Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 28;140(4):2183–2191. doi: 10.1007/s00414-026-03746-9

Table 2.

Effect of scan length on radiation dose

Patient characteristics All scans (n = 90) Scan length ≤ 4 cm (n = 26) Scan length > 4 cm (n = 64) P-value
Body mass index (kg/m2) 90 21.1 (19.5; 22.4) 26 21.2 (19.9; 22.4) 64 21.0 (19.4; 22.5) 0.621
 Weight (kg) 90 62.0 (57.5; 67.9) 26 62.2 (58.0; 68.0) 64 62.0 (57.3; 67.8) 0.793
 Height (cm) 90 172.0 (168.0; 177.5) 26 170.5 (166.0; 177.5) 64 173.0 (169.0; 177.2) 0.207
Scan characteristics
 CT scan length (cm) 90 4.9 (4.2; 5.4) 26 4.1 (3.9; 4.2) 64 5.1 (4.8; 5.7) < 0.001
 Total humeral head inclusion (R&L) (cm) 90 0.4 (0.0; 2.3) 26 0.3 90.0; 1.1) 64 0.1 (0.0; 2.8) 0.169
Right humeral head inclusion (cm) 90 0.0 (0.0; 1.2) 26 0.0 (0.0; 0.4) 64 0.4 (0.0; 1.7) 0.028
Left humerus head inclusion (cm) 90 0.5 (0.0; 1.0) 26 0.5 (0.0; 0.4) 64 0.1 (0.0; 1.2) 0.368
Humeral head position, n (%) 90 26 64
 Arms in 55 (61.1) 16 (61.5) 39 (60.9)
 Arms out 35 (38.9) 10 (38.5) 25 (39.1) 0.958
Scan length/humeral head inclusion 90 26 64
 SL: ≤4 cm, Arms out 10 (11.1) 10 (38.5) 0 (0.0)
 SL: ≤4 cm, Arms in 16 (17.8) 16 (61.5) 0 (0.0)
 SL: >4 cm, Arms out 25 (27.8) 0 (0.0) 25 (39.1) < 0.001
 SL: >4 cm, Arms in 39 (43.3) 0 (0.0) 39 (60.9)
Radiation doses
 Effective CT tube current (mAs) 90 65.5 (58.0; 81.0) 26 69.0 (59.0; 83.0) 64 64.5 (58.0; 78.0) 0.325
 CT dose index (mGy) 90 4.5 (3.9; 5.5) 26 4.7 (4.0; 5.6) 64 4.3 (3.9; 5.3) 0.306
 Dose length product (mGy*cm) 90 30.0 (27.0; 38.0) 26 28.5 (24.0; 32.0) 64 32.0 (28.0; 41.0) 0.007
 Effective dose (mSv) 90 0.4 (0.4; 0.5) 26 0.4 (0.3; 0.4) 64 0.4 (0.4; 0.6) 0.007

Continuous variables are described with median (IQR), p-values obtained by Wilcoxon rank sum test

Categorical variables are shown with number (%) in each category, p-values obtained by Chi-squared test

Fisher’s exact test was additionally calculated if possible (otherwise signed by -), when the expected frequency of one cell was less than 5