Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec 16;102(52):18830–18835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509512102

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular characterization of AVP1D expression in transgenic tomato. (A) Southern blot analysis indicates the absence of the transgene from control plants, and the presence of the 35S::AVP1D construct in genomic DNA of the transgenic tomato plants. In all cases, genomic DNA (10 μg) was digested with EcoRI, separated on a 0.9% agarose gel by electrophoresis, and probed with a BglII fragment of the AVP1D ORF. Results are shown for two replicate plants for each of the controls, and five independently generated transgenic lines (XAVP1D-1, -2, -3, -4, and -5). (B) Western blot analysis of H+-PPase protein expression in control and transgenic tomato. Size-fractionated protein (20 μg protein per lane) from tonoplast-enriched vesicles prepared from root tissue of vector-transformed (control) and XAVP1D-1 (blot 1), -2 (blot 2), and -3 (blot 3) lines was probed with an antibody immunoreactive to both the endogenous, and the recombinant H+-PPase. Results are shown for one representative experiment with a control plant and three transgenic lines (see A); this experiment was repeated a total of four times. Migration of molecular mass markers indicated that the single immunoreactive band in each lane had a mass of ≈81 kDa (i.e., the deduced mass of the endogenous and recombinant H+-PPases). (C) Quantification of relative H+-PPase protein levels in control (Control) and transgenic plants (lines 1–3 as above). Pooled results (means ± SE) are presented for four experiments similar to that shown in B; data are presented as protein levels in transgenic lines relative to that found in the control plants.