Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2026 Jun 9;610:147–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2026.06.002

Fig. 4. Iba1-labeling in the hippocampus from Sal US female and male rats compared to their CIS counterparts.

Fig. 4.

a-d. Representative micrographs showing Iba1 labeling in the CA1 of Sal US female (a), Sal CIS female (b), Sal US Male (c), and Sal CIS male (d) rats. e. CA1: Sal US females compared to Sal CIS females have lower Iba1 labeling densities in CA1 SLM. f-i. Representative micrographs showing Iba1 labeling in CA2/3a of Sal US female (f), Sal CIS female (g), Sal US male (h) and Sal CIS male (i) rats. j. CA2/3a: Sal US males had lower Iba1 densities than Sal CIS males in SO. k-n. Representative micrographs showing Iba1 labeling in CA3b of Sal US female (k), Sal CIS female (l), Sal US male (m), and Sal CIS male (n) rats. o,p. CA3b: Sal US females compared to Sal CIS females had higher Iba1 densities in the SO. Sal US males compared to Sal CIS males had higher Iba1 densities in SO, SP, SLu and SR. q-t. Representative micrographs showing Iba1 labeling in the DG of Sal US female (q), Sal CIS female (r), Sal US male (s), and Sal CIS male (t) rats. u. DG: Sal CIS males compared to Sal US males had lower Iba1 densities in GCL. Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM, N = 5–6 rats/grp. *p < 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. Scale Bars: a-d, f-i, k-n, & q-t, 100 microns