity of choice behavior to changes in the red/green reinforcer ratio increased. An analogous relation has been reported in conditional discriminations in which the physical disparity of stimuli has been varied. This correspondence suggests that increasing the delay between presentation of one of two stimuli and an opportunity to respond discriminatively to it may be functionally similar to increasing the physical similarity of the two stimuli.

Keywords: nonhuman remembering, stimulus discriminability, sensitivity to reinforcement, response bias, delayed matching to sample, conditional discrimination, key peck, pigeon

Full text

PDF
164

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alsop B., Davison M. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):67–80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsop B., Elliffe D. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davison M. C., Tustin R. D. The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison M., McCarthy D. Effects of relative reinforcer frequency on complex color detection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):291–315. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davison M., McCarthy D. The interaction of stimulus and reinforcer control in complex temporal discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):97–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harnett P., McCarthy D., Davison M. Delayed signal detection, differential reinforcement, and short-term memory in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):87–111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McCarthy D. C., Davison M. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):51–66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCarthy D., Davison M. Isobias and alloiobias functions in animal psycophysics. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Jul;10(3):390–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Snodgrass J. G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):34–50. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Watson J. E., Blampied N. M. Quantification of the effects of chlorpromazine on performance under delayed matching to sample in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):317–328. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. White K. G. Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):15–34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. White K. G. Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):161–174. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. White K. G., McKenzie J. Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):305–312. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES