Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 25;41(1):130. doi: 10.1007/s10103-026-04934-0

Table 2.

Group means and mean differences (95% CI) for VAS pain and Vancouver Scar Scale at 48-hour follow-up

Desfecho Controlen = 52 Experimentaln = 52 DM (95%CI)Experimental vs. Control
Reavaluation − 48 h(Mean ± EPE) Reavaluation − 48 h(Mean ± EPE) Reavaluation − 48 h
EVA (0–10) 5.5 ± 0,3 4.1 ± 0.3 -1.4 (-2.3; -0.5)
Vancouver (0–13) 5,07 ± 0,32 1,76 ± 0,30 3,31 (3.19; 3.43)
Thickness (0–3) 1,39 ± 0,13 1,11 ± 0,12 -0,28 (-0.63; 0.07)
Vascularization (0–3) 1,41 ± 0,07 0,41 ± 0,08 1.0 (1.00; 1.03)
Pigmentation (0–2) 0,12 ± 0,06 0,17 ± 0,06 0,08 (-0,11; 0,27)
Flexibility (0–5) 1,18 ± 0,11 0,07 ± 0,12 1.11 (1.07; 1.15)

VAS− Visual Analogue Scale (0 – 10). Low values indicate reduced pain perception. Vancouver Scar Scale (0 – 13). Low values indicate better quality of healing. MD− Estimated mean difference; EPE− Standard error of estimate