Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 17;14:e21289. doi: 10.7717/peerj.21289

Table 2. Charectestics of included studies.

2A: Segmentation & Volumetric Studies.
Author (Year) Sample size AI model/ tool Reference standard Key performance metrics Main findings Limitations
Alsufyani et al. (2016) 10 CBCT Semi-automatic Segura tool Manual segmentation ICC (Volume): 0.96; ICC (Surface area): 0.97 Strong agreement with manual segmentation; time-efficient No disease- specific outcome
Zhang et al. (2019) 10 CBCT Airway Segmentor (AS) Mimics 19.0 & INVIVO 5 Phantom gold standard ICC: 0.899–0.966; Random error: 3.9 to 4.5% Volumetric estimates close to gold standard Small pilot study
Leonardi et al. (2021) 40 CBCT CNN-based segmentation Manual segmentation ICC: 0.921; DSC difference: 3.3–5.8% Comparable performance to experienced reader No clinical outcome validation
Liu et al. (2021) 170 CT/CBCT Multi-stage CNN (SkullEngine) Manual annotation DSC > 0.90; Landmark error below clinical threshold Reduced processing time from 12 hrs to <3 min Not airway- specific focus
Shujaat et al. (2021) 103 CT/CBCT 3D U-Net Manual segmentation DSC: 0.97; IoU: 0.93; Precision: 0.97; Recall: 0.96 Strong agreement across airway regions No diagnostic utility assessed
Sin et al. (2021) 306 CBCT Deep-learning CNN Manual (ITK-SNAP) DSC: 0.919; IoU:0993 Accuracy: 0.961 High segmentation accuracy OSA status not reported
Cho et al. (2022) 216 CBCT 3D U-Net Expert manual segmentation DSC: 0.928 Precision: 0.925; Recall: 0.921 Reduced precision in hypopharyngeal region No OSA validation
De Bataille et al. (2022) 60 CBCT Semi-automated 3D volumetric Manual segmentation ICC > 0.7 Strong correlation with manual measures Restricted population
Orhan et al. (2022) 200 adults (PSG-confirmed OSA vs controls) CNN-based segmentation (Diagnocat) Manual radiologist segmentation ICC: 0.954–0.972 Strong volumetric agreement No diagnostic outcome tested
Balashova et al. (2023) 40 pediatric Diagnocat AI segmentation Visual exam + CBCT Significant airway differences between groups Effective 3D visualization Not benchmarked to PSG
Chen et al. (2023) 30 CBCT Semi-automatic segmentation (Amira) Phantom gold standard ICC: 0.948–0.997; Overestimation: 1.1–3.1% Reliable nasal cavity volume measurement Semi-automatic, limited automation