ABSTRACT
Chlamydia trachomatis (C.t.) infections can lead to severe complications due to the pathogen’s ability to evade the host immune response, often resulting in asymptomatic infections. The mechanisms underlying this immune subversion remain incompletely understood, but likely involve specific bacterial effector proteins. Here, we identify CT181 as a novel effector that binds to Mcl-1, a key regulator of neutrophil survival. While a C.t. CT181 mutant exhibited only modest defects in epithelial cell replication and inclusion development, it was required for C.t. survival in neutrophils, which correlated with elevated Mcl-1 levels in cells infected with wild-type C.t. Using a murine infection model, we demonstrate that CT181 contributes to C.t. colonization and inflammatory cytokine production in vivo. Our findings establish CT181 as the first bacterial effector protein known to bind Mcl-1 and show that it is associated with prolonged neutrophil survival, revealing a novel strategy by which C.t. promotes immune dysregulation, facilitating bacterial persistence while driving C.t. pathogenesis.
IMPORTANCE
Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular pathogen that must evade early immune defenses to establish infection. This study identifies CT181 as a previously undescribed secreted effector that associates with the host pro-survival protein Mcl-1 and is linked to prolonged neutrophil survival during infection. Neutrophils, which normally undergo rapid apoptosis, persist longer when infected with wild-type C. trachomatis, whereas loss of CT181 reduces bacterial survival in these cells. In a mouse model of infection, the CT181 mutant exhibits reduced bacterial burden and diminished inflammatory responses, including neutrophil recruitment and cytokine production. Together, these findings highlight CT181 as a bacterial factor that contributes to host cell survival and immune modulation during C. trachomatis infection, underscoring the complex strategies used by intracellular pathogens to persist within the host.
KEYWORDS: CT181, chlamydia, T3SS effector, neutrophil, Mcl-1
INTRODUCTION
The obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis (C.t.) is the causative agent of trachoma (1) and the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia (2). While many cases are asymptomatic, untreated infections can result in serious complications, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, sterility, and the development of cervical or ovarian cancer (2–5). There is no vaccine, and over 127 million new cases are reported annually worldwide (6). Moreover, antibiotic failure occurs in 10% of the cases (7, 8).
All Chlamydiae share a unique biphasic developmental cycle in which they differentiate between infectious elementary bodies (EBs) and replicative reticulate bodies (RBs) (9). Upon contact with a target host cell, EBs are internalized into a membrane-bound inclusion (9), which avoids lysosomal fusion and traffics along microtubules to the peri-Golgi region (10, 11). EBs differentiate into RBs, undergoing multiple rounds of replication prior to converting back to EBs for release by host cell lysis or extrusion (12). At all stages of the developmental cycle, C.t. utilizes its type III secretion system (T3SS) to secrete effector proteins to engage host organelles and perturb vital signaling pathways to acquire key nutrients for replication, promote host cell viability, and subvert host defense mechanisms.
As an obligate intracellular pathogen, C.t. is dependent on the host cell to provide a replicative niche conducive to completing its replication cycle. To achieve this, C.t. has evolved methods to inhibit the induction of apoptosis and promote host cell viability. C.t. employs multiple strategies to subvert host cell death, including inhibiting the activation of Bax and Bak, preventing mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and cytochrome c release, and inhibiting caspase-3 cleavage (13, 14). Additionally, pro-survival signaling pathways, including Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT, are activated during C.t. infection, which, in turn, induces the upregulation and stabilization of induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein (Mcl-1) (15). The importance of this process is underscored by studies indicating that the depletion of Mcl-1 sensitizes the C.t.-infected cell to death (15). Prior work revealed that Cdu1, a C.t. secreted factor that possesses deubiquitinase and Lys-acetyltransferase activity, localizes to the inclusion membrane and stabilizes Mcl-1 through deubiquitination (16, 17). However, infection with a Cdu1 mutant only resulted in a marginal decline in Mcl-1 protein levels (17), suggesting that Mcl-1 levels are regulated via multiple mechanisms and might involve additional C.t. effector proteins.
While the identification of inclusion membrane proteins (Incs) has been achieved by screening proteins for the presence of a bi-lobed hydrophobic domain, the identification of conventional T3SS proteins has proven more challenging. Although some have been identified based on the presence of a eukaryotic-like domain, signal sequence, and analysis in a surrogate host (18–23), it is likely that other undiscovered secretion substrates remain to be identified. C.t. effectors TmeA, TarP, TmeB, and TepP are uniquely produced by the EBs and have been shown to be secreted early in infection to facilitate host cell invasion and initiate early infection events (24–28). Thus, we hypothesized that other hypothetical proteins, distinctly present in EBs, may represent novel secreted effector proteins (29). Here, we assessed whether any of these hypothetical proteins uniquely produced in EBs (29) are secreted during C.t. infection, successfully identifying one novel secretion substrate and two that are possibly secreted. Using yeast two-hybrids (Y2H) and affinity purification mass spectrometry, we determined that the secreted effector protein CT181 binds to the induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein (Mcl-1). Importantly, we show that the CT181 mutant was severely impaired in its ability to survive in neutrophils and in its ability to survive in the mouse genital tract. By binding to Mcl-1, CT181 serves to promote inflammation by impacting host cell survival pathways, highlighting its crucial role in both immune evasion and pathogen persistence during infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial and cell culture
C. trachomatis serovar L2 (LGV 434/Bu) was propagated in HeLa 229 cells (American Type Culture Collection), and EBs were purified using a gastrografin density gradient, as previously described (30). As is conventional in the field, we used C.t. serovar L2 (CTL0433) but adopted the serovar D nomenclature (CT181). HeLa cells were grown at 37°C with 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco). A2EN cells (Kerafast) were propagated in keratinocyte serum-free media (K-SFM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 0.16 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 25 μg/mL bovine pituitary extract (BPE), 0.4 mM CaCl2, and gentamicin (31).
Human and mouse polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) isolation
Mouse neutrophils were isolated from the bone marrow of naive C57BL/6N mice by density gradient centrifugation. Bone marrow cells were overlaid onto Histopaque 1119 and Histopaque 1077 and centrifuged for 30 min at 872 RCF at room temperature without brake. Neutrophils were collected at the interface of Histopaque 1119 and Histopaque 1077, washed with RMPI 1640, and used immediately. Human neutrophils were freshly isolated from the blood of healthy volunteers using the Ficoll separation method (32). Briefly, blood was layered on top of Ficoll and centrifuged at 1,500 RCF for 30 min. All cell layers above the PMN layer were removed, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) solution was added to the remaining layers. After incubation for 45 min, the light red layer was transferred to a fresh tube and centrifuged at 1,000 RCF for 5 min. The remaining red blood cells were lysed with sterile H2O, and the osmolarity was then restored by adding sterile 5× PBS. These neutrophils were collected by centrifugation and then resuspended in RPMI medium. The neutrophil number was determined using a Neubauer chamber and trypan blue staining.
Plasmid construction
To assess the secretion of candidate effectors, each candidate secretion substrate was PCR-amplified from L2/434/Bu genomic DNA and cloned into the NotI/KpnI site of pBomb4 CyaA, pBomb4 BlaM, and pBomb4 GSK FLAG (22). For affinity-purification mass spectrometry, CT181 was cloned into the NotI/KpnI site of pBomb4-tet-mCherry (33), and a FLAG tag was added to the C-terminus via PCR. TargeTron insertion sites were predicted by TargeTronics, and gene blocks were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. Gene blocks were cloned into the HindIII/BsrGI site of pACT to generate CT181::bla (34). To complement CT181, the full-length gene along with the 300 bp upstream region, encompassing the promoter, was cloned into the SacII/SalI site of pBomb3 to express CT181-FLAG. For ectopic expression, CT181 was cloned into the KpnI/XhoI of pcDNA-GFP. The integrity of all constructs was verified by DNA sequencing at McLab. All primers are listed in Table S1.
Transformation of Chlamydia
C.t. serovar L2 (LGV 434/Bu) EBs were transformed as previously described (22). Infectious progenies were harvested every 48 h and used to infect a new HeLa cell monolayer until viable inclusions were evident (~2–3 passages). Expression of individual fusion proteins was confirmed by western blotting. For the TargeTron mutant, successful insertion into the target gene, CT181, was confirmed by PCR, and expression of the complementation construct was confirmed by western blotting.
Adenylate cyclase (CyaA) secretion assay
Confluent HeLa cell monolayers were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 with C.t. transformant strains harboring the pBomb4 CyaA expression plasmids. Expression of the CyaA fusion protein was induced using 10 ng/mL anhydrous tetracycline (aTc) at the time of infection, and 24 h post-infection, the relative abundance of cAMP in host cells was measured via competitive ELISA as previously described (22). The levels of cAMP in cells infected with C.t. pBomb4 CyaA (negative control vector) were compared to those infected with C.t. CyaA-effector fusions strains to evaluate effector secretion.
Beta-lactamase assay
To assay for effector secretion, HeLa cells, seeded into black, clear-bottom, 96-well plates (Greiner), were infected at an MOI of 5, and effector expression was induced at the time of infection using 10 ng/mL aTc as previously described (22). At 24 h post-infection, cells were loaded with CCF4-AM using the alternative loading protocol following the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Plates were incubated in the dark for 1 h at room temperature and then were read on a plate reader (Tecan). To quantify effector translocation, the background was subtracted, a ratio of 460–535 nm (blue:green) was determined, and expression, relative to the cells infected with C.t. expressing BlaM only, was calculated as previously described (35).
GSK-FLAG immunoprecipitation
To evaluate effector secretion using the GSK assay, HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 5, and effector-GSK FLAG fusion protein expression was induced using 10 ng/mL aTc as previously described (22). Cells were harvested 24 h post-infection by lysing in 800 µL eukaryotic lysis solution (ELS) (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 1% Triton-X 100) containing Halt cocktail protease and phosphatase inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific) along with 10 µM GSK-3 α- and β-inhibitor 1-(7-methoxyquinolin-4-yl)-3-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]urea (Tocris). Supernatants were applied to anti-FLAG magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at 4°C, and unbound proteins were removed by washing the beads five times in ELS without Triton-X 100. Purified protein was eluted using 4× LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and samples were analyzed by western blotting.
Western blotting
To evaluate the expression, confluent HeLa cell monolayers were infected at an MOI of 5, and after 24 h, the samples were lysed in ELS with Halt cocktail protease inhibitor. Lysates were resolved using 3%–8% Tris-acetate protein gels with Tris-acetate SDS running buffer for CyaA and BlaM fusion proteins. GSK FLAG IPs were resolved using 4%–12% Bis-Tris protein gels with MOPS SDS running buffer. Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed using anti-CyaA (Santa Cruz Cat# sc-13582), anti-BlaM (QED BioScience Cat# 15720), GSK-3β-Tag (Cell Signaling Cat# 9325S), or Phospho-GSK-3-beta (Cell Signaling Cat# 9336S) antibodies. For IPs, blots were probed with anti-FLAG (Thermo Cat# 701629) and anti-HA (Sigma Cat# H6908) antibodies.
To evaluate the expression of proteins in neutrophils, human or mouse neutrophils were infected at an MOI of 5, and after 48 h, the samples were lysed either in 8 M urea or 3 M trichloroacetic acid to precipitate the protein. The lysate was mixed with 2× Laemmli buffer and resolved using 10% acrylamide gel with Tris-vhloride SDS running buffer. Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane in Transblot and probed with anti-Mcl-1 (Cell Signaling Cat# 5453T), C.t. OmpA (Thermo Cat# PA5-117609), or anti-β-actin (Thermo Cat# A00702-100) antibodies.
Immunofluorescence
To determine the subcellular localization of CT181 and co-localization with Mcl-1, HeLa cells were transfected using Lipofectamine LTX (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Eighteen hours post-transfection, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100, the nucleus was stained using DAPI, and mitochondria were stained using CoxIV (Novus MAB6980). Images were captured using a Leica DFC7000T confocal microscope equipped with Leica software.
Growth assay
A2EN or HeLa cells were infected on ice at an MOI of 5 for A2EN or 2.5 for HeLa with each strain. After 30 min on ice, the inoculum was removed, and the cultures were shifted to 37°C to stimulate bacterial uptake. At 0, 24, and 48 h post-infection, the cells were lysed in water, and the supernatants were added to fresh HeLa cell monolayers as previously described (36). Titer plates were fixed 24 h post-infection and stained with an anti-C.t. LPS antibody (Novus Cat#NBP1-28820) for enumeration of inclusions by immunofluorescence microscopy. In parallel, a set of samples was fixed at 24 h and stained with anti-C.t. LPS and anti-IncE (inclusion membrane marker). Inclusion area was measured using ImageJ.
Freshly isolated human or mouse PMNs were infected at an MOI of 5. At 48, 72, and 96 h post-infection, cells were sonicated at 4°C for 15 min, and the supernatants were added to fresh, overnight-grown HeLa cells (in case of human PMNs) and McCoy cells (in case of mouse PMNs) in 24-well plates. Cells were fixed 36 h post-infection and stained with an anti-C.t. HSP60 antibody (Santa Cruz Cat#SC-57840) and DAPI for enumeration of inclusions by immunofluorescence microscopy. Infection was calculated from the number of cells and inclusions present in randomly captured microscopic images.
Invasion assay
To determine if CT181 is important for host cell invasion, A2EN cells were seeded on glass coverslips, and an invasion assay was conducted as previously described (25). Briefly, cells were infected on ice at an MOI of 5 for 30 min, after which the inoculum was removed, and the plates were placed at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 60 min to allow for bacterial uptake. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde, and differential immunostaining was conducted as previously described (37). The number of internal bacteria (single stained) and host cells (DAPI-stained) was enumerated from at least 30 images per experiment.
Yeast two-hybrid analysis
ULTImate Y2H analysis was completed by Hybrigenics Services (Paris, France). The coding sequence for CT181 C.t. L2/434/Bu (aa1-236) was PCR-amplified and cloned into the pB27 construct as a C-terminal fusion with LexA (N-CT181-LexA). The resulting construct was introduced into yeast as bait and screened by mating with yeast bearing a randomly primed HeLa cell cDNA library (prey). Due to autoactivation, the screen was conducted on selective media with 100 mM AT. Positively selected clones were isolated and identified using the NCBI GenBank. The predicted biological score (PBS) was calculated to assess the reliability of each interaction. Scores ranged from a high probability of specificity (A score) to a low probability of specificity (E score) between the bait and prey.
Affinity purification mass spectrometry
A confluent monolayer of HeLa cells was infected at an MOI of 2 with C.t. expressing FLAG-tagged CT181. After 24 h, the cells were lysed in ELS, placed on ice for 20 min, and subsequently spun at 12,000 × g for 20 min. Supernatants were incubated with preclearing beads (mouse IgG agarose, Millipore Sigma) for 2 h and then were applied to FLAG magnetic beads (anti-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel, Millipore Sigma) overnight at 4°C. Beads were washed six times with ELS without Triton-X 100 in MS-grade water and prepared for mass spectrometry as previously described (38, 39). Raw LC-MS/MS data were searched against a database containing UniProt_Human and Chlamydia_trachomatis_D/UW-3/C× using Mascot 2.8.
Immunoprecipitation
HeLa cells were co-transfected with pcDNA3.1-GFP plasmids containing empty vector, CT181, or TmeA and pcDNA3.1-Mcl-1HA using Lipofectamine LTX (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Four hours post-transfection, the medium was changed. For infection IPs, HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 2, and the effector FLAG fusion was induced using 10 ng/mL aTc as previously described (22). At 24 hpi, the cells were washed with ice-cold 1× PBS and lysed in 800 µL ELS containing Halt cocktail protease and phosphatase inhibitor (22). Supernatants were applied to anti-FLAG (infection) or anti-HA (transfection) magnetic beads (Pierce Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1.5 h at 4°C. The beads were subsequently washed 5× in ELS without Triton-X 100, and the purified protein was eluted using 4× NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were analyzed by western blotting.
Cell death assay
To determine neutrophil viability during C.t. infection, freshly isolated 106 human or mouse neutrophils were infected with either wild-type C.t. or CT181::bla at an MOI of 5 in six-well plates in RPMI 1640 medium. After different time points, annexin V-APC and 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen Cat#550475) were added to the cells in binding buffer and incubated for 15 min at 37°C. Cells were washed and analyzed using an Attune NXT flow cytometer. Cells negative for both annexin V and 7-AAD were considered viable cells and plotted as a percent of double-negative cells.
In vivo mouse infection
C57BL/6N mice were injected with 2.5 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) subcutaneously 5 days prior to infection. On the day of the infection, mice, housed in specific pathogen-free conditions, were transcervically infected with 107 inclusion-forming units of wild-type C.t. or CT181::bla. On day 7, mice were sacrificed, and the female genital tract (FGT) was collected in PBS. The tissue was weighed and digested with collagenase/DNAse to release the cells. Cells were lysed using sonication for 10 min to release the bacteria. The lysate was centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was serially diluted and applied to overnight-grown monolayers of McCoy cells. Inclusions formed after 30 h incubation were counted and plotted.
Bacterial load determination
Quantitative PCR was performed on homogenized tissue using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA, USA) as described elsewhere (40). Briefly, C.t. and mouse DNA were isolated from the tissue. DNA was subjected to quantitative, real-time PCR in triplicate on a StepOne Plus thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) using the primers listed in Table S1. In parallel, standard curves were generated from known amounts of C.t. DNA and mouse DNA and used to determine the amount of DNA present in the sample. Bacterial load was determined by calculating (pg) of C.t. DNA per unit weight of (μg) of mouse DNA in the samples.
Flow cytometry analysis
Mice, infected for 7 days, were sacrificed, and the female genital tract was collected in PBS with gentamicin. The tissue was digested with collagenase/DNAse to release the cells and then passed through a 70-µm filter to remove undigested tissue. The cell suspension was washed with FACS buffer and stained with CD16/32 (BioLegend Cat#101302) at a 1:100 dilution for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed and incubated with CD45-PE594 (BioLegend Cat#103145), CD11b-PEcy7 (Thermo Fisher Cat#25-0112-82), F4/80-AF700 (Thermo Fisher Cat#56-4801-82), and Ly6G-FITC (BioLegend Cat#127605). CD45+ CD11b+ Ly6G+F4/80- cells were considered neutrophils.
ELISA
Cells from the lumen of the female genital tract were collected by flushing with 1 mL of PBS and subsequent centrifugation to pellet down the cells. The secreted cytokines in the supernatant were detected by ELISA. Briefly, TNFα and IL-6 antibodies were coated onto ELISA plates in coating buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C. The plates were washed three times with PBS/0.05% Tween (PBST) and incubated with blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The collected lavage was diluted in the blocking buffer, added to the plates, and incubated overnight at 4°C. The plates were washed three times with PBST and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with biotin-labeled TNFα and IL-6 antibodies, respectively, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After washing three times with PBST, streptavidin-HRP was added and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Plates were washed, and the HRP substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added. The reaction was stopped by adding the stop solution (1N H2SO4), and the amount of converted TMB was measured at 450 nm. The values obtained were compared to standards to calculate the concentration of cytokines present in the lavages.
RESULTS
Identification of secreted effector proteins
Delivery of effector proteins into a host cell during C.t. invasion and modulation of early infection events does not require de novo protein synthesis, suggesting that C.t. pre-packages effector proteins at the end of its developmental cycle to initiate new rounds of infection. Indeed, TmeA, TmeB, TarP, and TepP are prepacked into EBs at the end of the developmental cycle and have since been confirmed to be secreted proteins required for invasion or promoting the early steps of infection (26, 27, 41, 42). Proteomic profiling of C.t. developmental forms identified additional hypothetical proteins that are uniquely present in EBs (Table 1) (29), potentially representing novel effector proteins. To determine whether any of these proteins are delivered into the host cell during C.t. infection, we conducted CyaA, BlaM, and GSK secretion assays. Expression of the fusion protein was confirmed by western blotting (Figs. S1 and S2). CT053 was used as a positive control, as we have previously demonstrated that it is secreted (23).
TABLE 1.
Early effector candidates assayed for secretion
| D/UW-3/CX | L2/434/Bu | MW | CyaA assay | BlaM assay | GSK assay | Final designation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT053 | CTL0309 | 17.2 kDa | Secreted | Secreted | NDc | Secreted |
| CT181 | CTL0433 | 24.4 kDa | Secreted | Secreted | NDc | Secreted |
| CT365 | CTL0619 | 61.0 kDa | NDb | NDb | Not secreted | Unable to conclude |
| CT389 | CTL0645 | 47.0 kDa | Not secreted | NDa | NDb | Unable to conclude |
| CT590 | CTL0853 | 109.1 kDa | NDa | Not secreted | Not secreted | Not secreted |
| CT668 | CTL0037 | 24.4 kDa | Not secreted | Not secreted | NDb | Not secreted |
| CT676 | CTL0045 | 19.9 kDa | Not secreted | NDa | NDb | Unable to conclude |
| CT814 | CTL0185 | 11.4 kDa | Not Secreted | Not secreted | Secreted | Possibly secreted |
| CT837 | CTL0209 | 76.4 kDa | NDb | Not secreted | NDb | Unable to conclude |
| CT865 | CTL0244 | 37.5 kDa | Not secreted | Secreted | Not secreted | Possibly secreted |
Assay results were not determined (ND) due to the lack of clone.
Assay results were not determined (ND) because the candidate was not expressed.
Assay results were not determined (ND) because the candidate was not tested, as it was secreted in two prior assays.
cAMP assays revealed an increase in cAMP for CT181-CyaA relative to CyaA alone, indicating that it is released into the host cell during chlamydial infection (Fig. 1A; Table 1). In line with our CyaA assay, our BlaM assay results indicated that CT181-BlaM is secreted (Fig. 1B; Table 1), confirming that it represents a bona fide secretion substrate. Furthermore, the results from our BlaM assay suggest that CT865 may also be secreted. We (23) and others (33, 43) have used the small 13-residue GSK-tag to identify secreted Chlamydia proteins. Here, we employed this third assay for CT865 as it had conflicting results between the CyaA and BlaM assays. We also used this assay for those that were unable to be assayed or were found not to be secreted using the CyaA and BlaM assays (Table 1). Uniquely, this assay identified CT814 as a potential secretion substrate (Fig. 1C).
Fig 1.

Several proteins, uniquely produced by EBs, are secreted effectors. HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 5 with each strain for 24 h. (A) Cytosolic levels of cAMP were measured, and the levels obtained from cells infected with the effector-CyaA fusion were compared to those of cells infected with C.t. expressing CyaA alone. Data are from three experiments with three replicates per experiment. (B) Secretion of effector-BlaM fusion was determined by evaluating the change in 460/535 nm fluorescence, which results from cleavage of the CCF4-AM substrate. Ratios associated with the effector-BlaM fusion were compared to cells infected with C.t. expressing BlaM alone. Data are representative of three experiments with three replicates per experiment. (C) Effector-GSK FLAG fusions were immunoprecipitated using FLAG magnetic beads and analyzed by western blotting using anti-GSK-3β and anti-phospho-GSK-3β antibodies. Data are representative from three independent experiments. (A, B) Error bars represent the standard deviation from the means. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA comparing the candidate effector to (A) CyaA or (B) BlaM alone using Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test. ****P < 0.0001.
As in our previous work, we classified effectors as “secreted” if positive in at least two assays, “possibly secreted” if positive in only one assay, and “not secreted” if negative in at least two assays without any positives (22, 23). Using these criteria, we identified CT181 as a new secreted effector and two candidates, CT814 and CT865, as possibly secreted. Taken together, our results reinforce the importance of using multiple assays to identify secretion substrates.
CT181 is important for intracellular replication and inclusion development in cervical epithelial cells
To determine whether the newly identified secretion substrate CT181 is important for chlamydial infection, we used the TargeTron (34, 44, 45) system, successfully generating a CT181 mutant (CT181::bla). We then evaluated the ability of the CT181::bla mutant to invade, replicate, and form a spacious inclusion relative to wild-type C.t., a CT144 mutant (CT144::bla) as an effector control, and a TmeA mutant (tmeA-lx), which was used as a positive control for an invasion defect (24, 25, 46). Evaluation of CT181 growth revealed it is important for intracellular replication in A2EN and HeLa cells (Fig. 2A). Complementation through the expression of full-length CT181, under the control of the native promoter, restored replication in both HeLa and A2EN cells (Fig. 2B). This growth defect was not simply due to a defect in bacterial invasion, as no significant difference in bacterial uptake was noted for CT181::bla compared to wild-type (Fig. 2C). In line with the observed reduction in bacterial replication, smaller inclusions were formed by CT181 mutant relative to wild-type (Fig. 2D and E). Taken together, these data indicate that CT181 is important for bacterial replication and inclusion development in epithelial cells but is dispensable for host cell invasion.
Fig 2.

CT181 is dispensable for host cell invasion but is important for intracellular replication and inclusion formation. (A, B) A2EN or HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 2.5 with (A) wild-type, tmeA-lx, CT181::bla, or CT144::bla or (B) with wild-type, CT181::bla, or CT181::bla comp. (A, B) At 48 h, the cells were lysed and replated on fresh HeLa cell monolayers, and infectious forming units were quantified by immunofluorescence microscopy. (C) A2EN or HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 2.5 for 60 min with wild-type, tmeA-lx, CT181::bla, or CT144::bla. The number of internal bacteria was determined using differential immunostaining. (D) To measure the inclusion size, A2EN cells were infected at an MOI of 2.5 for 24 h. Bacteria were stained with anti-LPS (green), the inclusion membrane was stained with an anti-IncE antibody (red), and DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). (E) Inclusion diameter was measured in ImageJ. (A–E) Data are representative of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test comparing the mutants to wild type. ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
CT181 binds to the induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein (Mcl-1)
To dissect the molecular function of CT181, we sought to identify the host target(s). HeLa cells were infected for 24 h with C.t. L2 expressing FLAG-tagged CT181 under the control of a tetracycline-inducible promoter. Affinity purification was performed using FLAG beads, and mass spectrometry data were compared to cells infected with C.t. harboring the pBomb4-tet vector. A total of 55 proteins were present in all three replicates of CT181, of which 33 were unique to the CT181 AP-MS and were not found in the vector IP (Table S2).
Simultaneous to our AP-MS, we employed a Y2H screen to identify potential interacting partners. Several candidates were identified (Table 2), of which the induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein 1 (Mcl-1) represented the largest population of clones and had the highest score. Cross-comparison of hits between the Y2H and AP-MS revealed Mcl-1 as the only hit common to both screens. Interactions between Mcl-1 and CT181 were further supported by alpha-fold modeling (Fig. S3A and B). Protein-protein interaction analysis of the modeled CT181-Mcl-1 complex identified several potential intermolecular contacts at the interface. Notably, negatively charged residues in CT181 (E85 and E111) are positioned near R329 of Mcl-1 (Fig. S3C, left), suggesting stabilizing electrostatic interactions, while Q193 of CT181 is predicted to form a hydrogen bond with the backbone of F335 (Fig. S3C, middle). Additional contacts involving D64 and R36 of CT181 with N260 and D256 of Mcl-1 (Fig. S3C, right) further support a network of electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding interactions that may stabilize the interface. Together, these findings provide structural support for an interaction between CT181 and Mcl-1.
TABLE 2.
Candidate CT181-binding partners identified by yeast 2-hybrida
| Protein | Name | Function | No. of clones | PBS score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARMCX6 | Armadillo repeat containing X-linked 6 | Regulates mitochondrial dynamics and distribution in neural cells | 2 | D |
| BIRC6 | Baculoviral IAP repeat containing 6 | Regulation of apoptosis | 5 | D |
| CIR1 | Corepressor interacting with RBPJ | Regulation of transcription | 1 | D |
| DHX29 | DExH-box helicase 29 | Regulation of translation | 3 | D |
| EHBP1 | EH domain-binding protein 1 | Actin cytoskeleton organization | 1 | D |
| ELP1 | Elongator complex protein 1 | tRNA binding | 1 | D |
| FEZ2 | Fasciculation and elongation protein zeta-2 | Signal transduction | 1 | D |
| FOXRED2 | FAD-dependent oxidoreductase domain-containing protein 2 | Ubiquitin-dependent ERAD pathway | 3 | D |
| GPATCH8 | G patch domain-containing protein 8 | RNA binding | 1 | D |
| HNRNPF | Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F | RNA processing | 2 | D |
| LDLRAP1 | Low-density lipoprotein receptor adaptor protein 1 | Cholesterol homeostasis | 2 | D |
| LHX9 | LIM/homeobox protein Lhx9 | Regulation of transcription | 1 | D |
| MCL1 | Induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein | Regulation of apoptosis | 81 | A |
| MYCBP2 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase | Protein ubiquitination | 7 | C |
| NUMB | Protein numb homolog | Adherens junction organization | 2 | D |
| PGK1 | Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 | Epithelial cell differentiation | 3 | D |
| PRKD3 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase D3 | Protein kinase D signaling | 5 | D |
| PSD3 | PH and SEC7 domain-containing protein | Regulation of ARF protein signal transduction | 2 | D |
| PTBP1 | Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 1 | RNA splicing | 21 | C |
| SMURF2 | E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SMURF2 | Protein ubiquitination | 6 | C |
| TMOD3 | Tropomodulin-3 | Actin filament organization | 11 | B |
| WNK1 | Serine/threonine-protein kinase WNK | Ion homeostasis | 1 | D |
Predicted biological score (A–F) was assigned by Hybrigenics. A, very high confidence in the interaction; B, high confidence in the interaction; C, good confidence in the interaction; D, moderate confidence in the interaction; E, potential non-specific interaction; and F, experimentally proven artifact.
To validate this interaction, HeLa cells were infected at an MOI of 2, with C.t. expressing FLAG-tagged CT181, CteG, or TmeA. As shown in Fig. 3A, CT181-FLAG specifically bound to endogenous Mcl-1, confirming their interaction during C.t. infection. To further confirm this interaction, HeLa cells were co-transfected with GFP-tagged CT181 and HA-tagged Mcl-1. GFP-tagged CT181 or the negative controls, GFP-TmeA or GFP alone, were immunoprecipitated from cells, and western blots were probed for HA-tagged Mcl-1. GFP-CT181, and not the negative controls, immunoprecipitated HA-Mcl-1 (Fig. 3B).
Fig 3.
CT181 binds to the induced myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein. (A) HeLa cells were infected with CT016-FLAG, CteG-FLAG, CT181-FLAG, or TmeA-FLAG, and C.t. effectors were immunoprecipitated with FLAG beads. Immunoblots were probed with anti-FLAG or anti-Mcl-1. (B) HeLa cells were co-transfected with HA-tagged Mcl-1 and GFP, GFP-CT181, or GFP-TmeA. Proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-HA beads and analyzed by western blotting using anti-GFP or anti-HA antibodies. (C–E) HeLa cells were transfected with the GFP-effector or GFP-CT181 alone (green) or in combination with HA-tagged Mcl-1. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100. (D) DAPI (blue) was used to demark the nucleus, and Mcl-1 (red) was visualized using anti-HA antibodies. (E) Mitochondria were visualized using anti-CoxIV (blue), and Mcl-1 (red) was visualized using anti-HA antibodies. (C) Images were obtained using epifluorescence microscopy. Scale bar is 10 μm. (D and E) Images were obtained using confocal microscopy. Scale bars are 10 μm. (A–E) Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Ectopically expressed CT181 co-localizes with Mcl-1
To orthogonally confirm that CT181 interacts with Mcl-1, we ectopically expressed GFP-CT181 with or without HA-tagged Mcl-1 and evaluated subcellular localization by immunofluorescence microscopy. Because cT3SS effectors are generally not readily visualized by immunofluorescence during infection, we relied on ectopic expression. When expressed alone, GFP-CT181 was localized throughout the cell (Fig. 3C); however, co-expression with Mcl-1 resulted in the formation of large aggregate-like structures (Fig. 3D). Aggregate formation when co-expressed with Mcl-1 was specific to CT181 and was not noted when Mcl-1 was co-expressed with vector or CteG, a C.t. effector that binds to CETN2 (38). Mcl-1 is a critical regulator of numerous host cell processes, including apoptosis, mitophagy, mitochondrial bioenergetics, cell cycle, and DNA repair (47). To gain insight into the role Mcl-1 might play during chlamydial infection, we co-expressed CT181 with Mcl-1 and assessed co-localization with the mitochondrial marker CoxIV. While CT181 did not co-localize with CoxIV when expressed independently of Mcl-1, co-expression with Mcl-1 resulted in prominent co-localization with CoxIV (Fig. 3E). Collectively, these results indicate that CT181 colocalizes with Mcl-1 and contributes to increased abundance of Mcl-1 when ectopically expressed.
CT181 is involved in PMN lifespan extension
Previous work has shown that Chlamydia infection can interfere with host cell death induced by extrinsic or intrinsic stress stimuli (13–15, 48, 49). Unlike epithelial cells, PMNs have a short lifespan of only 12–24 h in the bloodstream without stimulation and are inherently programmed to undergo spontaneous apoptosis (50). Notably, Mcl-1 plays a central role in PMN survival (50). We have previously shown that C.t. can survive in PMNs for extended periods, even beyond 24 h (49, 51), indicating that infection prolongs PMN lifespan. We therefore investigated whether CT181 extends the lifespan of human PMNs. Human PMNs were infected with wild-type C.t. or CT181::bla, and cell viability was analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 4A). Wild-type C.t., but not CT181::bla, significantly extended the survival of PMNs, with more than 50% of the cells remaining alive even after 48 h (Fig. 4B). Next, we investigated whether infection of human PMNs affects the amount of Mcl-1. Due to the highly variable nature of PMNs, we infected PMNs isolated from the blood of different donors. A strong increase in Mcl-1 levels was detected upon wild-type C.t. infection. Interestingly, CT181::bla infection failed to increase Mcl-1 levels in PMNs isolated from three different donors (Fig. 4C and D). Consistent with this observation, PMNs infected with CT181::bla exhibited reduced neutrophil survival compared to those infected with wild-type C.t. (Fig. 4B). To assess bacterial survival and infectivity within neutrophils, we recovered bacteria from infected cells and plated them on epithelial cell monolayers. This infectivity assay revealed that CT181::bla showed reduced infectious output compared to wild-type C.t. The infectivity assay is an indication of only infectious bacteria viable in the neutrophils. However, western blot analysis of OmpA in neutrophil lysates quantified the total bacterial burden regardless of viability. Infected PMNs were lysed, and bacteria were assessed for reinfectivity in epithelial cells. Recovery of infectious CT181::bla was markedly reduced, with approximately 35% of the initial infection inoculum being detected at 48 hpi, and no detectable infectious bacteria at 96 hpi (Fig. 4E through G). Furthermore, total viable Chlamydia was quantified by assessing the total OmpA levels by western blot. Across all time points, chlamydial load was reduced in CT181::bla compared to wild-type C.t. (Fig. 4H and I). Notably, the inability of the CT181::bla mutant to induce Mcl-1 stability was not due to decreased bacterial burden, as when a higher burden was used and normalized to wild-type, an inability to increase Mcl-1 levels was still noted (Fig. S4A). Aligned with this observation, plasmid-deficient C.t., which has a survival defect, was still able to induce Mcl-1 (Fig. S4B). The complementation strain in which CT181 expression was restored rescued Mcl-1 protein levels, demonstrating that the reduction in Mcl-1 observed during CT181::bla infection results from the absence of CT181 rather than from differences in bacterial load (Fig. S4C). Taken together, our results suggest that CT181 is important for enhancing Mcl-1 expression and may contribute to C.t.’s ability to prolong survival of human PMNs.
Fig 4.
CT181 is involved in the prolongation of human PMN lifespan, and the survival of C.t. Freshly isolated PMNs from human blood were infected with wild-type (WT) C.t. or CT181::bla at an MOI of 5 for the indicated time points. (A) PMNs were stained with annexin V and 7-AAD at the indicated time points and analyzed for cell survival using flow cytometry. (B) Annexin V- and 7-AAD-negative cells were considered live cells and shown as the percentage of double-negative cells. (C) Mcl-1 expression was analyzed by western blot 48 h post-infection (h.p.i). The data are representative of three independent experiments with technical replicates. (D) Relative densities in panel C were quantified and plotted using ImageJ. (E) Graphical representation of the work plan for re-infectivity assays. Freshly isolated human PMNs were infected with C.t. or CT181::bla for 48 h, lysed, and released bacteria were added to fresh HeLa cells. (F) Infected PMNs were lysed and replated on fresh HeLa cell monolayers, and infectious-forming units were quantified using immunofluorescence. Bacteria were stained with anti-OmpA (green) and nuclei with DAPI (blue). (G) Inclusion counts were calculated and plotted as the percent of infection. (H) In a replicate experiment, HeLa cells were harvested to determine the total C.t. OmpA expression relative to human actin levels to estimate infectious burden. (I) Relative densities in panel H were quantified and plotted using ImageJ. The data are representative of two independent experiments. (B, D, G, I) Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ****P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05. (A–F) Data are representative of three independent experiments. (G) Data are representative of two independent experiments.
CT181 is required for survival of C.t. in mouse PMNs and in transcervical infection
To investigate the role of CT181 in the interaction of C.t. with PMNs in an immunocompetent model, we repeated experiments performed with human PMNs using mouse PMNs. Similar to human PMNs, infection with wild-type bacteria extended the lifespan of mouse PMNs (Fig. 5A). The CT181::bla mutant failed to extend the lifespan of mouse PMNs at any of the investigated time points, and the number of viable cells was lower than that of the non-infected PMN sample at 24 hpi (Fig. 5A). Fewer neutrophils survived during CT181::bla infection, possibly because the absence of CT181 failed to stabilize Mcl-1, as evidenced by decreased Mcl-1 expression in CT181::bla-infected neutrophils compared to wild-type-infected neutrophils (Fig. 5B and C). Increasing the bacterial load of CT181::bla to compensate for the lower bacterial load of CT181::bla in neutrophils did not result in Mcl-1 stabilization, indicating that the decrease in Mcl-1 levels is not due to less C.t. survival but indeed is due to the lack of CT181 (Fig. S5A). However, complementation of CT181 in the CT181::bla strain restored neutrophil survival and Mcl-1 stabilization, highlighting the role of CT181 in promoting Mcl-1 stabilization and neutrophil survival (Fig. 5A through C). To assess bacterial load and infectivity, Chlamydia released from neutrophils following lysis was used to infect McCoy cells in a secondary infection assay (Fig. 5D). CT181 was important for C.t. survival in PMNs as significantly fewer mutant bacteria were able to re-infect McCoy cells after exposure to mouse PMNs compared to wild-type C.t. (Fig. 5E and F). Consistent with these findings, western blot analysis of the secondary infection assay showed a similar trend; loss of CT181 in CT181::bla strain significantly reduced total OmpA levels, which were restored by CT181 complementation (Fig. 5G and H). The reduced OmpA levels indicate a lower bacterial burden, correlating with the reduced infectivity observed in Fig. 5E and F. Complementing the loss of CT181 by over-expressing full-length CT181 restored the C.t. survival defect and PMN survival in mouse neutrophils (Fig. S5B). In addition, we infected mice by transcervical infection and determined the number of infectious EBs by infecting McCoy cells with lysates of the FGT 6 days pi (Fig. 6A). Significantly fewer infectious EBs could be isolated from mice infected with the CT181::bla mutant compared to those infected with the wild-type bacteria (Fig. 6B and C). Interestingly, the number of PMNs detected in the FGT tissue of the mice infected with CT181::bla was significantly lower compared to the wild-type infected mice (Fig. 6D and E). The lower number of PMNs correlated with lower levels of the inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-6 (Fig. 6F and G), suggesting that CT181 may contribute to shaping the PMN and inflammatory cytokine response during in vivo infection.
Fig 5.
CT181 is involved in the prolongation of mouse PMN lifespan and the survival of C.t.. Neutrophils were isolated from the bone marrow of naive C57BL6/N mice and were infected with wild-type or CT181::bla or CT181::bla::Comp (CT181::bla Npro comp) C.t. at an MOI of 5 for the indicated time points. (A) PMNs were stained with annexin V and 7-AAD and analyzed for cell survival using flow cytometry. Double-negative cells were considered live cells and shown as the percentage of double-negative cells. (B) Mcl-1 expression was analyzed by western blot at 48 hpi. The data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) Relative densities were quantified and plotted using ImageJ. (D) Graphical representation of the work plan for re-infectivity assays. Freshly isolated human PMNs were infected with C.t. or CT181::bla for 48 h, lysed, and released bacteria were added to fresh McCoy cells. (E) Infected PMNs were lysed and replated on fresh McCoy cell monolayers, and infectious-forming units were quantified by immunofluorescence. Bacteria were stained with anti-OmpA (green) and nuclei with DAPI (blue). (F) Inclusion counts were calculated in ImageJ and plotted as the percentage of infection. (G) In a replicate experiment, McCoy cells were harvested to determine the total C.t. OmpA expression relative to mouse actin levels to estimate infectious load. The data are representative of three independent experiments. (H) Relative densities were quantified and plotted using ImageJ. (A, C, F, H) Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05. (A–H) Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Fig 6.
CT181 is involved in the survival of Chlamydia during mouse genital tract infection. Female C57BL/6N mice were infected for 6 days with 107 wild-type or CT181::bla C.t. (A) Graphical representation of the experimental setup. At 6 dpi, the female genital tract was harvested, weighed, and lysed using collagenase D/DNase I. (B) A portion of the cells was collected and lysed by sonication. The lysate and released C.t. were added to a monolayer of McCoy cells. The number of inclusions was counted from each mouse and expressed as the number of bacteria per 100 mg of tissue. (C) A portion of the tissue was subjected to DNA isolation, and the bacterial load was determined through quantitative real-time PCR of the C.t. 16s RNA gene and the mouse GAPDH gene. The ratio of (pg) C.t. 16s RNA gene/µg host GAPDH gene was plotted to determine bacterial burden in the tissue. (B and C) Statistical significance was determined using Student t-test. (D) A portion of the harvested cells was stained for CD45, CD11b, Ly6G, and F4/80. CD45+ CD11b+ F4/80- Ly6G+ were considered neutrophils recruited to the tissue. Shown is the gating strategy for the neutrophil count. (E) The total number of cells collected was analyzed and expressed as the number of neutrophils per 100 mg of tissue. The data points represent the results obtained from a single mouse (n = 6). (F) IL-6 and (G) TNFα levels were determined from female genital tract lavages by ELISA (N = 4). (E–G) Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01. (A–G) Data are representative of three independent experiments.
DISCUSSION
Infection of a host cell by an obligate intracellular pathogen requires the pathogen to subvert host cell death pathways while simultaneously promoting host cell viability, a phenotype conferred by bacterial effector proteins. Although Inc proteins have been readily identified based on the presence of a bi-lobed hydrophobic domain, the identification of non-Inc-secreted factors has proven more challenging. By focusing on proteins uniquely present in the EB of C.t., we identified CT181 as a novel secreted effector protein and demonstrated that it binds to Mcl-1. Our findings suggest that CT181 contributes to prolonged neutrophil survival, potentially through Mcl-1 signaling. Furthermore, infection with the CT181 mutant was associated with reduced PMN numbers and decreased production of inflammatory cytokines in vivo, consistent with an overall attenuation of infection.
To date, only a handful of secreted effectors have been identified and characterized, limiting our understanding of the roles they play in C.t. pathogenesis. While some effectors have been identified based on the presence of a eukaryotic-like domain or via their interaction with chaperones (18–20, 27, 52, 53), it is likely that other C.t.-secreted proteins remain to be discovered. Prior work has demonstrated that effector proteins associated with host cell invasion and early infection events are uniquely prepackaged at the end of the developmental cycle, positioning them to initiate new rounds of infection (26, 27, 46). While TarP and TmeA directly promote host cell invasion by inducing cytoskeletal rearrangements (24–26, 28, 46, 54–57), TmeB appears to play an opposing role by interfering with Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization (58). TepP represents another multifunctional prepackaged effector that binds to Crk adaptor proteins and the PI3K complex, stimulating PI(3,4,5)P3 formation, and it disassembles tight junctions by perturbing EPS8 (27, 42, 59). Intriguingly, TepP also regulates the expression of immunity-regulated genes and reduces neutrophil recruitment in an organoid infection model (27, 60). Given the diverse roles these early effector proteins play in promoting C.t. infection, we rationalized that additional hypothetical proteins uniquely produced by EBs may represent novel secreted effector proteins (29). By screening 10 candidate proteins for secretion, we identified CT181 as a novel secretion substrate. Our data indicate that CT181 is dispensable for invasion but might be important later in infection.
Manipulation of host cell viability is a critical defense mechanism employed by a broad range of microbial pathogens. While some pathogenic bacteria, such as Yersinia, Shigella, and Salmonella, promote apoptosis to induce the killing of phagocytes, obligate intracellular bacteria like C.t. have evolved sophisticated strategies to protect their host cells from apoptotic stimuli while simultaneously stimulating pro-survival pathways. During apoptosis, pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members Bax and Bak trigger permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane, a critical step in the apoptotic cascade. However, anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, including Mcl-1, counteract this process by sequestering Bax and Bak in the cytoplasm (47). Mcl-1’s expression and activity are tightly controlled at multiple levels—transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and translational—allowing for finely tuned and rapid changes in response to internal and external stimuli (47). Crucially, Mcl-1 is further regulated via rapid protein turnover through ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, making it an ideal target for pathogens seeking to manipulate host cell survival. During C.t. infection, both mRNA and protein levels of Mcl-1 are upregulated in a RAF/MEK/ERK pathway-dependent manner (15). Activation of this signaling pathway results in Mcl-1 phosphorylation and stabilization, enhancing its anti-apoptotic activity and ensuring survival of the host cell. Interestingly, a sub-pool of Mcl-1 localizes near the inclusion periphery, where it is stabilized during C.t. infection via deubiquitination by the Chlamydia deubiquitinating enzyme 1 (Cdu1), whereas the majority of Mcl-1 is stabilized independently of Cdu1 (17). While a Cdu1 mutant reduced Mcl-1 levels during infection, Mcl-1 levels remained elevated relative to uninfected cells or those treated with an apoptosis inducer (17). This suggests that C.t. employs multiple, potentially redundant methods to maintain Mcl-1 levels. Our study builds upon these findings by demonstrating that the secreted protein CT181 associates with Mcl-1 and that CT181 contributes to maintaining Mcl-1 abundance during infection. This discovery adds another layer of complexity to C.t.-host interactions, revealing a novel mechanism for the pathogen to manipulate host cell survival pathways. The multi-faceted approach taken by C.t. in manipulating Mcl-1 levels—through signaling pathway activation, deubiquitination, and now the observed association between CT181 and Mcl-1 detected by Co-IP and Y2H—underscores the central role of Mcl-1 in bacterial survival.
Importantly, our data indicate that CT181 contributes to infection through mechanisms that extend beyond modulation of host cell survival. While CT181 promotes neutrophil longevity at early time points (24–48 hpi), the pronounced reduction in infectious progeny observed at later time points (72–96 hpi) in CT181::bla-infected neutrophils is unlikely to be explained solely by differences in host cell viability. In particular, reduced OmpA levels normalized to host actin suggest a defect in bacterial burden on a per-cell basis, consistent with impaired bacterial survival and/or replication within neutrophils. A limitation of our study is that neutrophil viability was not assessed at later time points corresponding to maximal differences in infectious output (72–96 hpi), precluding a definitive distinction between increased host cell death and enhanced bacterial killing as contributors to the observed phenotype. However, the reduction in bacterial burden independent of host cell number supports a model in which CT181 has functions beyond prolonging neutrophil lifespan. Together, these findings support a model in which CT181 plays a dual role: (i) preserving the intracellular niche by delaying neutrophil apoptosis and (ii) promoting bacterial survival and/or replication within that niche.
Although Mcl-1 was the interaction partner we prioritized, our data sets suggest that CT181 may engage additional host factors. In addition to Mcl-1, our interaction screens identified several candidate proteins that may point to broader functions for CT181. Notably, BIRC6, MYCBP2, and SMURF2 are all linked to apoptosis or ubiquitin-dependent protein regulation, raising the possibility that CT181 may influence host cell survival more broadly, potentially including pathways that affect Mcl-1 indirectly. TMOD3, EHBP1, ACTB, and ITGB1 suggest possible connections to cytoskeletal remodeling or membrane trafficking, processes that are central for chlamydial entry, inclusion formation, and intracellular survival. These candidates were not pursued here because we prioritized Mcl-1 due to the overlap between the Y2H and AP-MS and prior work, which highlight the importance of Mcl-1 to chlamydia infection (15, 17, 49, 61).
Neutrophils are essential components of the innate immune system and, as such, play a crucial role in the initial host response to microbial pathogens. These cells are among the first to respond to microbial infection, where they act to limit bacterial spread and facilitate pathogen clearance via phagocytosis, degranulation, and release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Notably, neutrophils have a short lifespan, typically undergoing apoptosis within 12–24 h, at which point, scavenger macrophages clear out the apoptotic neutrophils, leading to resolution of the inflammatory response and containment of cytotoxic materials that could otherwise damage host tissues. However, under certain conditions, including during inflammation or infection, the lifespan of neutrophils can be prolonged. Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis, induces transcription upregulation of Mcl-1 (62, 63), activates the PI3K/Akt pathway to maintain Mcl-1 expression (64), and induces phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (65), all to promote neutrophil survival. Coxiella burnetii also prolongs neutrophil survival by activating MAPK pathways to promote stabilization of Mcl-1. While the specific factor involved remains unknown, Mcl-1 stabilization and inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis occur in a type IV secretion system-dependent manner, suggesting that a secreted protein is required (66, 67). Additionally, Chlamydia pneumoniae can prolong the life span of neutrophils by delaying apoptosis (48, 68, 69). Previous studies have shown that C.t. can remain viable and infectious for at least 24 h after infection (51, 70), suggesting that prolonging neutrophil survival may serve as a protected niche for the pathogen to spread during infection (9). Remarkably, and consistent with this notion, C.t. infection was recently shown to activate the PI3K/Akt pathway to induce Mcl-1 expression and promote neutrophil survival (49). Our new data indicate that the CT181 mutant is unable to maintain a replication niche in neutrophils, which can be attributed to both a failure to prolong neutrophil lifespan and a reduction in C.t. survival. Collectively, while prior studies highlight the importance of neutrophil survival, the mechanism remains unknown. Our study indicates that secreted bacterial proteins, namely CT181, may be crucial to this process and further emphasizes that Mcl-1 manipulation may be a common strategy among diverse intracellular pathogens. Importantly, because our AP-MS screen was performed in epithelial cells, it is possible that additional CT181 interacting partners uniquely expressed by neutrophils were not captured in this screen and remain to be identified.
In conclusion, we have identified a novel C.t. secreted protein, CT181, that binds to Mcl-1 and prolongs neutrophil survival during C.t. infection. Our work provides a framework for future studies aimed at understanding how bacterial effector proteins disarm the host immune response to allow for productive infection.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge grant support from the NIH (M.M.W., R01 AI150812, R01 AI155434, and R61 AI179999; B.S. and A.M., T32 AI007511), the University of Iowa Stead Family Scholars to M.M.W., and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ERC-2018-ADG/NCI-CAD) to T.R. This work was supported by the DFG within the Collaborative Research Center SFB 1583 (Project B01) to T.R.
We thank Weber lab members Steve Huang and Xavier Tijerina for assistance. We thank Kristin Patrick for helpful discussions.
Contributor Information
Thomas Rudel, Email: thomas.rudel@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Mary M. Weber, Email: mary-weber@uiowa.edu.
Sunny Shin, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00357-26.
Fig. S1 to S5.
Primers.
AP-MS.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ramadhani AM, Derrick T, Holland MJ, Burton MJ. 2016. Blinding trachoma: systematic review of rates and risk factors for progressive disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Menon S, Timms P, Allan JA, Alexander K, Rombauts L, Horner P, Keltz M, Hocking J, Huston WM. 2015. Human and pathogen factors associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related infertility in women. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:969–985. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00035-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Das M. 2018. Chlamydia infection and ovarian cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 19:e338. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30421-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Koskela P, Anttila T, Bjørge T, Brunsvig A, Dillner J, Hakama M, Hakulinen T, Jellum E, Lehtinen M, Lenner P, Luostarinen T, Pukkala E, Saikku P, Thoresen S, Youngman L, Paavonen J. 2000. Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 85:35–39. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000101)85:1<35::aid-ijc6>3.0.co;2-a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zhu H, Shen Z, Luo H, Zhang W, Zhu X. 2016. Chlamydia trachomatis infection-associated risk of cervical cancer. Medicine (Abingdon) 95:e3077. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Huai P, Li F, Chu T, Liu D, Liu J, Zhang F. 2020. Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 20:589. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05307-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mohammadzadeh F, Dolatian Ph.D. M, Jorjani M, D. P, Afrakhteh M, Majd HA, Abdi F, Pakzad R. 2019. Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis treatment failure with azithromycin: a meta-analysis. Int J Reproductive Biomed 17:603–620. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Afrakhteh M, Mahdavi A, Beyhaghi H, Moradi A, Gity S, Zafargandi S, Zonoubi Z. 2011. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in patients who remained symptomatic after completion of sexually transmitted infection treatment. Iran J Reprod Med 11:285–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Stelzner K, Vollmuth N, Rudel T. 2023. Intracellular lifestyle of Chlamydia trachomatis and host-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 21:448–462. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00860-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Scidmore MA, Fischer ER, Hackstadt T. 2003. Restricted fusion of Chlamydia trachomatis vesicles with endocytic compartments during the initial stages of infection. Infect Immun 71:973–984. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.2.973-984.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Grieshaber SS, Grieshaber NA, Hackstadt T. 2003. Chlamydia trachomatis uses host cell dynein to traffic to the microtubule-organizing center in a p50 dynamitin-independent process. J Cell Sci 116:3793–3802. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hybiske K, Stephens RS. 2007. Mechanisms of host cell exit by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11430–11435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703218104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Fan T, Lu H, Hu H, Shi L, McClarty GA, Nance DM, Greenberg AH, Zhong G. 1998. Inhibition of apoptosis in Chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. J Exp Med 187:487–496. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.4.487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Perfettini J-L, Ojcius DM, Andrews CW, Korsmeyer SJ, Rank RG, Darville T. 2003. Role of proapoptotic BAX in propagation of Chlamydia muridarum (the mouse pneumonitis strain of Chlamydia trachomatis) and the host inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 278:9496–9502. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211275200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rajalingam K, Sharma M, Lohmann C, Oswald M, Thieck O, Froelich CJ, Rudel T. 2008. Mcl-1 is a key regulator of apoptosis resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells. PLoS One 3:e3102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bastidas RJ, Kędzior M, Davidson RK, Walsh SC, Dolat L, Sixt BS, Pruneda JN, Coers J, Valdivia RH. 2024. The acetylase activity of Cdu1 regulates bacterial exit from infected cells by protecting Chlamydia effectors from degradation. eLife 12:RP87386. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fischer A, Harrison KS, Ramirez Y, Auer D, Chowdhury SR, Prusty BK, Sauer F, Dimond Z, Kisker C, Hefty PS, Rudel T. 2017. Chlamydia trachomatis-containing vacuole serves as deubiquitination platform to stabilize Mcl-1 and to interfere with host defense. eLife 6:e21465. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Subtil A, Delevoye C, Balañá M-E, Tastevin L, Perrinet S, Dautry-Varsat A. 2005. A directed screen for chlamydial proteins secreted by a type III mechanism identifies a translocated protein and numerous other new candidates. Mol Microbiol 56:1636–1647. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04647.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Muschiol S, Boncompain G, Vromman F, Dehoux P, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B, Subtil A. 2011. Identification of a family of effectors secreted by the type III secretion system that are conserved in pathogenic Chlamydiae. Infect Immun 79:571–580. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00825-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pais SV, Milho C, Almeida F, Mota LJ. 2013. Identification of novel type III secretion chaperone-substrate complexes of Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS One 8:e56292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. da Cunha M, Pais SV, Bugalhão JN, Mota LJ. 2017. The Chlamydia trachomatis type III secretion substrates CT142, CT143, and CT144 are secreted into the lumen of the inclusion. PLoS One 12:e0178856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. McCaslin PN, Andersen SE, Icardi CM, Faris R, Steiert B, Smith P, Haider J, Weber MM. 2023. Identification and preliminary characterization of novel type III secreted effector proteins in Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun 91:e00491-22. doi: 10.1128/iai.00491-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. McCaslin PN, Andersen SE, Smith P, Weber MM, Faris R. 2025. Validation and subcellular localization of previously predicted type III secreted effector proteins in Chlamydia trachomatis. Microbiol Spectr 13:e01616-25. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01616-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Keb G, Ferrell J, Scanlon KR, Jewett TJ, Fields KA. 2021. Chlamydia trachomatis TmeA directly activates N-WASP to promote actin polymerization and functions synergistically with TarP during invasion. mBio 12:e02861-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02861-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Faris R, McCullough A, Andersen SE, Moninger TO, Weber MM. 2020. The Chlamydia trachomatis secreted effector TmeA hijacks the N-WASP-ARP2/3 actin remodeling axis to facilitate cellular invasion. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008878. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ghosh S, Ruelke EA, Ferrell JC, Bodero MD, Fields KA, Jewett TJ. 2020. Fluorescence-reported allelic exchange mutagenesis-mediated gene deletion indicates a requirement for Chlamydia trachomatis tarp during in vivo infectivity and reveals a specific role for the C terminus during cellular invasion. Infect Immun 88:423–428. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00841-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chen Y-S, Bastidas RJ, Saka HA, Carpenter VK, Richards KL, Plano GV, Valdivia RH. 2014. The Chlamydia trachomatis type III secretion chaperone Slc1 engages multiple early effectors, including TepP, a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein required for the recruitment of CrkI-II to nascent inclusions and innate immune signaling. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003954. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. McCullough A, Jabeena CA, Huang S, Steiert B, Faris R, Weber MM. 2025. Chlamydia trachomatis TmeA promotes pedestal-like structure formation through N-WASP and TOCA-1 interactions. mSphere 10:e00101-25. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00101-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Saka HA, Thompson JW, Chen Y-S, Kumar Y, Dubois LG, Moseley MA, Valdivia RH. 2011. Quantitative proteomics reveals metabolic and pathogenic properties of Chlamydia trachomatis developmental forms. Mol Microbiol 82:1185–1203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07877.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Faris R, Weber MM. 2019. Propagation and purification of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2 transformants and mutants. Bio Protoc 9:e3459. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Buckner LR, Schust DJ, Ding J, Nagamatsu T, Beatty W, Chang TL, Greene SJ, Lewis ME, Ruiz B, Holman SL, Spagnuolo RA, Pyles RB, Quayle AJ. 2011. Innate immune mediator profiles and their regulation in a novel polarized immortalized epithelial cell model derived from human endocervix. J Reprod Immunol 92:8–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hattar K, Sibelius U, Bickenbach A, Csernok E, Seeger W, Grimminger F. 2001. Subthreshold concentrations of anti-proteinase 3 antibodies (c-ANCA) specifically prime human neutrophils for fMLP-induced leukotriene synthesis and chemotaxis. J Leukoc Biol 69:89–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bauler LD, Hackstadt T. 2014. Expression and targeting of secreted proteins from Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 196:1325–1334. doi: 10.1128/JB.01290-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Weber MM, Noriea NF, Bauler LD, Lam JL, Sager J, Wesolowski J, Paumet F, Hackstadt T. 2016. A functional core of IncA is required for Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion fusion. J Bacteriol 198:1347–1355. doi: 10.1128/JB.00933-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Newton P, Latomanski EA, Newton HJ. 2016. Applying fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to examine effector translocation efficiency by Coxiella burnetii during siRNA silencing. J Vis Exp 113:54210. doi: 10.3791/54210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Weber MM, Lam JL, Dooley CA, Noriea NF, Hansen BT, Hoyt FH, Carmody AB, Sturdevant GL, Hackstadt T. 2017. Absence of specific Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion membrane proteins triggers premature inclusion membrane lysis and host cell death. Cell Rep 19:1406–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Faris R, Andersen SE, McCullough A, Gourronc F, Klingelhutz AJ, Weber MM. 2019. Chlamydia trachomatis serovars drive differential production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines depending on the type of cell infected. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:399. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Steiert B, Icardi CM, Faris R, McCaslin PN, Smith P, Klingelhutz AJ, Yau PM, Weber MM. 2023. The Chlamydia trachomatis type III-secreted effector protein CteG induces centrosome amplification through interactions with centrin-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120:e2303487120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303487120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Steiert B, Elwell CA, Tijerina X, Elliott MA, Delgado Y, Ni J, Faris R, Smith P, Andersen SE, McCaslin PN, Kevil-Yeager J, Eldridge Q, Imai BS, Arrington JV, Yau PM, Mirrashidi KM, Johnson JR, Verschueren E, Dollen JV, Jang GM, Krogan NJ, Bouhaddou M, Suetterlin C, Engel JN, Weber MM. 2024. Global mapping of the Chlamydia trachomatis conventional secreted effector – host interactome reveals CebN interacts with nucleoporins and Rae1 to impede STAT1 nuclear translocation. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.25.587017 [DOI]
- 40. Bernstein-Hanley I, Balsara ZR, Ulmer W, Coers J, Starnbach MN, Dietrich WF. 2006. Genetic analysis of susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis in mouse. Genes Immun 7:122–129. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Mueller KE, Fields KA. 2015. Application of β-lactamase reporter fusions as an indicator of effector protein secretion during infections with the obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis. PLoS One 10:e0135295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Dolat L, Carpenter VK, Chen Y-S, Suzuki M, Smith EP, Kuddar O, Valdivia RH. 2022. Chlamydia repurposes the actin-binding protein EPS8 to disassemble epithelial tight junctions and promote infection. Cell Host Microbe 30:1685–1700. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.10.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Yanatori I, Miura K, Chen Y-S, Valdivia RH, Kishi F. 2021. Application of a Chlamydia trachomatis expression system to identify Chlamydia pneumoniae proteins translocated into host cells. J Bacteriol 203:e00511-20. doi: 10.1128/JB.00511-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Weber MM, Faris R. 2019. Mutagenesis of Chlamydia trachomatis using TargeTron. Methods Mol Biol 2042:165–184. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9694-0_12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Johnson CM, Fisher DJ. 2013. Site-specific, insertional inactivation of incA in Chlamydia trachomatis using a group II intron. PLoS One 8:e83989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Keb G, Hayman R, Fields KA. 2018. Floxed-cassette allelic exchange mutagenesis enables markerless gene deletion in Chlamydia trachomatis and can reverse cassette-induced polar effects. J Bacteriol 200:e00479-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00479-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Widden H, Placzek WJ. 2021. The multiple mechanisms of MCL1 in the regulation of cell fate. Commun Biol 4:1029. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02564-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Sarkar A, Möller S, Bhattacharyya A, Behnen M, Rupp J, van Zandbergen G, Solbach W, Laskay T. 2015. Mechanisms of apoptosis inhibition in Chlamydia pneumoniae-infected neutrophils. Int J Med Microbiol 305:493–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Koch R, Challagundla N, Stelzner K, Rudel T. 2025. Chlamydia trachomatis subverts neutrophil cell death pathways through RIP3 and Mcl-1 manipulation. mBio 16:e02098-25. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02098-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Dzhagalov I, St John A, He Y-W. 2007. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 is essential for the survival of neutrophils but not macrophages. Blood 109:1620–1626. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-013771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Rajeeve K, Das S, Prusty BK, Rudel T. 2018. Chlamydia trachomatis paralyses neutrophils to evade the host innate immune response. Nat Microbiol 3:824–835. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0182-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. da Cunha M, Milho C, Almeida F, Pais SV, Borges V, Maurício R, Borrego MJ, Gomes JP, Mota LJ. 2014. Identification of type III secretion substrates of Chlamydia trachomatis using Yersinia enterocolitica as a heterologous system. BMC Microbiol 14:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Spaeth KE, Chen Y-S, Valdivia RH. 2009. The Chlamydia type III secretion system C-ring engages a chaperone-effector protein complex. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000579. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Clifton DR, Fields KA, Grieshaber SS, Dooley CA, Fischer ER, Mead DJ, Carabeo RA, Hackstadt T. 2004. A chlamydial type III translocated protein is tyrosine-phosphorylated at the site of entry and associated with recruitment of actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10166–10171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402829101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lane BJ, Mutchler C, Al Khodor S, Grieshaber SS, Carabeo RA. 2008. Chlamydial entry involves TARP binding of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000014. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Romero MD, Carabeo RA. 2022. Distinct roles of the Chlamydia trachomatis effectors TarP and TmeA in the regulation of formin and Arp2/3 during entry. J Cell Sci 135:jcs260185. doi: 10.1242/jcs.260185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Romero MD, Carabeo RA. 2024. Dynamin-dependent entry of Chlamydia trachomatis is sequentially regulated by the effectors TarP and TmeA. Nat Commun 15:4926. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49350-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Scanlon KR, Keb G, Wolf K, Jewett TJ, Fields KA. 2023. Chlamydia trachomatis TmeB antagonizes actin polymerization via direct interference with Arp2/3 activity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 13:1232391. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1232391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Carpenter V, Chen Y-S, Dolat L, Valdivia RH. 2017. The effector TepP mediates recruitment and activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase on early Chlamydia trachomatis vacuoles. mSphere 2:e00207-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00207-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Dolat L, Valdivia RH. 2021. An endometrial organoid model of interactions between Chlamydia and epithelial and immune cells. J Cell Sci 134:jcs252403. doi: 10.1242/jcs.252403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Waguia Kontchou C, Gentle IE, Weber A, Schoeniger A, Edlich F, Häcker G. 2022. Chlamydia trachomatis inhibits apoptosis in infected cells by targeting the pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Bak. Cell Death Differ 29:2046–2059. doi: 10.1038/s41418-022-00995-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Pedra JHF, Sukumaran B, Carlyon JA, Berliner N, Fikrig E. 2005. Modulation of NB4 promyelocytic leukemic cell machinery by Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Genomics 86:365–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ge Y, Yoshiie K, Kuribayashi F, Lin M, Rikihisa Y. 2005. Anaplasma phagocytophilum inhibits human neutrophil apoptosis via upregulation of bfl-1, maintenance of mitochondrial membrane potential and prevention of caspase 3 activation. Cell Microbiol 7:29–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00427.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sarkar A, Hellberg L, Bhattacharyya A, Behnen M, Wang K, Lord JM, Möller S, Kohler M, Solbach W, Laskay T. 2012. Infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum activates the phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt and NF-κB survival pathways in neutrophil granulocytes. Infect Immun 80:1615–1623. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05219-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Choi K-S, Park JT, Dumler JS. 2005. Anaplasma phagocytophilum delay of neutrophil apoptosis through the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signal pathway. Infect Immun 73:8209–8218. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8209-8218.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Elliott A, Schoenlaub L, Freches D, Mitchell W, Zhang G. 2015. Neutrophils play an important role in protective immunity against Coxiella burnetii infection. Infect Immun 83:3104–3113. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00042-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Cherla R, Zhang Y, Ledbetter L, Zhang G. 2018. Coxiella burnetii inhibits neutrophil apoptosis by exploiting survival pathways and antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1. Infect Immun 86:e00504-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00504-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. van Zandbergen G, Gieffers J, Kothe H, Rupp J, Bollinger A, Aga E, Klinger M, Brade H, Dalhoff K, Maass M, Solbach W, Laskay T. 2004. Chlamydia pneumoniae multiply in neutrophil granulocytes and delay their spontaneous apoptosis. J Immunol 172:1768–1776. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Rupp J, Pfleiderer L, Jugert C, Moeller S, Klinger M, Dalhoff K, Solbach W, Stenger S, Laskay T, van Zandbergen G. 2009. Chlamydia pneumoniae hides inside apoptotic neutrophils to silently infect and propagate in macrophages. PLoS One 4:e6020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Register KB, Morgan PA, Wyrick PB. 1986. Interaction between Chlamydia spp. and human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in vitro. Infect Immun 52:664–670. doi: 10.1128/iai.52.3.664-670.1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S5.
Primers.
AP-MS.




