Skip to main content
. 2026 Jun 16;14:1846138. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1846138

Table 2.

Effects of industrial robot adoption on workers’ health.

Variable Subjective health change Objective Health Mental Health
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Manufacturing sector
Robot −0.0059*** (−2.871) −0.0062*** (−2.952) −0.0015*** (−2.712) −0.0016*** (−2.685) −0.0013*** (−2.623) −0.0019*** (−2.773)
Controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fixed Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 9,080 9,080 9,080 9,080 9,080 9,080
R 2 0.472 0.489 0.468 0.481 0.471 0.486
Non-manufacturing Sector
Robot −0.0052*** (−2.742) −0.0054*** (−2.813) 0.0016*** (2.742) 0.0018** (2.325) 0.0015**(2.38 6) 0.0017** (2.494)
Controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 15,976 15,976 15,976 15,976 15,976 15,976
R 2 0.551 0.536 0.509 0.528 0.531 0.522

*, **, and *** denote statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively.

t-statistics are reported in parentheses. Standard errors are clustered at the city level. Individual-level controls include gender, educational attainment, marital status, and hukou status. City-level controls include GDP per capita, population density, and measures of industrial structure. Columns (1), (3), and (5) include city, province-by-year, occupation, and industry fixed effects. Columns (2), (4), and (6) additionally include survey-year-by-occupation and survey-year-by-industry fixed effects. Unless otherwise stated, the remainder of the paper follows the specification in Columns (1), (3), and (5).