Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 25;16:19696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-45991-3

Table 3.

Planned pairwise contrasts of estimated marginal means by Visit for dietary quality and PHQ-8 scores.

Contrast Intervention period Estimate [95% CI] p d
Diet quality
Visit 1 – Visit 2 Baseline stability .06 [-.99, 1.11] .99 .04
Visit 2 – Visit 3 Intervention effect −3.17 [−4.23, −2.11]  <.001 −1.93
Pre-avg – Visit 3 Intervention effect −3.14 [−3.90, −2.38]  <.001 −1.91
PHQ-8 scores
Remote – Visit 1 Baseline stability -.89 [−2.63,.86] .54 -.35
Remote – Visit 2 Baseline stability 1.02 [.72, 2.76] .42 .41
Visit 1 – Visit 2 Baseline stability 1.91 [.17, 3.65] .03 .76
Visit 2 – Visit 3* Intervention effect 2.71 [.96, 4.45]  <.001 1.08
Pre-avg – Visit 3 Intervention effect 3.68 [2.60, 4.76]  <.001 1.47

*Note: effect qualified by a visit × condition interaction.