Skip to main content
. 2026 May 12;26:157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2026.01.010

Table 4.

Effects of dietary addition of Echinacea purpurea polysaccharides (EP) on serum immune function of broilers.

Items Age, d Groups1
SEM P-value
CON EPL EPM EPH ANOVA Linear Quadratic EPs × age
IgA, μg/mL 21 223.4b 248.5ab 276.4aA 285.3aA 7.804 0.015 0.001 0.004 0.410
42 191.1 241.3 231.0B 233.1B 7.688 0.092 0.147 0.109
IgG, μg/mL 21 172.1A 165.2A 170.9A 163.8 3.358 0.042 0.025 0.036 0.004
42 131.1abB 123.6bB 148.6aB 147.3a 3.487 0.013 0.010 0.041
IgM, μg/mL 21 265.7 226.0 256.8 255.2B 10.477 0.595 0.918 0.774 0.001
42 232.3b 201.9b 227.1b 351.6aA 13.094 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
IL-6, pg/mL 21 15.4aA 12.9bA 13.1bA 10.1c 0.513 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
42 11.2B 10.6B 11.3B 10.8 0.164 0.414 0.768 0.929
IL-10, pg/mL 21 20.5 20.0 21.6 19.5B 0.330 0.135 0.584 0.315 0.049
42 20.5b 21.8ab 23.0ab 23.2aA 0.395 0.041 0.006 0.014

Ig = immunoglobulin; IL = interleukin; CON = control; SEM = standard error of the mean.

Different lowercase letter superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences among EP addition levels (0.0, 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0.9%) (P < 0.05). Different uppercase letter superscripts within the same column indicate significant differences between age stages (21 and 42 d) (P < 0.05); EPs × age denotes the interaction between EP addition levels and ages.

1

CON, EPL, EPM, and EPH, represent EP addition levels of 0.0, 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0.9% in the diet, respectively (n = 6).