Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 10;17:1823729. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1823729

TABLE 5.

Age-appropriate auditory monitoring for aminoglycoside ototoxicity.

Age group Primary assessment Secondary assessment Practical considerations Monitoring frequency
Neonates (0–27 days) ABR with frequency-specific tone burst stimuli (500–4,000 Hz); prioritize the highest feasible frequencies for early detection of basal cochlear changes DPOAE with high-frequency emphasis (4–8 kHz) Testing during natural sleep
Portable equipment for bedside assessment
Middle ear status verification
Baseline before therapy, when feasible
Intensify for prolonged courses (>7–10 days), repeated courses, renal dysfunction, MT-RNR1 risk, or concurrent ototoxins
Post-treatment follow-up for any detected change
Infants (28 days–12 months) DPOAE (2–8 kHz); ABR for baseline VRA (6–12 months); behavioral observation (supplementary only) Testing during optimal alertness
Parental assistance for VRA conditioning
Objective measures when behavioral is unreliable
Baseline before therapy, when feasible
Intensify for prolonged courses, repeated courses, renal dysfunction, MT-RNR1 risk, or concurrent ototoxins
Post-treatment follow-up for high-risk or any detected change
Young children (1–5 years) Conditioned play audiometry; DPOAE (2–8 kHz) Immittance measures: ABR if behavioral testing is unreliable Game-based conditioning approaches
Brief session duration (15–20 min)
Visual reinforcement
Baseline before therapy
Intensify for prolonged or repeated courses, renal dysfunction, genetic risk, or concurrent ototoxins
Post-treatment follow-up
Older children (≥5 years) Conventional audiometry with extended high frequencies (where available) Speech audiometry; DPOAE Self-report of symptoms
Extended high frequencies are most sensitive
Functional assessment
Baseline before therapy
Intensify for prolonged or repeated courses, renal dysfunction, genetic risk, or concurrent ototoxins
Post-treatment follow-up

Age groupings are pragmatic, based on audiology and vestibular testing feasibility, and do not strictly follow ICH E11 (R1) categories used elsewhere in the manuscript. Audiological testing feasibility, rather than pharmacological classification, determines the monitoring strategy and, therefore, the age groupings used here. Monitoring frequency should be individualized based on cumulative exposure, course duration, renal function, genetic susceptibility, and concurrent ototoxic exposures rather than applied as fixed intervals.

Abbreviations: ABR, auditory brainstem response; DPOAE, distortion product otoacoustic emission; ICH, international council for harmonisation; MT-RNR1, mitochondrially encoded 12S ribosomal RNA; VRA, visual reinforcement audiometry.