Skip to main content
. 2026 May 20;14:1823497. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1823497

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis.

Outcome indicator Study population Intervention duration Intervention methods
Normal elderly MCI elderly ≤6 weeks ≥8 weeks Immersive virtual reality training Semi-immersive virtual reality training Non-immersive virtual reality training
Global cognition ① 5 4 6 3 2 5
② 75% 0% 56% 69% 0% 67% 45%
③ 0.63 0.33 0.45 0.64 0.22 0.81 0.58
④ [0.26, 1.00] [0.01, 0.68] [0.09, 0.81] [−0.04, 1.31] [−0.04, 0.47] [−0.21, 1.82] [0.26, 0.91]
⑤ 0.0009 0.06 0.01 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.0005
Functional mobility ① 3 2 3 2 0 0 4
② 72% 15% 0% 85% 67%
③ 0.49 0.04 0.29 0.47 0.40
④ [0.08, 0.91] [−0.67, 0.74] [0.10, 0.47] [−1.06, 2.01] [−0.15, 0.96]
⑤ 0.02 0.92 0.002 0.55 0.15

Subgroup analyses were not conducted for TMT-based executive/attention-related performance because only one trial contributed relevant data. The blank spaces indicate that the sample size was insufficient to meet the minimum requirements for subgroup analysis. ① Number of studies; ② I2; ③ SMD; ④ 95%CI; ⑤ p-value.