Table 2. Effectiveness of MLE on sperm viability during chilled storage.
| Treatment | Days | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| T0 | 90.40 ± 2.07 | 76.50 ± 2.08a | 64.00 ± 4.97a | 51.50 ± 1.29a | 32.75 ± 2.22a |
| T1 | 90.60 ± 1.52 | 79.75 ± 1.50ab | 71.50 ± 3.11b | 52.50 ± 3.11a | 34.50 ± 2.08a |
| T2 | 90.80 ± 0.84 | 83.50 ± 1.29b | 75.25 ± 1.71b | 64.75 ± 2.22b | 51.00 ± 2.16b |
| T3 | 90.00 ± 1.58 | 77.25 ± 2.50ab | 57.75 ± 4.19a | 51.25 ± 1.71a | 37.50 ± 3.51a |
Note: Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) based on six independent ejaculates (n = 6) per treatment per storage day. abDifferent superscript letters within the same colomn p < 0.05).; T0 (Control): 100% Andromed extender; T1 (MLE-2): 98% Andromed + 2% MLE; T2 (MLE-4): 96% Andromed + 4% MLE; T3 (MLE-6): 94% Andromed + 6% MLE.