Abstract
Background
Monkeypox virus (MPXV), a zoonotic orthopoxvirus (OPXV), re-emerged as a global public health concern following the 2022 multi-country outbreak that disproportionately affected people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In July 2023, the U.S. National Institutes of Health classified MPXV as an AIDS-defining opportunistic infection, underscoring the urgency of understanding immune features in immunocompromised populations. Existing studies provide limited data on the durability and coordination of MPXV-specific humoral and cellular immunity in people with HIV (PWH). Moreover, whether concomitant MPXV infection modulates HIV-specific immunity in PWH remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the durability of immune responses against MPXV, compare immune profiles between PWH and people without HIV (PWoH), and assess the impact of MPXV coinfection on HIV-specific immunity.
Methods
We conducted a prospective immunological analysis involving 28 PWH and 13 PWoH with confirmed MPXV infection. Peripheral blood samples were collected at 1–2 weeks, 1–6 months, and 12–18 months post-infection. Plasma IgG levels against MPXV antigens were measured using ELISA. Poxvirus- and HIV-specific memory T (Tm) cell responses were assessed using activation-induced marker and intracellular cytokine staining assays via flow cytometry.
Results
MPXV infection elicited durable humoral and cellular immune responses for up to 18 months, regardless of HIV status. However, PWH demonstrated attenuated MPXV-specific antibody responses, lower frequencies of poxvirus-specific Tm cells, and reduced polyfunctionality compared to PWoH. Notably, immune coordination in PWH was impaired, as evidenced by weakened concordance between humoral and cellular responses, disrupted interactions between CD4+ and CD8+ Tm cell subsets, and diminished consistency among antibody levels. Additionally, HIV-specific Tm cell responses remained stable in antiretroviral-treated PWH, irrespective of prior MPXV infection.
Conclusions
MPXV infection induced long-lasting cellular and humoral immunity in both PWH and PWoH. However, HIV-mediated immune dysregulation compromised the strength and coordination of these responses.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-026-08341-5.
Keywords: Monkeypox virus, HIV infection, T cell immunity, Antibody response, Immune coordination
Introduction
Monkeypox virus (MPXV), a member of the orthopoxvirus (OPXV) genus, shares strong antigenic similarity with variola and vaccinia viruses [1, 2]. Once a rare zoonosis endemic to parts of Africa, mpox (monkeypox) emerged in non-endemic regions in 2022 and rapidly spread worldwide, marking the largest orthopoxvirus outbreak in humans since smallpox eradication [3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in July 2022 and reaffirmed it in August 2024 [4, 5]. By May 31, 2025, 146,051 confirmed cases and 359 deaths had been reported globally [6]. The outbreak predominantly affected men who have sex with men (MSM), among whom an estimated 38–50% were people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [7]. This group (PWH) with uncontrolled viremia or severe CD4+ T cell depletion faces increased risks of severe disease and death, which highlights the critical role of host immunity in shaping MPXV outcomes [7, 8].
Although smallpox vaccination provides partial cross-protection against MPXV, its global cessation after smallpox eradication in 1980 has left most individuals without poxvirus-specific immune memory [9, 10]. Consequently, antiviral immunity depends on responses generated through natural infection. MPXV infection can induce both humoral and cellular immune responses, which form the basis of protective antiviral immunity [11]. However, chronic immune activation and T/B cell dysfunction in PWH may impair the generation and maintenance of MPXV-specific immune responses [12–14]. Previous studies have demonstrated that PWH and people without HIV (PWoH) differ in their immune responses against MPXV infection, especially the timing and durability of antibody production [15, 16]. However, data comparing immune responses between PWH and PWoH beyond the acute phase are limited, with only two studies extending assessments up to 6 and 12 months [15, 16]. The long-term persistence of these differences remains uncertain. Additionally, as viral coinfections can alter existing immune responses through mechanisms such as antigenic competition and bystander activation, it is unclear whether acute MPXV infection perturbs pre-existing HIV-specific immunity.
In this study, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of antibody responses to MPXV antigens and poxvirus-specific memory T (Tm) cells in both PWH and PWoH at multiple time points after MPXV infection. Among PWH, participants were stratified by CD4 count to investigate the impact of immune reconstitution on immune responses against MPXV. Additionally, we analyzed immune coordination by examining the interactions between humoral and cellular responses, as well as the correlations among T cell subsets and antibody levels. Furthermore, we evaluated HIV-specific Tm cell responses to determine whether MPXV coinfection modulates pre-existing HIV-specific responses, thereby informing personalized immune surveillance and reinfection risk assessment.
Methods
Study design, participants, and sample collection
This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Beijing Ditan Hospital from September 2023 to October 2024, enrolling 41 laboratory-confirmed MPXV-infected individuals, including 28 PWH and 13 PWoH. Blood samples were collected at 1–2 weeks, 1–6 months, and 12–18 months after symptom onset. Immune responses were compared cross-sectionally between groups. Detailed follow-up time points were listed in Table S1. In addition, two control groups were included: four healthy controls (HC) and six antiretroviral therapy (ART)-treated, virologically suppressed PWH without MPXV infection, with all controls matched for age and gender. During the study period, no specific antiviral drugs for mpox had been approved in China; all patients received symptomatic supportive care according to the “Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Monkeypox (2022 Edition)” issued by the National Health Commission of China [17]. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data were systematically collected.
Mpox severity score System (mpox-SSS)
The Mpox-SSS, a validated tool for evaluating disease severity, includes seven parameters: number of active lesions, anatomic extent of lesion involvement, presence of confluent lesions, presence of bacterial superinfection, extent of mucosal areas affected, level of care, and analgesia requirement (Table S2). It is suitable for both clinical and research use and distinguishes severity among MPXV cases [18, 19].
Plasma HIV-1 viral load and CD4+ T cell count
Plasma HIV-1 RNA was quantified using the Amplicor HIV Monitor assay (Roche, detection limit: 40 copies/mL). The CD4+ T cell count was measured by flow cytometry using TruCOUNT tubes (BD Biosciences).
MPXV-specific IgG detection by ELISA
Plasma IgG against MPXV antigens A29L, E8L, and A35R was measured using ELISA kits (#KAV13402, #KAV13202, #KAV13102; Antibody System) based on a quantitative competitive enzyme immunoassay technique, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices).
Activation-induced cell marker (AIM) and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay
Frozen PBMCs were thawed and recovered overnight. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 5 × 105 cells/well for AIM and 1 × 106 cells/well for ICS assays. Anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (0.5 µg/mL; Miltenyi Biotec) was added 15 minutes before stimulation. Four stimulation groups were set up: DMSO (negative control), CD3/CD28 (5 µg/mL, positive control), orthopoxvirus peptide pool (0.4 µg/mL, JPT; 127 peptides derived from MPXV, vaccinia virus, and variola virus, of which 96% are fully conserved in MPXV), and HIV peptide pools (Gag, Nef, Pol, 0.2 µg/mL each, JPT). PWoH received the first three stimulations; PWH received all four. Anti-CD107a antibody (#563869, BD Biosciences) was added at the time of stimulation, and GolgiPlug (1:1000) was added 5 hours before harvest. After 24 hours, cells were stained for surface markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CCR7, CD69, 4-1BB, CD40L, CXCR5, CCR4, CCR6, CCR10, CXCR3). Staining of intracellular markers: tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), Perforin, Granzyme B (GrzB) (Table S3). CD4+ T helper (Th) subsets were defined based on chemokine receptor expression patterns according to established criteria [20]: Tfh (CXCR5+CCR10-), Th1 (CXCR5-CCR6-CCR4-CXCR3+ CCR10-), Th2 (CXCR5-CCR6-CCR4+CXCR3-CCR10-), Th9 (CXCR5–CCR6+CCR4-CXCR3-CCR10-), ThGM (CCR6-CCR4+CXCR3-CCR10+), Th17 (CXCR5-CCR6+CCR4+CXCR3-CCR10-), Th1/17 (CXCR5-CCR6+CCR4-CXCR3+CCR10-) and Th22 (CXCR5-CCR6+CCR4+CXCR3-CCR10+). CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell (Tc) and Th subsets shared the same chemokine receptor expression signatures [21–23]. Cells were acquired on an LSRFortessa (BD), and data were analyzed with FlowJo software. The frequency of antigen-specific cells (AIM+ cells, ICS+ cells) was calculated by subtracting the frequency of the non-stimulation condition (DMSO) from each antigen-stimulated condition (orthopoxvirus peptide or HIV mixed peptides). CD4+ AIM+ Tm cells were defined as CD69+ CD40L+, and CD8+ AIM+ Tm cells as CD69+ 4-1BB+. ICS+ Tm cells were defined by cytokine and granule production (IFN-γ, TNF-α, GrzB, Perforin, CD107a) in CD40L+CD4+ or CD69+CD8+ Tm cells. The gating strategy was shown in Figure S1.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 10. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For two-group comparisons, Student’s t-test was used for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal data. For comparisons involving more than two groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was applied. Pearson correlation was used for normally distributed continuous variables; otherwise, Spearman’s rank correlation was used. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. Dynamic changes in AIM+ and ICS+ Tm cell frequencies were analyzed using polynomial regression. Heatmaps and Pie charts were generated using R (version 4.4). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
MPXV-specific antibody responses were weaker and delayed in PWH than in PWoH
All 41 MPXV-infected participants (28 PWH, 13 PWoH) were male, aged 23–40 years, and smallpox-unvaccinated. Sexual contact was the most likely transmission route in both groups (PWH: 89.3%, PWoH: 84.6%). Median CD4+ T cell count was 521.5 cells/μL (IQR 377.5–777.75) in PWoH and 494 cells/μL (IQR 104.25–694.5) in PWH, with 19 PWH (67.9%) achieving viral suppression on ART. None of the participants received antiviral treatment for mpox, and three PWH died during hospitalization. The control group included four healthy individuals (age range: 21–27) and six ART-treated PWH without MPXV infection (age range: 22–40), all unvaccinated against smallpox. Demographic and clinical characteristics were shown in Table 1; individual-level detailed information was provided in Table S1. Mpox-SSS assessments at 1–2 weeks post-MPXV symptom onset were shown in Table S4.
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants
| PWoH (n = 13) | PWH (n = 28) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | ||
| Median age | 29 (27.5–32.25) | 32 (26–36.5) |
| 43 years or older | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 13 (100%) | 28 (100%) |
| Famale | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Route of possible exposure† | ||
| MSM | 11 (84.6%) | 25 (89.3%) |
| Other | 2 (15.4%) | 3 (10.7%) |
| Days from last exposure to onset | 7 (5–8) | 8 (3–15) |
| Smallpox vaccination history | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| HIV-positive | - | 28 (100%) |
| Regular ART | - | 19 (67.9%) |
| Regular ART duration, years | - | 4 (2–6) |
| CD4+ T cell count, cells/μL | 521.5 (377.5–777.75) | 494 (104.25–694.5) |
| Undetectable HIV RNA | - | 19 (67.9%) |
| Coexisting conditions | ||
| Syphilis | 1 (7.7%) | 15 (53.6%) |
| Hepatitis B | 0 (0%) | 2 (7.1%) |
| Hepatitis C | 0 (0%) | 2 (7.1%) |
| Mode of admission | ||
| Inpatient | 10 (76.9%) | 25 (89.3%) |
| outpatient | 3 (23.1%) | 3 (10.7%) |
| Days from symptom onset to mpox diagnostic test, days | 6 (5–7.5) | 6 (5.5–10) |
| Length of hospital stay, days | 8 (3.5–10) | 7 (5–18.5) |
| Systemic symptoms | ||
| Rash or skin lesions | 13 (100%) | 28 (100%) |
| Fever | 10 (76.9%) | 16 (57.1%) |
| Lymphadenopathy | 8 (61.5%) | 18 (64.3%) |
| Perianal pain | 0 (0%) | 6 (21.4%) |
| Antiviral treatment for mpox | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Death | 0 (0%) | 3 (10.7%) |
| PCR positive | ||
| Throat swab | 8/10 (80.0%) | 15/19 (78.9%) |
| Skin lesions | 11/11 (100%) | 20/21 (95.2%) |
| Perianal swab | 0/1 (0%) | 4/4 (100%) |
| Serum | 1/5 (20%) | 6/10 (60%) |
Notes: Data are expressed as median (lQR) of n (%)
†The last possible exposure before symptom onset
Abbreviations: PWoH, people without HIV; PWH, people with HIV; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MSM, men who have sex with men; ART, antiretroviral therapy; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction
To assess the MPXV-specific antibody response in PWoH and PWH, we quantified plasma IgG levels against the MPXV antigens A29L, E8L, and A35R. At 1 month, PWH exhibited significantly lower IgG levels than PWoH for all three antigens (p = 0.0280 for A29L, E8L, and A35R). Although IgG levels decreased over time in both groups, PWH continued to show lower levels at 18 months for A29L (p = 0.0556) and E8L (p = 0.0792), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, distinct kinetic patterns were observed between the groups. In PWoH, IgG responses peaked at 1 month and subsequently declined. In PWH, anti-A29L IgG showed a similar early peak, while anti-E8L IgG responses rose more gradually and peaked around 3–6 months. Conversely, anti-A35R IgG responses remained low without a clear peak. Overall, IgG levels in PWH remained consistently lower than those in PWoH across all time points (Fig. 1A–C).
Fig. 1.
Kinetics of MPXV-specific IgG responses. (A-B) levels of anti-A29L, E8L, and A35R IgG antibody in PWoH (n = 7 at 1–2 weeks; n = 3 at 1 month; n = 2 at 3 months; n = 2 at 6 months; n = 3 at 12 months; n = 5 at 18 months) and PWH (n = 7, 10, 3, 5, 7, and 5 at corresponding time points). Bar plots represented group-wise comparisons at each time point; line graphs illustrated temporal dynamics. Data were shown as geometric means ± geometric standard deviation. Statistical comparisons used the mann-whitney U test; P values were indicated when significant. Abbreviations: w, weeks; m, months. (C) dynamic changes of anti-A29L, E8L, and A35R IgG antibodies in each participant after the onset of symptoms (PWoH: n = 13, samples = 26; PWH: n = 28, samples = 52)
PWH exhibited decreased poxvirus-specific Tm cell responses compared to PWoH
Given the high sequence homology between MPXV and other orthopoxviruses [10, 24] and the fact that all participants were smallpox vaccine-naïve, we evaluated the overall MPXV memory T cell response by stimulating PBMCs with an orthopoxvirus peptide pool [25] and conducting AIM and ICS assays across multiple time points. Furthermore, the analyses focused on memory T cells, particularly the central memory and effector memory subsets, which represent the major populations responsible for long-term immune surveillance and effector functions. Compared to HCs, MPXV-infected participants exhibited stronger poxvirus-specific Tm cell responses, regardless of HIV status. Comparison across time points revealed that differences between PWoH and PWH were most pronounced at 1–6 months. At this time point, PWoH showed a higher responder rate of AIM+ CD4+ Tm cells than PWH (100% vs 71%) with significantly elevated frequencies (p = 0.0107; Fig. 2A). A similar trend was observed in CD8+ Tm cells at 1–6 months (100% vs 53%; p = 0.048; Fig. 2B). No significant group differences were observed at 1–2 weeks and 12–18 months. ICS+ CD4+ and CD8+ Tm cell responses remained generally comparable between groups across most time points. Notably, a trend toward increased ICS+ CD8+ Tm cell responses in PWoH at 12–18 months (p = 0.0594) may reflect sustained cytotoxic potential (Fig. 2C–D). To assess temporal dynamics, AIM+ and ICS+ Tm cell frequencies were plotted over time since symptom onset. Over time, AIM+ Tm cell frequencies declined in PWoH but remained stable in PWH, resulting in a reduced difference between groups at later time points. In contrast, ICS+ Tm cell responses remained relatively stable across time points, with no significant group differences (Fig. 2E–F). Poxvirus-specific Tm cell responses persisted in most participants at 12–18 months, suggesting sustained cellular immunity following MPXV infection.
Fig. 2.
Poxvirus-specific Tm cell responses at different time points in PWoH and PWH. (A-D) frequencies of poxvirus-specific AIM+ CD4+ Tm (A), AIM+ CD8+ Tm (B), ICS+ CD4+ Tm (C), and ICS+ CD8+ Tm (D) cells at three time points: 1–2 weeks (PWoH: 7 participants, 7 samples; PWH: 6 participants, 6 samples), 1–6 months (PWoH: 3 participants, 7 samples; PWH: 12 participants, 17 samples), and 12–18 months (PWoH: 8 participants, 8 samples; PWH: 14 participants, 14 samples). Dashed line identified the median of poxvirus-specific Tm cells in healthy controls (4 participants, 4 samples). Blue, red, and gray circles represented PWoH responders, PWH responders, and non-responders, respectively. Data were shown as geometric means ± geometric standard deviation. The mann-whitney U tests were used for group comparisons; P values were displayed in the plots. Pie charts below each panel represented responder frequencies, with P values from Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests shown beneath each chart. (E-F) temporal dynamics of AIM+ (E) and ICS+ (F) CD4+ and CD8+ Tm cell frequencies. The solid lines represented the fitted curve obtained using curve fitting polynomial regression, and the shaded areas represented 95% confidence intervals
We examined the polyfunctionality of poxvirus-specific Tm cells by profiling the co-expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, GrzB, Perforin, and CD107a. At 1–2 weeks, CD4+ Tm cells from PWoH displayed broader polyfunctionality, with subsets expressing combinations of IFN-γ+ TNF-α+, IFN-γ+ Perforin+, and IFN-γ+ TNF-α+ GrzB+. In contrast, CD4+ Tm cells from PWH were skewed toward Perforin+ and GrzB+ single- or dual-positive subsets with minimal IFN-γ expression and limited cytokine co-expression. Over time, CD4+ Tm cells in PWH increased functional diversity, progressively resembling the pattern observed in PWoH. CD8+ Tm cells in both groups were dominated by GrzB+ Perforin+, or single-positive subsets, with stable profiles across time points (Fig. 3A). We further compared the frequencies of functional subsets between PWoH and PWH. The results showed that PWH had significantly elevated proportions of GrzB+ CD4+ Tm cells at 1–2 weeks (p = 0.014). At 1–6 months, PWoH exhibited higher frequencies of IFN-γ+ GrzB+ CD4+ Tm cells (p = 0.0169) and Perforin+ CD8+ Tm cells than PWH (p = 0.0296). By 12–18 months, TNF-α+ Perforin+ CD4+ Tm cells were increased in PWoH (p = 0.0044), along with elevated frequencies of TNF-α+ Perforin+ CD107a+, Perforin+ CD107a+, and Perforin+ CD8+ Tm cells (p = 0.0096, 0.0018, and 0.0419, respectively; Fig. 3B–D).
Fig. 3.
Polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ Tm cell responses in PWoH and PWH post-MPXV infection. (A) polyfunctionality profiles of poxvirus-specific CD4+ Tm and CD8+ Tm cells at three time points: 1–2 weeks (PWoH: 7 participants, 7 samples; PWH: 6 participants, 6 samples), 1–6 months (PWoH: 3 participants, 7 samples; PWH: 12 participants, 17 samples), and 12–18 months (PWoH: 8 participants, 8 samples; PWH: 14 participants, 14 samples). Pie charts illustrated the proportion of cells producing 5 (dark orange), 4 (light orange), 3 (pale orange), 2 (dark gray), or 1 (light gray) effector molecules. (B-D) frequency comparisons of polyfunctional CD4+ Tm (left) and CD8+ Tm (right) cells between PWoH and PWH. Data were shown as geometric means ± geometric standard deviation. The mann-whitney U test was applied to each graph; significant P values were shown. Abbreviations: IFN-γ = interferon-γ. TNF-α = tumour necrosis factor-α. GrzB = Granzyme B
PWH and PWoH displayed differential polarization of T cell subsets following MPXV infection
Considering the distinct roles of various T cell subsets in antiviral immunity and immune regulation, we compared the distribution of Th and Tc subsets between MPXV-infected PWH and PWoH (Figure S2A-C). At 1–2 weeks, no significant differences were observed between groups. At 1–6 months, PWH exhibited decreased frequencies of T follicular helper (Tfh) cells (p = 0.0409), along with lower proportions of Th1 and Th1/17 subsets and increased Th2 cells (p = 0.0021, 0.0053, and 0.0408, respectively). In the CD8 compartment, T follicular cytotoxic (Tfc), Tc1/17, and TcGM subsets were significantly decreased in PWH (p = 0.0472, 0.0160, and 0.0005, respectively), while Tc9 cells were also lower but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.0553). At 12–18 months, Th22 and Tc22 cell frequencies were lower in PWH compared to PWoH (p = 0.0338 and 0.002, respectively). These data indicated that T cell polarization was affected by HIV infection. Furthermore, we assessed chemokine receptor expression within AIM+ CD4+ and CD8+ Tm cells (Figure S3A-C). The analysis revealed an elevated proportion of CCR4+ AIM+CD4+ Tm cells in PWH at 1–2 weeks (p = 0.0103). In contrast, CXCR3+ AIM+CD4+ Tm cells were significantly more frequent in PWoH at 1–6 months (p = 0.0186). By 12–18 months, CCR6+ CCR4+ AIM+CD4+ Tm cells were higher in PWH than in PWoH (p = 0.0361). No significant differences in chemokine receptor expression were found among poxvirus-specific CD8+ Tm cells.
Protective immune responses were associated with mpox disease severity in PWoH and with CD4+ T cell count in PWH
To assess the association between immune responses and mpox disease severity, we correlated humoral and cellular parameters with the disease severity score at 1–2 weeks post-symptom onset. In PWoH, higher frequencies of ICS+ CD4+ Tm cells (r = −0.8365, p = 0.027) and Perforin+ CD69+ CD8+ Tm cells (r = −0.8729, p = 0.019) were associated with lower disease severity score, suggesting a protective role of polyfunctional T cells. No such associations were observed in PWH, further highlighting their impaired immune response (Figure S4A-B).
The lack of correlation between protective immune responses and disease severity in PWH suggested a potential role of underlying immune impairment. Therefore, we assessed whether CD4+ T cell count was associated with the magnitude of immune responses against MPXV in PWH. At 1 month post-infection, PWH were stratified by CD4+ T cell count into two groups: ≥200 cells/μL and <200 cells/μL. PWH with a high CD4 count exhibited a higher responder rate of AIM+ CD4+ Tm cells (p = 0.048), although overall frequencies did not differ significantly (Figure S5A). The response rates and frequencies of AIM+ CD8+ Tm cells, ICS+ CD4+ Tm cells, and ICS+ CD8+ Tm cells were comparable between groups (Figure S5B-D). Polyfunctionality profiling revealed a significantly higher proportion of IFN-γ+ TNF-α+ GrzB+ CD4+ Tm cells in PWH with high CD4 count (p = 0.0333), suggesting enhanced polyfunctionality. No differences in polyfunctional subsets were observed in CD8+ Tm cells between groups (Figure S5E). In addition, plasma anti-A29L, E8L, and A35R IgG levels were slightly higher but non-significant in PWH with high CD4 count (Figure S5F). Furthermore, we performed correlation analyses between CD4+ T cell count and the frequencies of poxvirus-specific Tm cell subsets among PWH. Significant positive correlations were observed between CD4+ T cell count and the proportions of ICS+ CD40L+ (r = 0.7716, p = 0.0135), IFN-γ+ CD40L+ (r = 0.8128, p = 0.0028), TNF-α+ CD40L+ (r = 0.7169, p = 0.0246), GrzB+ CD40L+ (r = 0.8128, p = 0.0028), and Perforin+ CD40L+ (r = 0.8125, p = 0.0067) CD4+ Tm cells (Figure S5G). These results suggested that stronger poxvirus-specific CD4+ Tm cell responses were associated with a more favorable immune status.
PWH exhibited impaired coordination between humoral and cellular immune responses
To assess immune coordination, correlation analyses were performed across all measured immune parameters within 18 months post-symptom onset (Figure S6). In PWoH, anti-E8L IgG levels positively correlated with the frequencies of Tfh cells (r = 0.4315, p = 0.0449), Tfc cells (r = 0.4869, p = 0.0216), and CXCR5+ AIM+ CD4+ Tm cells (r = 0.4249, p = 0.0487). Anti-A35R IgG levels also showed significant correlations with Tfh (r = 0.4349, p = 0.0431) and Tfc cells (r = 0.4620, p = 0.0304). Moreover, IgG levels against different MPXV antigens demonstrated strong concordance: A29L and E8L (r = 0.8639, p < 0.0001), A29L and A35R (r = 0.9378, p < 0.0001), and E8L and A35R (r = 0.905, p < 0.0001). These results highlighted the coordination of humoral responses and their association with T cells (Fig. 4A). In PWoH, functional coordination between CD4+ and CD8+ Tm cell subsets was also evident, as frequencies of ICS+ CD4+ and ICS+ CD8+ Tm cells positively correlated (r = 0.5991, p = 0.0032). Similar coordination was observed across other functional T cell subsets (Fig. 4B). In contrast, these associations were attenuated or lost in PWH, who exhibited weaker humoral coordination and markedly disrupted T cell subset interactions (Fig. 4A–B).
Fig. 4.
Immune coordination within 18 months post-MPXV symptom onset in both PWH and PWoH. (A) correlations between MPXV-specific IgG levels (A29L, E8L, A35R) and T cell subsets in PWoH (n = 13) and PWH (n = 28). (B) correlation between CD4+ Tm and CD8+ Tm cell immune response in PWoH (n = 13) and PWH (n = 28). Analyses were conducted using Pearson’s or Spearman’s tests, depending on distribution. Only significant correlations (p < 0.05) were shown. IgG values were log₁₀-transformed
MPXV coinfection did not alter HIV-specific Tm cell immunity in ART-treated individuals
To determine whether MPXV coinfection alters HIV-specific Tm cell responses, we evaluated immune responses in ART-treated PWH with or without prior MPXV infection. These participants were then stratified by time since MPXV infection, and six ART-treated PWH without MPXV exposure were included as PWH controls. HIV-specific responses were measured by stimulating PBMCs with pooled HIV peptide mixes (Gag, Nef, Pol). The proportions of HIV-specific AIM+ Tm cells were comparable across groups (Fig. 5A–B). Similarly, the frequencies of HIV-specific ICS+ Tm cells showed no significant differences (Fig. 5C–D). Polyfunctional profiling revealed no differences between groups (Fig. 5E–F). HIV-specific CD8+ Tm cells were predominantly Perforin+ and GrzB+ subsets, while CD4+ Tm cells exhibited broader functional diversity (Fig. 5G). These findings suggested that MPXV coinfection does not markedly alter HIV-specific Tm cell responses in individuals on ART.
Fig. 5.
HIV-specific immune response at different time points in PWH. (A-F) frequencies of HIV-specific AIM+ CD4+ Tm (A), AIM+ CD8+ Tm (B), ICS+ CD4+ Tm (C), ICS+ CD8+ Tm (D), polyfunctional CD4+ Tm (E) and polyfunctional CD8+ Tm (F) cells in ART-treated PWH at 1–2 weeks (6 participants, 6 samples), 1–6 months (7 participants, 11 samples), and 12–18 months post-event (14 participants, 14 samples), and compared to ART-treated MPXV-naïve PWH controls (6 participants, 6 samples). Dark blue, light blue, pink, orange, and gray circles represented: (1) ART-treated PWH responders at 1–2 weeks post-MPXV infection, (2) 1–6 months, (3) 12–18 months, (4) ART-treated MPXV-naïve PWH responders, and (5) non-responders, respectively. Data were shown as geometric means ± geometric standard deviation. The Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were used for group comparisons. (G) polyfunctionality profiles of HIV-specific CD4+ Tm and CD8+ Tm cells in PWH at different time points after MPXV infection and in PWH who have never been infected with MPXV
Discussion
Since the global mpox outbreak in 2022, PWH have been recognized as a highly vulnerable population due to immune dysregulation [26]. While previous studies have characterized MPXV-specific immune responses in PWH, data on the durability of antibody and T cell responses, as well as coordination between humoral and cellular immunity, remain limited [15, 16]. Here, we conducted a comprehensive, multidimensional assessment of immune responses at multiple time points. Our findings revealed that HIV infection impacts immune responses against MPXV through multiple mechanisms: it decreased antibody levels, reduced proportion and polyfunctionality of antigen-specific Tm cells, and impaired immune coordination.
A key finding of this study was that PWH exhibited significantly lower frequencies and polyfunctionality of poxvirus-specific Tm cells, compared to PWoH at 1–6 months after MPXV infection. Of note, these deficiencies persisted at 12–18 months. Previous studies did not observe such differences at any time points, likely due to methodological variations. Earlier studies primarily assessed total T cell responses without distinguishing memory subsets. For instance, an Italian study employed IFN-γ ELISpot assays, which preclude the analysis of memory subsets, while a Spanish study, despite utilizing AIM and ICS assays, focused solely on total T cell populations [15, 16]. Given that HIV infection depletes naive T cells and expands memory T cells, and that this imbalance often persists even after ART [27], evaluating total T cell responses may obscure differences in memory functionality. Our study addressed this limitation by profiling poxvirus-specific Tm cells, enabling accurate functional comparison between PWH and PWoH. More importantly, previous studies might have overlooked these distinctions due to incomplete T cell functional characterization [16]. In contrast, our study incorporated cytotoxic markers (GrzB, Perforin, and CD107a) and effector cytokine markers (IFN-γ and TNF-α) to comprehensively evaluate T cell effector functions. Consequently, we revealed that several cytotoxic T cell subsets were significantly more abundant in PWoH than in PWH at both 1–6 and 12–18 months post-infection, further supporting functional impairments in PWH. These findings aligned with reports of diminished smallpox vaccination-induced T cells in PWH compared to PWoH, suggesting that HIV infection might cause long-lasting damage to poxvirus-specific immune memory [28]. Similar impairments have also been reported in other viral infections, with PWH exhibiting attenuated SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses compared to PWoH following both natural infection and vaccination [29, 30]. Collectively, these findings suggested that HIV infection could weaken antigen-specific T cell responses to acute viral infections, potentially affecting clinical outcomes.
Consistent with previous reports [15, 16, 31], our study also revealed that PWH exhibited lower antibody levels than PWoH, suggesting impaired humoral response. More importantly, anti-A29L and E8L IgG levels remained reduced in PWH even 18 months post-infection, demonstrating persistent defects in long-term humoral immunity. This impairment may be linked to decreased frequencies of Tfh, Tfc, and Tc9 cells in PWH. Tfh and Tfc cells assist B cells via CD40L and IL-21 signals, supporting robust antibody production, while Tc9 cells promote functional B cell memory via the IL-9-ZBTB18 axis [32, 33]. The depletion of these helper populations could compromise B cell function, resulting in suboptimal antibody quality and durability. Moreover, HIV infection induces irreversible B cell exhaustion and impairs antigen responses despite virologic control [34], contributing to defective memory B cell development and long-lasting antibody responses against MPXV in PWH.
Another important finding was disrupted immune coordination in PWH after MPXV infection. Successful immune responses require precise coordination across immune components for effective antigen recognition, immune activation, and memory formation. While previous mpox studies have investigated immune coordination, most have focused on associations within T cell subsets or antibody profiles [15, 35–37]. Only one Spanish study analyzed cellular-humoral interplay, but it was limited to total T cells without examining the interactions of specific subsets and antigen-specific antibody responses [16]. In contrast, our study systematically evaluated three key aspects of immune coordination: the functional synergy among poxvirus-specific Tm cell subsets, the relationships between T cell populations and IgG antibodies, and the concordance across various antibody responses. This multidimensional analysis revealed striking differences between PWoH and PWH. PWoH demonstrated robust immune integration, characterized by strong correlations between functional T cell subsets, coupling between Tfh/Tfc cells and MPXV-specific IgG antibodies, and highly consistent IgG profiles across different MPXV antigens. Conversely, PWH exhibited significant disruptions in immune coordination that extended beyond simple quantitative deficiencies. This dysregulation likely resulted from the dual pathological effects of HIV infection: impaired CD4+ T cell helper functions compromising both cytotoxic T cell and B cell responses, combined with chronic immune activation that disrupts normal intercellular communication [38]. These findings suggested that achieving protective immunity in PWH might require not only enhancing response magnitude but also restoring proper coordination within the immune system. Thus, future vaccine development should strengthen T-B cell interactions and functional synergy among T cell subsets to establish long-lasting immunity in this vulnerable population.
The relationship between immune status and immune responses against MPXV in PWH warrants further investigation. PWH with high CD4+ T cell count typically developed mild and self-limiting illness comparable to that observed in PWoH, whereas those with low CD4+ T cell count were at increased risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death [7, 13, 39]. However, comprehensive immunological correlates underlying these clinical observations remain limited. Our study provides important mechanistic insights, revealing that PWH with CD4+ T cell count above 200 cells/μL mounted significantly stronger poxvirus-specific immune responses. Notably, we identified a positive correlation between CD4+ T cell count and poxvirus-specific Tm cell response. These findings highlighted the clinical importance of early HIV diagnosis and prompt ART initiation in high-risk populations. Timely immune reconstitution not only enhances protection against opportunistic pathogens, such as MPXV, but also reduces risks of severe morbidity and mortality.
In addition to examining the impact of HIV infection on MPXV-specific immunity, we further investigated potential reciprocal effects of MPXV infection on HIV-specific immune responses. Previous research documented stable levels of both integrated and defective HIV proviral DNA in a virologically suppressed PWH before and after MPXV infection, indicating no significant alteration in the latent reservoir size [40]. Our results corroborated this virologic observation, demonstrating preserved frequencies and polyfunctional capacity of HIV-specific Tm cells in ART-treated PWH throughout MPXV infection, with no discernible differences compared to MPXV-naïve controls. These results provided compelling evidence that MPXV infection does not substantially compromise HIV-specific Tm cell populations. The conclusion aligned with prior research showing that COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in ART-treated PWH neither expanded the intact HIV reservoir in peripheral CD4+ T cells nor modified HIV-Nef- or Gag-specific T cell frequencies [41, 42]. These findings had important clinical implications, supporting the safety of vaccination protocols and the management of acute infections in virologically suppressed PWH receiving ART.
This study has several limitations. First, humoral immunity was assessed only through MPXV-specific IgG levels, excluding IgA responses and neutralizing activity. Second, the exclusive analysis of peripheral blood limited insights into tissue-resident immunity. Third, we did not explore the potential impact of MPXV infection on the HIV-1 latent reservoir during ART, limiting our understanding of reservoir dynamics. Lastly, the single-center design and modest sample size may restrict the external validity of our findings. Future studies should incorporate multicenter cohorts with larger sample sizes, more comprehensive immune profiling, and longitudinal tracking of latent reservoir dynamics to fully elucidate the immunological features of MPXV/HIV coinfection.
In summary, this study demonstrated that MPXV-specific IgG antibodies and poxvirus-specific Tm cell responses were durably maintained for up to 18 months in both PWH and PWoH. However, PWH exhibited significantly attenuated immunological memory compared to PWoH, as evidenced by lower MPXV-specific IgG levels, reduced frequencies and polyfunctionality of poxvirus-specific Tm cells, and impaired immune network coordination. While these disparities showed partial attenuation over time, they persisted throughout the observation period, indicating that HIV infection compromises the durability of immunological memory. Notably, ART-treated PWH maintained stable HIV-specific Tm cell responses despite MPXV infection. These findings underscored the necessity for customized immunotherapeutic approaches in PWH to optimize long-term protection against emerging viral threats.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We especially thank all the sample contributors from the Beijing Ditan Hospital.
Abbreviations
- MPXV
Monkeypox virus
- OPXV
Orthopoxvirus
- MSM
Men who have sex with men
- HIV
human immunodeficiency virus
- PWH
People with HIV
- PWoH
People without HIV
- Tm
Memory T
- HC
Healthy controls
- ART
Antiretroviral therapy
- AIM
Activation-induced marker
- ICS
Intracellular cytokine staining
- TNF-α
Tumour necrosis factor-α
- IFN-γ
Interferon-γ
- GrzB
Granzyme B
- Th
T helper
- Tc
Cytotoxic T
- Tfh
T follicular helper
- Tfc
T follicular cytotoxic
Author contributions
LX, XW, and MJ performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. HY, XZ, JL, JX, and YL contributed to recruitment and clinical data collection. CS and QP analyzed the data. RJ reviewed the manuscript. YK, HZ, and XW designed the study, accessed and verified the data, and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the article.
Funding
This work was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority’s Ascent Plan [DFL20241802], Beijing Natural Science Foundation [L254074], Beijing Natural Science Foundation [L222069], National Natural Science Foundation of China [82171548], Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research [CFH2024-2-2175], and the science foundation of Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University [DTYM-202408].
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Ditan Hospital (No. DTEC-YJ2023-001–02), and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
We declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Lulu Xing, Xinyue Wang, and Meiqing Jiang contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Xi Wang, Email: xiwang@ccmu.edu.cn.
Hongxin Zhao, Email: drzhao66@ccmu.edu.cn.
Yaxian Kong, Email: kongyaxian@ccmu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Adamo S, Gao Y, Sekine T, Mily A, Wu J, Storgärd E, et al. Memory profiles distinguish cross-reactive and virus-specific T cell immunity to mpox. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(6):928–36.e4. 10.1016/j.chom.2023.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mitjà O, Ogoina D, Titanji BK, Galvan C, Muyembe JJ, Marks M, et al. Monkeypox. Lancet. 2023;401(10370):60–74. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02075-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zaeck LM, Lamers MM, Verstrepen BE, Bestebroer TM, van Royen ME, Götz H, et al. Low levels of monkeypox virus-neutralizing antibodies after MVA-BN vaccination in healthy individuals. Nat Med. 2023;29(1):270–78. 10.1038/s41591-022-02090-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ghebreyesus TA. Why the monkeypox outbreak constitutes a public health emergency of international concern. BMJ. 2022;378:o1978. 10.1136/bmj.o1978 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Marty AM, Beÿ CK, Koenig KL. 2024 mpox outbreak: a rapidly evolving public health emergency of international concern: introduction of an updated mpox identify-isolate-inform (3I) tool. One Health. 2024;19:100927. 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.WHO. Global mpox trends 2025. https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/#sec-global. June 10, 2025.
- 7.Mitjà O, Alemany A, Marks M, Lezama Mora JI, Rodríguez-Aldama JC, Torres Silva MS, et al. Mpox in people with advanced HIV infection: a global case series. Lancet. 2023;401(10380):939–49. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00273-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miller MJ, Cash-Goldwasser S, Marx GE, Schrodt CA, Kimball A, Padgett K, et al. Severe monkeypox in hospitalized patients — United States, August 10–October 10, 2022. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022;71(44):1412–17. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7144e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huang Y, Guo L, Li Y, Ren L, Nie J, Xu F, et al. Residual immunity from smallpox vaccination and possible protection from mpox, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(2):321–24. 10.3201/eid3002.230542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu J, Xing H, Wang C, Tang M, Wu C, Ye F, et al. Mpox (formerly monkeypox): pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):458. 10.1038/s41392-023-01675-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abebaw D, Akelew Y, Adugna A, Teffera ZH, Tegegne BA, Fenta A, et al. Antigen recognition and immune response to monkeypox virus infection: implications for mpox vaccine design - a narrative review. Infez Med. 2025;33(2):151–62. 10.53854/liim-3302-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Zucker J, Hazra A, Titanji BK. Mpox and HIV-collision of two Diseases. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2023;20(6):440–50. 10.1007/s11904-023-00682-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pinnetti C, Cimini E, Mazzotta V, Matusali G, Vergori A, Mondi A, et al. Mpox as AIDS-defining event with a severe and protracted course: clinical, immunological, and virological implications. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24(2):e127–35. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00482-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Liu Y, Liu X, Wang J, Xie Y, Guo J, Liu Z, et al. Single-cell sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells reveals immune landscape of monkeypox patients with HIV. Emerging Microbes Infections. 2025;14(1):2459136. 10.1080/22221751.2025.2459136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mazzotta V, Matusali G, Cimini E, Colavita F, Esvan R, Notari S, et al. Kinetics of the humoral and cellular immune response up to 1 year from mpox virus infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025;31(8):1356–62. 10.1016/j.cmi.2025.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moraes-Cardoso I, Benet S, Carabelli J, Perez-Zsolt D, Mendoza A, Rivero A, et al. Immune responses associated with mpox viral clearance in men with and without HIV in Spain: a multisite, observational, prospective cohort study. LancetThe Lancet Microbe. 2024;5(8):100859. 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00074-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.National Health Commission of China. Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Monkeypox. 2022. https://www.nhc.gov.cn/ylyjs/zcwj/202206/9e73ffe2ba70426592bf2a55bfa02d33.shtml. March 25, 2026.
- 18.Zucker J, McLean J, Huang S, DeLaurentis C, Gunaratne S, Stoeckle K, et al. Development and Pilot of an mpox severity scoring System. The J Infect Dis. 2024;229(Supplement_2):SS229–sS233. 10.1093/infdis/jiad492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Hazra A, Zucker J, Bell E, Flores J, Gordon L, Mitjà O, et al. Mpox in people with past infection or a complete vaccination course: a global case series. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):57–64. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00492-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang X, Wei Y, He Z, Wang D, Zhang L, Du J, et al. CD70-induced differentiation of proinflammatory Th1/17/22/GM lymphocytes associated with disease progression and immune reconstitution during HIV infection. Emerging Microbes Infections. 2023;12(2):2271068. 10.1080/22221751.2023.2271068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Loyal L, Warth S, Jürchott K, Mölder F, Nikolaou C, Babel N, et al. SLAMF7 and IL-6R define distinct cytotoxic versus helper memory CD8+ T cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6357. 10.1038/s41467-020-19002-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yao SY, Peng Y, Zhang X, Yang H, Kazuo S, Liu J, et al. The CXCL13–CXCR5 axis and follicular cytotoxic T cells: linking T–B crosstalk in autoimmune diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;193:118784. 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Islam R, Figura M, Heyer J, Lieber S, Huber M, Loveland KL, et al. T cell microenvironmental impacts and therapeutic opportunities: application to human testicular germ cell tumors. Andrology. 2026;e70200. 10.1111/andr.70200. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Xia A, Wang X, He J, Wu W, Jiang W, Xue S, et al. Cross-reactive antibody response to monkeypox virus surface proteins in a small proportion of individuals with and without Chinese smallpox vaccination history. BMC Biol. 2023;21(1):205. 10.1186/s12915-023-01699-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Agrati C, Cossarizza A, Mazzotta V, Grassi G, Casetti R, De Biasi S, et al. Immunological signature in human cases of monkeypox infection in 2022 outbreak: an observational study. The Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(3):320–30. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00662-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Taha AM, Elrosasy A, Mahmoud AM, Saed SAA, Moawad WAE, Hamouda E, et al. The effect of HIV and mpox co-infection on clinical outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. HIV Med. 2024;25(8):897–909. 10.1111/hiv.13622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang XM, Zhang JY, Xing X, Huang HH, Xia P, Dai XP, et al. Global transcriptomic characterization of T cells in individuals with chronic HIV-1 infection. Cell Discov. 2022;8(1):29. 10.1038/s41421-021-00367-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mazzotta V, Lepri AC, Matusali G, Cimini E, Piselli P, Aguglia C, et al. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of modified vaccinia Ankara pre-exposure vaccination against mpox according to previous smallpox vaccine exposure and HIV infection: prospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;68:102420. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ngalamika O, Lidenge SJ, Mukasine MC, Kawimbe M, Kamanzi P, Ngowi JR, et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and humoral immunity in individuals with and without HIV in an African population: a prospective cohort study. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;127:106–15. 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang X, Yan Y, Su B, Xiao D, Yu M, Jin X, et al. Comparing immune responses to inactivated Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 between people living with HIV and HIV-Negative individuals: a cross-sectional study in China. Viruses. 2022;14(2):277. 10.3390/v14020277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang H, Xie X, Zeng M, Cao Y, Fan Q, Jiang M, et al. Clinical characteristics, viral dynamics, and antibody response of monkeypox virus infections among men with and without HIV infection in Guangzhou, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1412753. 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1412753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Koh CH, Lee S, Kwak M, Kim BS, Chung Y. CD8 T-cell subsets: heterogeneity, functions, and therapeutic potential. Exp Mol Med. 2023;55(11):2287–99. 10.1038/s12276-023-01105-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Luo X, Hou X, Wang Y, Li Y, Yu S, Qi H. An interleukin-9-ZBTB18 axis promotes germinal center development of memory B cells. Immunity. 2025;58(4):861–74.e6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wheatley AK, Kristensen AB, Lay WN, Kent SJ. HIV-dependent depletion of influenza-specific memory B cells impacts B cell responsiveness to seasonal influenza immunisation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):26478. 10.1038/srep26478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yang Y, Niu S, Shen C, Yang L, Song S, Peng Y, et al. Longitudinal viral shedding and antibody response characteristics of men with acute infection of monkeypox virus: a prospective cohort study. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):4488. 10.1038/s41467-024-48754-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Colavita F, Matusali G, Mazzotta V, Bettini A, Lapa D, Meschi S, et al. Profiling the acute phase antibody response against mpox virus in patients infected during the 2022 outbreak. J Med VirolJournal Med Virol. 2023;95(6):e28851. 10.1002/jmv.28851. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Stefanie S, Koldehoff M, Schenk-Westkamp P, Horn PA, Esser S, Lindemann M. T cell responses against orthopoxviruses in HIV-Positive patients. Vaccines (Basel). 2024;12(2):131. 10.3390/vaccines12020131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kaw S, Ananth S, Tsopoulidis N, Morath K, Coban BM, Hohenberger R, et al. HIV-1 infection of CD4 T cells impairs antigen-specific B cell function. Embo J. 2020;39(24):e105594. 10.15252/embj.2020105594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Maan I, Kohli M, Gilson R. Mpox in people living with HIV. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2024;37(1):1–7. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rai MA, Shi V, Kennedy BD, Justement JS, Manning MR, Praiss L, et al. Impact of monkeypox virus infection on immune parameters in a woman with human immunodeficiency virus receiving clinically effective antiretroviral therapy. The J Infect Dis. 2023;228(3):270–75. 10.1093/infdis/jiad096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Duncan MC, Omondi FH, Kinloch NN, Lapointe HR, Speckmaier S, Moran-Garcia N, et al. Effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination on HIV viremia and reservoir size. Aids. 2024;38(8):1120–30. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Matveev VA, Mihelic EZ, Benko E, Budylowski P, Grocott S, Lee T, et al. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and their effect on HIV reservoir in older people with HIV. iScience. 2023;26(10):107915. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.






