Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 10;20(24):17316–17326. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6c01486

5.

5

Codeposition of a metal (Cu) and a dielectric material (Mg­(OH)2). (a, b) Two-channel nozzle used for multimaterial-class deposition. One channel is filled with 1 mM CuSO4 and the other is filled with 1 mM MgCl2. Best deposition results were obtained for orifice sizes around 160 nm. (c) EDX analysis of separate Cu and Mg­(OH)2 pad indicates that the materials can be deposited separately from the same nozzle with little intermixing. Only a minor Cu peak can be observed in the Mg structure. (d) Low magnification image of a 5 by 5 μm Cu pad on top of a 10 by 10 μm magnesium hydroxide pad. The inset is shown in the EDX maps. The spatial distribution of Cu, Mg, and O indicates that Cu is only present in the square where it was deposited (the square at the top left in the Cu image originates from a shift in the position of the substrate during printing) and that Mg is mostly found in the larger pad surrounding the Cu. (e) Cross section of a Cu–Mg­(OH)2–Cu multilayered structure. The first Cu layer delaminated from the Au substrate. Both Cu layers appear much brighter than the porous Mg­(OH)2. Further, charging of the Mg­(OH)2 layer can be observed as a brighter section within the layer.