Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 23;8(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s42466-026-00508-1

Table 2.

Demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics of the study cohort

Variable All patients
[n = 15]
CMT1A
[n = 5]
CMT1X
[n = 3]
CMT1B
[n = 2]
CMT1C
[n = 2]
CMT2
[n = 1]
Hereditary myoneuropathy
[n = 1]
Affected gene N/A PMP22 GJB1 MPZ LITAF DCNT2 DNAJB5
Mutations N/A PMP22 Dup (het)

1. c.479 A > G; p.Tyr160Cys (hem)

2. c.479 A > G; p.Tyr160Cys (hem)

3. c.617dupT; p.(Ala207Glyfs*36)

c.616G > T; p.Gly206Ter (het) c.430G > A; p.Val144Met (het) c.1159 C > G; p.Leu387Val(het) c.85_89dupTGGAG; p.Arg30Serfs*50 (het)
Sex [f: m] 9:5 3:2 1:2 1:1 2:0 1:0 1:0
Age [years]

53 ± 13.3

(32–74)

53.2 ± 12.36

(40–69)

51.33 ± 15.53 (34–64)

57 ± 24.04

(40–74)

48 ± 22.63

(32–64)

54 58
Height [cm] 171.07 ± 7.74 (154–183)

166.2 ± 9.42

(154–178)

170.33 ± 2.52 (168–173) 174.5 ± 12.02 (166–183)

174 ± 1.42

(173–175)

176 180
Weight [kg] 86.21 ± 19.22 (57–137)

73.6 ± 6.35

(68–84)

76.33 ± 16.86 (57–88)

95 ± 7.07

(90–100)

116 ± 29.7

(95–137)

95 93
CMTESv2 (0–28) 13.71 ± 5.7 17.8 ± 4.09 16.33 ± 4.16 12 ± 2.83 10.5 ± 3.54 5 4
Foot dorsiflexion MRC scale (0–5) baseline 3.44 ± 1.47 2.4 ± 1.52 3.5 ± 0.5 5 ± 0 5 ± 0 5 5
Foot dorsiflexion MRC scale (0–5) follow-up 3.61 ± 1.67 2.3 ± 1.92 3.5 ± 1.15 5 ± 0 5 ± 0 5 5
Foot plantarflexion MRC scale (0–5) baseline 4.53 ± 0.93 3.8 ± 1.3 4.83 ± 0.29 5 ± 0 5 ± 0 5 5
Foot plantarflexion MRC scale (0–5) follow-up 4.36 ± 1.2 3.5 ± 2.06 3 ± 0 5 ± 0 5 ± 0 5 5
VL muscle nSI baseline 0.4 ± 0,05 0.41 ± 0.07 0.36 ± 0.02 0.38 ± 0.02 0.43 ± 0.04 0.45 0.38
VL muscle nSI follow-up 0.41 ± 0.06 0.4 ± 0.06 0.36 ± 0.03 0.4 ± 0.01 0.5 ± 0.038 0.43 0.41
RF muscle nSI baseline 0.35 ± 0.04 0.34 ± 0.05 0.35 ± 0.05 0.33 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.07 0.37 0.3
RF muscle nSI follow-up 0.32 ± 0.03 0.31 ± 0.04 0.3 ± 0.03 0.34 ± 0.00 0.37 ± 0.01 0.3 0.32
TA muscle nSI baseline 0.38 ± 0.1 0.41 ± 0.08 0.44 ± 0.18 0.33 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.06 0.29 0.3
GCNL muscle nSI baseline 0.41 ± 0.07 0.44 ± 0.09 0.36 ± 0.07 0.43 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.02 0.38 0.38
GCNM muscle nSI baseline 0.52 ± 0.2 0.56 ± 0.21 0.57 ± 0.36 0.44 ± 0.09 0.49 ± 0.72 0.39 0.45
TA muscle nSI follow-up 0.41 ± 0.12 0.45 ± 0.11 0.45 ± 0.2 0.34 ± 0.002 0.45 ± 0.08 0.31 0.29
GCNL muscle nSI follow-up 0.46 ± 0.1 0.54 ± 0.14 0.42 ± 0.06 0.43 ± 0.05 0.43 ± 0.01 0.39 0.41
GCNM muscle nSI follow-up 0.56 ± 0.21 0.65 ± 0.25 0.59 ± 0.31 0.46 ± 0.14 0.55 ± 0.13 0.39 0.44
TA muscle echogenicity

80.55 ± 19.79

*

99.01 ± 12.68* 70.5 ± 7.21 64.55 ± 37.64 77.38 ± 19.5 85.15 70.59
GCNL muscle echogenicity 73.67 ± 21.39 86.37 ± 17.7 62 ± 17.34 73.62 ± 19.41 43.38 ± 9.96 94.51 85.09
GCNM muscle echogenicity

74.9 ± 11.52

*

72.38 ± 13.39* 71.22 ± 16.02 79.42 ± 9.35 69.8 ± 1.07 90.81 81.35

Values are given as mean ± standard deviation (range) unless otherwise indicated. CMTESv2 = Charcot-Marie-Tooth Examination Score version 2; MRC = Medical Research Council scale; RF = rectus femoris; VL = vastus lateralis; TA = tibialis anterior; GCNL/GCNM = gastrocnemius lateralis/medialis; nSI = normalized signal intensity; muscle echogenicity = grayscale histogram value. Muscle echogenicity is only indicated here at the time of follow-up. One dataset was missing for echogenicity in CMT1A (*)