Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 5;14:1840932. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1840932

Figure 4.

Forest plot illustrating a meta-analysis of studies, each line showing the study name, log relative risk with ninety-five percent confidence interval, and study weight. Most studies favor increased risk, pooling at a combined estimate of one point three eight with a confidence interval of one point one nine to one point five nine. Study weights range from about five to thirteen percent. Heterogeneity metrics indicate high variability among studies, and results are generated with a random-effects REML model.

Residual risk of psoriasis in former smokers compared with never smokers. The forest plot presents relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident psoriasis in former smokers compared with never smokers across included studies. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model based on restricted maximum likelihood (REML). The diamond represents the overall combined effect.