Table 1.
Barriers and Facilitators to Immunity Research among LTCH/RH populations
| Behavioural Domain (Capability, Opportunity or Motivation) | Theoretical Domain | Barriers to immunity research participation | Facilitators to immunity research participation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | Knowledge |
• Insufficient understanding of study details (compounded by language barriers) • Complexity of study documents • Challenges in interpreting study findings |
• Clear understanding of study details • Simple, accessible study materials • Desire to understand COVID-19, antibody status and impact of vaccine • Interest in receiving personal antibody results |
| Skills | • Lack of technological proficiency to facilitate administrative study components | ||
| Opportunity | Environmental context and resources |
• Time constraints • Accessibility of collection site • Suitability of physical space (noise/ privacy) |
• Flexibility and convenience of participation • Accessibility of collection site including on-site research team presence • Utilization of digital tools to facilitate participation (Ipad, videos) |
| Social influences | • Lack of trust in study team or organization |
• Opinion leaders or a LTCH/RH culture that encourages research participation • Trust in study team or organization • Professional and friendly research team with positive attitudes • Perceived benefits to society at large |
|
| Motivation | Beliefs about consequences |
• Hesitancy towards experiments • Concerns about data privacy and confidentiality |
• Perception that antibody / immunity results would be available immediately or shortly after sample provided OR understanding of study timelines • Scientific progress and community impact |
| Beliefs about capabilities | • Concerns or challenges in self-collection of sample | ||
| Optimism | • Pain, physical discomfort with sample collection | ||
| Social or Professional Role | • Responsibility to scientific progress and community impact | ||
| Reinforcements | • Study compensation |