Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 28.
Published before final editing as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 May 18:S1542-3565(26)00325-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.03.046

Table 1:

Performance of GIVersa-Endoscopy in the retrospective evaluation of 95 patients directly referred for endoscopy: (a) confusion matrix for sedation type triage and (b) performance metrics. Agreement was defined as concordance between the GenAI assistant and clinician triage decisions. In the confusion matrix, true positive represent cases in which both clinician and assistant recommended anesthesia support and true negatives represent cases in which both recommended moderate sedation. False positives represent conservative over-triage (assistant recommending anesthesia support when clinician recommended moderate sedation), and false negatives represent liberal under-triage (assistant recommending moderate sedation when the clinician recommended anesthesia support).

a. Confusion Matrix for Sedation Type Triage
Predicted: Anesthesia Support Predicted: Moderate Sedation
Clinician: Anesthesia Support 48 9
Clinician: Moderate Sedation 15 23
b. Performance Metrics
Task Class Precision Recall Specificity F1 score 95% CI
Sedation Type Anesthesia 0.76 0.84 0.61 0.80 0.72–0.88
Moderate 0.72 0.61 0.84 0.66 0.52–0.78
Location/risk level* Overall 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93–1.00**
*

Anesthesia risk level triage was conditionally evaluated only when sedation type matched.

**

Binomial confidence interval for components rather than bootstrap CI for a F1 score of 1.