Table 3. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. recovered from cattle and buffaloes.
| Antimicrobial agent | Sensitivity patterns percentage | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial class | Antimicrobial agents | Disc | Conc. | Resistance | Intermediate | Sensitive | |||
| Escherichia coli | Salmonella spp. | Escherichia coli | Salmonella spp. | Escherichia coli | Salmonella spp. | ||||
| Quinolones | Ofloxacin | OFX | 5 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| Tetracycline | tetracycline | TE | 2 | 90% | 100% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Cephalosporins | Ceftriaxone | CRD | - | 20% | 75% | 10% | 0% | 70% | 25% |
| Lincomycin | Clindamycin | DA | 2 | 30% | 25% | 20% | 25% | 20% | 50% |
| B–lactams | Ampicillin/ Sulbactam | SAM | 20 | 60% | 50% | 30% | 25% | 10% | 50% |