Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neurol Open Access. 2025 May 22;1(2):e000015. doi: 10.1212/wn9.0000000000000015

Table 2:

Proportion of sample meeting Core TES Criteria by head trauma exposure group.

LETBI Cohort ≥2 Mild TBIs Only ≥2 Mild TBIs + RHI Complicated Mild/Moderate Only Complicated Mild/Moderate + RHI Severe Only Severe + RHI Total
N=35 N=43 N=32 N=23 N=90 N=72 N=295
I. RHI EXPOSURE
TES RHI Criteria 0(0%) 43(100%) 0(0%) 23(100%) 0(0%) 72(100%) 138(46.8%)
II. COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING
1.Self/Informant/or Clinician’s Report of Cognitive Impairment 27(77.1%) 30(69.7%) 16(50%) 17(73.9%) 64(71.1%) 45(62.5%) 199(67.4%)
2. Significant Cognitive decline from Baseline 30(85.7%) 35(81.3%) 15(46.8%) 18(78.2%) 73(81.1%) 50(69.4%) 221(74.9%)
3. Deficits in Episodic Memory and/or Executive Functioning; Deficits in Neurocognitive Performance 25(71.4%) 27(62.7%) 16(50%) 16(69.5%) 60(66.7%) 35(48.6%) 179(60.6%)
OVERALL TES Cognitive Impairment 23(65.7%) 25(58.1%) 14(43.7%) 16(69.5%) 57(63.3%) 33(45.8%) 168(56.9%)
III. NEUROBEHAVIORAL FUNCTIONING
1. Self/Informant/ or Clinician’s Report of Neurobehavioral Dysregulation 32(91.4%) 34(79%) 21(65.6%) 17(73.9%) 65(72.2%) 55(76.4%) 224(75.9%)
2. Significant Neurobehavioral Functioning decline from Baseline 15(42.8%) 17(39.5%) 9(28.1%) 11(47.8%) 31(34.4%) 15(20.8%) 98(33.2%)
3. Symptoms and/or Observed Behaviors Representing Poor Regulation or Control of Emotions and/or Behaviors 24(68.6%) 25(58.1%) 14(43.8%) 13(56.5%) 40(46%) 36(48%) 152(51.5%)
OVERALL TES Neurobehavioral Dysregulation 15(42.9%) 17(39.5%) 9(28.1%) 11(47.8%) 30(33.3%) 15(20.8%) 97(32.9%)
IV. PROGRESSIVE COURSE
1. Self/Informant/ or Clinician’s Report of Progressive Worsening of Overall Symptoms 9(25.7%) 13(30.2%) 5(15.6%) 9(39.1%) 34(37.8%) 13(18.1%) 83(28.1%)
2. Progressive Worsening of Cognitive Functioning 12(34.2%) 18(41.8%) 14(43.7%) 13(56.5%) 46(51.1%) 30(41.7%) 133(45%)
3. Progressive Worsening of Neurobehavioral Functioning 10(28.5%) 13(30.2%) 5(15.6%) 9(39.1%) 37(41.1%) 15(20.8%) 89(30.1%)
Overall TES Progressive Course 13(37.1%) 18(41.8%) 14(43.7%) 13(56.5%) 47(52.2%) 30(41.74%) 135(45.7%)
V. POSITIVE TES DIAGNOSIS
RHI Exposure and all 3 Core Clinical Features 0(0%) 15(34.8%) 0(0%) 11(47.8%) 0(0%) 18(25%) 44(14.9%)
No RHI Required; all 3 Core Clinical Features 11(31.4%) 15(34.8%) 6(18.7%) 11(47.8%) 38(42.2%) 18(25%) 99(33.5%)
VI. FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE/DEMENTIA: level of functional dependence (n(%)) by exposure group
Severe Dependence 7(20%) 5(11.6%) 3(9.3%) 5(21.7%) 17(18.9%) 17(23.9%) 54(18.3%)
Moderate Dependence 12(34.2%) 11(25.5%) 8(25%) 6(26%) 35(38.9%) 26(36.6%) 98(33.2%)
Mild Dependence 14(40%) 11(25.5%) 7(21.8%) 7(30.4%) 14(15.6%) 14(19.7%) 67(22.7%)
Subtle Dependence 2(5.7%) 14(32.5%) 6(18.7%) 2(8.6%) 14(15.6%) 9(12.7%) 47(15.9%)
Independent 0(0%) 2(4.6%) 8(25%) 3(13%) 10(11.1%) 5(7%) 28(9.4%)
VII. PROVISIONAL LEVELS OF CERTAINTY FOR CTE PATHOLOGY: criteria met (n(%)) by exposure group
Substantial RHI exposure (5+ years) 0(0%) 36(83.7%) 0(0%) 18(78.3%) 0(0%) 66(91.7%) 120(40.68%)
Extensive RHI exposure (11+ years) 0(0%) 23(53.5%) 0(0%) 9(39.1%) 0(0%) 31(43.1%) 63(21.36%)
Supportive Features*
 Delayed Onset
 Motor Signs 9(25.7%) 10(23.3%) 5(15.6%) 11(47.8%) 30(33.3%) 23(31.9%) 88(29.83%)
 Psychiatric Features (≥1) 26(74.3%) 27(65.9%) 9(31%) 13(59.1%) 47(57.3%) 33(50%) 155(52.54%)
Number of Supportive Features**
(Mean ± SD)
2.80±1.05 2.63±1.29 1.91±1.30 2.96±1.46 2.60±1.38 2.32±1.24 2.52±1.32
VIII. Overall Certainty (Positive TES Diagnosis with RHI required): level of certainty (n(%)) by exposure group
Criteria not met 35(100%) 28(65.1%) 32(100%) 12(52.2%) 90(100%) 54(75%) 251(85.1%)
Suggestive CTE 0(0%) 3(7%) 0(0%) 1(4.3%) 0(0%) 3(4.2%) 7(2.4%)
Possible CTE 0(0%) 4(9.3%) 0(0%) 6(26.1%) 0(0%) 10(13.9%) 20(6.8%)
Probable CTE 0(0%) 8(18.6%) 0(0%) 4(17.4%) 0(0%) 5(6.9%) 17(5.8%)
*

Supportive features include the following: Delayed onset, Motor signs (i.e., parkinsonism, other motor signs, motor neuron disease); Psychiatric features (i.e., anxiety, apathy, depression, paranoia); neurobehavioral dysregulation; severity of functional independence.

**

The number of supportive features reported below refers to the mean ± SD features beyond clinical features included in the Core criterion (i.e., neurobehavioral dysregulation as defined in Table 2) and severity of functional dependence of mild or worse (as defined in Table 2). A minimum of 2 Supportive features are required for Possible CTE; 3 are required for Probable CTE. 13