Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 5;17:1842390. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1842390

Table 2.

Performance of PLSR models for predicting soil physicochemical properties under different spectral preprocessing methods.

Properties Preprocessing PCs Rc RMSEC Rp RMSEP RPD
pH Raw 12 0.78 0.46 0.71 0.47 1.219
S-G 8 0.67 0.55 0.74 0.43 1.075
SNV 11 0.73 0.48 0.71 0.50 1.079
Medfilt 13 0.76 0.46 0.85 0.41 1.416
Normalize 12 0.71 0.49 0.83 0.42 1.311
SOM Raw 10 0.92 3.52 0.93 3.80 2.466
S-G 10 0.93 3.43 0.93 3.75 2.535
SNV 9 0.93 3.66 0.92 3.84 2.592
Medfilt 12 0.95 3.07 0.95 3.04 3.118
Normalize 9 0.92 3.71 0.94 3.50 2.815
AN Raw 11 0.82 31.77 0.80 38.71 1.330
S-G 9 0.80 32.61 0.79 40.07 1.282
SNV 10 0.82 33.91 0.80 34.38 1.498
Medfilt 12 0.85 29.17 0.85 36.13 1.429
Normalize 10 0.82 33.66 0.84 33.01 1.536
AP Raw 10 0.75 23.25 0.79 23.93 1.330
S-G 10 0.76 22.77 0.79 23.94 1.360
SNV 10 0.73 23.33 0.73 28.22 1.030
Medfilt 13 0.79 22.70 0.79 22.09 1.397
Normalize 10 0.73 23.80 0.79 24.46 1.221
AK Raw 11 0.80 54.24 0.81 70.16 1.212
S-G 10 0.80 54.13 0.80 71.26 1.214
SNV 10 0.77 65.96 0.81 56.47 1.372
Medfilt 14 0.82 53.82 0.84 67.31 1.481
Normalize 10 0.78 61.58 0.83 59.87 1.386

Bold values indicate the optimal preprocessing method for each indicator.