Skip to main content
Asian Journal of Andrology logoLink to Asian Journal of Andrology
. 2026 Jan 13;28(3):310–320. doi: 10.4103/aja202553

SPACA4 regulates the structure and molecular basis of spermatid maturation and ultimately affects sperm quality in mice

Xu Chen 1,2, Hai-Qian Wu 1, Dan-Yang Wan 1,3, Xiang-Zheng Zhang 1, Xin-Li Zhou 1, Xue-Jiang Guo 1, Hui Zhu 1,
PMCID: PMC13258286  PMID: 41527940

Abstract

Sperm quality is crucial for sperm function and can even affect embryo quality and offspring health. Spermatid maturation is extremely complex, as spermatids undergo morphological changes, laying the foundation for the execution of sperm function. The function of sperm acrosome-associated 4 (SPACA4) in spermatogenesis is not well known. The present study revealed that SPACA4 was specifically expressed in the acrosomes and cytoplasm of mouse spermatids. Spaca4 knockout mice demonstrated that the loss of SPACA4 led to male subfertility. The quality of mature sperm was abnormal in Spaca4−/− mice, manifested by decreased motility and multiple deformities. Spaca4-/- sperm exhibited irregular nuclear shapes, abnormal nuclei with vacuoles, missing or incompletely fused acrosomes, and multiple cross-sections enclosed in the same sperm cell membrane. Electron microscopy and molecular expression analyses of testicles revealed that the loss of SPACA4 affected the differentiation of the acrosome, acroplaxome, and manchette, resulting in abnormalities in nuclear elongation, chromatin condensation, and flagellar development. Interestingly, SPACA4 did not regulate spermiogenesis via the acetylcholine signaling pathway. Analysis of the differential protein expression profile revealed that the expression of 9 proteins was significantly decreased in Spaca4−/− spermatids. A decreased protein, transformation-related protein 53 target 5 (TRP53TG5), was knocked down in spermatids and found that the phenotype was consistent with Spaca4 knockout mice. These results revealed that the absence of SPACA4 leads to abnormal spermatid maturation and affects sperm quality in mice. Abnormal sperm quality in Spaca4−/− mice results in decreased sperm capacitation and a decreased acrosome response, ultimately affecting the fertility of male mice.

Keywords: multiple abnormalities, SPACA4, spermatid maturation, sperm quality, subfertility

INTRODUCTION

Infertility is a growing health problem that affects 70 million people worldwide.1,2 Sperm are the ultimate executors of male fertility, and a sufficient quantity and high quality of sperm are fundamental guarantees of male fertility.3,4 Clinically, male infertility patients, in addition to azoospermia and/or severe oligospermia, often present with asthenospermia and/or teratospermia. In patients with asthenospermia and/or teratospermia, the spem count is not reduced but the sperm shows decreased quality and dysfunction.5,6 Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is becoming more widely used to help infertile male patients give birth to offspring without the need for a natural conception process.7,8 However, sperm quality affects the fertilization rate, pregnancy outcome, and health of offspring, including decreased blastocyst rate, decreased embryo implantation rate, and increased risk of birth defects.9,10,11,12

Spermatogenesis is a complex process of cell division and differentiation. The spermatogenic cycle begins with spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) maintaining self-renewal through mitosis, while some SSCs continue to differentiate into spermatocytes. The spermatocytes produce haploid spermatids through meiosis, after which the spermatids undergo dramatic characteristic changes to form sperm. The sperm are transported to the epididymis to develop into fertile mature sperm.13,14,15 In the process of spermatid maturation, round spermatids undergo substantial structural and functional alterations, representing the most critical and direct biological processes that affect sperm morphology and quality.16,17 Spermatid maturation involves multiple steps, including nuclear elongation and condensation, acrosome development, mitochondrial remodeling, and central microtubule assembly.18,19,20 At present, little is known about the molecular regulatory mechanism of spermatid maturation. Revealing and explaining the key molecules will help to further clarify the regulatory mechanism of spermiogenesis and may provide certain ideas for the evaluation and improvement of clinical ART outcomes.

To this end, we constructed protein profiles of mouse spermatids (unpublished data) to elucidate the molecular networks involved in spermatid maturation. We focused on sperm acrosome-associated 4 (SPACA4), a testicle-specific protein that belongs to the Ly6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (Ly6/uPAR) family. The Ly6/uPAR family members, which are highly conserved across species, are usually associated with cell differentiation and play important roles in different physiological or pathological processes.21,22 In the Ly6/uPAR family, five members (acrosomal vesicle protein 1 [ACRV1], lymphocyte antigen 6 family member K [LY6K], LY6/PLAUR domain containing 4 [LYPD4], testis expressed 101 [TEX101], and SPACA4) are specifically expressed in testicular tissue. Previous studies have reported that ACRV1, LY6K, LYPD4, and TEX101 are involved in sperm-specific functions, such as zona pellucida penetration, sperm-oocyte interactions, and spermatozoa migration into the oviduct.23,24,25,26 Fujihara et al.27 reported that the absence of SPACA4 affects the fertility of male mice and influences zona pellucida penetration. A recent clinical study has reported that incubating human sperm with an SPACA4 antibody inhibits the binding of sperm and the zona pellucida,28 further demonstrating that SPACA4 is involved in sperm function and may affect male fertility.

However, we identified SPACA4 in round spermatids and elongated spermatids in mouse testes, indicating that it not only plays a role in sperm function but is also likely to participate in spermatid maturation. Ly6/uPAR contains an Ly6/uPAR (LU) domain composed of 60–90 amino acids,29 and it regulates protein receptors, such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), and acetylcholinesterase (AChEs).30 Ly6/uPAR is involved in several biological processes by regulating the function of cholinergic receptors, especially nAChRs.29,31,32 Whether SPACA4, as a Ly6/uPAR family member, regulates nAChRs and the acetylcholine signaling pathway remains to be verified. Therefore, the present study explored the function and molecular mechanism of SPACA4 in spermatid maturation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mouse model and genotype identification

The mouse Spaca4 gene (NC_000073.7) has one transcript and is located on chromosome 7. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technique was used to generate Spaca4 knockout mice on a C57BL/6NJ background.33 The animals were kept in a specific pathogen-free environment (12 h light/12 h dark cycle, constant temperature at 22°C, constant humidity of 45%, and sufficient water and food) at the Animal Core Facility of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing, China). All animal study protocols and disclosure of data covered in this article were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Medical University (Approval No. 1809030).

DNA was extracted from the toes with 50 mmol l−1 NaOH. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was performed with genotyping primers (Supplementary Table 1), and the products were run on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel.

Supplementary Table 1.

The forward primer sequence and reverse primer sequence of each gene

Gene name Primer sequences (5’–3’)
Spaca4-genotyping AGGACTGAAGAGCTTCTGAA
GTGGTGAGACTGTATGTGAG
Gapdh ACCCTTAAGAGGGATGCTGC
CCCAATACGGCCAAATCCGT
Akt CCGCCTGATCAAGTTCTCCT
AGAGGGAGAGGGCCAGTTAG
Stat3 AGGACATCAGTGGCAAGACC
AACTTGGTCTTCAGGTACGGG
Pi3k GGGGAGACATCTCAAGGGAAGAA
TGACAACTTGATCCTGCTGGT
Jak2 GTGTCGCCGGCCAATGT
CCTGATTCGCTTCCGGGTTA
Sirt1 TCGGCTACCGAGGTCCATA
CCGCAAGGCGAGCATAGATA

Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from tissues via TRIzol reagent (15596-026; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In accordance with the concentration of RNA, total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA with HiScript II Q RT SuperMix (R232-01; Vazyme, Nanjing, China). qRT-PCR analysis of cDNA was performed using ChamQ Blue Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Q312-02; Vazyme) and an Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences of primers used for these experiments are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The reference gene for data normalization was glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh).

Fertility analysis

Knockout male mice and wild-type male mice (8–10 weeks old) in the same litter were mated with fertile C57BL/6NJ female mice for 5–6 months. The vaginal plugs, pregnancies, and litter dates of the females were monitored. The average litter size from each pregnant female was calculated.

Morphological and histological analyses

Spaca4 knockout mice and wild-type littermates were subjected to gross morphological analyses, including body weight, testis weight, epididymis weight, and appearance of the testes and epididymides. Testes and epididymides were fixed with modified Davidson’s fluid for 48 h,34 dehydrated with gradient alcohol, hyalinized in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. The whole tissue was sectioned (5 -µm thickness) consecutively and collected on slides. The sections were placed in a 65°C incubator (DNP-9052BS; CIMO, Shanghai, China) for 2 h, dewaxed with xylene, and hydrated with gradient alcohol. Testis sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS; G1281; Solarbio, Beijing, China), whereas epididymis sections were stained with hematoxylin (G1004, Servicebio, Wuhan, China) and eosin (G1002; Servicebio).35

For sperm morphology analysis, sperm from testis suspensions, the caput epididymis, the corpus epididymis, and the cauda epididymis were applied to slides after washing three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After drying naturally, the sperm were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E). At least 200 sperm were analyzed per sample.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining

In accordance with our previously published protocols,36 dewaxed and rehydrated tissue sections were heated in 0.1 mol l−1 citric acid buffer for 10 min for heat-induced antigen repair. After three washes with PBS, the sections were blocked in 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA; V900933; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 2 h and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. The sections were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or fluorescently coupled secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. For immunohistochemistry, positive immunostaining was developed using a DAB kit (ZLI9018; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) and observed under a microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The immunofluorescence slides were viewed with confocal microscopy (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Supplementary Table 2.

Primary and secondary antibodies and their applications in this study

Designation Source or reference Identifiers
GAPDH Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA 60004-1-Ig
Rabbit IgG Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA 30000-0-AP
Mouse-HRP Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA SA00001-1
Rabbit-HRP Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA SA00001-2
Rabbit-488 Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA SA00013-2
Mouse-555 Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA RGAM003
Hoechst 33342 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA H1399
PNA-FITC Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA L7381
SPACA4 Abcam, Cambridge, UK ab122758
SPACA4 Made in Abclonal, Wuhan, China
AGFG1 Abclonal, Wuhan, China A13500
VAMP4 Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas, USA sc-365332
Keratin5 Affinity Biosciences, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA AF5479
TNP1 Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA 17178-1-AP
CLIP170 GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA GTX85030
IFT88 Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA 13967-1-AP
α7nAChR Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas, USA sc-58607

Count spermatogenic cells

Testicular tissue was stained with PAS, and the stages of spermatogenesis were identified according to the order of spermatogenic cells.37 The spermatogenic cells in stages VII–VIII and XI with better lumen morphology were counted. The pachytene spermatocytes, preleptotene spermatocytes, and round spermatids in stages VII–VIII were counted. The zygotene spermatocytes, diplotene spermatocytes, and elongated spermatids in stage XI were counted.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays

The testis sections were evaluated via TUNEL assay (A113-01; Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Briefly, standard techniques (xylene, anhydrous ethanol, 90% [v/v] ethanol, 80% [v/v] ethanol, 70% [v/v] ethanol, and sterile water) were used to dewax and hydrate testicular sections. The sections were equilibrated with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) buffer for 10 min, and the sections were incubated with the terminal transferase reaction mixture for 1 h at 37°C. All spermatogenesis tubules were analyzed using confocal microscopy (Zeiss). The nuclei of TUNEL-positive cells were indicated by red fluorescence.

Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA)

The sperm were collected from the cauda epididymis and subsequently incubated in prewarmed human tubal fluid (HTF) culture medium (M1130; AibeiBio, Nanjing, China) maintained at 37°C for 5 min. The sperm suspension was lightly mixed with a wide-bore pipette, and the sperm count and motility were measured using CASA (Hamilton Thorne, Beverly, MA, USA).

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

Proteins from testes were extracted using radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (P0013C; Beyotime, Shanghai, China) containing 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (B14001; Bimake, Houston, TX, USA). After 30 min of centrifugation at 12 000g (75002407; Thermo Fisher Scientific), the supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (P0010; Beyotime) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) loading buffer (WB2001; New Cell & Molecular Biotech, Suzhou, China) was added to the protein samples, which were boiled at 95°C for 5 min. Proteins were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE gels (P2014; New Cell & Molecular Biotech) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (1620177; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk (P0216; Beyotime) for 2 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and detection using a Tanon 5200 chemiluminescence imaging system (Tanon, Shanghai, China). The antibodies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Transmission electron microscopy

Testis tissue was dissected into small chunks with a blade and immediately immersed in ice-cold 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for primary fixation at 4°C. The sperm suspensions were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000g for 5 min (75002407; Thermo Fisher Scientific), washed three times with PBS (pH 7.2), and fixed in fresh 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde. Following primary fixation, the samples were rinsed with 0.1 mol l−1 cacodylate buffer (97068; Sigma-Aldrich), fixed with 2% (w/v) osmium tetroxide (OsO4; 201030; Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h, and embedded in araldite (10951; Sigma-Aldrich). Images of ultrathin sections, which were stained with uranyl acetate (U25690; Acmec Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and lead citrate (L26640; Acmec Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd.), were acquired using a Tecnai G2 electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

Spermatid isolation and mass spectrometry analysis

Spermatids were isolated and collected from adult mouse testes (one mouse as a sample) by the STA-PUT velocity sedimentation method.38 In brief, the testes were collected in ice-cold PBS, and the tunica albuginea was carefully removed. Collagenase IV (1 g l−1; 17104019; Invitrogen) was used to digest the tissues for 15 min at 37°C. The tissues were then placed on ice for 5 min to extract the supernatant. All seminiferous tubules were subsequently digested with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin containing DNase I (1 g l−1; B002004; Sangon-Biotech, Shanghai, China) at 37°C. A pipette gun was used to blow the tissue repeatedly until all lumens were digested within 10 min. A single-cell suspension was prepared with a 40 μm nylon filter and further loaded above a 2%–4% (w/v) BSA gradient (ProScience, Inc., Toronto, Canada). After 2 h of precipitation, the components were slowly collected from the bottom. Spermatid purity was determined by specific peanut agglutinin (PNA, marked acrosome; L7381; Sigma-Aldrich) and Hoechst (marked nucleus; H1399; Thermo Fisher Scientific) staining. At least 200 cells were analyzed by a LSM800 confocal microscope (Zeiss), and the proportion of PNA-positive cells was determined to be at least 80%.

For mass spectrometry (MS), proteins in spermatids were extracted with protein extraction buffer (8 mol l−1 urea; 75 mmol l−1 NaCl; 50 mmol l−1 Tris, pH 8.2; and 1% [v/v] ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-free [EDTA-free] protease and phosphatase inhibitor [A32961; Thermo Fisher Scientific]), after which the proteins were reduced, alkylated, digested overnight with trypsin at 37°C, and labeled with tandem mass tag (TMT). The labeled peptides were then separated by a high-pH reversed-phase separation microcapillary column (ACQUITY BEH C18 Column; 186009259; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) and analyzed using an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with an EASY-nLC 1200 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Intratesticular injection

The small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were diluted to a final concentration of 20 µmol l−1 and mixed with 0.1% (w/v) Fast Green (A610452; Sangon-Biotech). Each mouse was anesthetized with 1.25% (w/v) tribromoethanol (M2920; AibeiBio, Nanjing, China). The abdomen was cleaned and disinfected, and a small incision was made. The testicles were removed from the abdomen, and the efferent ductules were identified using a stereomicroscope (SMZ1000; Nikon) and injected with siRNA. After the injection was completed, the testes were returned to their physiological position, and the abdomen was sutured. Control testes were injected with negative control RNA. The following siRNA sequences were used: Trp53tg5-siRNA-sense, 5’-GGCAGAGUCCGUAAAGGAA(dT)(dT)-3’; and Trp53tg5-siRNA-antisense, 5’-UUCCUUUACGGACUCUGCC(dT)(dT)-3’.

Statistical analyses

All experiments included at least three biological replicates. The data were compared for statistical significance using GraphPad software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis between two groups, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for analysis among three or more groups. All data represent mean ± standard deviation (s.d.), and statistically significant differences are represented as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

SPACA4 is specifically expressed in the acrosome and cytoplasm of spermatids in mouse testes

SPACA4 expression in multiple mouse tissues, including the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, muscle, and testis, was detected by western blot analysis with specific antibodies. SPACA4 was expressed in the testis (Figure 1a). Analysis of SPACA4 abundance in mouse testes of different ages after birth revealed that SPACA4 was weakly expressed from 2 weeks and increased with the first wave of spermatid maturation and was maintained into adulthood (Figure 1b). Further immunohistochemical tests revealed that SPACA4 expression was detected mainly in the acrosome and weakly in the cytoplasm of testicular spermatids (Figure 1c). The expression pattern of SPACA4 in mouse testes suggested that SPACA4 plays a potentially important role in mouse spermatid maturation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

SPACA4 is specifically expressed in spermatids and is necessary for male fertility. (a) Western blot analysis of multiple tissues from adult mice revealed that the SPACA4 protein was expressed in the testis. (b) Western blot analysis of SPACA4 expression levels in the testes of mice at different postnatal weeks. (c) Expression patterns of SPACA4 during spermatogenesis were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. IgG was used as a control. Scale bar = 10 µm. (d) Schematic diagram of the targeting strategy involving CRISPR/Cas9. Sanger sequencing confirmed a 68-bp deletion in Spaca4 knockout mice (Spaca4−/−). (e) The genotype of each Spaca4−/− mouse was confirmed using PCR. (f) SPACA4 protein was completely absent in the testes of Spaca4−/− mice. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (g) Litter size of adult Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=5). ***P<0.001. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA. SPACA4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; IgG: immunoglobulin G; CRISPR/Cas9: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/ CRISPR-associated protein 9; sgRNA: single guide RNA; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ANOVA: analysis of variance; bp: base pair.

Loss of SPACA4 decreases sperm quality and affects male fertility

To determine the role of SPACA4 in male fertility and spermatid maturation, CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to knockout SPACA4 (Figure 1d). DNA and Sanger sequencing revealed that the deletion of 68 bp in Spaca4 knockout mice (Spaca4−/−) caused frameshift mutations (Figure 1d and 1e). Furthermore, western blot analysis verified that SPACA4 was knocked out at the protein level in the testes (Figure 1f). The fertility of Spaca4−/− mice was tested for 5-6 months, and wild-type littermates (Spaca4+/+) were used as controls. Female Spaca4−/− mice were fertile and exhibited litter sizes comparable to those of female Spaca4+/+ mice. In contrast, fertility was severely impaired in Spaca4−/− male mice (P < 0.001; Figure 1g). These results suggested that SPACA4 is required for male mouse fertility.

To explore the possible reasons for subfertility in Spaca4−/− male mice, the sperm number was assessed. Morphological observations revealed that the weight and size of the epididymis (Figure 2a and 2b) were not significantly different between Spaca4−/− and Spaca4+/+ mice. The sperm count (Figure 2c) and sperm density in the epididymal duct (Figure 2d) were not significantly reduced in Spaca4−/− mice. These results suggested that the absence of SPACA4 does not affect sperm production. The comparison of spermatogenic cell counts and apoptosis detection in testes between Spaca4−/− and Spaca4+/+ mice indirectly confirmed the above conclusion. Compared with Spaca4+/+ mice, the numbers of spermatocytes, round spermatids, and elongated spermatids were not reduced in Spaca4−/− mice (Figure 2e), and the proportions of apoptotic lumens and apoptotic cells were similar in these two groups (Figure 2f2i).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Loss of SPACA4 decreases sperm quality and affects male fertility. (a) Epididymal morphology and size of both Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=3). (b) Epididymis/body weight ratios of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=3). (c) Sperm count in the caudal epididymis of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=6). (d) H&E-stained cauda epididymides of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=3). Scale bars=50 µm. (e) Statistical results for the number of spermatocytes, round spermatids and elongated spermatids per tubule (n=3). (f) Testicular tissue was subjected to TUNEL staining. The negative control resulted in no positive cells, whereas the positive control resulted in apoptotic cells after DNase I treatment. Scale bar = 20 µm. Blue: Hoechst; red: apoptotic cells. (g) TUNEL staining of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− testes. Scale bar = 50 µm. Blue: Hoechst; red: apoptotic cells. (h) Percentage of TUNEL-positive tubules (n=3). (i) Quantification statistics of TUNEL-positive cells per tubule (n = 3). (j) Computer-assisted sperm analysis of sperm motility from the cauda epididymis of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=6). (k) Computer-assisted sperm analysis of sperm progressive motility in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=6). (l) Representative images of sperm under a light microscope. Scale bars=20 µm. Black arrowhead: sperm with anomalous heads; red arrowhead: sperm with folded tails. (m) The percentage of head defects in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− sperm (n=6). (n) The percentage of folded tails in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− sperm (n=6). NS: not significant, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; Pl: preleptotene spermatocytes; Z: zygotene spermatocytes; P: pachytene spermatocytes; D: diplotene spermatocytes; Rst: round spermatids; Est: elongated spermatids; TUNEL: terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling.

We further assessed sperm quality in Spaca4−/− mice. Evaluation by CASA revealed significantly decreased sperm motility and progressive motility in Spaca4−/− mice (both P < 0.001; Figure 2j and 2k). Under a light microscope, Spaca4−/− sperm presented multiple abnormalities (Figure 2l), including irregular head morphology and tail folding, and the sperm malformation rate was significantly increased (both P < 0.01; Figure 2m and 2n). Electron microscopy analysis revealed several abnormalities in the ultrastructure of Spaca4−/− sperm (Figure 3a), which manifested primarily as irregular nuclear shapes, abnormal nuclei with vacuoles, missing or incompletely fused acrosomes, and multiple cross-sections enclosed in one cell membrane. These results suggested that low sperm quality impairs the fertility of Spaca4−/− male mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Spaca4−/− sperm present low quality and multiple abnormalities. (a) Ultrastructural analysis of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− sperm by transmission electron microscopy (n = 3). Scale bars=1 µm. Red arrowhead: abnormal nuclei with vacuoles; blue arrowhead: missing or incompletely fused acrosomes; yellow arrowhead: nuclear and flagellar structures in the same cross section; green arrowhead: irregular nuclear shapes. (b) Testis morphology and size of both Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (n=3). (c) Statistical analysis of adult Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− testis/body weight ratios (n=3). (d) Paraffin sections of testicular tissues from Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− male mice were stained with PAS (n=3). Scale bars=50 µm. (e) Twelve stages of spermatogenesis in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− male mice are presented as PAS-stained paraffin sections of seminiferous tubules (n=3). Scale bar = 10 µm. (f) The morphologies of sperm in the corpus epididymides, caput epididymides and testicular suspensions as determined by H&E staining (n=3). Scale bar = 20 µm. Red arrowhead: sperm with anomalous head; green arrowhead: sperm with folded tails. NS: not significant. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; PAS: periodic acid-Schiff.

Deletion of SPACA4 affects spermatid maturation and decreases sperm quality

Because sperm are generated in the testis, the structure and function of the testis were evaluated. The testis weight and size did not significantly differ between Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice (Figure 3b and 3c), and PAS staining revealed similar thicknesses and arrangements of seminiferous epithelia between these two groups (Figure 3d and 3e). Analysis of spermatozoa in testicular suspensions, caput epididymides, and corpus epididymides from Spaca4−/− mice revealed deformities consistent with the sperm in cauda epididymides (Figure 3f), suggesting that the sperm deformity originated from abnormal differentiation of spermatids in the testes.

To determine whether sperm malformation is caused by impaired spermatid maturation, specific molecules involved in spermatid maturation in the testis, including acrosome development, chromatin condensation, and flagellum assembly, were examined. ArfGAP with FG repeats 1 (AGFG1) and vesicle-associated membrane protein 4 (VAMP4) are key proteins involved in acrosome vesicle secretion fusion, and Keratin 5 is essential for the acroplaxome. Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of these proteins decreased in the testes of Spaca4−/− mice (all P < 0.05; Figure 4a and 4b). Transition protein 1 (TNP1) is a molecule related to sperm nuclear protein transformation, and CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1 (CLIP170) is critical for the manchette structure. Moreover, intraflagellar transport 88 (IFT88) plays an important role in flagellum assembly. These three proteins were expressed at lower levels in Spaca4−/− testes (all P < 0.05; Figure 4c and 4d). To further demonstrate that the loss of SPACA4 affects the development of key structures during spermatid maturation, the ultrastructure of spermatids was observed in testes. Several abnormal ultrastructures were observed in Spaca4−/− spermatids, such as abnormal nuclear elongation, abnormal chromatin concentration with vacuoles, and defects in the acroplaxome and manchette (Figure 4e).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Deletion of SPACA4 affects spermatid maturation and leads to low-quality sperm. (a) Western blot analysis of AGFG1, VAMP4, and Keratin5 in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− testes (n=3). (b) The density ratio of AGFG1, VAMP4, and Keratin5 to GAPDH is shown as the relative expression. (c) Western blot analysis of TNP1, CLIP170, and IFT88 in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− testes (n=3). (d) The density ratio of TNP1, CLIP170, and IFT88 to GAPDH is shown as the relative expression. (e) Ultrastructural analysis of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− spermatids in the testis by transmission electron microscopy. Scale bar = 1 µm. Red arrowhead: acroplaxome defect; blue arrowhead: abnormal acrosome development; yellow arrowhead: abnormal nucleus with vacuoles; green arrowhead: irregular nuclear shape; white arrowhead: abnormal manchette formation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test. Ac: acrosome; N: nucleus; G: Golgi apparatus; Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; AGFG1: ArfGAP with FG repeats 1; VAMP4: vesicle-associated membrane protein 4; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TNP1: transition protein 1; CLIP170: CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1; IFT88: intraflagellar transport 88.

Taken together, these results revealed that SPACA4 deficiency may affect multiple aspects of spermatid maturation in mice, resulting in decreased sperm quality.

SPACA4 plays a role in the mouse testis by regulating the expression of proteins associated with spermatid maturation instead of affecting α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR)

Many neuronal receptors have been implicated in sperm function.39,40 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), such as α7nAChR, influence motility and initiate acrosome reactions.41,42 Thus, the expression of α7nAChR in the testis and sperm was examined. Interestingly, α7nAChR was expressed normally in the testes of Spaca4−/− mice (Figure 5a and 5b) but was expressed at lower levels in Spaca4−/− sperm than that in Spaca4+/+ sperm (P < 0.05; Figure 5a and 5c). Furthermore, detection of the mRNA expression levels of downstream molecules in the acetylcholine signaling pathway, including protein kinase B (Akt), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (Pi3k), janus kinase 2 (Jak2), and sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), revealed that the expression of Pi3k, Jak2, and Sirt1 decreased in the sperm of Spaca4−/− mice (all P < 0.05; Figure 5d). These results suggested that SPACA4 affects sperm function through the acetylcholine signaling pathway.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SPACA4 plays a role in the testis by regulating the expression of proteins associated with spermatid maturation instead of affecting α7nAChR. (a) Western blot analysis of α7nAChR in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− testes and sperm (n=3). (b) The density ratio of α7nAChR to GAPDH in testes is shown as the relative expression. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test. (c) The density ratio of α7nAChR to GAPDH in sperm is shown as the relative expression. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test. (d) qRT–PCR analysis of the mRNA expression levels of downstream molecules in the acetylcholine signaling pathway (n=3). Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test. (e) Round spermatids and elongated spermatids were isolated from the testis by STA-PUT and observed under a microscope. Scale bar = 20 µm. Blue: Hoechst; green: PNA. (f) Round spermatids and elongated spermatids were tested for purity. Scale bar = 20 µm. Blue: Hoechst; green: PNA. (g) Volcano plot for the comparison of protein expression differences between spermatids from the testes of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice. Cut-off values (fold change >2 and P < 0.05) were utilized to show protein expression with differential levels. Unchanged proteins are shown in gray. The blue and red dots indicate significant downregulated and upregulated proteins, respectively. (h) Knockdown of Trp53tg5 mRNA expression in spermatids via siRNA (n=3). Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA. (i) Analysis of the sperm count after TRP53TG5 was knocked down (n=3). (j) Motility of sperm after TRP53TG5 was knocked down (n=3). (k) Analysis of the progressive motility of sperm (n=3). (l) Sperm morphology was analyzed by H&E staining (n=3). Scale bar = 20 µm. (m) Ultrastructural analysis of sperm after TRP53TG5 knockdown. Scale bars=500 nm. Red arrowhead: abnormal nuclei with vacuoles; blue arrowhead: increased flagellar cross sections in one cell membrane. NS: not significant. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01. Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; α7nAChR: α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; qRT–PCR: quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; DIC: digital image correlation; PNA: peanut agglutinin; Rst: round spermatids; Est: elongated spermatids; TRP53TG5: transformation-related protein 53 target 5; NC: negative control; siRNA: small interfering RNA; ANOVA: analysis of variance; FC: fold change; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; Akt: protein kinase B; Stat3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; Pi3k: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; Jak2: janus kinase 2; Sirt1: sirtuin 1; CCDC88A: coiled-coil domain containing 88A; THRAP3: thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3; UROC1: urocanate hydratase 1; TNP1: transition protein 1; RPL29: ribosomal protein L29; H1FNT: testis-specific H1 histone; CYPT3: cysteine-rich perinuclear theca 3; PPP1R35: protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 35.

To elucidate the molecular mechanism of spermatid maturation regulated by SPACA4, STA-PUT was used to isolate spermatids from the testes of Spaca4−/− and Spaca4+/+ mice (Figure 5e and 5f). Protein expression profiles revealed that 88 proteins were upregulated and 10 proteins (including SPACA4) were downregulated (fold change>2, P < 0.05) in Spaca4−/− spermatids (Figure 5g and Supplementary Table 3). Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the upregulated proteins revealed that the enriched proteins were involved mainly in the regulation of collagen fibril organization, the steroid biosynthetic process, and the androgen biosynthetic process. In terms of cell components, GO analysis revealed that the enriched proteins were involved mainly in the regulation of mitochondria and extracellular space. Moreover, GO analysis revealed that the enriched proteins were involved in the following molecular functions: extracellular matrix structural constituent, oxidoreductase activity, and glutathione transferase activity (Supplementary Figure 1 (94.6KB, tif) ). Because the biological processes and molecular functions of the upregulated proteins were not significantly associated with Spaca4−/− sperm malformation, we focused on the following 9 downregulated proteins: coiled-coil domain containing 88A (CCDC88A), thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3 (THRAP3), urocanate hydratase 1 (UROC1), transition protein 1 (TNP1), ribosomal protein L29 (RPL29), testis-specific H1 histone (H1FNT), transformation related protein 53 target 5 (TRP53TG5), cysteine-rich perinuclear theca 3 (CYPT3), and protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 35 (PPP1R35), as shown in Figure 5g. Among these proteins, THRAP3, UROC1, TRP53TG5, CYPT3, and PPP1R35 have not been reported to exhibit reproductive function.

Supplementary Table 3.

Quantitative proteomic analysis of spermatids in Spaca4−/− and Spaca4+/+ mice

Protein names Spaca4−/− rep1 Spaca4−/− rep2 Spaca4−/− rep3 Spaca4+/+ rep1 Spaca4+/+ rep2 Spaca4+/+ rep3 FC (Spaca4−/−/Spaca4+/+) P
CCDC88A 0 0 0 38211 48641 24397 0.0 0.0
SPACA4 614980 665680 741410 9428100 8518400 9112400 0.1 0.0
THRAP3 1854300 1388900 1299200 5627100 4079900 6385400 0.3 0.0
UROC1 524930 441000 391230 1425400 972420 1517500 0.3 0.0
TNP1 8372700 11399000 9572300 26965000 18047000 33162000 0.4 0.0
RPL29 14826000 14150000 15220000 39157000 34035000 40394000 0.4 0.0
H1FNT 29755000 30073000 30674000 73889000 71261000 70300000 0.4 0.0
TRP53TG5 687780 802480 823810 1777600 1716300 1654400 0.4 0.0
CYPT3 9158300 9068200 8855300 19100000 17722000 20074000 0.5 0.0
PPP1R35 1116800 1011000 1121600 2389300 1947400 2254600 0.5 0.0
ACSBG1 76585000 77685000 81299000 41150000 37539000 38657000 2.0 0.0
PECR 5921400 5544000 6216200 3227600 2687700 2867300 2.0 0.0
PRDX3 36826000 35785000 39251000 19630000 17360000 18133000 2.0 0.0
MSMO1 1535900 1470100 1627500 878350 689890 708360 2.0 0.0
COL3A1 554070 581100 572600 282870 254630 298350 2.0 0.0
ABHD3 3209900 3271400 3523500 1820700 1479300 1588400 2.0 0.0
DPT 1378100 1346300 1379000 676120 667430 657480 2.1 0.0
GSTM2 535460000 560160000 573490000 278510000 265480000 266680000 2.1 0.0
CA1 1709000 1694100 1788700 859620 838640 817170 2.1 0.0
EPB42 733660 832700 835860 394290 364170 404010 2.1 0.0
IGHG2B 957130 993120 890700 484300 447830 430310 2.1 0.0
SULT1E1 17704000 18395000 19217000 9370500 8329900 8698400 2.1 0.0
ALDH1L1 47756000 48045000 51014000 24693000 22459000 22808000 2.1 0.0
HP 3530600 3502400 3793600 1883800 1580400 1688000 2.1 0.0
PM20D1 3392200 4123300 3758700 1959000 1532400 1868100 2.1 0.0
KRT84 833930 883000 1284700 557450 369730 493480 2.1 0.0
ZAN 561640 717600 726370 359460 307680 280390 2.1 0.0
CTSH 4402000 4384700 4481900 2203000 2121500 1943300 2.1 0.0
C4B 631290 627330 681980 301180 313760 298500 2.1 0.0
AASS 3556600 4007700 3864100 1946100 1684300 1737000 2.1 0.0
ALDH1A1 184690000 201820000 197340000 96934000 86257000 90039000 2.1 0.0
TECR 18585000 18341000 19214000 9372800 8216600 8603600 2.1 0.0
UGT3A2 830120 833510 876620 439470 315270 411310 2.2 0.0
PRELP 5153300 4605900 5592500 2487900 2164400 2382200 2.2 0.0
FADS2 13429000 13849000 13721000 6719200 5812100 6211100 2.2 0.0
SMOC1 9129500 9665400 9686300 4649900 4138200 4221300 2.2 0.0
OCIAD2 2031500 2223700 2307500 1064600 929710 998120 2.2 0.0
PTPN18 96052 76216 99804 43883 52189 27404 2.2 0.0
GJA1 6285200 6612900 6514700 3040500 2688300 3057800 2.2 0.0
ALDH2 163560000 168460000 176260000 81043000 73813000 75083000 2.2 0.0
ARG1 569520 517350 532510 258140 210110 262300 2.2 0.0
PIPOX 402490 443940 499740 214910 219190 165130 2.2 0.0
SMPD4 2575900 2719600 3044300 1285300 1212000 1205400 2.3 0.0
NUDT19 5386300 5356600 5522700 2631300 2154200 2399500 2.3 0.0
ECHDC3 3455600 3263000 3446400 1621500 1319700 1548200 2.3 0.0
PLD3 7237900 7494200 7714900 3476700 3196100 3202600 2.3 0.0
PPP1R36 1609600 1220900 1534400 692590 480960 744780 2.3 0.0
FDX1 23013000 23176000 23938000 10767000 10102000 9921100 2.3 0.0
CYP21 2783900 2961100 2952900 1289200 1172800 1291800 2.3 0.0
GSTA2 27322000 31045000 30078000 13362000 12045000 12645000 2.3 0.0
LCN2 2535600 2631400 2783700 1165700 1047200 1207600 2.3 0.0
SLC4A1 6632500 6577600 6953000 3036700 2633100 2941100 2.3 0.0
AKR1CL 39838000 42730000 41443000 18493000 16467000 17495000 2.4 0.0
MMD2 635660 593560 781960 293300 290520 259290 2.4 0.0
SUGCT 2612500 2750600 2668800 1239500 983710 1056700 2.4 0.0
HSD17B3 12868000 12543000 13801000 5732200 4854700 5338400 2.5 0.0
GPT2 22138000 22666000 23166000 9959300 8641800 8960500 2.5 0.0
FN1 32225000 33186000 34091000 14170000 12634000 13539000 2.5 0.0
PTGDS 20043000 18215000 21079000 8266900 7684400 7982500 2.5 0.0
GSTM1 358980000 420010000 380200000 160640000 1.49E+08 1.55E+08 2.5 0.0
EHHADH 12258000 12587000 12756000 5345700 4559300 5078200 2.5 0.0
HMGCS2 106030000 108650000 109520000 45159000 40917000 41848000 2.5 0.0
UGT1A6B 903620 833060 941670 416110 282260 348620 2.6 0.0
MYH4 6062300 6483000 6640600 2382700 2504900 2543400 2.6 0.0
ARL5A 46615 71347 68358 32242 19828 19362 2.6 0.0
ARHGEF40 1426200 1522600 1562600 621550 559090 537750 2.6 0.0
MGARP 4805900 4951300 4633200 1925000 1663500 1851000 2.6 0.0
TMEM35 4937700 4817400 5036800 1964100 1917800 1669200 2.7 0.0
PON3 13472000 13095000 13871000 5363600 4962500 4809200 2.7 0.0
ASS1 59873000 58532000 62582000 23469000 21829000 21802000 2.7 0.0
HAO2 2932400 2922200 3025300 1066000 1015500 1163800 2.7 0.0
COL5A1 1349400 1277200 1257800 509660 401620 498210 2.8 0.0
ACOX3 39632000 41096000 43428000 15478000 14085000 14509000 2.8 0.0
MYH7 44691000 45287000 47386000 17118000 15370000 15881000 2.8 0.0
FABP3 116020000 114190000 122600000 43581000 40790000 39625000 2.8 0.0
GSTK1 33404000 33248000 34860000 12475000 10829000 11848000 2.9 0.0
SLC7A8 3276100 3127500 3327400 1312800 1021600 1020300 2.9 0.0
EPHX1 90029000 92524000 95745000 33799000 30969000 30824000 2.9 0.0
INSL3 3411200 3581500 3638600 1309000 1094900 1230500 2.9 0.0
ALDH3A1 26011000 27721000 28025000 9875200 8562700 9338500 2.9 0.0
FEZ2 66788 74829 42149 30430 0 31447 3.0 0.0
ASPN 566330 550490 610400 210120 163130 201270 3.0 0.0
HBBT1 168860000 205820000 187880000 63860000 61731000 59327000 3.0 0.0
PUS3 3672600 3715100 3982900 1345200 1120700 1134000 3.2 0.0
UGT1A7C 58277000 58187000 63542000 19758000 18348000 18625000 3.2 0.0
CES1D 27949000 28207000 29143000 9138700 8755500 8665200 3.2 0.0
COL5A2 527570 560430 556570 184340 150020 177510 3.2 0.0
HSD3B1 35995000 35330000 38608000 11482000 10400000 11244000 3.3 0.0
GSTA3 15096000 14526000 15176000 4754100 4171400 4347700 3.4 0.0
MGST1 19921000 19910000 21115000 6528100 5518300 5938900 3.4 0.0
IGHV1-31 1392300 1525600 1536700 454930 401910 451810 3.4 0.0
COL1A2 19099000 19615000 20565000 6051800 5435800 5790000 3.4 0.0
CYP17A1 76467000 78631000 82852000 23928000 21754000 22574000 3.5 0.0
UGT1A6 13643000 14638000 15128000 4458300 3916300 3991100 3.5 0.0
FGG 29482000 28689000 31822000 9140800 8338400 8122400 3.5 0.0
HBA 393850000 425410000 443650000 119300000 1.12E+08 1.11E+08 3.7 0.0
KRT76 3204600 4347900 3268100 994950 919240 1016100 3.7 0.0
COL1A1 18549000 19972000 19843000 5623700 4889300 5182900 3.7 0.0
APCS 947640 841650 1006100 233970 168990 298020 4.0 0.0
PTN 2908500 2933900 3067300 748910 700400 733100 4.1 0.0
BHMT 89046000 92008000 94990000 19293000 19421000 18606000 4.8 0.0
HSD3B6 52975000 52751000 56322000 11085000 10160000 11110000 5.0 0.0
ITIH4 29782 41109 21678 16757 0 0 5.5 0.0
CYP2D11 2516900 5749500 2916800 663890 496190 695110 6.0 0.0

FC >2, P<0.05. FC: fold change

According to the high-precision transcriptome of mouse male germ cells,43 Trp53tg5 and Cypt3 were highly expressed in spermatids (Supplementary Figure 2 (167.5KB, tif) ), which was consistent with the expression characteristics of SPACA4 in the testis. To explore the function of TRP53TG5 and CYPT3, we sought to knock down their expression in spermatids via siRNA. However, CYPT family members are highly similar, and specific siRNAs to knock down Cypt3 cannot be designed.44 Thus, we focused on TRP53TG5. In TRP53TG5 knockdown mice (P < 0.05; Figure 5h), sperm motility and progressive motility were decreased (all P < 0.05; Figure 5i5k), and sperm tail showed curling and folding to varying degrees (Figure 5l), suggesting that TRP53TG5 is involved in the tail assembly of spermatids, thereby affecting sperm quality. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that nuclear vacuoles and multiple flagellar cross-sections were wrapped in the same cell membrane in TRP53TG5 knockdown sperm (Figure 5m). These results are consistent with the weak malformation phenotype of Spaca4−/− sperm, suggesting that TRP53TG5 may be a downstream molecule of SPACA4 that regulates mouse spermatid maturation.

Abnormal spermatid maturation affects sperm function in Spaca4−/− mice

Theoretically, impaired quality can affect sperm function. Given the significant expression of SPACA4 in the acrosome of spermatids, the effect of SPACA4 deficiency on acrosome-related function was investigated by testing sperm capacitation ability and acrosomal reactions in vitro. Sperm capacitation was detected by chlortetracycline (CTC) staining, which revealed that the capacitation rate was significantly decreased in Spaca4−/− mouse sperm (all P < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 3a (230.2KB, tif) and 3b (230.2KB, tif) and Supplementary Materials and Methods). Similarly, the incidence of acrosome reactions after capacitation was also reduced (all P < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 3a (230.2KB, tif) and 3b (230.2KB, tif) and Supplementary Materials and Methods). These findings may partially explain the inability of sperm to cross the zona pellucida in the absence of SPACA4 (all P < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 3c (94.6KB, tif) 3e and Supplementary Materials and Methods). Overall, these results indicated that the loss of SPACA4 in mice leads to decreased sperm quality, which affects sperm function. Abnormalities in sperm function, such as sperm capacitation, the acrosome reaction, and zona pellucida binding and penetration, ultimately impair male fertility.

DISCUSSION

With the development of the social economy, the number of male infertility patients is gradually increasing. The fundamental cause of male infertility is abnormal sperm quantity and quality. Although some infertile male patients can obtain offspring through ART, abnormal sperm quality affects embryo quality and offspring health. Spermatid maturation is a key and direct process that affects the quantity and quality of sperm.

The present study revealed that SPACA4 was expressed in the acrosome and cytoplasm of spermatids in the mouse testis. This expression pattern suggested an important role of SPACA4 in spermatid maturation. Deletion of SPACA4 severely impaired male fertility, which is consistent with previous results.27 Analysis of the morphology of reproductive organs, the number and structure of spermatids, and various sperm parameters in Spaca4−/− mice revealed that the decline in male fertility was caused by impaired sperm quality, manifested as abnormal morphology and a decrease in motility.

Spermatid maturation is the final stage of spermatogenesis, in which the nucleus is remodeled by chromatin condensation, the excess cytoplasm is removed, and the acrosome and sperm tail are formed. The cytoskeleton is a crucial unit in this process, as the acroplaxome and manchette are two structures that cooperate with various functional proteins to ensure the correct formation of the acrosome, nucleus, and flagellum.45,46 The acroplaxome, a circular basement belonging to the acrosome, is composed of microfilaments with associated motor molecules.47 During spermatid maturation, the acroplaxome maintains the acrosome at the nuclear anchoring site during nuclear elongation, promoting sperm acrosome formation and nuclear shaping.48 Manchette is the earliest cytoskeleton element observed in spermatids, which rapidly forms a microtubular platform between the perinuclear ring and the axoneme.49 The manchette can help shape the sperm head and deliver the particles required for the sperm tail in an orderly manner to the axoneme to facilitate flagellum assembly.20,50 In the present study, SPACA4 deletion in mice resulted in multiple malformations of sperm. The ultrastructure of Spaca4−/− sperm exhibited irregular nuclear shapes and vacuoles, missing or incompletely fused acrosomes, and increased cross-sections of the flagellum in the one-cell membrane. These Spaca4−/− sperm malformations were due to abnormal spermatid maturation in the testis. The ultrastructures of spermatids in Spaca4−/− mice presented defects in the acroplaxome and manchette structures, which are involved in the development of the acrosome, nucleus, and flagella. Similarly, the expression of the following molecules related to these structures was decreased: AGFG1 and VAMP4, which are associated with acrosome development; Keratin 5, which is associated with the acroplaxome; CLIP170, which is associated with manchette formation; and TNP1, which is associated with nuclear condensation. Defects in the acroplaxome-manchette system result in abnormal spermatid maturation, leading to the production of low-quality sperm. The decrease in sperm quality affects sperm capacitation and the acrosomal reaction in Spaca4−/− mice, which may explain why Spaca4−/− sperm reported by Fujihara et al.27 cannot cross the zona pellucida.

The LU domain in Ly6/uPAR family members interacts with several nAChRs, such as secreted LY6/PLAUR domain containing 1 (SLURP1) and Ly6/neurotoxin 1 (LYNX1).51,52 nAChR subunits, including α3, α5, α7, α9, and β4, are expressed in human sperm. Previous studies have reported that α7nAChR is expressed in the postacrosomal and neck regions of human sperm and that its activity is involved in human sperm motility, acrosome reactions, and zona pellucida penetration.41,53 In mice, the loss of α7nAChR affects sperm motility and function, including capacitation and the acrosome reaction.42,54 Surprisingly, male mice lacking α7nAChR have normal sperm morphology and are fertile.42,55 These reports suggest that while α7nAChR deficiency affects mouse sperm motility and function, it is not a key factor affecting fertility in male mice. In the present study, there was a marked reduction in the expression levels of α7nAChR and its downstream molecules, such as Akt, Jak2, and Sirt1, in Spaca4−/− sperm, but there was no significant difference in α7nAChR expression in Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− testes. These results suggested that SPACA4 may affect sperm motility and function by regulating the α7nAChR pathway, but that it is not the key factor that damages fertility in Spaca4−/− male mice. The low fertility of SPACA4-deficient male mice may be due to abnormal spermatid maturation.

To gain a deeper understanding of the molecular function of SPACA4 in spermatid maturation, spermatid differential protein expression profiles were constructed, which revealed a significant decrease in the expression of 9 proteins. Among these potential downstream proteins, TNP1 and H1FNT play key roles in the replacement of histones with protamine during sperm head shaping.56,57 Moreover, CCDC88A and RPL29 are essential for male fertility because they regulate flagellar development and affect sperm motility.58,59 CYPT3 and TRP53TG5 are specifically expressed in the testis. In situ hybridization has revealed that CYPT members 1–10 are strongly expressed in spermatids and are expressed earlier than other sperm-specific genes, such as transition protein 2 (Tnp2) and protamine 1 (Prm1).44 The CYPT family may function in the remodeling of the spermatid nucleus, but the sequences of its members are highly similar, which may need to be explored in specific knockout mouse models. In the present study, the function of TRP53TG5, which is a potential downstream target of SPACA4, was explored. TRP53TG5 knockdown affected chromatin condensation and flagellar development, resulting in increased tail malformation and decreased sperm motility.

In summary, SPACA4 is essential for the structural differentiation of spermatids, including acrosome formation, nuclear shaping, and flagellum development, in mice (Figure 6). Deletion of SPACA4 decreases sperm quality and impairs sperm motility, capacitation, and acrosomal reactions, which ultimately leads to impaired male mouse fertility. During spermatid maturation, SPACA4 does not regulate the acetylcholine signaling pathway but regulates the expression of spermatid-related molecules. The present findings provide a detailed mechanism of male subfertility in Spaca4 knockout mice.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Schematic diagram of the role of SPACA4 in spermiogenesis. Spermatids lacking SPACA4 exhibit abnormal differentiation during acrosomal development, manchette formation, chromatin condensation, nuclear elongation, and flagellum development, ultimately affecting sperm quality and function. Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4.

In human sperm, SPACA4 is expressed in the acrosome. Inhibition of SPACA4 affects the binding of sperm to the zona pellucida in vitro.28 However, there is no difference in SPACA4 expression in the sperm of males with oligospermia, asthenospermia, or oligoasthenospermia.28 The significance of SPACA4 in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of male infertility still needs more clinical samples and further studies, such as exploring the mutation of SPACA4 in infertile patients and the expression level of SPACA4 in the sperm of patients with teratozoospermia. Using a mouse model, the present study provides a new perspective on the role of SPACA4 in regulating sperm quality through spermatid maturation in male fertility.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

HZ conceived and designed the research. XC, HQW, DYW, XZZ and XLZ performed the experiments. XC, HQW, DYW, XLZ, and HZ analyzed the data. XC, XJG, and HZ interpreted the results of the experiments. XC and HQW prepared the figures and edited and revised the manuscript. XC and HZ drafted the manuscript. HZ provided critical insights and feedback that enhanced the overall quality of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Figure 1

Gene Ontology analysis of up-regulated proteins in Spaca4-/- spermatids. BP: Biological process; CC: Cell component; MF: Molecular function; Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4.

AJA-28-310_Suppl1.tif (94.6KB, tif)
Supplementary Figure 2

The expression of proteins associated with spermatid differentiation in male germ cells. Analysis of high-precision transcriptome of mouse male germ cells revealed the expression abundance of Uroc1 (a), Cypt3 (b), Thrap3 (c), Ppp1r35 (d), and Trp53tg5 (e) in a variety of male germ cells. PGC: primordial germ cells; PMC: peritubular myoid cell; IP: interstitial progenitor; Thrap3: thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3; Uroc1: urocanate hydratase 1; Trp53tg5: transformation-related protein 53 target 5; Cypt3: cysteine-rich perinuclear theca 3; Ppplr35: protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 35.

AJA-28-310_Suppl2.tif (167.5KB, tif)
Supplementary Figure 3

Abnormal spermatid differentiation affects sperm function in Spaca4−/− mice. (a) CTC staining of sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction after capacitation. Scale bars = 50 μm. (b) Quantification of the percentage of sperm capacitation, acrosomal reactions, and acrosome reaction after capacitation from Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice. (c) Representative images of fertilization and fertilization without zona pellucida in vitro of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice. Scale bars = 100 μm. (d) Quantification of the percentage of fertilization in vitro (n = 3). (e) Quantification of the percentage of fertilization without zona pellucida in vitro (n = 3). NS: not significant, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student's t-test. Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; CTC: chlortetracycline.

AJA-28-310_Suppl3.tif (230.2KB, tif)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071702, No. 82271636 and No. 31871164).

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Asian Journal of Andrology website.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS

In vitro fertilization

Sperm from the cauda epididymis of adult male mice were absorbed into TYH (Toyoda, Yokoyama, Hoshi) (M2050, AibeiBio, Nanjing, China) and cultured 1.5 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for capacitation. Female mice with 8-12 weeks old were injected pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) (Sansheng Biological Technology, Ningbo, China) for superovulation, and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) (Sansheng Biological Technology, Ningbo, China) was injected 48 h later. The cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were taken from the ampulla of the oviduct after 13-14 h. For cumulus cell–free oocytes, COCs were digested in M2 medium (M1250, AibeiBio, Nanjing, China) containing hyaluronidase (H3884, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to remove cumulus cells, then oocytes were washed in M2 medium. For zona pellucida removal, the cumulus cell–free oocytes were moved to a droplet of Tyrode's solution (T1788, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Once the zona pellucida was shed, the oocytes were immediately transferred to M2 medium and washed three times. The capacitated sperm was added in oocytes and incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 3-4 h. The fertilized eggs were washed in potassium simplex optimization medium (KSOM) (M1450, AibeiBio, Nanjing, China) to remove excess sperm and observed under microscope.

Acrosomal reaction and CTC staining

The sperm were released from cauda epididymis, and cultured in TYH (Toyoda, Yokoyama, Hoshi) (M2050 , AibeiBio, Nanjing, China) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 1.5 h to induce capacitation. To induce the acrosome reaction, the calcium ionophore A23187 (100107, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added and continued to culture for 1 h. Sperm samples were added with equal volume of CTC solution (750 mM CTC, 20 mM Tris, 130 mM NaCl, and 5 mM cysteine, pH 7.4) and appropriate amount of stationary liquid (2.5M Tris and 5% [v/v] formaldehyde in PBS). The sample was gently mixed and was left at 4°C overnight. Next day, the stained sperm was applied to the slides and observed under confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). At least 400 sperm were measured from each sample and evaluated for four groups: live acrosome-reacted sperm (AR pattern), live capacitated sperm (B pattern), live non-capacitated sperm (F pattern), and dead sperm (D pattern).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking:potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1506–12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fainberg J, Kashanian JA. Recent advances in understanding and managing male infertility. F1000Res. 2019;8 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17076.1. F1000 Faculty Rev–670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hernández-Silva G, Caballero-Campo P, Chirinos M. Sperm mRNAs as potential markers of male fertility. Reprod Biol. 2022;22:100636. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Roldan ER. Assessments of sperm quality integrating morphology, swimming patterns, bioenergetics and cell signalling. Theriogenology. 2020;150:388–95. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leaver RB. Male infertility:an overview of causes and treatment options. Br J Nurs. 2016;25:S35–40. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.18.S35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tu C, Wang W, Hu T, Lu G, Lin G, et al. Genetic underpinnings of asthenozoospermia. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;34:101472. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2020.101472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Calvert JK, Fendereski K, Ghaed M, Bearelly P, Patel DP, et al. The male infertility evaluation still matters in the era of high efficacy assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tahmasbpour E, Balasubramanian D, Agarwal A. A multi-faceted approach to understanding male infertility:gene mutations, molecular defects and assisted reproductive techniques (ART) J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1115–37. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0280-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chapuis A, Gala A, Ferrières-Hoa A, Mullet T, Bringer-Deutsch S, et al. Sperm quality and paternal age:effect on blastocyst formation and pregnancy rates. Basic Clin Androl. 2017;27:2. doi: 10.1186/s12610-016-0045-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhou WJ, Huang C, Jiang SH, Ji XR, Gong F, et al. Influence of sperm morphology on pregnancy outcome and offspring in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection:a matched case-control study. Asian J Androl. 2021;23:421–8. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_91_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Colaco S, Sakkas D. Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1953–68. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1304-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Danis RB, Samplaski MK. Sperm morphology:history, challenges, and impact on natural and assisted fertility. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20:43. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0911-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dunleavy JE, O’Bryan MK, Stanton PG, O’Donnell L. The cytoskeleton in spermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2019;157:R53–72. doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Du L, Chen W, Cheng Z, Wu S, He J, et al. Novel gene regulation in normal and abnormal spermatogenesis. Cells. 2021;10:666. doi: 10.3390/cells10030666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miyaso H, Ogawa Y, Itoh M. Microenvironment for spermatogenesis and sperm maturation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2022;157:273–85. doi: 10.1007/s00418-021-02071-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Teves ME, Roldan ER, Krapf D, Strauss JF, Bhagat V, et al. Sperm differentiation:the role of trafficking of proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:3702. doi: 10.3390/ijms21103702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang M, Zeng L, Su P, Ma L, Zhang M, et al. Autophagy:a multifaceted player in the fate of sperm. Hum Reprod Update. 2022;28:200–31. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hao SL, Ni FD, Yang WX. The dynamics and regulation of chromatin remodeling during spermiogenesis. Gene. 2019;706:201–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khawar MB, Gao H, Li W. Mechanism of acrosome biogenesis in mammals. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:195. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lehti MS, Sironen A. Formation and function of the manchette and flagellum during spermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2016;151:R43–54. doi: 10.1530/REP-15-0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Loughner CL, Bruford EA, McAndrews MS, Delp EE, Swamynathan S, et al. Organization, evolution and functions of the human and mouse Ly6/uPAR family genes. Hum Genomics. 2016;10:10. doi: 10.1186/s40246-016-0074-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Galat A. Multidimensional drift of sequence attributes and functional profiles in the superfamily of the three-finger proteins and their structural homologues. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55:2026–41. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cruz A, Sullivan DB, Doty KF, Hess RA, Canisso IF, et al. Acrosomal marker SP-10 (gene name Acrv1) for staging of the cycle of seminiferous epithelium in the stallion. Theriogenology. 2020;156:214–21. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.06.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang D, Cheng L, Xia W, Liu X, Guo Y, et al. LYPD4, mouse homolog of a human acrosome protein, is essential for sperm fertilizing ability and male fertility. Biol Reprod. 2020;102:1033–44. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaa018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Endo S, Yoshitake H, Tsukamoto H, Matsuura H, Kato K, et al. TEX101, a glycoprotein essential for sperm fertility, is required for stable expression of Ly6k on testicular germ cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23616. doi: 10.1038/srep23616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fujihara Y, Noda T, Kobayashi K, Oji A, Kobayashi S, et al. Identification of multiple male reproductive tract-specific proteins that regulate sperm migration through the oviduct in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:18498–506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908736116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fujihara Y, Herberg S, Blaha A, Panser K, Kobayashi K, et al. The conserved fertility factor SPACA4/Bouncer has divergent modes of action in vertebrate fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2108777118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108777118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen L, Song J, Zhang J, Luo Z, Chen X, et al. Spermatogenic cell-specific SPACA4 is essential for efficient sperm-zona pellucida binding in vitro. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11:1204017. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1204017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vasilyeva NA, Loktyushov EV, Bychkov ML, Shenkarev ZO, Lyukmanova EN. Three-finger proteins from the Ly6/uPAR family:functional diversity within one structural motif. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2017;82:1702–15. doi: 10.1134/S0006297917130090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kessler P, Marchot P, Silva M, Servent D. The three-finger toxin fold:a multifunctional structural scaffold able to modulate cholinergic functions. J Neurochem. 2017;142(Suppl 2):7–18. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tsetlin VI. Three-finger snake neurotoxins and Ly6 proteins targeting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors:pharmacological tools and endogenous modulators. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015;36:109–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nirthanan S. Snake three-finger α-neurotoxins and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors:molecules, mechanisms and medicine. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;181:114168. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Niu Y, Shen B, Cui Y, Chen Y, Wang J, et al. Generation of gene-modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos. Cell. 2014;156:836–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Latendresse JR, Warbrittion AR, Jonassen H, Creasy DM. Fixation of testes and eyes using a modified Davidson's fluid:comparison with Bouin's fluid and conventional Davidson's fluid. Toxicol Pathol. 2002;30:524–33. doi: 10.1080/01926230290105721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zheng M, Chen X, Cui Y, Li W, Dai H, et al. TULP2, a new RNA-binding protein, is required for mouse spermatid differentiation and male fertility. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:623738. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.623738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhu F, Yan P, Zhang J, Cui Y, Zheng M, et al. Deficiency of TPPP2, a factor linked to oligoasthenozoospermia, causes subfertility in male mice. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:2583–94. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ahmed EA, de Rooij DG. Staging of mouse seminiferous tubule cross-sections. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;558:263–77. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhu T, Zhang Y, Sheng X, Zhang X, Chen Y, et al. Absence of CEP78 causes photoreceptor and sperm flagella impairments in mice and a human individual. Elife. 2023;12:e76157. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meizel S. The sperm, a neuron with a tail:'neuronal'receptors in mammalian sperm. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2004;79:713–32. doi: 10.1017/s1464793103006407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramírez-Reveco A, Villarroel-Espíndola F, Rodríguez-Gil JE, Concha II. Neuronal signaling repertoire in the mammalian sperm functionality. Biol Reprod. 2017;96:505–24. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.144154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bray C, Son JH, Meizel S. Acetylcholine causes an increase of intracellular calcium in human sperm. Mol Hum Reprod. 2005;11:881–9. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bray C, Son JH, Kumar P, Meizel S. Mice deficient in CHRNA7, a subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, produce sperm with impaired motility. Biol Reprod. 2005;73:807–14. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.042184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhao J, Lu P, Wan C, Huang Y, Cui M, et al. Cell-fate transition and determination analysis of mouse male germ cells throughout development. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6839. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27172-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hansen MA, Nielsen JE, Tanaka M, Almstrup K, Skakkebaek NE, et al. Identification and expression profiling of 10 novel spermatid expressed CYPT genes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006;73:568–79. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wei YL, Yang WX. The acroframosome-acroplaxome-manchette axis may function in sperm head shaping and male fertility. Gene. 2018;660:28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.03.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.O’Donnell L, O’Bryan MK. Microtubules and spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kierszenbaum AL, Rivkin E, Tres LL. Acroplaxome, an F-actin-keratin-containing plate, anchors the acrosome to the nucleus during shaping of the spermatid head. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:4628–40. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-04-0226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kierszenbaum AL, Tres LL, Rivkin E, Kang-Decker N, van Deursen JM. The acroplaxome is the docking site of Golgi-derived myosin Va/Rab27a/b- containing proacrosomal vesicles in wild-type and Hrb mutant mouse spermatids. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1400–10. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shen J, Chen W, Shao B, Qi Y, Xia Z, et al. Lamin A/C proteins in the spermatid acroplaxome are essential in mouse spermiogenesis. Reproduction. 2014;148:479–87. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gunes S, Sengupta P, Henkel R, Alguraigari A, Sinigaglia MM, et al. Microtubular dysfunction and male infertility. World J Mens Health. 2020;38:9–23. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.180066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Durek T, Shelukhina IV, Tae HS, Thongyoo P, Spirova EN, et al. Interaction of synthetic human SLURP-1 with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16809-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Palumbo TB, Miwa JM. Lynx1 and the family of endogenous mammalian neurotoxin-like proteins and their roles in modulating nAChR function. Pharmacol Res. 2023;194:106845. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kumar P, Meizel S. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits and associated proteins in human sperm. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:25928–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502435200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Son JH, Meizel S. Evidence suggesting that the mouse sperm acrosome reaction initiated by the zona pellucida involves an alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biol Reprod. 2003;68:1348–53. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Morley BJ, Rodriguez-Sierra JF. A phenotype for the alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor null mutant. Brain Res. 2004;1023:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tanaka H, Iguchi N, Isotani A, Kitamura K, Toyama Y, et al. HANP1/H1T2, a novel histone H1-like protein involved in nuclear formation and sperm fertility. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:7107–19. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.7107-7119.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhao M, Shirley CR, Mounsey S, Meistrich ML. Nucleoprotein transitions during spermiogenesis in mice with transition nuclear protein Tnp1 and Tnp2 mutations. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1016–25. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.028191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Aravindan RG, Kirn-Safran CB, Smith MA, Martin-DeLeon PA. Ultrastructural changes and asthenozoospermia in murine spermatozoa lacking the ribosomal protein L29/HIP gene. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:925–6. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.133318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Reynoso S, Castillo V, Katkar GD, Lopez-Sanchez I, Taheri S, et al. GIV/Girdin, a non-receptor modulator for Gαi/s, regulates spatiotemporal signaling during sperm capacitation and is required for male fertility. Elife. 2021;10:e69160. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Gene Ontology analysis of up-regulated proteins in Spaca4-/- spermatids. BP: Biological process; CC: Cell component; MF: Molecular function; Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4.

AJA-28-310_Suppl1.tif (94.6KB, tif)
Supplementary Figure 2

The expression of proteins associated with spermatid differentiation in male germ cells. Analysis of high-precision transcriptome of mouse male germ cells revealed the expression abundance of Uroc1 (a), Cypt3 (b), Thrap3 (c), Ppp1r35 (d), and Trp53tg5 (e) in a variety of male germ cells. PGC: primordial germ cells; PMC: peritubular myoid cell; IP: interstitial progenitor; Thrap3: thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3; Uroc1: urocanate hydratase 1; Trp53tg5: transformation-related protein 53 target 5; Cypt3: cysteine-rich perinuclear theca 3; Ppplr35: protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 35.

AJA-28-310_Suppl2.tif (167.5KB, tif)
Supplementary Figure 3

Abnormal spermatid differentiation affects sperm function in Spaca4−/− mice. (a) CTC staining of sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction after capacitation. Scale bars = 50 μm. (b) Quantification of the percentage of sperm capacitation, acrosomal reactions, and acrosome reaction after capacitation from Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice. (c) Representative images of fertilization and fertilization without zona pellucida in vitro of Spaca4+/+ and Spaca4−/− mice. Scale bars = 100 μm. (d) Quantification of the percentage of fertilization in vitro (n = 3). (e) Quantification of the percentage of fertilization without zona pellucida in vitro (n = 3). NS: not significant, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Student's t-test. Spaca4: sperm acrosome-associated 4; CTC: chlortetracycline.

AJA-28-310_Suppl3.tif (230.2KB, tif)

Articles from Asian Journal of Andrology are provided here courtesy of Editorial Office of AJA.

RESOURCES